I hesitate to do this, as I know it’s exactly what they want, but fuck Urban Outfitters

kentstatedetail

I know that I should just keep my mouth shut, as everyone else is already talking about this, and as I know it’s exactly what Richard Hayne, the far-right CEO and chief provocateur of Urban Outfitters wants, but I can’t help myself. I keep putting down my computer, and trying to walk away, but I just can’t seem to do it. As disgusting as many of the stunts pulled by Urban Fitters have been over the years, I never thought the’d go so far as to make light of a tragedy like the Kent State killings… killings which happened, by the way, just as Hayne was launching Urban Outfitters in 1970.

Following, for those of you unaware of the history of Urban Outfitters, is a clip from my interview last year with Hayne’s ex-wife, the founder of the Business Alliance for Living Local Economies (BALLE), Judy Wicks.

…I started the Free People’s Store (which would later become Urban Outfitters) in 1970 with my first husband (Richard Hayne), my 5th grade boyfriend. We were 23 at the time and were very aligned politically as anti-war, anti-corporate progressives. The store was a sixties kind of place with progressive books, houseplants, new and used clothing, and hip house wares – a sort of department store for the under 30 crowd. We even campaigned for George McGovern out of the store. I left the marriage and the business in 1972 because I wanted to seek my own path for a number of reasons. As I continued my progressive views and learned to use my business to express those views through the educational programs at the restaurant as well as my business practices, I was unaware that my ex-husband had changed his views until about 10 years ago… We don’t talk politics or business when we do happen to run into each other…

It’s hard to imagine how a man who once considered himself to be an anti-corporate progressive, could now be running a corporation that takes every opportunity to shove its thumb into the eye of progressive America, but I guess, when you have money, all you want is more. And apparently, in the case of Hayne, $1.8 billion isn’t enough.

So, the next time you’re out shopping for crap, like a disgusting shirt urging young people not to vote, or a racist board game, keep in mind that your hard-earned dollars are going right into the pocket of Hayne, who has a record not only of selling products that are calculated to offend the sensitive left, but of giving generously to those politicians like Rick Santorum who promise to rid our country of things like gay marriage and abortion.

urbankent2

For what it’s worth, the folks at Urban Outfitters are claiming that the blood spattered Kent State sweatshirt wasn’t intended to be offensive. Here’s the company’s statement.

Urban Outfitters sincerely apologizes for any offense our Vintage Kent State Sweatshirt may have caused. It was never our intention to allude to the tragic events that took place at Kent State in 1970 and we are extremely saddened that this item was perceived as such. The one-of-a-kind item was purchased as part of our sun-faded vintage collection. There is no blood on this shirt nor has this item been altered in any way. The red stains are discoloration from the original shade of the shirt and the holes are from natural wear and fray. Again, we deeply regret that this item was perceived negatively and we have removed it immediately from our website to avoid further upset.

The folks from Kent State, it would appear, don’t believe them. Here’s their response.

May 4, 1970, was a watershed moment for the country and especially the Kent State family. We lost four students that day while nine others were wounded and countless others were changed forever. We take great offense to a company using our pain for their publicity and profit. This item is beyond poor taste and trivializes a loss of life that still hurts the Kent State community today. We invite the leaders of this company as well as anyone who invested in this item to tour our May 4 Visitors Center, which opened two year ago, to gain perspective on what happened 44 years ago and apply its meaning to the future.

Posted in Corporate Crime, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 13 Comments

Being there for The Replacements Minneapolis homecoming

replacementshmecoming2I spent this past Saturday with an old high school friend in the suburbs of Minneapolis… The trip had been in the works for over three years. It started in early 2011, when I scored two hard-to-get tickets for the big Stooges reunion show at the Michigan Theater commemorating the passing of Ron Asheton. I offered to give one to my friend Dan, on two conditions. First, he had to find a way to get himself down to Ann Arbor from St. Paul. And, second, he had to promise that, if The Replacements ever got back together again for a reunion show in their hometown of Minneapolis, he’d return the favor, and get a ticket for me. And that’s why, on Saturday night, I was crammed into the soon-to-be demolished Midway Stadium, along with 14,000 other diehard Replacements fans, jumping up and down to Takin’ a Ride like we’d just been transported back to the ’80s.

