Trump asks the President of Ukraine to make nice with Russia, the country that attacked it and stole its land

I want to write about everything that’s happened today, as writing about things here helps me to process things, but, before I dive in, I wanted to share this piece of video with you. It was taken earlier today in New York City, at the United Nations building, where Donald Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky had made themselves available to talk with the press. Donald Trump, after saying, “I owned something called the Miss Universe pageant years ago… we had a winner from Ukraine… it’s a country with tremendous potential,” and then going on to share a few conspiracy theories, suggested that Zelensky get together with Putin and “solve (their) problem.”

The “problem”, of course, is that Putin’s military, in violation of international law, invaded the sovereign country of Ukraine, took possession of the Crimean peninsula, and left over 10,000 people dead in the process.

Zelensky’s pained facial expression, after hearing Trump’s suggestion that he and Putin just get together and work our their differences, speaks volumes.

This, of course, won’t get a lot of news today, given everything else that’s going on relative to Trump’s impeachment, but it deserves to be talked about. The fact that we have a President who, despite having been in the job for almost three years, is still so completely ignorant of even the most basic elements of foreign policy, is an absolute embarrassment. And, that, I should add, is the most generous interpretation of events. A more likely explanation, of course, is that he’s so completely beholden to Vladimir Putin, that he knowingly makes statements like this, not because he’s a complete and total fool, but because he knows that doing so will keep him in the good graces of a dictator who holds power over him. Either way, we’re fucked.

[It’s worth noting that Trump has never held Putin responsible for the annexation of Crimea, instead choosing to blame everything on Obama. It wasn’t an aggressive Putin that stole Crimea, Trump suggested recently, but a weak Obama who had it “taken away” from him.]

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Citing a “betrayal of our national security”, Nancy Pelosi goes all-in on impeachment

Things appear to be taking a decisive turn in Washington. With evidence mounting that Donald Trump had attempted to coerce the President of Ukraine into assisting with the swiftboating of Joe Biden, and news breaking that the intelligence community whistleblower who first brought the charges to the attention of the IGIC had reached out to request a meeting with members of the House Intelligence Committee, things have really begun to unfold rapidly. By the end of the day, not only had another 62 Democrats in the House of Representatives announced their support for a formal impeachment inquiry, but every member of the Senate — Democrat and Republican alike — had voted to pass a resolution calling for the whistleblower complaint to be transmitted to the House and Senate Intelligence Committees. And, not just that, but Republican Senator Richard Burr of North Carolina joined with Democratic Senator Mark Warner of Virginia to formally request that the whistleblower appear before the Senate Intel Committee, letting it be known that they intend to pursue the inquiry in a bipartisan fashion, which is something that we haven’t seen a lot of in the Trump era… Could this mean that we might see some Republicans joining Mitt Romney, who, a few days ago, publicly said that he found the allegations against Trump “troubling in the extreme“? I’m not going to get my hopes up, but it certainly feels like Trump, for the first time in a long while, might be feeling his Republican support slipping. I guess time will tell.

Oh, and then there’s the really big news of the day… Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, as you can see in this video, finally got comfortable with saying the “I” word publicly, announcing to the world that the House of Representatives had officially launched an impeachment inquiry into the President of the United States, referring to his most recent actions as a “betrayal of our national security”. [Apparently it’s a bad thing to block Congressionally-approved aid to a foreign country — aid which had been allocated in the interest of our national security — in order to advance one’s own political objectives. Who would have thought?]

[Over 200 Democrats in Congress now support this impeachment inquiry into President Trump. This includes every Democratic Representative from the state of Michigan.]

Donald Trump, the perpetual victim, has responded by tweeting “PRESIDENTIAL HARASSMENT!” in all caps. He also promised to release what he referred to as a “transcript” of a call he’d had with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Oleksandrovych Zelensky, which, given this administration’s track record when it comes to telling the truth, I expect will be incomplete at best.

