ICE raids across SE Michigan, and the launch of “Bad and Nasty” …on this weekend’s episode of the Saturday Six Pack

This weekend’s episode of the Saturday Six Pack, which I believe will be our third under the Trump administration, will be told in two parts.

First, we’ll be talking about recent raids in our community by U.S. Immigration Customs and Enforcement (ICE) officials, which have resulted in the arrest of
four undocumented immigrants in Ypsilanti
. We’ll be talking about the changing legal landscape in Washington, the impact this new enforcement regime is having on local families, the specifics of the individual cases, and the opportunities in front of us, should we choose to push back.

Joining us for this hour-long panel discussion, will be: U-M Law Professor Margo Schlanger, who served as Officer for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security under President Obama; Washtenaw County Sheriff Jerry Clayton, who will have just returned from D.C., where he’s been involved in a series of meetings and briefings with members of Congress and their staffers about the immigration issue in preparation for an upcoming Senate Homeland Security Committee meeting; civil rights attorney Angie Martell, who serves on the ACLU Washtenaw County Lawyers’ Committee; U-M School of Social Work postdoc William Lopez, who has ben studying the health outcomes of local Latina/o communities in periods of aggressive enforcement; and Manny Lagunes, a youth organizer for the Washtenaw Interfaith Coalition for Immigrant Rights (WICIR) and host of the AM 1700 radio program WICKIDZ Radio.

If you’d like to join the conversation, we should be starting right at 6:00 PM< and you 'll find out how to listen on line, and how to call into the studio, below. And, during our second segment, we'll be talking with internationally acclaimed performance artists Holly Hughes, about the role of the arts in the fight against Trump. Hughes, who was recently referred to as a “timeless agent for political dissent,” will be joining us primary to discuss Bad and Nasty [“Bad Hombres and Nasty Women”], the “loose knit coalition of artists, activists, media makers, theater folk, web geeks, designers, performers, writers, concerned citizens, and (others)” that she recently co-founded with NY/London-based artist Lois Weaver and media professional Mary Jo Watts.

While I hope to talk with Hughes extensively about Bad and Nasty, the international events they hosted on “Not My President’s Day,” and what they’ve got coming up, I suspect we’ll likely also go back to her roots in activist theater as a member of WOW Cafe (Women’s One World), her experience with controversy as one of the NEA Four, and what she thinks of Trump’s promise to slash the National Endowment for the Arts budget.

FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE NEVER TUNED IN TO THE SIX PACK BEFORE, HERE ARE THE DETAILS ON HOW TO LISTEN:

Unless you live inside the AM 1700 studio, chances are you won’t be able to pick the show up on your radio. As that’s the case, I’d recommend streaming the show online, which you can do either on the AM1700 website or by way of TuneIn.com.

And for those of you who aren’t yet familiar with the show, and need to get caught up, you can listen to the entire archive on iTunes.

And do call us if you have a chance. We love phone calls. So please copy down this number and slide it into your sock – 734.217.8624 – and call us this Saturday evening. The show is nothing without you.

One last thing… If you’d like to tell your friends and neighbors about the program, feel free to share the Facebook event listing.

And, here, thanks to AM 1700 senior graphic designer Kate de Fuccio, is this week’s poster, in case any of you want to print copies and leave them at one of your favorite highway rest areas.

Posted in Civil Liberties, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

With the news that Sessions lied under oath about his communications with Russia, one gets the sense that the net might be starting to tighten around Trump

I know this is old news, as the story first broke last night, but sometimes it helps me to write this stuff down… So, with that said, here’s what I think is going on. Please correct me if I get anything wrong.

Yesterday, the Washington Post reported that the new Attorney General of the United States, Jeff Sessions, the highest ranking law enforcement officer in the United States, had, during his sworn testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last month, not told the truth in response to questions about whether or not he’d had any interactions with representatives of the Russian government during the 2016 presidential campaign, when, according to U.S. intelligence agencies, the Kremlin was actively attempting to influence the outcome of the election.

Senator Al Franken, during Sessions’ confirmation hearing, asked him what he would do if he were to learn that a member of the Trump team had been in communication with the Russians during the campaign. Sessions, after acknowledging that he himself was a Trump “surrogate” during the campaign, said, “I did not have communications with the Russians.”

As a part of the confirmation process, Franken and the other Senators on the Judiciary Committee were also able to submit questions in writing to Sessions. Senator Patrick Leahy asked the following. “Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?” Sessions responded with a single word. “No.”