For those of you who don’t know the background, The Replacements haven’t played in their hometown, where they formed in 1979, in over 23 years. Most folks never thought it would happen, but, in 2012, when guitarist Bob “Slim” Dunlap suffered a severe stroke that left him paralyzed, founding members Paul Westerberg and Tommy Stinson came together to record a four-song EP as part of a bigger fundraising effort. (Dunlap had replaced original Replacements guitarist Bob Stinson in 1987. Stinson, a long time alcoholic, had been forced out of the band in 1986.) So, one thing led to another, and Paul and Tommy decided to reform the band for short tour, which is scheduled to end in Texas next month. The Minneapolis show, where I saw them, sold out in ten minutes.

Here, for those of you who weren’t with me on the field of the run-down minor league ball park Saturday night, is a little video.

I was going to write about the show, but, as the folks at the Star Tribune did such a nice job, I’ll just share what they had to say.

…(M)ostly the new ’Mats just took care of business. Like their 10 previous shows since the first in Toronto a year ago, they opened with a batch of fast, snarling oldies. “Favorite Thing” and “Takin’ a Ride” kicked off the first-round assault, and an all-too-appropriate “Don’t Ask Why” delivered the first knock-out moment.

After switching modes for two melodic, sophisticated late-era fan faves, “I’ll Be You” and “Valentine,” the guys slid back into several more rowdy, gritty, snotty rockers, including “Tommy Gets His Tonsils Out” and “Take Me Down to the Hospital” — both altered to great effect. The former was stretched out by tacking on a minute or two of Jimi Hendrix’s “Third Stone From the Sun.” The latter was stretched out by Westerberg either intentionally or unintentionally dropping some of the lyrics, forcing some musical improv that bounced back ferociously.
No surprise that the rockiest rockers were tight, bouncy and wicked, as has been the case at the other shows, with Freese appearing to be the primary culprit. “Left of the Dial” and “Alex Chilton” both came off exuberantly in the encore. What really made the hometown show feel special, though, were the quieter, more introspective moments.

Westerberg sang with unusual tenderness — soft, raspy, sadly beautiful — in the mid-show highlights “If Only You Were Lonely” and “Androgynous.” He once again botched the lyrics at the end of “Androgynous,” but his smile after hearing the crowd fill in the words suggested he perhaps did so on purpose.

There were two more unusually lovely and emotional turns at show’s end, as the band added in two songs yet to be played by the new lineup: “Skyway,” which Westerberg played by himself to kick off the first encore, and “Unsatisfied,” which they saved for the one-song second encore and turned into the most perfect part of the night…

And here are a few photos I picked up by looking around various online fan sites as I waited for my $75 plane ride back to Michigan on Sunday morning. The first one, shot by someone identifying himself as Darin K, shows original Replacements Paul Westerberg and Tommy Stinson hugging one another.

DarinKreplacements

Westerberg also kissed Stinson midway through their song Kiss Me on the Bus.

Speaking of Westerberg and Stinson, there was only one spoken exchange between the two men that I recall hearing. Early on, Westerberg said something to the effect of, “I’m sorry it’s taken us so long to come back and play for you,” at which point Stinson responded, “No you’re not.”

I was expecting more banter. I was expecting Westerberg to talk more about the early days, perhaps noting the passing of former bandmate Bobby Stinson, who passed away in ’95, or acknowledging that Chris Mars, their first drummer, still lives in the area. Aside from the kissing, there wasn’t a lot of sentimentality, though. The show was still incredible, but they just didn’t take the opportunity to reflect, at least publicly, on this tumultuous journey that they’ve been on. I suspect, however, that went on behind the scenes… The following image was anonymously posted to a fan forum shortly after the show.

Replacements3a

Here, thanks to a photographer by the name of Nate Ryan, is a shot of the boys in action.

NateRyanReplacements

And, lastly, for all you hardcore fans out there, is the set list, thanks to someone by the name of Caryn Rose.

CarynRoseReplacements2

All in all, I’d say it was a pretty awesome time.

Oh, and I’d like to thank Dan’s wife Jen for driving us to the show and dropping us off in the parking lot, where we’d planned to meet up with some of Dan’s fellow middle-aged high school teacher friends. (It was like we’d traveled back in time a few decades, and his mom was dropping us off for a show somewhere, telling us to be safe and have fun.) And, for what it’s worth, you haven’t lived until you’ve tailgated in a desolate St. Paul parking lot with a few high school English teachers and a guidance councilor.

