Alan Haber and other founding members of SDS call on the young Socialists of today to put aside their political purity tests, consider the threat Donald Trump poses to our republic, and back Joe Biden’s campaign for president

Earlier this week, as you can read in the above Twitter post, the Democratic Socialists of America announced that they would not be following in the footsteps of progressives like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, and endorsing Joe Biden for President. Well, this didn’t exactly sit well with some members of the old left. And, to their credit, they decided to speak up. What follows is an open letter signed by some 65 former leaders of Students for a Democratic Society, including Ann Arbor’s own Alan Haber, the first president of the organization. [SDS was born on the campus of the University of Michigan in 1960, having evolved from the socialist League for Industrial Democracy’s youth program.] Here’s the letter.

On April 13, 2020, Senator Bernie Sanders urged his supporters to vote for the presumptive Democratic nominee, former Vice President Joe Biden. Writing as founders and veterans of the leading New Left organization of the 1960s, Students for a Democratic Society, we welcome Bernie’s wise choice—but we are gravely concerned that some of his supporters, including the leadership of Democratic Socialists of America, refuse to support Biden, whom they see as a representative of Wall Street capital. Some of us are DSA members, but do not believe their position is consistent with a long-range vision of democracy, justice, and human survival.

Now it is time for all those who yearn for a more equal and just social order to face facts. All of us have charged for years that Trump is the leader of an authoritarian party that aims for absolute power, rejects climate science, embraces racism, sexism, homophobia, and violence, holds the democratic process in contempt, bids to take over the entire federal judiciary, represses voting rights, and violates plain human decency on many fronts. These are the grounds for our solemn determination: a common effort to unseat him is our high moral and political responsibility.

In our time, we fought—for a time successfully—against the sectarian politics of the Cold War. We were mindful then of the cataclysm that befell German democracy when socialists and communists fought each other—to death—as Hitler snuck by and then murdered them all.

Now we fear that some on the left cannot see the difference between a capitalist democrat and a protofascist. We hope none of us learn this difference from jail cells.

We have dedicated much of our lives to the fight to extend democracy to more people, more institutions, more places. We continue this work in diverse ways motivated now as then by a spirit of community and solidarity. But now the very existence of American democracy is in jeopardy.

Some of us think “endorsing” Joe Biden is a step too far; but we who now write this open letter all know that we must work hard to elect him. This is an all-hands-on-deck moment.

In 1919, in the midst of the brief German socialist revolution, the great sociologist Max Weber addressed left-wing students about politics. He urged upon them that the best politics must be painfully aware of the consequences of action, not just intentions. Speaking to young men, he prophetically warned them that the cost of ignoring consequences might be their deaths.

We salute Bernie Sanders and our friends and comrades in DSA and in the diverse movements for social justice and environmental sanity that enabled them to rise. We look forward to joining together to build on and defend our accomplishments. And now we plead with all: get together, beat Trump, and fight for democracy—precious, fragile, worth keeping.

For those who want to know more about Haber and the history of SDS, I’d encourage you to listen to my interview with him from a decade ago or so, which is really fascinating. I know, over the past few years, he’s made more of a local name for himself as an outspoken critic of downtown development and density in Ann Arbor, but it’s good to be reminded on occasions like this that he can still be a force for good. It made me incredibly happy to see his name on the list of signatories accompanies this letter, and to know that he’s on the right side of this fight.

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 43 Comments

Trump supporters protest against public health in Lansing

There was a protest against Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer in Lansing today…

I get it. People want to put this behind them and get back to business-as-usual. They want to go back to work. They want a return of some kind of normalcy. And, apparently, they think that’ll happen if Governor Whitmer just lifts her stay-at-home order. That’s not how it works, by the way, but I can see the appeal of magical thinking at times like these.

I know it looks as though things are finally kind of starting to plateau here in Michigan — thanks in very large part to Whitmer’s order — but that doesn’t mean that it’s a sure thing that the virus will just fade away. In fact, we know from history that something called a “double-peaked curve” can occur in instances where people ease up on social distancing too soon. It happened with the flu of 1918, and it could happen again. Here, on that subject, is an excerpt from a story that came out of the University of Michigan today about a paper just published by Howard Markel, Harvey B. Lipman, and J. Alexander Navarro. [The paper is titled, Nonpharmaceutical Interventions Implemented by US Cities During the 1918-1919 Influenza Pandemic.]