But now, thanks to the reporting of the Washington Post, and whatever breadcrumbs may have been left by the previous administration, in hopes that the facts would eventually get out, we know Sessions perjured himself in his responses to both Franken and Leahy.

We know that, despite his comments to the contrary, Sessions met with the Russian ambassador, Sergey Kislyak, a man thought widely to be one of Putin’s top spies and recruiter of spies, twice in the past year. [Kislyak is the same man that Trump’s National Security Advisor Michael Flynn had lied about talking with during the campaign.] According to the article in the Washington Post, Sessions and Kislyak met on at least two occasions — once during the Republican National Convention last July, when, as you might remember, the Trump campaign introduced Russia-friendly language into the Republican platform, and again in Sessions’ Senate office this past September, at the height of the Kremlin’s hacking campaign.

Sessions acknowledged both meetings in a statement issued late yesterday, but added that the they had nothing to do with the campaign. He said that he met with Kislyak in his capacity as a member of the Senate Armed Sercices Committee, not as a surrogate of Donald Trump. The Washington Post, however, contacted all 26 members of the Committee and asked if any of them had, like Sessions, met with Kislyak during 2016 on Committee business. Of the 20 that have respondedd thus far, none had.

So, last night, as you might imagine, people starting calling for his head. Richard Painter, the chief ethics officer under George W. Bush said, “Misleading the Senate in sworn testimony about one’s own contacst with the Russians is a good way to go to jail.” And House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said that Bill Clinton was impeached for “something so far less.”

Speaking of the impeachment of Bill Clinton, here’s something Sessions said back in 1998, during those hearings: “I have no doubt that perjury qualifies under the Constitution as a high crime,” he said. “It goes to the heart of the judicial system.”

Indeed.

While I didn’t see much evidence today of Republicans demanding that Sessions follow in Flynn’s footsteps and step down, a number of them did begin to speak out, suggesting that Sessions should probably recuse himself from the ongoing investigation into the role Russia played during the 2016 election. Trump, however, stayed supportive, saying that the Attorney General still had his “total” confidence. Furthermore, when asked by a reporter if Sessions should recuse himself from the Russia investigation, Trump said, “I don’t think so.” In spite of this, though, Sessions came out later this afternoon and said he would be recusing himself.

As for whether or not Sessions will be able to hold on to his job as our head law enforcement official, I’m not sure. Given the fact that the Republicans control every branch of government, I think it would be difficult for the Democrats to force him out. Then again, with every passing hour, more information surfaces. In the time I’ve been writing this, not only have I heard that evidence has surfaced that Jared Kushner and Michael Flynn met with Kislyak during the transition, but that Kislyak was actually in the audience at the Washington hotel where Trump delivered his first foreign policy speech of his campaign last April. [In the speech, Trump said great things about Russia.] Oh, and I’m listening to news right now that former Trump advisor Carter Page has refused to deny that he talked with Kislyak at the GOP convention last July.

So, just to recap, we now know that Kislyak, Putin’s main man in the U.S., was not only in the audience when Trump gave his first foreign policy speech praising Putin’s regime this past April, but we also know that he was at the Republican National Convention in July, when the Trump team demanded that pro-Russia language be inserted into the GOP platform. I think it’s safe to say that the pieces are beginning to fall into place.

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 18 Comments

Former Ypsi CIty Planner Richard Murphy weighs in with data on gentrification

Last night, prompted by the social media dustup over news that Ann Arbor’s Babo would be opening a location in Depot Town, I posted something here about the looming threat of gentrification in Ypsilanti. I’d encourage you, if you haven’t already, to read through the comments, as, for the most part, they’re pretty thoughtful. Here, though, for those of you who won’t take my advice and follow that link back to yesterday’s conversation, is my favorite comment from the thread. It was left by former Ypsilanti City Planner Richard Murphy.

Are we talking “gentrification” as in “the stuff I used to like closed, and stuff I don’t like opened”, or as in “my community has undergone a wide-scale transformation where people with more money and choices have actively displaced people with less money and fewer choices”?

If the former, meh. If we call any single business’ opening “gentrification” — most especially when they’re opening in a vacant space that used to house an IT company — it’s hard for that word to mean anything. To babo: welcome to town, and good luck. I admittedly don’t even know what a juice cleanse is, let alone why I would pay triple digits for it, but not every business in town has to (or should even try to) cater to me.