Posted in Art and Culture, Mark's Life, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

The failed experiment of privatization in Michigan

Our friends at Progress Michigan have just done something good. They’ve invested in a Robert Reich sound-alike to explain, in easy to understand terms, the true costs of privatization in Michigan. As fond as I am of my painstakingly-detailed and painfully-long rants on the subject, like my recent piece on the privatization of Michigan’s prison food service industry, the truth is, a four-minute video is infinitely more effective when it comes to conveying the importance of the subject matter, and the threat we’re facing from those, like Governor Snyder, who would like to see all public services privatized. And this, of course, is in spite of the evidence, which shows that, more often that not, costs have risen, quality has dropped, and corruption has increased, when we’ve handed these critical parts of Michigan’s infrastructure over to private hands… Here’s the video. If you like it, please pass it along to your friends.

Speaking of Aramark, the prison food vendor that was recently found to have been serving maggot-contaminated food to Michigan’s prisoners, it’s now being reported that the Snyder administration quietly forgave the $98,000 fine that had been levied against them by the State. And Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mark Schauer, among others, is wondering why. In fact, Schauer is requesting that Snyder release all emails relating to Aramark, so that we might have a better understanding of what happened. “Schauer also called on Snyder,” according to the Detroit Free Press, “to immediately disclose whether Aramark Correctional Services of Philadelphia or any of its officials had donated to the New Energy to Reinvent and Diversify (NERD) fund, a Snyder nonprofit fund that accepted undisclosed corporate donations and which Snyder announced in October he was disbanding.”

Could it be that Snyder quietly forgave the $98,000 penalty because Aramark had been depositing big checks in his super secret NERD fund in the run up to this November’s race against Schauer, who, coincidentally, is now beating him in the polls? I guess we’ll have to wait and see. Regardless, though, I think it’s safe to say that Snyder has been dishonest at best, in that he’s given the impression that his administration has been taking a hard line against Aramark, to the tune of $98,000, when, in fact, that wasn’t the case.

In related news, Snyder has refused to set a time to debate Schauer, which, I think, speaks volumes.

[It should be noted that, while the $98,000 fine against Aramark was descended, there are still other fines against the company that have not been.]

Posted in Corporate Crime, Michigan, Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

The Argus Farm Stop, changing the local food paradigm in Ann Arbor

About a year ago now, longtime Ann Arbor residents Kathy Sample and Bill Brinkerhoff made the decision to change direction in their careers and dedicate themselves full-time to advancing the local food movement. Their work culminated, a few weeks ago, in the launch of the Argus Farm Stop, a 1,300 square foot, year-round farmers’ market at the intersection of Liberty and 2nd, which they’re hoping will not only encourage more people to eat local food, but make small-scale farming a more financially viable career option in southeast Michigan. Here, with more on what they’re hoping to accomplish with Argus, are Kathy and Bill.

argusoutside

MARK: When I first talked with you about this project, Bill, you were still in the fact-finding stage, making your way around the area, meeting with people, and trying to discern where there were unmet needs in the local food ecosystem. What did you discover having gone through that process?

BILL: Generally speaking, we found two things. First, there was great support and enthusiasm for the idea of growing access to local food. And, second, there was a lack of satisfaction with the current situation. Many people described their strong desire to purchase from local producers, but found it difficult to always make it to farmers’ markets or participate in CSAs. On the producer side, we heard how difficult it was to make a living on a farm. Farmers’ markets and CSAs offer high margins, but they take a lot of time. And selling through other retail outlets often means accepting much lower prices for your goods, and losing control over the way in which those goods are sold. There was great interest, therefore, in finding a way to sell local products in such a way that maintained strong consumer-producer connections, offered higher margins to the producers, and letting the farmers spend more time on the farm.

MARK: And, now that Argus has been up and running for a few weeks, how do you think you’re doing relative to those three objectives?

BILL: We’ve been very pleased with the reception from customers, with many each day making it a point to voice their appreciation for the store and their ability to now shop from their favorite farms every day. For the producers, the sales volumes have been strong, and they’re very happy with the rapid uptake.

argusgreensMARK: Kathy, I’m somewhat familiar Bill’s background, having spent some time with him over these past few years, but I know very little about your background and the path that brought you here. What had you been doing prior to this, and how’d you become interested in the local food movement?

