Local Transition Town visioning session scheduled for February 1

I’ve written quite a bit here over the last few years on the Transition Town movement. For those not familiar with the initiative, it involves the preparation and certification of towns attempting to address the duel challenges of climate change and peak oil proactively. It basically involves analyzing local food production, energy use, etc, and then setting about a deliberate course of patching holes and fixing what needs to be fixed before we enter the much scaled down period in human history that’s on the horizon. Well, I’ happy to report that, after a few fits and starts, it looks as though the local Transition Town movement is getting some traction. And, there’s a open meeting here in Ypsi on Monday, February 1 for those who are interested. The meeting will be held at Bombadill’s (217 West Michigan Avenue), and it’s scheduled to begin at 7:00 PM.

Among the things being discussed in this visioning session, according to organizer Lisa Bashert, are affordable alternative energy, native landscaping, energy and water reduction, bee keeping, local eating, urban chickens, gardening, composting, local retail, the possibility of starting a Transition book club (i.e. The Transition Handbook: From Oil Dependency to Local Resilience, Depletion and Abundance: Life on the New Home Front, etc.) and establishing a series of local skills training classes (darning, sewing, canning and preserving, salves, carpentry, fixing & re-use, gardening).

Posted in Agriculture, Alternative Energy, Ann Arbor, energy, Food, Sustainability, Ypsilanti | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Sprouting Populist balls, and going after Wall Street

One good thing to come out of Republican Scott Brown’s election to the Senate a few days ago, is that it seems to have lit a fire under our President. In an abrupt about-face, Obama came out late last week, saying that our unrepentant financial industry had to be reigned in. Distancing himself from Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Obama publicly embraced the tough restraints which had been advocated by former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker.

Consensus seems to be that Obama didn’t have much of a choice. The tides were turning against him, and he needed to recast himself as a defender of the regular Americans… you know, that guy we elected, who promised to fight the moneyed interests and stand up for regular Americans. So, I guess I could be cynical, and pissed that it took a Tea Party Republican winning Teddy Kennedy’s Senate seat to get Obama motivated, but I’m just happy that it’s happened. And it seems that others, like Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich and Elizabeth Warren, the Chair of the Congressional panel charged with overseeing the bank bailout, are too. Here’s a clip from an article by Reich, followed by a video of Warren, who has, until recently been pushing the idea of a Consumer Financial Protection Agency without much support from above.

President Obama is now, finally, getting tough on Wall Street. Today he’s giving his support to two measures critically important for making sure the Street doesn’t relapse into another financial crisis: (1) separating the functions of investment banking from commercial banking (basically, resurrecting the Depression-era Glass-Steagall Act) so investment banks can’t gamble with insured commercial deposits, and (2) giving regulatory authorities power to limit the size of big banks so they don’t become “too big to fail,” as antitrust laws do with every other capitalist entity. A few days ago the White House demanded that the biggest banks repay the $120 billion or so still owed the government from the bailout.

All good, all correct, all important. The president deserves at least two cheers. Why not three? It took him over a year to finally get here. The House has already completed its work on financial reform and may be reluctant to start over. The Senate is in disarray since Chris Dodd, chair of the Banking Committee, announced recently he wouldn’t seek reelection, and is poised to compromise with Wall Street on a number of big issues. Neither chamber has shown any interest whatsoever in resurrecting Glass-Steagall or limiting the size and risk of big banks. In other words, much of the game is over….

But suddenly the winds are blowing in a different direction over the Potomac. The 2010 midterms are getting closer, and the Democrats are scared. Their polls are plummeting. The upsurge in mad-as-hell populism requires that Democrats become indignant on behalf of Americans, and indignation is meaningless without a target. They can’t target big government because Republicans do that one better, especially when they’re out of power. So what’s the alternative? Wall Street…

And here’s that video of Elizabeth Warren:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

And here’s, for those of you who don’t do video, is a clip from the transcript:

“I feel better than I’ve felt in a long time. Because what I’ve heard the president saying on the Consumer Financial Protection Agency is, ‘It’s not going down. I’m here, I’m not giving up on it. There is not going to be a compromise to cave in on it.’ I heard him say that we’re going to tax those large financial institutions, and we’re going to make them pay back all of the money under TARP. And then today, I heard him say we’re gonna break apart too-big-to-fail. And we’re going to have an answer, so that every financial institution, if it makes big enough mistakes, if it takes big enough risks and loses, every one of them, can in the end, die…. And what I hear in that is that… the financial institutions have pushed him hard… [Obama] is pushing right back.”

[Also, be sure to check out Frank Rich’s column in today’s New York Times.]

Posted in Corporate Crime, Economics, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Corporations given the green light to buy elections

Last night, I posted a video here by Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig about the importance of getting corporate money out of politics. At the time, I agreed with the professor that corporations had way too much influence over American politics. Since I posted it, however, things have gotten considerably worse. This morning, the U.S. Supreme Court, led by Bush appointee John Roberts, voted 5-4 to allow corporations even greater influence in politics. (You can read the actual opinion of the court here.) Here, by way of background, is a clip from the New York Times:

Overruling two important precedents about the First Amendment rights of corporations, a bitterly divided Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that the government may not ban political spending by corporations in candidate elections.

