By now, you’ve no doubt heard that, yesterday, Ron Paul’s son, Rand Paul, who just won the Republican Senate primary in Kentucky, said that he would like to live in a world where segregated lunch counters were allowed. And, I’m not exaggerating. Paul, a Libertarian purist, said that, although he detests racism, he feels that business owners should be allowed to serve whomever they please. If you don’t believe me, check out this footage from the Rachel Maddow show.
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
While I respect his honesty, and his commitment to Libertarian principles, regardless of how distasteful, you’ve got to wonder what in the hell he was thinking as this stuff left his mouth. Even the most bat shit insane Republican racist knows that you don’t go around saying that you want to repeal the Civil Rights Act and bring back segregated lunch counters.
In Paul’s world, the free market would no doubt solve everything. People who found the practice of segregation reprehensible would simply boycott those businesses where blacks weren’t served, and, as a result, they’d quickly go out of business. It sounds good in theory, right? But, if it were true, we wouldn’t have needed a Civil Rights Act to begin with.
“My main problem with Libertarians is that they’re idiots.”
-Mark Maynard
Without government intervention, women would still be unable to vote in this country, blacks would still be drinking from separate water fountains, and kids would still be working in coal mines for a dollar a day. That’s what the free market, left to its own devices, gives us. And to argue otherwise is to completely misunderstand both history and human nature.
And, as Ta-Nehisi Coates mentions at The Atlantic, if you follow Paul’s logic, it goes beyond just lunch counters… Here’s a clip from his article:
…But what about red-lining? Does Paul know anything about blockbusting? Does he think banks should be able to have a policy of not lending to black businesses? Does he think real-estate agents should be able to discriminate? Does he think private homeowner groups should be able to band together and keep out blacks? Jews? Gays? Latinos?…
In Paul’s defense, maybe he hasn’t thought that far ahead. Or, maybe, like a great many wealthy white folks, he just doesn’t care about such things… Speaking of which, I haven’t looked into it yet, but, if I’m reading the comments of Representative Jim Clyburn correctly, Paul held his recent victory party in a private, members-only club that excludes on the basis of race.
Given these new developments, one wonders whether Paul supporters in Kentucky will put his signs up in their yards, or, more importantly, contribute money to the campaign. I suppose these recent comments could help him with some folks, but I would think that most non-racists would think twice about embracing him publicly.
And, as if that weren’t enough, then there’s the stuff about how he wants to privatize several federal departments, and abolish the Department of Education.
But, if you can believe it, there were bigger assholes in the news today. Or, at least there was one. Newt Gingrich came out to say that Barack Obama – you know, that guy who fought for a more inclusive health care system – was a bigger threat to America than either Stalin or Hitler… Check out this video.