…Easing up on “social distancing” steps too soon, and too quickly, could give the novel coronavirus a chance to race back into broad circulation, (Markel) explains. Serious cases, and deaths, could spike again, and waste all the progress that has been made so far.

That’s exactly what happened in many cities during the flu pandemic of 1918 and 1919, as Markel and his colleagues showed in their detailed study of how non-pharmaceutical measures like school and business closings affected rates of excess deaths in dozens of U.S. cities.

Even though the world of 2020 is far different from that of the World War I period, Markel sees the same thing happening today that happened then, and in other disease outbreaks he’s studied.

“In every pandemic, there’s a tug of war. On one end, there are the economic and business interests, and on the other end is the public’s health,” he says. “We know from history that when citizens become restless and protest to their leaders about lifting these sanctions too early, another rise in cases invariably occurs. In some places it was worse than the first peak. This creates a situation where you have endured shelter in place sanctions and crippled the economy for nothing,” says Markel, a professor of medicine, history and public health at U-M and member of the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation…

And that tug of war between business interests and public health were on full display today in Lansing, as many of our fellow Michiganders gathered to demand that rules put in place in order to slow the pandemic and save lives, be repealed.

For what it’s worth, I can see how some of the Governor’s rules might be confusing. I can see how, for instance, people with motorboats might find it difficult to reconcile the fact that, while they can’t take their boats out, their neighbors with sailboats can. It makes sense from a public health perspective, when you consider the need to cut down on unnecessary gas station interactions, but I don’t think a lot of people take the time to think these things through. They just see them as the capricious rules put in place by out-of-touch liberal elites who don’t appreciate the importance of things like hunting, fishing and driving boats fast over water. [For what it’s worth, the Governor left gun stores open, deeming them “essential”, which seems ridiculous. But good politics is all about striking the right balance, I suppose.]

And it certainly doesn’t help that these folks in the streets of Lansing are being egged on by a president who has made it clear that he thinks it would be fine to reopen society, regardless of whatever objections public health officials might have, and wealthy Michigan business owners, like the members of the DeVos family, who helped make today’s protest happen through their funding the Michigan Freedom Fund, which helped organize the event. [The DeVos family denies that they were directly involved in the planning of today’s event.] Of course, none of those rich folks were actually at the event, rubbing elbows with these Confederate flag-waving Trump supporters, very few of whom, by the way, were wearing masks. [I counted more guns than masks in the videos I saw.] They were supposed to be in cars, as I understand it, but a lot of them, I guess, decided that they wanted to make a statement by walking around in close proximity to one another, in spite of the public safety warnings.

To Whitmer’s credit, she didn’t discourage the protest, or demean those speaking out against her orders. “It’s OK to be frustrated, it’s OK to be angry, and if it makes you feel better to direct it at me, that’s OK too, I’ve got thick skin,” she said. All she asked was that people be safe, and not further spread the disease through their actions.

So, on one hand, you have Whitmer saying that her “immediate concern is trying to keep everyone in Michigan safe.” And, on the other, you have the Michigan Conservative Coalition issuing statements about the stay-a-home order having come from “power-hungry bureaucrats.” And a lot of people apparently can’t see how wrong and dangerous that is. They can’t appreciate the fact that the only reason we don’t have more deaths right now in Michigan is because Whitmer and others took bold action. Yes, it sucks. Yes, we know you feel as though you have a right to your motorboat, jet-ski, or whatever. But the reality is that social distancing is working, and we can’t jeopardize it by stopping now, before we’ve instituted measures – like robust, accurate and free testing – to keep the “double-peaked curve” at bay.

Let’s say, however, that certain parts of Whitmer’s order are too strict. Let’s say that she went too far when she said that people, for instance, couldn’t travel between their multiple homes. I can see possibly being upset by that. What I can’t see, however, is attacking Whitmer for this position of hers, while, at the same time, giving Donald Trump a complete pass for dismantling our pandemic preparedness infrastructure, botching the rollout of COVID-19 testing, etc. That’s just shear lunacy… These poor stupid sons-of-bitches are putting themselves in harm’s way to protest against a woman trying to save their fucking lives, while waving signs in support of the man who put us in this position to begin with. It’s complete madness.