Here are just a few things to keep in mind tomorrow, assuming Trump stays true to his word and releases something. First, according to the whistleblower’s complaint, it would appear as though there were several instances, and not just a single call, that prompted the complaint that the IGIC found to be “credible” and “urgent,” so the transcript of a single call likely won’t tell us much. Second, as other’s have pointed out, Nixon also offered written transcripts when it was discovered that he’d surreptitiously been taking his conversations in the Oval Office, but, as we’d later come to discover, those transcripts didn’t reflect what was actually said in context, so we should acknowledge that there’s precedent for deceit when it comes to such things. Third, the administration is legally obligated to release the whistleblower’s complaint to Congress, and we shouldn’t accept a transcript in it’s place. And, fourth, the transcript, assuming it’s legitimate, does not need to demonstrate that Trump threatened to withhold foreign aid until such time that the Ukraine President agreed to investigate Biden. It is an impeachable act for the President to ask a world leader to open an investigation into an political opponent, regardless of whether or not there’s a quid pro quo involved. [By the way, if Trump really thought a crime was committed, he would have taken this to the FBI to investigate instead of the Ukrainians.]

So, why is Trump offering a transcript? Well, my guess, having lived through “the Barr memo“, is that he wants to establish a false narrative before the details of the whistleblower’s complaint are made public. So, whatever it says, I’d take it with a grain of salt, and wait for few days before announcing that this whole thing amounted to nothing… If that was really the case, Trump’s appointed IGIC, Michael Atkinson, wouldn’t have determined the whistleblower complaint to be both “credible” and “urgent”, and Trump’s acting DNI, Joseph Maguire, would have done his duty, followed the law, and taken the complaint to the members of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees. But he didn’t do that. Instead, he took the complaint to William Barr, who continues to hide it from view. So, yes, I think it’s safe to assume there’s more to it than just a simple, innocuous call between Trump and Zelensky.

One last thing. I really like this idea of Dan Pfeiffer’s to draft either Sally Yates or Preet Bharara to be the point person on this as we move forward. We need someone who can make the case 24/7, reminding the American people why it’s absolutely necessary for us to prosecute the President and defend the rule of law.

OK, I know I said that was the last thing I was going to say on the matter, but it’s probably also worth noting that the President’s private attorney, Rudy Giuliani, just said publicly that he only initiated conversation with the Ukrainians on the subject of Joe Biden after being instructed to do so by the State Department, meaning that this whole initiative was being directed by the federal government. [Who’s going to be called to testify first, Mike Pompeo or Rudy Giuliani?]

Oh, and while we’re talking about Giuliani quotes, check out this one from this past May’s New York Times, in which he does a pretty good job of articulating the crime for federal prosecutors. [God, I can’t wait for him to testify.]

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 103 Comments

The time has come to call Pelosi’s office and demand impeachment

I know this makes three posts in a row, which is unprecedented for me, but I’m not ready to move on from Trump’s admission yesterday that he sought to coerce the President of Ukraine into lending credibility to a roundly debunked right wing conspiracy theory involving former Vice President Joe Biden. This, assuming we can verify it, would be the most significant crime committed by an American president in our nation’s history.

While we’ve yet to read the whistleblower’s complaint the initially brought this crime to light, as Trump’s Director of National Intelligence and Attorney General are still refusing to hand it over to Congress (in violation of federal law), we have every reason to believe, given the evidence that’s surfaced thus far, that the President of the United States held up $341 million in foreign aid that Congress had allocated to be sent to Ukraine, until such time that the country’s new President, Volodymyr Zelensky, agreed to provide kompromat that could be used against Joe Biden during our 2020 presidential election. These are funds which, it should be noted, Congress allocated to Ukraine with the belief that doing so was in our nation’s best interest. So, Donald Trump, assuming all of this is true, not only abused the power of his office in hopes of finding dirt (either real of manufactured) against a political rival here in America, but, in doing so, prioritized his own reelection over our national security interests. And this was apparently a big enough deal that a national security officer with knowledge of the call filed a whistleblower complaint with the Intelligence Community’s Inspector General, who then, in turn, found said complaint to be both “credible” and “urgent”. [It’s been reported that Trump, on the call in question, pressured Zelensky eight times to deliver dirt on Vice President Biden and his son, Hunter.] And, it should be noted that Michael Atkinson, the Intelligence Community’s Inspector General who found the complaint to be both credible and urgent, is himself a Trump appointee with a reputation for being a highly cautious “straight shooter”. So, regardless of what you might hear, this isn’t a “deep state” takedown of the President. This is one of Trump’s own people saying that his behavior on this particular call was troubling enough to be taken to Congress. Trump’s DNI, however, had other plans. Instead of taking the complaint immediately to Congress, as is mandated by law, he took the whistleblower’s complaint to William Barr at the Department of Justice, who, as I write this, is still refusing to hand it over to our elected representatives on the House and Senate Intelligence Committees.