KATHY: I had a career in marketing and business planning that often took me away from Ann Arbor on business travel, but I’ve always had an interest in local food. I’ve been involved in local agriculture through the school gardens and through the county extension office as a master gardener. I’ve worked on the Burns Park school garden and the Tappan School garden, and see a real opportunity to connect people with local food sources again. As our family has traveled, we’ve found that there is no better way to get to know a culture than to visit local farmers’ markets. When we were dropping our son Ben off at the College of Wooster in Ohio last summer, we came across the Local Roots market, which has really helped change the environment for local food there. And, last fall, together with our business partner Scott Fleck, we began exploring the potential of something similar in Ann Arbor.

MARK: And, Bill, this is something of a shift for you, given that, prior to this, you’d been in the pharmaceutical business. How’s the transition been?

BILL: I used to spend 90% of my time on pharma/biotech work and 10% on local initiatives. Now the ratio is reversed. It is rewarding to be working with the local farmers and food producers, and the customers in our market are people who are interested and involved, so it’s been an easy transition.

MARK: So, tell us about the Argus Farm Stop. What might we expect to find there? What would I see if I were to walk through the front door today?

KATHY: Argus has quickly become a little community meeting space for people who care about local food. The vibe is just great, from my standpoint. It’s really the neighborhood coming in and meeting and shopping. We have a full coffee bar, with both indoor and outdoor seating. (We brew Roos Roast coffee.) As you enter the market side, you will find products from over 60 local producers including meats, dairy, produce and baked goods. We’re really trying to cover all the categories that we can in this small space. There is signage explaining each product, and a single point of check out, which makes shopping easy, and frees the farmers to spend more time on the farm. We have the most talented farmers. They are wonderful people. And, when you come in, you might meet them as they bring in their produce!

argus2MARK: Why did you decide to locate at Liberty and Second, instead of somewhere else in Ann Arbor, or in a surrounding community, like Ypsilanti?

BILL: We searched broadly for a location which would have sufficient space and parking, and also be funky, welcoming and accessible for pedestrians and bike traffic. Every time we visited the building at Liberty and Second, where Argus is now, we noticed the large number of people walking by to the residential Old West Side neighborhood, and began to feel that this location would make an ideal home for this store. When people visit the store, they’re amazed at the nice view looking back towards downtown Ann Arbor. The concept of renovating a 1930’s gas station into a new use as a coffee shop and grocery store also held some appeal.

MARK: What kind of outreach have you done thus far with the local farming community?

KATHY: We began discussions last Fall with several of the larger local farms, to ask for feedback on the overall this idea. To a one, they were thoughtful about the concept, encouraging and offered excellent advice on ways we might proceed and things we should consider. We continued and expanded these discussions as the store renovations were ongoing. We had to really keep the conversation going through the process so that they would plan to have product available, and so that they would be comfortable with how things were moving forward.

MARK: What do you have in the way of local meat?

KATHY: It’s all here! We have a great variety of local meat, all raised within a close radius to us. We have worked to provide a variety of choices for customers in each area (beef, pork, poultry, lamb) and currently are carrying names familiar to those shopping in our local farmers markets including Golden Fleece, Steinhauser Farms, Ernst, Black Oak, Biercamp, Harnois, Duerksen Turkey, and we have interest from several other small farms, we are just trying to fit them all in. We also carry Sanilac (heirloom organic Mangalitsa pork) meats, and their dog food. So we’re happy with our meat selection. And we have meat-free protein options, like seitan from Mama MoFoods which is popular, and really high quality.

argustomoatosMARK: Are there any holes right now? Are there items, for instance, that you’d like to carry, but haven’t yet found a local source for?

KATHY: We have the basics down. I guess jam is a surprising thing we’re trying to source, as well as salad dressings and oils. It’s hard to source something like cooking oil that you know comes from local corn or canola. And we’re bringing in yoghurt too – there are few small dairies with really good yoghurt! We’re also increasing our prepared food options, as that’s something that has been a big hit. We use Bona Sera Cafe and Harvest Kitchen. Both in Ypsi, and use local ingredients. And they’ve both got excellent cooks!