And I really wouldn’t care, if, by gathering together like this, they were just hurting themselves. But they aren’t just hurting themselves. [See the photo of the blocked ambulance above trying to get to Sparrow Hospital.] When they allow themselves to be used as political pawns like this, they’re not just putting themselves at risk, but they’re putting their families at risk, and everyone else that they come in contact with, including health care workers, like my friend Monica Echeverri Casarez, who gave her life to the fight against COVID-19 a few days ago in Detroit. It’s one thing to take risks that only have the potential to impact you. It’s quite another to take unnecessary risks during a pandemic, when you know that your actions have the potential to reverberate through society, taking down the old, the infirm, those with preexisting conditions, etc. It’s absolutely unconscionable.

But some people, I guess, really want to get back to dying their hair and putting chemicals on their lawns.

I don’t know if it’ll make you feel any better, but you might take some comfort in knowing that ours isn’t the only state where gullible fools are out in the streets, doing the bidding of their corporate masters, and demanding that the interests of business supersede those of the American people. No, the anti-science, MAGA zombies were also been unleashed in Ohio today.

Posted in Free Speech, Health, Michigan, Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 261 Comments

I’ve got other shit to do tonight, and I really don’t have time for this, but what the fuck, people?

update: The president, denying reporting that it was his decision to slow down the issuance of stimulus checks in order to include his name, says he doesn’t know how it came to pass that his name was added to the checks. He then adds, “I’m sure people will be very happy to get a big, fat, beautiful check and my name is on it.”

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 45 Comments

Donald Trump, claiming to have “total authority,” says the American economy will reopen when he decides

Today was fucked up. I found out that a friend of mine, a nurse in Detroit, died from COVID-19. We hadn’t seen each other in quite a long time, but I thought about her often. About a week ago, I found myself logging into Facebook, just to see if she was OK. Knowing that she was a nurse in Detroit, I was concerned. I found a photo of her in protective gear, accompanied by a few lines about her coworkers, and how impressed she was by them. And now she’s gone. I suspect, once I have time to process what’s happened, I’ll say more here. Right now, though, I’m just overwhelmingly sad and angry. I’m angry that this driven, talented, selfless woman, who had dedicated her life to helping others, is now dead. And I’m mad at myself for not being a better friend, and not fighting harder against the forces in our society that brought us to this point. Because, as we’ve discussed here on many occasions, none of this had to happen.

I’m not sure how the passing of my friend is going to influence my work, but I can tell you that it certainly influenced my perspective on the news this evening. As I was sitting here, reading about conservatives and their plans to descend upon the capitol in Lansing this Wednesday in order to protest Governor Whitmer’s recent public health directives, I didn’t have a lot of sympathy for the position of those coming out to demand that, in spite of all the scientific evidence to the contrary, we reopen society, and let the chips fall where they may. I can certainly see why those behind the protest, like DeVos-funded Michigan Freedom Fund, are taking the position that they are. I can see why they’d issue statements calling the Governor’s attempts to enforce social distancing, “erratic, unilateral orders that threaten Michiganders’ economic existence.” They’re successful business owners. And they’re losing money. But when they call for the reopening of the economy, they do so knowing that they’ll be relatively insulated. They can afford to stay home with their families. They aren’t working customer service jobs. They aren’t working in health care. When the economy reopens, the life-expectancy of their loved ones isn’t going to drop. And I’m ready to channel all of the anger I’m feeling into one hell of a fight, if anyone tries to open things back up before we have “widespread, easily available and prompt testing” in place. That, by they way, is a quote from Joe Biden, who released his Plan to Reopen America today. [His plan is heavy on diagnostic and serology tests, as it should be.]

The problem, of course, is bigger than just Michigan. Donald Trump, clearly fearful that he’ll lose in November if the economy isn’t showing signs of recovery by then, has started to push the idea of reopening the economy hard. First, as you may recall, he was talking about reopening things by Easter. Now, the target is apparently May 1. And he’s assembled the group that he says will make the final decision. Here they are. [He also wants to get the NFL going again, but we’ll have to save that discussion for another time.]