And, with that, I wanted to share an excerpt from a letter written by seven freshman Democrats in Congress that was just posted by the Washington Post. [One of the seven is Elissa Slotkin of Michigan.]

Our lives have been defined by national service. We are not career politicians. We are veterans of the military and of the nation’s defense and intelligence agencies. Our service is rooted in the defense of our country on the front lines of national security.

We have devoted our lives to the service and security of our country, and throughout our careers, we have sworn oaths to defend the Constitution of the United States many times over. Now, we join as a unified group to uphold that oath as we enter uncharted waters and face unprecedented allegations against President Trump.

The president of the United States may have used his position to pressure a foreign country into investigating a political opponent, and he sought to use U.S. taxpayer dollars as leverage to do it. He allegedly sought to use the very security assistance dollars appropriated by Congress to create stability in the world, to help root out corruption and to protect our national security interests, for his own personal gain. These allegations are stunning, both in the national security threat they pose and the potential corruption they represent. We also know that on Sept. 9, the inspector general for the intelligence community notified Congress of a “credible” and “urgent” whistleblower complaint related to national security and potentially involving these allegations. Despite federal law requiring the disclosure of this complaint to Congress, the administration has blocked its release to Congress.

This flagrant disregard for the law cannot stand. To uphold and defend our Constitution, Congress must determine whether the president was indeed willing to use his power and withhold security assistance funds to persuade a foreign country to assist him in an upcoming election.

If these allegations are true, we believe these actions represent an impeachable offense. We do not arrive at this conclusion lightly, and we call on our colleagues in Congress to consider the use of all congressional authorities available to us, including the power of “inherent contempt” and impeachment hearings, to address these new allegations, find the truth and protect our national security….

Things are definitely beginning to shift. You can feel it.

We knew that Donald Trump was the kind of man who would collude with foreign powers to attain and maintain power. And, now, it looks as though we may finally have the “smoking gun” evidence that we’ve been looking for, documentation that he withheld foreign aid dollars to shake down a fellow world leader to essentially lie for him. The question is, is it enough to finally move Pelosi on the subject of impeachment. My guess is that it is, and I think that’s what we’ll hear tomorrow afternoon, after her scheduled meeting with the six Democratic committee chairs who are presently investigating the various criminal acts of the Trump administration.

But, just to be sure Pelosi does the right thing here, it certainly wouldn’t hurt to contact her office and urge her to treat this most recent affront to the rule of law like the deadly serious threat that it is. While Donald Trump has certainly engaged in a litany of likely illegal acts over the two years, this time there can be no question. And either we stand up to stop him, or we allow him to destroy what’s left of our once-great democracy. If this isn’t impeachable, nothing is. And we have no choice left but to fight with everything that we have. We cannot just wait and hope that he leaves the White House willingly in 2020.

update: Well, it’s looking like Pelosi is coming around. The Washington Post just issued a piece titled, “Pelosi quietly sounding out House Democrats about whether to impeach Trump, officials say.” Here’s an excerpt.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi has been quietly sounding out top allies and lawmakers about whether the time has come to impeach President Trump, a major development as several moderate House Democrats resistant to impeachment suddenly endorsed the extraordinary step of trying to oust the president.

