Some of what you’re about to read may very well be wrong. I don’t pretend to understand the ins and outs of our convoluted government funding mechanisms. I have, however, been trying to follow along, and I wanted to share what I think is going on. As always, if you have an issue with something that I’ve written, or have access to more timely, relevant information, please leave a comment.
Every year, by October 1, which is the start of the government’s fiscal year, Congress needs to have passed 12 different appropriations bills, and the President needs to have signed them. And, if that doesn’t happen, the government… or at least all the parts of the government that have been deemed non-essential… come grinding to a halt. Well, this past September, as you may recall, when Trump didn’t get the funding for his border wall, he refused to sign the appropriations bills that had been given to him by Congress. Instead of bringing our federal government to a standstill, though, Trump agreed to accept a proposal offered by Chuck Schuemer and Nancy Pelosi, which would temporarily fund the government through something called a continuing resolution, essentially funding everything for the short term, with he understanding that we’d go on to have this fight at some point down the line. Well, that first deadline came and went, as did a second, and a third, leaving us with an ultimate deadline of January 19, which is two days from now. [And many seem to think that another continuing resolution, extending the deadline even further, would not pass if it came to a vote.]
As I understand it, if a shutdown happens, the active military keeps working, the Post Office keeps delivering mail, and Robert Mueller and his team keep going to work. A lot of departments, however, implement rolling furloughs. According to CNN, the Office of Management and Budget reported that “at the peak of the 2013 government shutdown, about 850,000 employees were furloughed per day.” So it’s certainly not an insignificant thing, and millions of Americans would be impacted.
But, and here’s the good news, last week at about this time, a bipartisan group of Senators calling themselves the Gang of Six, were able to strike a bargain that both sides could live with, a bargain with would both increase border security and protect the 800,000 or so immigrants who came here as children and have been protected under DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) since the Obama administration. Sounds promising, right?
Well, Senators Lindsey Graham and Dick Durbin, who spearheaded this bipartisan agreement, took it to the White House to seek approval from the President late last week. And, guess what? It was at this meeting that the President, who was apparently joined by his racist advisor Stephen “Dead Eyes” Miller, went off on his tirade about how he’d rather have more (white) immigrants from nations like Norway, than (black) immigrants from “shithole” nations like Haiti. [While it’s true that several Republican who were in the room that day claim not to have heard this exchange, both Graham and Durbin have confirmed it.] And, after the meeting, Trump called their proposed compromise, which, again, would have passed both the House and Senate, a “big step backwards.”
As far right Texas Senator John Cornyn said today, the compromise funding bill won’t get a vote in either chamber for one reason, and one reason only… because Trump won’t sign it. [Simply put, the compromise bill is not racist enough for his tastes, as he wants to restrict immigration from “shithole” nations, and build his fucking wall.]
So, that’s we are today. We have a bill that would pass, protecting approximately 800,000 young immigrants who have grown up in the U.S., but, because of Trump, our government is about to be shut down. So, when you hear Trump say that the shutdown is happening because of the Democrats, don’t believe him. He was offered a compromise, and he refused because that compromise does not conform to whatever hodgepodge of racist ideologies informs his decision making.
It’s worth noting here that extending a path to citizenship for those currently signed up under DACA, also known as Dreamers, is widely popular among voters of both parties. In fact, accordion to some polls, as many as two-thirds of Trump supporters are in favor of passing DACA.
Some Republicans, of course, are saying that Congress can address DACA later, and no harm will come to these young people if we wait a few more months. This, however, isn’t true. Some DACA recipients are already losing their protections and their ability to secure work permits… The following comes from a Talking Points Memo article published yesterday titled “DHS Head Wasn’t Aware Thousands Have Already Lost DACA Status.”
The secretary of the Department of Homeland Security revealed during an oversight hearing Tuesday that she didn’t know that thousands of DACA recipients had already lost their status as a result of President Donald Trump ending the program on Sept. 5.
“No one has lost their status,” DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen said, incorrectly. “No one will lose their status until March 5 or later.”
Contrary to frequent and incorrect reporting that DACA will end on March 5, young people whose work authorizations expired before then actually began losing DACA status after Oct. 5 of last year, the Trump administration’s new deadline to reapply to renew one’s authorization. Many more DACA recipients were ineligible to renew their DACA applications in the first place, because their work permits expired after March 5.
A federal judge halted the end of DACA on Jan. 9, but the move left thousands of DACA recipients in limbo.