If it’s the latter meaning, widespread change that not only excludes but actively displaces community members, then yeah, that’s something we should address before it’s too late — and I’m glad people care enough about it to be watching for signs and symptoms of it.

As symptoms go, the housing market worries me more:

* Last year, according to board of realtors’ stats, home sale prices in Ypsi (school district) jumped 13.3% over the previous year’s, over twice as fast a climb as Ann Arbor or the county as a whole, and second only to Manchester’s 17%.

* A quick skim of this year’s property assessments from the city’s website shows even faster climbs in some neighborhoods — 10-20% in Normal Park, looking like 30% in the Historic East Side

* One datapoint on hearsay is poor data, but: I’m told a home in Normal Park recently got multiple offers for over $200k — and $50-60k over the zillow estimate or city’s assessor’s evaluation — in a single weekend on the strength of a facebook post? Certainly not a sign that the market is cooling

* I don’t have any comparable data on rental prices available, but would be interested in hearing them.

Like it or not, we’re part of a larger community that includes Ann Arbor, one of the fastest growing municipalities in the state, and we are going to see people looking at Ypsi as another option for places to live within that larger system. (Especially as our school system makes more positive strides.)

Short of outright intimidation, Ypsi doesn’t really have mechanisms for preventing people from moving here — and, as you say, we need people & investment to support public services and benefits within our community. (Fun fact: due to the arcana of Michigan’s tax system, those folks moving in, driving up home prices, and paying full Prop A “pop-up” taxes actually drive down the millage rate for everybody else — having some housing go up in value fast and turn over ownership can actually make it *more* affordable for other, longstanding homeowners.)

So I agree with you that “up” is a better direction than “down” for a community — and that those are the choices. I also agree that “up” should include policies and collective actions that specifically seek to include everyone in the benefit of up. Enough pontificating from me for now, though.

So let’s talk policies and collective actions. What are our options? What protections are already in place? What’s worked elsewhere? And what do we think might work given the unique circumstances we face here in Ypsi?

Also, for what it’s worth, I just heard from a friend of mine here in Ypsi that he’ll be leaving soon, as his landlord just raised the price of his one-bedroom apartment by $50 a month. So these shifts that we’ve been talking about really are beginning to effect people in real, tangible ways.

Posted in Ann Arbor, Uncategorized, Ypsilanti | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 31 Comments

OK, Ypsilanti, let’s talk about gentrification

In a text I received today, someone I know referred to Depot Town as “little Ann Arbor.” My sense, given the ensuing exchange, is that he didn’t intend it to be a compliment. He asked me if, since I took a stand way back when about the Quizno’s that had opened in Depot Town, I’d be taking a similar stand against Babo, the Ann Arbor “way of life” company that just announced they’d be opening a location on Cross Street, down the block from Aubree’s, and across the street from where that Quizno’s opened and then quickly closed… I’m still thinking about how I should respond.

For what it’s worth, I completely understand the concern. Ypsilanti is changing. And, to be honest, it kind of sucks in a lot of ways. Things that I loved dearly back in the early ’90s, like sitting next to stove at the old Frieghthouse cafe, drinking at the Elbow Room, and seeing bands at the Green Room are gone. And there seems to be a lot of outside money rushing in all of a sudden, speeding this transformation. Not only did we just have this announcement about Babo coming to town, but, in the last few months, we’ve also heard that a chef from Ann Arbor would be opening a place on Michigan Avenue, and a corporation owning several restaurants in Ann Arbor would be developing the Thompson block. It just feels as though we’ve reached some kind of tipping point, where, all of a sudden, due to rising rents in Ann Arbor, and changing perceptions about how terrifying of a place Ypsilanti is, people from Ann Arbor have decided it makes financial sense to be here. And it’s rubbing a lot of people the wrong way. It feels, at least for me, as though we no longer have control over our own destiny.

Personally, I’m torn. I’ve seen the city’s balance sheet, and I know, if we want to keep providing services, and fend off an emergency manager, we’re going to need to increase revenues. And people here need jobs. A lot of us, myself included, live in Ypsilanti, but work in Ann Arbor. And I think I speak for a lot of us when I say that we’d like to be able to have more opportunities here, closer to home. At the same time, though, we don’t want change. And for good reason. We’re here because we love this city, and its people, and we don’t want those things to change. We don’t want our neighbors to be priced out of their apartments, and for the slick and shallow veneer of Ann Arbor (no offense) to extend its reach into our community.