Pelosi, according to multiple senior House Democrats and congressional aides, has been gauging the mood of her caucus about whether they believe allegations that Trump pressured a Ukrainian leader to investigate a political foe is a tipping point. She was making calls as late as Monday night, and many leadership aides who once thought Trump’s impeachment was unlikely now say they think it’s almost inevitable.

update: Well, this most recent affront to the rule of law was apparently enough to get my Representative, Debbie Dingell, to do the right thing and support impeachment.

update: One more thing. It looks like the House Intelligence Committee might want to subpoena Mick Mulvaney.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 114 Comments

Fuck the Emmys. We’re in crisis.

We somehow allowed the Russia investigation to be framed in such a way that about 50% of Americans, even when confronted by evidence of Donald Trump’s multiple instances of obstruction of justice, still seemed to think that he should not be impeached. The Republicans, to their credit, had successfully set the ground rules at the beginning, telling the American people that, unless Mueller could prove collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians, it would be a victory for the President. This, of course, wasn’t true, as the obstruction of justice itself would have been an impeachable offense, but after Trump’s Attorney General issued his letter stating “no collusion“, and Donald Trump followed up with his “totally exonerated” tweet, it became incredibly difficult for Democrats to make the case. By the time the Mueller report was finally made public by the Attorney General, the damage had already been done. And it didn’t matter that Mueller went to Capitol Hill to say that his report had not exonerated Trump, or that any number of legal scholars had weighed in to say that Trump’s actions, as outlined in the Mueller Report, we’re, in fact, impeachable… The Democrats had allowed the investigation to be framed in the public consciousness around collusion, and, when Mueller didn’t turn up actual audio of Putin and Trump agreeing to a quid pro quo involving a tower in Moscow and a military-grade disinformation campaign directed at Hillary Clinton in exchange for a rollback of sanctions and the dismantling of NATO, the whole thing was pretty much over.

And the Republicans in Congress have been hiding these past several months behind this “no collusion” fig leaf, which has allowed them to keep supporting Donald Trump. It would have been different, they told us, if Trump, instead of standing on stage during the 2016 campaign, and publicly requesting that the Russians hack Hillary Clinton’s emails, had asked Vladimir Putin directly, but, as there was no evidence that he had, they felt comfortable in continuing their support. But, rest assured, if there had been hard evidence that Trump had colluded… if there there was evidence that he’d actually asked a foreign leader to help take down a political rival… well, then it would have been a completely different matter altogether.

Well, here we are.

It would appear as though this is exactly what’s now happened. According to multiple sources, it looks as though Donald Trump recently reached out to Ukraine President Volodymyr Oleksandrovych Zelensky, demanding that he open an investigation into Joe Biden, the man he’s expecting to face in the 2020 general election, or forego millions of dollars in foreign aid that had been appropriated by Congress. Here, with the background, is a clip from The Atlantic.

…The president of the United States reportedly sought the help of a foreign government against an American citizen who might challenge him for his office. This is the single most important revelation in a scoop by The Wall Street Journal, and if it is true, then President Donald Trump should be impeached and removed from office immediately.

Until now, there was room for reasonable disagreement over impeachment as both a matter of politics and a matter of tactics. The Mueller report revealed despicably unpatriotic behavior by Trump and his minions, but it did not trigger a political judgment with a majority of Americans that it warranted impeachment. The Democrats, for their part, remained unwilling to risk their new majority in Congress on a move destined to fail in a Republican-controlled Senate.

Now, however, we face an entirely new situation. In a call to the new president of Ukraine, Trump reportedly attempted to pressure the leader of a sovereign state into conducting an investigation—a witch hunt, one might call it—of a U.S. citizen, former Vice President Joe Biden, and his son Hunter Biden.

As the Ukrainian Interior Ministry official Anton Gerashchenko told the Daily Beast when asked about the president’s apparent requests, “Clearly, Trump is now looking for kompromat to discredit his opponent Biden, to take revenge for his friend Paul Manafort, who is serving seven years in prison.”

If this in itself is not impeachable, then the concept has no meaning. Trump’s grubby commandeering of the presidency’s fearsome and nearly uncheckable powers in foreign policy for his own ends is a gross abuse of power and an affront both to our constitutional order and to the integrity of our elections.

