I get that it’s important, from a public health perspective, to track the total number of active COVID-19 cases over time. Having a sense as to how many people have been diagnosed at a given point in time, should, in theory, give you a sense as to what you might expect a week or two down the line, as individuals recently infected by those diagnosed today begin to show signs of illness and seek treatment. [It’s currently thought that the basic R0 of COVID-19 is around 2.5, meaning that, on average, everyone with the disease passes it along to about 2.5 others. The R0 of the common flu, by comparison, is roughly 1.3, or about half.] So, if we had robust testing, and a decent understanding of social dynamics during this period of quasi-lockdown, one would imagine that we could model the progression of the virus fairly well, allowing us to plan accordingly, etc. But, when we aren’t really testing all that much, I don’t understand the purpose of tracking the number of confirmed cases. And I know that I probably don’t have a lot of epidemiologists in the audience right now, but, as I’m curious, I thought that I’d throw it out there for discussion anyway.
Maybe it’s because I keep hearing first-hand accounts of people seeking tests, who are being told to just go home and self-quarantine until such time that they either get well or begin to have trouble breathing, as there’s really nothing more that can be done for them until such time that they need respiratory intervention. And, if that’s the case — if people who likely have COVID-19 are being sent home without tests, as there’s really nothing that can be done for them anyway — I’m wondering what the value is in publishing the daily number of confirmed cases. [Might it give some a false sense of security?] I know it’s interesting, and that we feel obliged to look each day, but what does it really tell us? I’ll probably still continue to quote the daily number of confirmed cases — it’s now 7,615 in Michigan, by the way — but I have no idea what good that number actually does anyone.
It seems to me that the number of the dead, given that it’s more certain, is probably the metric that’s more predictive of what’s to come, right?
As for the number of people who have died from COVID-19 in Michigan, we’re now at 259, which, as of today, is the third highest in the country. I’m not, of course, an epidemiologist, but if we assume an average fatality rate of 1.4%, that means we’ve got roughly 18,500 with the disease presently, which is more than double the number of presently confirmed cases. I know that age of the population, weight, environmental factors, etc, all influence these numbers, and that no model is perfect. If it’s true, however, that we’re seeing something like a 1.4% fatality rate here in Michigan, then our 259 deaths would seem to indicated that we’ve got a lot more sick people out there than we’ve identified through testing.
Again, I admittedly know very little about this stuff. I’m just genuinely interested to know what useable information we get from the metric like “the number of diagnosed cases” when our testing still appears to be seriously flawed. I don’t know if the number of dead, the number of hospitalizations, or the number of people on ventilators is a better metric to pay attention to, but I have to think that all of them would be better than diagnosed cases.
Oh, and because I apparently still have a few minutes before falling to sleep, I might as well respond to recent comments by Mitch McConnell about how Donald Trump couldn’t respond as aggressively as he would have liked to the coronavirus threat because of his impeachment trial. As others have noted, Donald Trump still found time to golf and hold his rallies during the impeachment trial. If he had the time for those things, he could have found the time to respond responsibly to the threat… which we know that he was warned of as early as January in his intelligence briefings. Instead, however, he not only refused to act on the warnings for months, but played the threat down in public. So, no, Senator McConnell, this was not the fault of those bad Democrats and their reckless campaign to save the Republic. And even if they hadn’t tried to remove Donald Trump from office for having tried to coerce another world leading into launching a politically motivated investigation into a domestic opponent, chances are the same exact thing would have happened. When you allow family of Florida grifters to hot-wire party and take it for a joy ride, these are just the kind of things that should be expected.
Trump held rallies on:
—Jan 9th
—Jan 14th
—Jan 28th
—Jan 30th
—Feb 10th
—Feb 19th
—Feb 20th
—Feb 21st
—Feb 28thHe golfed on:
—Jan 18th
—Jan 19th
—Feb 1st
—Feb 15th
—Mar 7th
—Mar 8thBut sure, impeachment (ended Feb 5th) is what stopped him from responding to the coronavirus 🙄
— Andrew Wortman (@AmoneyResists) March 31, 2020
OK, because I still can’t sleep, here’s Donald Trump admitting to the fact that, if we made voting easier in this country, the Republican Party would never win another election. Seems like an important admission, doesn’t it?
There you have it, ladies and gentleman. Let’s all vote and make his nightmare come true. https://t.co/Q6ntIywNum
— Susan Rice (@AmbassadorRice) March 30, 2020
This, of course, was in response to an attempt on the part of Democrats to pass vote-by-mail legislation that would allow Americans to vote from home, instead of having to go to polling places next November, during what could be another deadly cold and flu season. The Republicans pushed back because the last thing they want is more people voting, for the very reasons articulated above by Donald Trump.