That’s right. Not a single public health professional. Not even a doctor. Just his most trusted family members and loyal sycophants. These are the people who, according to Donald Trump, will be making the decision as to when it’s safe for us to return to business-as-usual. [Just imagine Obama launching a “death panel” like this one, consisting of people like Van Jones, Valerie Jarrett, and either Sasha or Malia.]

But we know that this group won’t actually be making a decision. Their job is strictly to rubber stamp whatever it is that Donald Trump decides to do. And he told us last week that he won’t be relying on scientific evidence to make that decision. As he told members of the press, all the metrics he’ll need to make the decision as to when it’s safe to reopen society are in his head.

Thankfully, a lot of our governors aren’t seeing this as process they want to follow. They know the president doesn’t have the power to supersede their stay-home orders, and, from what it would seem, they have no intention of putting their citizens in danger in order to appease the administration. Here, for instance, is Governor Phil Murphy of my old home state of New Jersey, standing up and saying that his state will will make the decision, when the time comes, with its regional neighbors.

And Gavin Newsom is saying essentially the same thing in California, declaring, “The West Coast is guided by science. We issued stay at home orders early to keep the public healthy. We’ll open our economies with that same guiding principle.” [For what it’s worth — and I would have thought this would be evident — it’s a fool’s errand to try to bring back the economy without first getting a handle on COVID-19. Before we have confidence in our path forward, there’s no amount of stimulus that will return things to the way they were.]

And these governors are 100% correct when they say it’s their decision. Lest anyone be confused, the President, to quote Republican Representative Justin Amash, “has no authority to ‘close down’ or ‘open up the states.” Amash went on to say that the president should, “Put down the authoritarianism and read the Constitution.”

Donald Trump, not exactly a constitutional scholar, had a different perspective on this issue this afternoon, when he addressed the press at the White House. When asked if the states could remained closed even after he gave the word to reopen, he said, “They can’t do anything without the approval of the president of the United States.” He went on to say, “When somebody is the president of the United States, the authority is total.” This, of course, is completely, 100% wrong. And Donald Trump, as you might imagine, didn’t much appreciate being told this. Here he is as the White House today, quarreling with reporters on his interpretation of presidential authority.

One last thing… I’m old enough to remember when the Republican Party used to think that “states rights” were good, and “death panels,” like the one shown above, were bad.

Posted in Health, Mark's Life, Michigan, Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 109 Comments

What Donald Trump knew about COVID-19, when he knew it, and how his administration made the pandemic much worse

Not too long ago, I shared a timeline here of Donald Trump’s various lie-filled statements concerning the coronavirus outbreak, starting with, “We have it totally under control,” which he said on January 22, 2020. In that post, as you may recall, I not only included quotes from Donald Trump, but, where possible, I added other facts, in order to provide the appropriate context. For instance, when I noted that Donald Trump, on March 2, said, “I’ve heard very quick numbers (for a vaccine), that of months,” I was also sure to add that, a week before, on February 26, Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said that a useable vaccine was “about a year to a year and a half” away. Well, in the three weeks since I posted that timeline, we’ve come to know a lot more about what the President actually knew about the coronavirus outbreak, and when he knew it. So, I thought that I’d mark today — the day that the United States overtook Italy as the country with the most official COVID-19 deaths — by filling in a few more details on our timeline. What follows is by no means complete. Hopefully, however, it’ll at least give you a little to chew on while we wait for the inevitable congressional commission to start its investigation.

SPRING 2018, NSC PANDEMIC RESPONSE TEAM IS DISBANDED
Donald Tump has made it clear that he accepts no responsibility at all for what’s happened. He’s actually come right out and said, “I don’t take responsibility at all.” The truth is, however, that his administration not only failed miserably in the response to COVID-19, but started laying the groundwork for the pandemic years before the first case was discovered in China. Most notably, as we’ve discussed in the past, the Trump administration, in the Spring of 2018, disbanded the pandemic response team within the National Security Council that had been established during the Obama administration. This was done over the warnings of our public health and national security communities, and politicians like Senator Sherrod Brown, who wrote to the President on May 18, 2018, asking him to reconsider the decision.