The story may even be worse than we know. If Trump tried to use military aid to Ukraine as leverage, as reporters are now investigating, then he held Ukrainian and American security hostage to his political vendettas. It means nothing to say that no such deal was reached; the important point is that Trump abused his position in the Oval Office…

I don’t know how such things are archived — whether we just have a transcript, or an actual recording of the call between Trump and Zelensky — but it would appear that we now have the “smoking gun” that everyone said we needed in the earlier case with Russia. We have, it would seem, rock solid evidence of collusion. Sadly, though, the only Republican in Congress to speak out thus far is Mitt Romney, who just shared the following.

And, for what it’s worth, even the President is pretty much admitting it now. He started out last week adamantly denying the story, essentially saying that he wouldn’t be so stupid as to say something like this on a call when he knew that U.S intelligence officers were listening, and reiterating that it was “a perfectly fine and routine conversation” and that “nothing was said that was in any way wrong”. Then, yesterday, when someone likely confirmed for him that a transcript or recording existed, his tone changed, and he began sharing quotes about how “an American spy in one of our intelligence agencies (that) may have been spying on our own president”. [I love it when he plays the “I’m the real victim here” card.] And, today, he pretty much just came right out and admitted that he’d talked with Zelensky about Biden.

[Trump also said yesterday that “Everybody’s read (the whistleblower’s complaint, and they all) laugh at it”. The truth, however, is that virtually no one has read the whistleblower’s complaint, as Trump’s DNI and Attorney General are blocking it from Congress, as we discussed on Friday.]

Two quick things about the underlying allegations against Biden. First, Biden said today that he’s “never spoken to (his) son about his overseas business dealings”. And, second, most reliable fact-checks seem to indicate that Biden didn’t do anything wrong. This doesn’t mean, of course, that his son may not have traded on his father’s name to advance his own career, etc. It just doesn’t appear as though, at least in this instance, that Biden took any action to help advance his son’s business interests in Ukraine, as Trump has suggesting. [This has already been looked into a lot.]

I could go on, but I’ll leave you with this from Elizabeth Warren.

She’s absolutely right… I respect Pelosi, and I understand the position that she’s in, not wanting to go forward with impeachment proceedings when she knows that half the country doesn’t agree, and knowing that, even if the House votes to Impeach, Senate Republicans, who are in control of that chamber, likely wouldn’t even call a vote. She doesn’t want a ‘show’ vote, especially if it means harming the members of her delegation who hale from red states. But I think the time for considering such political calculus is well past us now. And Elizabeth Warren is exactly right when she says, “By failing to act (on impeachment earlier) Congress is complicit in Trump’s latest attempt to solicit foreign interference to aid him in US elections“. This is 100% true. And I think I speak for a lot of Democrats who invested heavily during the 2018 campaign when I say that this isn’t what we fought so hard for. This isn’t the kind of action that we had in mind when we fought for a Democratic majority in the House, and it’s not the kind of thing that’ll motivate us to fight again in 2020. We voted for Democrats with the understanding that the’d do their constitutionaly-mandated duty, and remove the criminally-unfit Donald Trump from office, not sit back and wait for a chance to take back the presidency in 2020. Every day we allow him to stay in office, he tests the system more (like a velociraptor testing the fences at Jurassic Park). Every day that we wait, he becomes more emboldened and brazen in his criminality. The longer we put it off, the more sane members of his administration, and of the Republican Congress, are forced out. And every moment we let pass, we become more desensitized to it all. Now is the time for action. We cannot allow this to continue. We need to articulate the case for impeachment for the American people.

