It’s been exactly a year since our Supreme Court, in a controversial 5-4 decision, ruled that corporate spending on political campaigns needed to be protected as though it were the free speech of an American citizen. The decision in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case has, among other things, made it unconstitutional to place any limits the amount of money spent by corporations and anonymous groups to influence political races. The resulting change in campaign spending was enormous, and the folks at the watchdog group Public Citizen have just issued a report detailing the shift. Following are just a few of their findings:

• Spending by outside groups jumped to $294.2 million in the 2010 election cycle from just $68.9 million in the 2006 cycle. The uncharacteristically high spending in 2010 presages blockbuster spending in the upcoming 2012 elections;

• Nearly half of the money spent ($138.5 million, or 47.1 percent) came from only 10 groups;

• Groups that did not provide any information about their sources of money collectively spent $135.6 million – 46.1 percent of the total spent by outside groups during the election cycle;

• Two “Crossroads” groups formed by Republican strategist Karl Rove combined to spend $38.2 million, more than any single group. Next was the U.S. Chamber of Commerce at $31.2 million; and

• Of 75 congressional contests in which partisan power changed hands, spending by outside groups favored the winning candidate in 60 contests.

So, have you got that? Corporations spent hundreds of millions of dollars more on attack ads this past electoral cycle, and, in 60 of 75 congressional races, the winner was the candidate with the most corporate money.

One would think the American people would like to know about this, but apparently all the investigative power of our corporate media is being channeled to England, in an attempt to determine where Prince William’s fiance is getting her wedding dress from.