The government did very little to notify DACA recipients of the Oct. 5 deadline, as Vox reported, and even some DACA recipients who thought they’d applied for renewal in time found that their applications had been delayed in the mail, according to the New York Times.
Estimates vary as to how many DACA recipients have so far been left out in the cold: The Hill reported on Jan. 10 that 15,000 people had lost their status since Sept. 5, citing unnamed immigration activists. Sen. Dianne Feinstein used the same number last week. According to the Center for American Progress’ running estimate, 16,166 have lost DACA status between Sept. 5 and Tuesday…
Meanwhile, across town, members of the Trump administration have already started walking back the President’s campaign promise about building a wall along the entire southern border, and having Mexico pay for it. First it was Kellyanne Conway, a week or so ago, saying that Trump had just “discovered” that an actual physical wall wouldn’t be necessary along the entire border, and today we’re hearing from White House Chief of Staff John Kelly that only part of Trump’s wall will be a big concrete barrier. According to attendees at the Kelly meeting, he also said that Mexico absolutely will not pay for the wall, as Trump had promised during the campaign, and that some of Trump’s immigration promises were “uninformed.” It was, of course, obvious to anyone paying attention that Trump was lying when he said that he’d build a ‘big, beautiful wall’ to keep the Mexican rapists and drug dealers out, and that we wouldn’t have to pay a dime for it. But I suppose it’s good that we’re finally coming to a point where that’s becoming obvious to his supporters. For what it’s worth, though, he still wants to give them a wall that they can be happy about. And that’s one of the things holding up the government funding deal.
Trump still has a number in his mind.. a certain number of miles that his great legacy wall needs to be. According to Dick Durbin, Trump wants $20 billion to build 722 miles of wall along the border, and, if he doesn’t get it, he won’t sign the funding resolution, throwing the government into shutdown.
And, to further complicate things, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, having apparently relocated his spine, informed reporters today that he is “not going to vote for” the GOP’s current government funding strategy, which, it would appear, includes the ridiculous wall, but not DACA. He went on to say that Trump “is pretty naive,” if he thinks that he can get this bill signed without DACA being a part of it.
So, that’s where we are right now. The Senate gave Trump a bipartisan bill, but he says he won’t sign it unless he gets 722 miles of useless wall that people can just throw drugs over, or tunnel underneath. [The entire border is approximately 1,900 miles long.] And, today, instead of working on the issue, and attempting to divert a government shutdown, Trump spent his time organizing his fake news awards… which, by the way, I still haven’t been able to see, as the RNC website, where they were to be announced, crashed.
This is what America has become.
Meanwhile, here at home, an immigrant who, at the age of 40, is too old to participate in DACA, was just deported. Jorge Garcia, who came to the United States at 10 years old with an undocumented relative, has now called this country his home for 30 years. He is married to a US citizen. He has two teenage sons here. He works as a landscaper. He pays his taxes. And he’s never been in any trouble with the law. In spite of all this, though, he was deported yesterday… Here’s video of Garcia crying at Detroit Metro airport as he says goodbye to his family.
EMOTIONAL SCENE: A tearful Detroit father says goodbye to his wife and children before being deported to Mexico after living in the U.S. for nearly 30 years. Jorge Garcia came to America with an undocumented relative at the age of 10. He is too old to fall under DACA protection. pic.twitter.com/gI2dMWwlJ8
— ABC World News Now (@abcWNN) January 16, 2018
I’m not sure how this makes America stronger. Sure, I suppose, there might be one more landscaping job, but at what cost? We now have two American kids growing up without a father in their lives. And we’ve lost a hardworking taxpayer, a Detroiter who, based on what I’ve read, was an asset to his community… Is this what you voted for when you voted for Trump? Is this what you, as a so-called “family values” voter, signed up for? When Trump talked about getting rid of gang members, did you know he really meant people like Jorge Garcia, who have been living here without incident for 30 years? I understand the desire to defend our borders, and I too want to have more clear immigration rules. But, with that said, I find it difficult to imagine that anyone could look at the case of Jorge Garcia, or that of any of the Dreamers, and say it’s in our nation’s best interest, after educating them here, to make them leave. These people are assets, and we should be doing everything in our power to keep them, not to push them away.
OK, one last thing… I’d like to ask you a favor. If you can set aside a few minutes today, can you please call your representatives in Congress and asked that they not vote in favor of any funding bill that does not include both DACA and CHIP, the health insurance program that covers 9 million American children in poverty? On both counts, they’re fights worth having.