This is something that I’ve wanted to talk about for a long time, but I just haven’t been able to find the words. I honestly think about every day… How do cities grow without sacrificing what they are, and what they value?

I don’t have the time to go too deep on this tonight, but here, for what they’re worth, are two related thoughts.

First. Local ownership matters. It’s why, a few years ago, I started looking for a building that I could afford to buy downtown. People who live in this community, and care about this community, are more likely to do right by it. Sure, local ownership alone won’t necessarily stop bad things from happening, but, chances are, a local owner is going to care more than, let’s say, a Northville-based ophthalmologist who seems only to care about the bottom line. It’s something I remember discussing here in the past with Curtis Sullivan, the owner of Vault of Midnight, one of the few things, in my opinion, that still makes Ann Arbor interesting, in spite of all the Starbucks and 7 Elevens. Sullivan, as I recall, told us that his store wouldn’t be where it is today if the owners of his building hadn’t been local people who actually cared more about what would be good for the community than what would pay the most per square foot. And, for that reason, I’m constantly encouraging local people who I know and respect to purchase buildings, because, with ownership, you at lest have some control. And, with this same thing in mind, I’ve started thinking about ways to pool local money to invest in property. I haven’t made much progress yet, but it’s something that I’d like to pursue, assuming my business partner and I are able to get this old building of ours on Pearl Street rehabbed and occupied before the bank takes it away from us. [More on this later, I promise.]

Second. I’ve been thinking about ways to encourage people, especially property owners from outside of Ypsi, to better know the city, invest in its people, and act in such a way as to protect what’s unique about this community. While I’m still not sure what it would look like, I keep coming back to that pledge not to raise taxes, which, for decades, Grover Norquist has so successfully been able to get Republican members of Congress to sign. And I kind of think there should be something similar at the local level. Not about taxes, but about community engagement. Again, I’m not sure what such a document would say, but I’d like to think that it would, at the very least, encourage property owners to consider renting to locally owned businesses as opposed to chains, and ask business owners to involve themselves in our schools by offering internships, support our local non-profits, etc. Who knows, maybe it’s just a card that says, “I promise not to be a dick and jack up prices so high that the people who live here now can no longer live here.” The thing is, I’d like to find ways to encourage people to be more accountable to those of together comprise this community.

Like it or not, the tide is changing. Fortunately, though, the window is still open, and we’ve got an opportunity to guide the growth that’s coming our way before Ypsilanti becomes a bedroom community for Ann Arbor, and our downtown becomes as soulless as Plymouth’s.

For what it’s worth, there seem to be models that work. There are people who have done this well… When I first met Bee, the owner of Beezy’s Cafe, who I think is generally regarded as an asset to our community, she was working for Zingerman’s in Ann Arbor. She wasn’t born here in Ypsi. She hadn’t lived here for decades. But she moved here and built something great. The thing is, she did so in a way that didn’t alienate people. She got to know the city. She moved here. She sought people out to talk. She didn’t just launch with a press release full of cringeworthy buzzwords. And I think that’s the distinction. People, at least from what I can tell, aren’t pissed that outsiders are coming in and opening places. They’re pissed at the way they’re doing it.

As for Babo’s, I don’t expect I’ll be fighting it. I’ll save my vitriol for the chains, like Family Dollar. I will, however, keep thinking of ways to increase local ownership and accountability. And, for what it’s worth, I think we need to have more open conversations about these issues. If we don’t do it now, we likely won’t have another chance.

Here’s for those of you who might have missed it, is a clip from the the article by Tom Perkins about the Babo opening that was just posted by the Metro Times, which kind of goes deeper into the local debate over Babo.

…On one hand, its supporters point out the obvious benefits: Babo sells high quality products, fills a vacant space, creates jobs, pays taxes, sources from local producers, and offers variety. Sure, the price point is high, but everyone loves Go! Ice Cream, and those aren’t cheap cones.

And supporters also point out that Babo isn’t the first Ann Arbor-based business to cross US 23. Ypsilanti is an independent town that is fiercely protective of its identity and is often suspicious of Ann Arborites. A2Vintage, photographers/marketers Chin Azzaro, and Thompson Block developers A2Mission (Blue Tractor, Jolly Pumpkin, and Grizzly Peak) are among Ann Arbor expats or residents doing business in Ypsi who aren’t viewed as gentrifiers. But Babo doesn’t seem to be getting the same welcome.