OCTOBER 2019, INTERNATIONAL PANDEMIC PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM IS SHUT DOWN
In October of 2019, just over a month before the coronavirus outbreak was to start spreading through Wuhan, the Trump administration shut down the Predict program, an initiative started under our second president Bush, and continued under Obama. The mission of the program, according to USAID, was the “detection and discovery of zoonotic diseases at the wildlife-human interface.” [Zoonotic diseases are those like COVID-19 that jump from animals to humans.] According to Senator Chris Murphy, Predict, which had been “actively working in China” at the time that it was shut down by Trump, “had found 1,200 viruses (and 160 coronaviruses) in 10 years.” So, we had zoonotic disease researchers on the ground in China in October — scientists who had been able to effectively identify 160 different coronaviruses over the previous decade — and the Trump administration shut the program down.

NOVEMBER 2019, WE HAD EARLY INTELLIGENCE OF AN OUTBREAK IN CHINA
It’s unclear as to whether or not it ever made its way to the desk of Donald Trump, but it’s looking as though our U.S. spy agencies had raw intelligence data as early as November indicating that there was an outbreak of some kind in Wuhan, China. According to NBC News, this information came “in the form of communications intercepts and overhead images showing increased activity at health facilities.” This information apparently made its way to some federal public health officials in late November in the form of what’s called a “situation report.” But, for some reason, this information never found its way into formal intelligence reports until December. As for when the situation in Wuhan was first brought to the attention of the Pentagon, here’s Defense Secretary Mark Esper saying that he doesn’t recall. [One hopes he can come up with a better response by the time the investigations begin.]

TRUMP KNEW HOW BAD THIS WAS BY JANUARY 18 AT THE LATEST, BUT REFUSED TO ACT
According to reporting by the New York Times, the National Security Council “received intelligence reports in early January predicting the spread of the virus to the United States.” And we know that, by January, this information had made its way into the President’s intelligence briefings. Reporting on this subject, however, is always clear to point out that we have no way of knowing whether or not Donald Trump, who is known to prefer Fox News to real intelligence, actually read these reports. What we do know, however, is that, on January 18, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar called Donald Trump to brief him on the seriousness of the outbreak. Two days later, we would have the first confirmed case in the United States. And, as we know now, there was talk inside the government at this time about “shutting down cities the size of Chicago.” In spite of this, Donald Trump said publicly on January 22, “We have it totally under control.” And he wouldn’t get behind those plans to shut cities down until March, only after U.S. governors had stepped in to issue shelter-in-place orders.

TRUMP DEFINITELY KNEW THE SITUATION BY THE END OF JANUARY, AND YET STILL REFUSED TO ACT
You could argue, as other have, that Donald Trump didn’t hear what Alex Azar had told him on the phone on January 18, and that he hadn’t read his intelligence briefings. We know, however, that, by January 29, he was fully aware of the seriousness of the situation. We now this because, on January 29, Trump trade adviser, Peter Navarro, submitted a memo to the President saying that as many as 500,000 Americans could die as a result of COVID-19, and that our economy could see trillions of dollars in losses. And we know that Trump read the memo, which said, “The lack of immune protection or an existing cure or vaccine would leave Americans defenseless in the case of a full-blown coronavirus outbreak on U.S. soil.” Navarro went on to write, “This lack of protection elevates the risk of the coronavirus evolving into a full-blown pandemic, imperiling the lives of millions of Americans.”

It’s also worth noting that, at roughly the same time that the above is happening, emails are swirling through the federal government about the magnitude of what we’re likely facing. “Any way you cut it, this is going to be bad,” wrote Dr. Carter Mecher, a senior medical adviser at the Department of Veterans Affairs, in an email to a group of public health experts on January 28. “The projected size of the outbreak already seems hard to believe.” Here’s one of the notes in that chain of emails, which were sent under the title “Red Dawn,” in reference to the 1984 film about an unsuspecting United States being overrun by an army of foreign invaders.

And, on January 30, we know that that Health and Human Services secretary Alex Azar talked with Donald Trump a second time, and this time “directly warned” the president that we might have a pandemic on our hands. And we know that Trump heard him this time, as it’s been reported that the president “responded that Mr. Azar was being (an) alarmist.”

So we can be relatively certain that, when Donald Trump said on January 30, “We think we have it very well under control,” he knew that wasn’t the case. He had, by this point, been warned of a pandemic by Azar, told to expect as many as 500,000 deaths by Navarro, and received numerous intelligence briefings… the contents of which, we can be certain, will eventually come out. But yet, on January 30, he said that we had it all “under control.”