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 52 Comments

Trump’s likely criminal “promise” to Ukrainian President Zelensky and the DOJ’s campaign to keep it from Congress

A senior intelligence officer apparently heard something so troubling in a call between Donald Trump and a foreign leader that he or she sought out legal counsel with experience in whistle-blower cases, and, then, on August 12, through said attorney, reported it to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IGIC), Michael K. Atkinson. Atkinson, finding the information contained in the report to be both “credible” and “urgent”, then, as required by law, forwarded the information to Acting Director of National Intelligence (DNI), Joseph Maguire. [“Urgent,” says House Intelligence Committee member Jackie Speier, “means it’s impacting our national security… at the highest level of concern.”] Maguire, as I understand it, then had seven days, according to federal law, in which to hand this “credible” and “urgent” information over to both the House and Senate Intelligence Committees, which he did not do. Instead, it would seem, he consulted with Bill Barr’s Department of Justice and determined that the information contained in the whistle-blower’s letter should be kept from Congress. This, as you can hear Congressman Adam Schiff stating here, is clearly a violation of the law.

While we don’t yet know the specifics of the whistle-blower’s letter, a few important facts have already come to the surface. We know, for instance, that the the whistle-blower’s concern stemmed from not one, but “multiple acts” on the part of Donald Trump, at least one of which involved a conversation between Donald Trump and a foreign leader in which something was “promised.” And, as of right now, it looks as though it all centers around the Ukraine. I should add at this point that Donald Trump denies that he said anything to a fellow world leader that might be construed as illegal. He says he’s too smart to say something like that when he knows that intelligence officers are listening.

Assuming this does involve conversations between Trump and recently elected Ukraine President Volodymyr Oleksandrovych Zelensky, one imagines it had to do with recent Republican attempts to manufacture dirt on Joe Biden, someone who Trump clearly fears facing in the 2020 general election… The following background, for those of you who might be unaware of what Trump and Guiliani have been doing in the Ukraine in service of their 2020 reelection campaign, comes by way of Just Security.

…The reporter’s questions to Pence struck at the heart of a controversy roiling U.S.-Ukraine relations since even before Zelenskyy’s election win in April. Starting at least late last year, President Donald Trump and his personal attorney and advisor, Rudy Giuliani, have agitated for Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Biden, the current frontrunner in the Democratic presidential race and the candidate they apparently think could be Trump’s biggest rival for a second term.

Trump and Giuliani allege, contrary to evidence, that Biden improperly pressured the Ukrainian government in 2016 to fire then-Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin in the midst of a corruption investigation of one of Ukraine’s biggest gas companies, Burisma Group. Biden’s youngest son, Hunter, was serving on the company’s board at the time.

But the prosecutor, in fact, was the target of pressure by Ukrainian anti-corruption advocates and a host of international supporters of Ukraine, who argued he should be fired for failing to pursue major cases of corruption. And it was the widely known and publicly espoused position of the U.S. government, across a half dozen agencies, that the prosecutor’s ouster was among crucial anti-corruption measures that the Ukrainian government needed to take to move forward economically and politically. As President Barack Obama’s point man on Ukraine, Biden dutifully relayed those messages at every opportunity.

Yet Trump and Giuliani have turned that real-life scenario on its head, falsely alleging that Biden sought to corruptly influence a Ukrainian prosecutor’s decisions in his son’s favor. The Trump camp’s steady volley of tweets, interviews and supportive articles by pro-Trump authors echoes the persistent Republican accusations against Hillary Clinton related to the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks on Benghazi, Libya, when she was Secretary of State…

So, given all of this, could it be that Donald Trump threatened to withhold U.S. aid, or arms, in until the Ukrainians agreed to deliver dirt (either real of manufactured) on Joe Biden? It certainly seems plausible, and Giuliani’s performance just now on CNN didn’t do very much to convince me otherwise. [He first adamantly denies that he asked the Ukrainians to look into Biden, and, just seconds later, says, “Of course I did.”]

I’m going to try not to get my hopes up, as we’ve seen other impeachable offenses come and go without much in the way of action on the part of Congress, but it does seem to me that things could be different this time, especially if there are recordings of Donald Trump offering a bribe to the leader of Ukraine in exchange for dirt on his political opponent. That, one thinks, would be difficult for Trump to worm his way out of.

update: Well, it looks like Giuliani just admitted it, tweeting out that Trump told Zelensky that he’d “better investigate” Biden.

update: Elizabeth Warren, as usual, is spot on.

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 30 Comments

Connect

BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative Slade