As one resident put it on Facebook, the brand holds “a culture that is very much not Ypsi-like” and “embraces some of the worst traits of A2.” That seems to sum up the opposition’s assessment. The source of that feeling could start with the price point, as there’s some skepticism over whether expensive cold pressed juice drinks and $125 juice cleanses are going to fly in Depot Town. And there’s concern over what that means for future developments.

There’s also some question about Babo’s status as a true “mom-and-pop” venture. The store is Babo location number three, and is a part of the Savco Hospitality Restaurant Group, a company founded by Ann Arbor restaurateur Sava Lelcaj that’s composed of five food businesses.

Beyond that, the sentiment could partly be attributed to Babo’s/Savco’s somewhat over-the-top marketing campaign, which presents Babo as a soulful “way of life company” designed to “fuel and enrich our guests’ lives with honest and delicious foods.” Its customers are “beloved”; its an “inspirational” brand; and its locations are each “journey of food exploration” that improves the Ann Arbor dining landscape.

In other words, you’re a much better person, and the world is a better place, if you spend money here. Some people are skeptical of that sort of pitch, and the same goes for slick marketing campaigns that seek to convince customers of a business’s soul. For evidence, see the Shinola debate that still simmers in Detroit…

[Babo’s response, in which they say they “simply love the community and want to be a part of it” can be found the chains.]

The bottom line, at least for me, is that if cities aren’t growing, they’re dying. And, if Ypsilanti wants to avoid the fate of other Michigan cities that have gone into receivership, we need to fill our storefronts, encourage people to invest, and attract new people. The question is, how to do it in such a way that those who call Ypsilanti home aren’t either further marginalized or forced out altogether. We need to identify models that work, and we need to implement systems now to ensure that these well known problems associated with economic development are mitigated. I’m sure there are other ways to go about it, but, as I said, I think accountability and local ownership are the key. And that’s where I think I’ll focus my time.

Posted in Ann Arbor, Uncategorized, Ypsilanti | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 79 Comments

Trump announces new government entity for tracking the crimes of immigrants, tells the wife of the Navy SEAL killed in Yemen that her husband is happy with the “record-breaking” applause that his death has received

Going into tonight’s State of the Union speech, I wasn’t sure what to expect. Given all of the developments over the past several days, I really didn’t know what Trump would say, or the tone he’d try to strike. “Would he, in an attempt completely reboot his presidency, dial back on the rambling insanity we’ve come to expect and take a conciliatory tone, or would he double down on the authoritarian doublespeak, accusing the Democrats and the ‘globalist international media’ of conspiring against him?”, I wondered. One thing I was pretty certain of, though, was that, whatever the tone, he’d take responsibility for the things that have gone well this past month, regardless of his involvement, while blaming others for the bad things that happened thus far during his tenure as President…. Regardless of what he might say, or how he might say it, that’s a constant.

Remember how, just yesterday, we were debating the extent to which the Trump administration might be responsible for setting the tone that brought about this recent wave of anti-Semitic acts that we’ve been experiencing? Well, the story took yet another strange twist today, before the State of the Union, when Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro told the press about something Trump had said to him and other state attorneys this morning at the White House. Trump, Shapiro said, seemed to indicate that 90-some bomb threats that have been reported against Jewish Community Centers since he took office one month ago, could well have been perpetrated by either Jews or progressives who are out to paint his administration as pro-white nationalist. According to Shapiro, Trump, speaking about the bomb threats, said, “Sometimes it’s the reverse, to make people, or to make others, look bad.” Shapiro, for what it’s worth, also said that Trump had called the threats “reprehensible,” before veering off script and suggesting that these threats could be part of a larger false flag operation meant to delegitimize his presidency.

Also of note, speaking of passing the buck and sidestepping responsibility, Trump told his friends at Fox News this morning that he thinks Obama is somehow responsible for the leaks that have plagued his administration. Yes, there was news yesterday that White House press secretary Sean Spicer had demanded to check the phones of his aides, in hopes of determining which of them might be leaking information to the press, but it’s easier to just blame Obama. [When all else fails, blame the black guy, right?] Furthermore, Trump said that it wasn’t his fault that Navy SEAL William “Ryan” Owens died during a raid in Yemen last month. “This was a mission that was started before I got here. This was something they wanted to do,” Trump said, speaking of the generals who planned the raid. “They came to me, they explained what they wanted to do ― the generals ― who are very respected, my generals are the most respected that we’ve had in many decades, I believe. And they lost Ryan.” Yes, “they lost Ryan.” [Oh, how far we’ve gone from the days of Harry Truman, when the buck stopped with the President.]