MARK: Will there be anything at all from outside the region?

KATHY: We’re sourcing exclusively from Michigan producers. The consignment model, and the frequent restocking that’s required, means that there’s a natural limitation on the distance from which our products can be supplied.

MARK: I’m curious about your business model. You mention consignment. Can you go into a little more detail as to how you’ve decided to structure your relationships with suppliers?

BILL: The business model is one where the farmers own and price their goods, and we provide a single point of check out in an attractive retail environment, which is open daily, year-round. The producers receive 80% of gross sales, which is very favorable compared to the other alternatives available to them. Our interest in this model has less to do with economics and more to do with the environment of mutual trust that it requires between the store and the producers. The producers need to trust that we will restock and refresh their displays, and do our best to communicate their stories to customers. And we need to trust that producers will provide abundant, beautiful products to sell in the store. Farmers also need to be present in the store frequently to replenish their supplies. They also care deeply about how their goods are displayed, and this translates into a very unique shopping experience for customers.

MARK: How did you come to settle on this particular model?

BILL: Our mission is to grow the local food ecosystem, and this model does a wonderful job of connecting customers with local producers. Given the volume of deliveries on any given day, customers are bound to meet and interact with producers during their visits to the store. This is exactly the kind of connected model we’re working to build.

MARK: And you think that 20% of gross sales will be enough to sustain Argus?

KATHY: It’s our mission at Argus to make an attractive return for our farmers, attractive enough for them to invest and grow. Based on the experience of Local Roots in Wooster, 20% is possible, as long as you have an additional revenue source, like our coffee bar. In Wooster, they’ve seen their farmers able to expand, and to invest in growing through the winter season, and this is something we would like to see with more of our local farmers. We want them to be successful, and expand their growing seasons.

MARK: So the hope is, since Argus will be open all winter, farmers will build hoop houses, expand their seasons, and keep you well stocked?

KATHY: We share that hope with our customers. We all want a robust, year-round local food options, and our hope is that Argus can help make that happen by serving as a platform.

argus3MARK: As you’ve mentioned, Argus is based loosely on a year-round market you’d had some experience with in Wooster, Ohio. What was in particular that struck you about that market?

BILL: I was struck by the interaction with farmers at Local Roots. On my first visit there, I met a blueberry farmer who explained the difference between blueberries from the first harvest and subsequent harvests. It was a weekday morning, and I wasn’t expecting this kind of experience. On our next visit, we met an egg supplier, who had just picked up a delivery of new chicks for his farm. (They come in the U.S. mail!) Customers want this kind of interaction. They want to feel connected. It’s what attracted us to Local Roots, and it’s what’s bringing people into Argus… We were surprised to learn, by the way, that, in the small town of Wooster (population 28,000), the sales from Local Roots exceeded $500,000… We thought, “Why shouldn’t Ann Arbor have such a wonderful type of store?”

MARK: And are you getting the sense that you’re developing that kind of culture? Are farmers hanging out, and talking with customers?

BILL: Yes, we’re seeing this kind of engagement all over the store. When our farmers are bringing in produce, they’re constantly educating us about the care of that produce, and the customers will often ask them questions, which they’re happy to answer. And the same is true of our meat suppliers, who are always more than happy to tell customers, as they stock up our freezers, about their cows or chickens.

MARK: What’s the response been from others in the local food community, like the Washtenaw Food Hub, the People’s Food Coop, and Ann Arbor Farmers’ Market?

KATHY: Nationally, less than 1% of food is purchased directly from producers. Over 99% goes through traditional distribution channels, where local farmers don’t fare very well. In our discussions with others who work in the local food community, we’ve found an interest in growing this percentage. Our mission is to grow local food, and if Argus demonstrates new approaches, we would be thrilled to see these practices adopted more broadly.

The Washtenaw Food Hub is home to The Brinery, one of our producers. And their commercial kitchen is used by cooks who make other products for sale locally. The Ann Arbor Farmers’ Market has been very supportive. We’ve been working with their manager, Sarah DeWitt, since the “concept” days. She has such a good grasp of how local food can grow.

MARK: That’s the answer I was hoping for, Kathy. With 99% of of food being sold through larger grocery stores, as you say, there’s certainly a huge opportunity to grow the pie for everyone involved in the local food movement. My concern, though, was that there might be some initial pushback from other more established players in the local food movement.