The very next day, by the way, Azar would declare a Public Health Emergency (PHE) for the United States.

And in spite of all of this, Donald Trump not only lied to the American people about the severity of what lay ahead, but refused to act. As Donald Trump’s failure to take action on the part of the American people has been well-documented, I won’t get into it here, but I would like to share this clip from Fox News, as I suspect it might carry a little more weight with some of the more heavily brainwashed Trump cultists. [For those of you who like real news, I’d suggest reading, “The U.S. was beset by denial and dysfunction as the coronavirus raged,” in the Washington Post, which is all about the 70 days that were wasted by the Trump administration.]

THERE HAD BEEN A PANDEMIC PLAYBOOK, BUT TRUMP HAD DISCARDED IT
In early 2017, members of the Obama administration public health team met with 30 Trump officials, to walk them through a number of pandemic scenarios and discuss the federal government’s pandemic flu playbook, which had been in existence, and evolving, since 2005. For those of you who are unaware of the “playbook,” here’s an excerpt from Politico.

“…(E)ven as the coronavirus threat arrived this January, the National Security Council set aside a step-by-step playbook carefully crafted by the Obama administration and career officials – based on their own sometimes rocky experiences dealing with H1N1 and Ebola — for an ad hoc process that’s left the White House running consistently days or weeks behind on its response.

…But the Obama-era warnings were largely ignored, forgotten or abandoned. Two-thirds of the Trump appointees who attended the 2017 pandemic transition exercise would end up leaving the administration before the coronavirus outbreak arrived this year. The pandemic playbook — which specifically warned of the high lethality of a coronavirus — was set aside.

…In the White House, Tom Bossert, a Bush administration veteran, was tapped as Trump’s first homeland security adviser where he was enthusiastic about the pandemic playbook prepared by his predecessors, advocated for readiness and began devising what became the 2018 National Biodefense Strategy.

….Bossert was already long gone (though). The pandemic-preparedness advocate had been dismissed in the spring of 2018 and the new national security adviser, John Bolton, dissolved the White House’s pandemic office and shifted the staffers into a broader National Security Council team. That meant Bossert was left trying to warn his former colleagues about coronavirus via Twitter and on TV, urging the administration to move faster to stop an outbreak that he predicted could kill hundreds of thousands of Americans…

So, essentially, there was a book that explained, in incredible detail, what had to happen at every point along the way, but no one in the Trump administration consulted it. If they had, the would have started acquiring personal protective equipment for America’s front-line health care workers three months ago. But they didn’t. And people are dying as a result… Here’s more background on the pandemic playbook.

As for when the Trump administration started procuring PPE, it wasn’t until mid-March. If you don’t believe me, here’s a quote from the Associated Press: “A review of federal purchasing contracts by the AP shows federal agencies largely waited until mid-March to begin placing bulk orders of N95 respirator masks, mechanical ventilators and other equipment needed by front-line health care workers.” And not just were they not acquiring PPE, they were actually allowing PPE to be exported. Just think about that the next time you see a photo of a nurse wearing a garbage bag.

So, when Donald Trump says, as he often does, that “Nobody could have predicted something like this,” he’s lying. People did predict this happening. They predicted exactly this. And they warned him repeatedly. They even gave him a playbook explaining what needed to be done, step by step, when the time came. But he chose not to listen. Instead, he fired the scientists and scrapped the playbook. And, as a result, 22,033 Americans are dead today, and there are mass graves in New York.

There’s more that I could say. There’s a lot more. There’s the fact that Fauci and deputy NSC adviser Matt Pottinger wanted to ban travel to Europe in early February, but Mnuchin and Trump, fearful of what it might do to the economy, overruled them. There’s the fact that Trump could have ramped up testing earlier, but chose not to as he thought that the results could hurt his reelection campaign. There’s the golfing and the rallies. There’s the blaming of Obama instead of taking responsibility… This list is endless… I’m going to have to end here for now, though. Good night, my invisible friends. Stay well. We’re going to need to in the fight.

Posted in Health, Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 112 Comments

Connect

BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative Lewinski