Speaking of Ryan, his death played a prominent role in Trump’s State of the Union speech tonight… Near the end of his remarks, Trump pointed out the deceased man’s widow in the audience and spoke of his sacrifice on behalf of the nation. It would have been a poignant moment, had Trump allowed himself to stay on script. Instead, though, he decided to take the opportunity to tell this woman that her dead husband is happy in heaven right now, knowing that his death got the biggest round of applause of the night. [Just think about that for a minute. We know that Trump is obsessed by applause and ratings, but there’s apparently no fucking end to his obsession. It even resonates in death.]

To Trump’s credit, he didn’t take the opportunity to remind everyone, yet once again, that the young man’s death was the fault of the previous administration and the generals who planned the raid, and not his. [For what it’s worth, Trump has an excuse. As we know now, he was tweeting as the raid went down.]

As for tonight’s speech, I thought it started well. I liked that Trump noted the recent bomb threats against Jewish Community Centers, and the shooting of three Indian men in what appears to be a racially motivated hate crime in Kansas, and actually said that such actions should not be tolerated. [I believe my exact words on Twitter were, “Someone’s got himself a new speechwriter.”] It was refreshing. As he’s made it a practice to only talk about crimes committed by non-whites, I thought it showed some evolution in the right direction. Unfortunately, though, things fell apart pretty quickly after those first few sentences left his pursed lips. [While he stay glued to the teleprompter for all but a few seconds, showing considerable restraint, the speech that had been prepared for him moved rapidly to the authoritarian right, with mentions of the deadly immigrants who walk among us, and the need to spend more on our police and military forces.] And, of course, he wrapped things up by announcing that he’d be launching a new governmental agency, called VOICE, charged with recording incidents of crime carried out by immigrants. [As someone else noted on Twitter, it’s worth remembering that Nazi Institute for Research on the Jewish Question kept files on “crimes committed by Jews.”]

As for how this new department will work, I’m not sure. He didn’t offer a great deal of detail. I’m imagining, however, that it’ll be like the department of motor vehicles, and there will be a little office in every American town where people can go in and vent about immigrant auto mechanics who they think overcharged them, and immigrant maids who may have helped themselves to a can of Pringles or a half pound of lunchmeat. Or may there will just be kiosks around where people are encouraged to talk shit about people of color, snitch on their neighbors, etc.

Oh, and for what it’s worth, Trump, as I noted at the top of the post, didn’t just pass the buck this week. He also took credit for things that he had absolutely nothing to do with. In a tweet sent out a few days ago, for instance, he claimed that, since taking office, he’d brought the nation debt down by $12 billion, despite the fact that he’s yet to propose a budget, or, for that matter, pass any financial legislation. No, just like his personal fortune, Trump inherited this.

Sorry for the jumbled nature of tonight’s post. I’m having a hard time focusing. There’s just too much to talk about… I want to talk about the fact that Trump brought one successful charter school graduate with him to make the case that it’s public education that’s holding our children of color back, but I just can’t seem to keep my eyes open.

One last thing before I pass out. I loved the enthusiastic applause Trump got when he called for aggressive spending in order to improve our aging infrastructure. I wonder, though, where all this Republican support was for the idea when it was Obama calling for the same thing. I hate to be cynical, but I’m starting to think that maybe they didn’t want to pursue it under the previous administration, even though they knew it would be good for the country, because they didn’t want the previous administration to get credit for putting people to work, improving the economy, and fixing our bridges, tunnels and highways.

Oh, and when he introduced the young woman in the wheelchair, I was half expecting Trump, a well known mocker of the disabled, to say, “She wouldn’t be by first choice.”

And, as you made it all the way to the end of the post, here’s my big takeaway from the speech… Trump has apparently been convinced to play the part of President, which, if he can keep it up, will make him harder to fight. Fortunately, though, I don’t think he’s going to be able to stay on script. I don’t think he can help himself. Even though it would make things exponentially easier for him and the Republicans to get their agenda enacted if he were to keep giving speeches like this, I can’t see him doing it. I think the thrill of the big lie, and the applause is too great. I think, when all is said and done, it’s more about ratings for him than it is agenda. And that may be the thing that, in the end, saves us.

Posted in Civil Liberties, Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Connect

BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative Why am I here