KATHY: I hope not – we should all be moving in a direction to support local producers. Larger stores are trying to cover so many bases with the product lines that they carry that it’s really hard to focus on the small, local supplier. I see that stores often have a “local” display in the produce area, but it’s kind of an island. So much of what’s in a typical grocery produce aisle is from industrial agricultural sources, and, when you make a selection, you’re picking between a local thing and a non-local thing. At Argus ,you don’t have to make that choice. And tt seems to resonate with our customers. They’re having a really good experience shopping here. Maybe they feel more connected to what they are buying. I hope they are!

MARK: You opened your doors in mid-August. How have things been going?

BILL: We‘ve been thrilled with reception by customers, who have been vocal in their support. They really like having a convenient place to shop for local food where people are passionate about what they’re doing. The farmers and producers have also been amazing in the variety and volume of beautiful products they’ve bringing to sell in the market. And our sales reflect that. We recently issued the first checks to producers for their sales over the first 9 days of market operations, which exceeded $22,000… We’re thrilled to be seeing such an immediate impact on economic development in local food.

argusgarlicMARK: How, if at all, are things evolved since your launch? I realize that it might be too early, but I’m wondering if you’re seeing any signs, for instance, that Argus might motivate growers to diversify their crops more than they might have otherwise? I’m also wondering the data that you’re getting concerning what sells and when might be used to better guide local production. It seems like there’s an enormous opportunity.

BILL: At first we were just learning to keep the shelves stocked. We had such great product, it was really moving. Now we can look at specific things that people are asking for, and see if we might be able to facilitate connections. We’re all learning together. Our customers are beginning to think about what they used to be able to get, like local horseradish, or other interesting things, and they’re telling us. Now, we’re getting to the point where we need to meet with our suppliers to communicate the next steps – what else they can consider growing for us. And what winter will look like!

MARK: I’m curious as to what outreach you may have planned, if any, to segments of the local community that perhaps don’t already make it a point to seek out fresh, local produce. For example, do you have plans to accept Bridge Cards, or provide food for those receiving assistance through federal programs like WIC?

KATHY: Being a farmers market with a single point of checkout, we are ideally situated for pursuing those things, and we’ve got plans to work with a local expert in order to set us up to work with those programs as soon as we’re eligible. Healthy food access is absolutely part of our mission. Double Up Food Bucks is an example of a local program that encourages those on food assistance to shop for fresh produce, and we want to be part of that. And our farmers do too.

MARK: Outside of what we’ve already discussed, is there anything else that you have planned for the immediate future?

BILL: Over the next several months, we’ll continue to fine tune store operations, and plan for the winter version of the market. We have growers who are interested and capable to grow almost year round, and we’re sketching out what our product offerings might look like between now and spring. In addition, we’re planning more activities, like “Farmer in the Store,” for local school groups. We want to facilitate conversations between children and farmers. And we’d like to host music events. But, really, our customers are the best source of ideas for what we can do. And we’ll just keep listening to them.

arguslogo

[Follow Argus Farm Stop on Facebook.]

Posted in Agriculture, Ann Arbor, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments

Estate Tax good. American aristocracy bad.

During the last Bush Presidency, as you may recall, there was a coordinated campaign to eliminate the Estate Tax, which has existed in some form in the United States since the 18th century. Rebranding it the “Death Tax” under the guidance of Republican pollster Frank Luntz, wrote that the term “kindled voter resentment in a way that ‘inheritance tax’ and ‘estate tax’ (did) not,” and alluding constantly to imaginary family farms that would be destroyed if the tax were to remain on the books, Republicans were successful in passing legislation in 2001 that phased out the tax, which primarily affected the super-rich, over a ten year period. (Coincidentally wealth inequality grew at an unprecedented rate over this same period of time in America.) Thankfully, the tax returned in 2011, albeit in a somewhat watered down form. Forces on the right, however, have never stopped plotting to kill the legislation once and for all on behalf of their wealthy backers, who would love to be able to move wealth from generation to generation without taxation.