The 5-to-4 decision was a vindication, the majority said, of the First Amendment’s most basic free speech principle — that the government has no business regulating political speech. The dissenters said that allowing corporate money to flood the political marketplace would corrupt democracy…

The ruling, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, No. 08-205, overruled two precedents: Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, a 1990 decision that upheld restrictions on corporate spending to support or oppose political candidates, and McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, a 2003 decision that upheld the part of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 that restricted campaign spending by corporations and unions….

So, as of right now, corporations will have the same level of control over U.S. elections that they, up till now, have exercised over other areas of American life.

Oh, speaking of which, did you see the headline today that top defense contractors spent $27 million lobbying for the Afghan surge? That’s right. They spent $27 million dollars making the case to our elected officials that a surge in Afghanistan, requiring their products, was necessary. (I don’t have the number handy, but I expect peace groups had considerably less to spend.) And, now, they’ll be have the same kind of influence over U.S. elections.

My favorite quote today was from someone on Reddit, who said, “Coming this November: attack ads by banks against Congressmen who advocate banking reform legislation — paid for by taxpayer bailout money. It’s kind of poetic, isn’t it?

And, as you might have guessed, Lawrence Lessig doesn’t seem too happy about this current turn of events. He’s advocating that people immediately get behind the Fair Elections Now Act, which would, if passed, cap personal donations to political campaigns at $100, and make public funding available for those who meet certain criteria.

And, the People for the American Way are taking it one step further. They’re suggesting that we don’t just legislate around the ruling, but amend the Constitution itself. Here’s a clip:

…There is no quick fix. The Roberts Court’s audacity must be met with bold action.

People For the American Way is launching a campaign to pass an amendment to the U.S. Constitution which would nullify the worst part of the Court’s decision by granting Congress the authority to limit corporate influence in elections. This is not something that we take lightly. But the very foundation of our democracy could depend on our ability to overturn this decision…

We support other legislative efforts in Congress to limit the impact of today’s anti-democratic decision – some of which are being talked about by our allies already. But this decision is such a drastic departure from sound democratic principles that we now stand on the precipice, and more is needed.

Congress must move quickly to protect our democratic system and the voice of the people by passing this amendment. From there, we will take our campaign to the states to get the amendment ratified by two thirds of the state legislatures. As the consequences of this decision sink in, more and more Americans will be justifiably outraged. We can make this national movement to amend the Constitution a success — with your help…

If you want to be involved, just click that last link and enter your email address.

And, here, in conclusion, are a few quotes that I found on the subject.

Senator Chuck Schumer: “The Supreme Court has just predicted the winners of the next November election. It won’t be Republicans. It won’t be Democrats. It will be Corporate America.”

Barack Obama: “With its ruling today, the Supreme Court has given a green light to a new stampede of special interest money in our politics. It is a major victory for big oil, Wall Street banks, health insurance companies and the other powerful interests that marshal their power every day in Washington to drown out the voices of everyday Americans… That’s why I am instructing my Administration to get to work immediately with Congress on this issue. We are going to talk with bipartisan Congressional leaders to develop a forceful response to this decision.”

And this, my friends, is the Bush legacy. This is what happens when criminally-uninformed voters put a far-right ideologue/puppet into the Oval Office. It’s not enough that we have to invest years, undoing all the shit he’s personally responsible for, but, then, on top of it, we have to suffer through the ridiculous decisions of his Supreme Court. And nothing is more ridiculous than this notion that corporations, in the eyes of the law, are people, entitled to the same rights as you and me.

Until a corporation can go to prison for breaking the law, in my opinion, it shouldn’t be given any of the privileges of personhood.

Posted in Corporate Crime, Economics, Free Speech, Observations, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 13 Comments

There weren’t many humans on the earth a million years ago

Tonight I’m fascinated by this article in the New York Times on what the human genome is teaching us about our evolution as a species. According to the article, now that we have two completely mapped human genomes, we’ve begun to make a number of significant observations based on the genetic variation between the two. For one, scientists at the University of Utah have been able to determine that 1.2 million years ago, the world contained a breeding population of just about 18,500 individuals. (The actual population may have been as high as 55,000 individuals.) Here’s a clip from the article:

…Comparable estimates for other primates then are 21,000 for chimpanzees and 25,000 for gorillas. In biological terms, it seems, humans were not a very successful species, and the strategy of investing in larger brains than those of their fellow apes had not yet produced any big payoff. Human population numbers did not reach high levels until after the advent of agriculture…

I love that the author makes it sound as though we made a conscious decision to invest in larger brains, and that, for hundreds of thousands of years, we got nothing for it. We weren’t any more successful, reproduction-wise, than chimps. But, then, someone had the bright idea to put seeds in the ground, and the rest is history. It’s funny how stuff works out.

And how weird is it to think that we’re all descended from a population of individuals smaller than that presently living in Ypsilanti. It’s amazing, isn’t it?

Posted in Agriculture, Other, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 28 Comments

Lawrence Lessig on how to bring about real political change

Harvard Professor and co-founder of Change Congress, Lawrence Lessig, decided to mark the occasion of Obama’s first year in office with a brief lecture on what went wrong, and why. If you have seven minutes, I’d recommend watching it.

And he’s absolutely right… until we deal with the underlying problem – that our members of Congress are, in our current system, more dependent on corporations than their constituents – we’ll never make real, significant change. We have to take money out of politics.

Posted in Observations, Politics | Tagged , , , , | 11 Comments

Connect

BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative Dustin Krcatovich