The most recent attempt to kill the Estate Tax, which I’d prefer to call the Patriot Tax, is being led by Texas Congressman Kevin Brady, the author of H.R. 2429, better known as the
Death Tax Repeal Act of 2013. As of right now, the bill, which could go to the floor of the House as early as this month, when Congress returns to D.C., has 221 cosponsors, the vigorous support of Koch brothers’ front group Americans for Prosperity, and a great deal of momentum. (Three of the bill’s cosponsors are Democrats; Representatives Mike McIntyre of North Carolina, Jim Matheson of Utah, and Sanford Bishop of Georgia. Representative David Price of North Carolina had been a cosponsor, but backed out in April.)

The following comes from an opinion piece in Forbes.

…H.R. 2429 has the support of a majority of the whole House and virtually everyone in the House GOP Conference. It has 221 cosponsors–almost the only Republicans not on there are the ones who traditionally don’t co-sponsor bills because they are in leadership or run committees…

House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.) has endorsed having a vote on H.R. 2429. 18 of the 21 GOP members of this tax writing committee are co-sponsors. Just last week, over 30 Members of Congress sent a letter to the leadership urging a vote on H.R. 2429 as soon as possible…

Reagan economist Steve Entin, now of the Tax Foundation, has a dynamic score which shows that repealing the death tax would actually raise more in pro-growth tax revenue than the meager amount the death tax collects today. That’s because killing the death tax will create hundreds of thousands of new jobs and free up economic resources currently trapped with insurance companies, lawyers, and estate planners. That’s probably why most states no longer have a death tax.

Killing the death tax has, in every poll taken for two decades, attracted supermajority support. Conservative activists – the ones the GOP needs coming out in force to vote this November – absolutely hate the death tax. Sure, it will face the same, tired class warfare arguments from the Left, but that’s never worked with our base voters, the ones that really matter in a midterm election.

It would be smart politics for the House GOP to energize, not demoralize, their base heading into the final election push…

I know, like me, your first inclination is probably to believe everything said by a Reagan administration economist extolling the virtues of trickle down economics, but, just in case you aren’t, here’s the other side of the argument, as expressed by Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, who let it be known yesterday that he’d be bringing forward an alternative proposal – one that wouldn’t see the Estate Tax eliminated, but strengthened. Here’s his statement in its entirety. (Please read it. It’s important.)

The founders of our country declared their independence from what they viewed as a tyrannical aristocracy in England. More than two centuries later, today’s tyrannical aristocracy is no longer a foreign power. It’s an American billionaire class which has unprecedented economic and political influence over all of our lives.

Unless we reduce skyrocketing wealth and income inequality, unless we end the ability of the super-rich to buy elections, the United States will be well on its way toward becoming an oligarchic form of society where almost all power rests with the billionaire class.

In the year 2014, the U.S. has by far the most unequal distribution of wealth and income of any major country on earth. This inequality is worse than at any time in our country’s history since 1928. Today, the top 1 percent owns about 37 percent of the total wealth in this country. The bottom 60 percent owns only 1.7 percent of our nation’s wealth.

At a time median family income is $5,000 less than it was in 1999, the net worth of the top 400 billionaires in this country has doubled over the past decade. The top 1 percent now owns more wealth than the bottom 90 percent of Americans and one family, the Walton family of Wal-Mart, owns more wealth than the bottom 40 percent of Americans.

In terms of income, the top 1 percent earns more than the bottom 50 percent. Since the Great Recession of 2008, 95 percent of all income gains in the U.S. have gone to the top 1 percent. While the rich have become even richer, more Americans are living in poverty than at any time in our nation’s history. Today, half of Americans have less than $10,000 in savings. We have the highest rate of childhood poverty – 22 percent – than any major country on earth.

More than a century ago, President Theodore Roosevelt recognized the danger of massive wealth and income inequality and what it meant to the economic and political well-being of the country. In addition to busting up the big trusts of his time, he fought for the creation of a progressive estate tax to reduce the enormous concentration of wealth that existed during the Gilded Age.

“The absence of effective state, and, especially, national, restraint upon unfair money-getting has tended to create a small class of enormously wealthy and economically powerful men, whose chief object is to hold and increase their power,” the Republican president said. “The really big fortune, the swollen fortune, by the mere fact of its size acquires qualities which differentiate it in kind as well as in degree from what is passed by men of relatively small means. Therefore, I believe in… a graduated inheritance tax on big fortunes, properly safeguarded against evasion and increasing rapidly in amount with the size of the estate.”

Roosevelt spoke those words on Aug. 31, 1910. They are even more relevant today.

A progressive estate tax on multi-millionaires and billionaires is the fairest way to reduce wealth inequality, lower our $17 trillion national debt and raise the resources we need for investments in infrastructure, education and other neglected national priorities.

I will shortly introduce legislation that will:

• Call for a progressive estate tax rate structure so that the super wealthy pay their fair share of taxes. The tax rate for the value of an estate above $3.5 million and below $10 million would be 40 percent. The tax rate on the value of estates above $10 million and below $50 million would be 50 percent, and the tax rate on the value of estates above $50 million would be 55 percent.

• Include a billionaire’s surtax of 10 percent. This surtax on the value of estates worth more than $1 billion would currently apply to fewer than 500 of the wealthiest families in America worth more than $2 trillion.

• Close estate tax loopholes that have allowed the wealthy to avoid billions in estate taxes. Some of the wealthiest Americans in this country have exploited loopholes in the tax code to avoid paying an estimated $100 billion in estate taxes since 2000. My bill would close those loopholes.

• Exempt the first $3.5 million of an estate from federal taxation ($7 million for couples), the same exemption that existed in 2009. Under this legislation, 99.75 percent of Americans would not pay a penny in estate taxes.

This legislation would exempt more than 99.7 percent of Americans from paying any estate tax while ensuring that the wealthiest Americans in our country pay their fair share.

I agree with former Labor Secretary Robert Reich who wrote, in support of this legislation, that America “is creating an aristocracy of wealth populated by heirs who don’t have to work for a living yet have great influence over how the nation’s productive assets are deployed.” He is right in calling the proposal that I’ve laid out “a welcome step toward reversing this trend.” Let’s fight together to see that it is implemented.

Sanders, of course, is right. Our country is fast approaching a point of no return relative to wealth inequality, and something needs to be done, and done immediately, if we’re to avoid the bloody mess that surely lies ahead. If you have a moment, please write or call your member of Congress and urge him, or her, to vote “no” on H.R. 2429. And, once you’ve done that, call your Senators and urge them to assist Bernie Sanders in whatever way they can, as he attempts to do the politically unthinkable… and ask the 1% to put the future of their country ahead of their desire to subvert our democracy in favor of an American aristocracy.

And, just so we’re clear, this was never about saving small family farms, as the Republicans have claimed. Tom Buis, the former president of the National Farmers Union, has said it best a few years ago. “Family farmers and ranchers are insulted by those who use farmers as the reason for eliminating estate taxes,” Buis said, “when the real beneficiaries are the nation’s multimillionaires.” This fight against the Estate Tax, regardless of how they attempt to position it, has always been about building dynasties, not helping preserve family businesses.

And, for those of you Tea Partiers out there who who claim to care about the “founding principles” our nation was built upon, you should know that our founding fathers supported the idea of an inheritance tax. In a letter written in 1783 by Benjamin Franklin to Robert Morris, the Superintendent of Finance (Treasury Secretary) under President George Washington, Franklin calls resistance to taxes “highly blameable,” and urges the passage of laws that would compel payment. Franklin then goes on to state in this letter, “All Property except (that) absolutely necessary for Subsistence, seems to me to be the Creature of public Convention. Hence the Public has the Right of Regulating Descents (inheritance) and all other Conveyances of Property, and even of limiting the Quantity and Uses of it.”

Yes, contrary to what you may have been told by the likes of Rush Limbaugh, America wasn’t built by people who fled England because they hated taxes, but by people who wanted desperately to create a government of their own, which didn’t just exist to serve the rich and powerful. Our founding fathers hated the idea of aristocracy, and I suspect, where they here with us today, they’d be rallying to the side of Bernie Sanders.

Oh, I should also add that not all wealthy Americans are blind to the risk that comes with severe wealth inequality. Bill Gates Sr., Warren Buffet and a few other billionaires have come out over the past several years in defense of taxes. They know that stability is important, and, more importantly, they know that they couldn’t have made their fortunes if not for the infrastructure investments made by their predecessors. They know that their fortunes were made thanks to the contributions of others, and they know that true patriots pay their taxes.

riot2

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 19 Comments

Connect

BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative Sperm and Egg