Bannon and Gates, in their testimony against Stone, pave the way for a Trump perjury charge

Donald Trump said yesterday that he would “strongly consider” providing written testimony in the House impeachment inquiry.

Coincidentally, at just around the same time that he said this, news broke that Doug Letter, the lead attorney for House Democrats, was in federal appeals court pursuing an investigation into whether or not Donald Trump had lied to Special Counsel Robert Mueller in his written testimony during the investigation into 2016 Russian election interference.

Ironic, right?

As for why House investigators are looking into Trump’s having lied to Mueller now, it would appear as though we have former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon and Trump 2016 Deputy Campaign Chairman Rick Gates to thank.

Both of them, you see, not only testified in the case that brought down long-time Republican operative Roger “rat-fucker” Stone last week for lying to Congress and witness tampering, but, in so doing, they also shed light on the President’s role in the WikiLeaks scandal, pointing to the very real possibility that he’d perjured himself in his written testimony to Mueller. Here’s more from the Washington Post.

…Rick Gates, who served as Trump’s deputy campaign chairman, testified Tuesday that Stone began discussing Clinton leaks with the campaign in April 2016 and that from May onward Gates understood Stone to be the campaign’s intermediary with WikiLeaks. By July 2016, Gates testified, Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort said he was updating Trump and others regularly and directed Gates to keep following up with Stone. After Trump ended one phone call from Stone at the end of that month, Gates testified, the future president said to Gates that “more information would be coming”…

[As you’ll recall, WikiLeaks is the Russian front organization that released the hacked Democratic emails in order to disadvantage the Clinton campaign in the run up to the 2016 election.]

Well, you see, this isn’t what Trump relayed in his sworn testimony, when he said, “I do not recall discussing WikiLeaks with him. Nor do I recall being aware of Mr. Stone having discussed WikiLeaks with individuals associated with my campaign.” And, now, we might have yet another charge – one of perjury – to add to the articles of impeachment.

Here’s Trump’s sworn testimony.

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 40 Comments

The enduring beauty of the deep state… Marie Yovanovitch provides the best counterpoint to Trumpism to date

I had the good fortune to be on vacation this past Friday, so I was able to watch quite a bit of Marie Yovanovitch’s courageous testimony before the House Intelligence Committee in real-time. While there’s a great deal that I could say about the shameful behavior of Republicans on the committee and the response to the former ambassador’s testimony in conservative media, I’d like to focus on the following four pieces of video, all of which I think are incredibly important. If you happened to have missed Yovanovitch’s testimony, I’d encourage you to watch them.

SETTING THE STAGE… Donald Trump, in his July 25 call with then newly-elected Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, before he complains about how the U.S. relationship with Ukraine hasn’t been “reciprocal,” and asks for the now infamous “favor,” starts out by both praising corrupt former Ukrainian prosecutor Yuriy Lutsenko, and lambasting U.S. Ambassador Yovanovitch, who he referred to as being “bad news.” Here Congressman Adam Schiff and Yovanovitch discuss the President’s call, and how unprecedented it is for an admired ambassador, with decades of experience leading our anti-corruption efforts abroad, to be criticized in such a way, and forced from her post without cause.

INTIMIDATION IN REAL-TIME… Not long into Yovanovitch’s testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff temporarily halted his line of questing, alerting the former ambassador to the fact that the President of the United States was, at that very moment, attacking her in real-time on Twitter. Here’s Schiff informing Yovanovitch, who chose to testify in spite of Trump’s order not to participate in the investigation, that the President had just tweeted out, “Everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad.” This, of course, is not only untrue, but appears to meet the standard for witness intimidation.

THE BIG TAKEAWAY… Here’s Schiff, at the very end of the session with Yovanovitch, summing up the big takeaway of the day, after reminding the audience that Yovanovitch was forced from her post after a coordinated smear campaign, because Donald Trump and Rudy Giuliani saw her as being an impediment to their plans. Before gaveling the session to a close, Schiff reminds the audience that, during the call with Zelensky, Donald Trump “praises the corrupt (Lutsenko), condemns the just (Yovanovitch), and asks for an investigation into the Bidens.” And, with that, the audience breaks into wild applause.

APPLAUDING THE RULE OF LAW… As I just noted, once the session came to a close, a huge percentage of those in the audience rose to their feet to give Yovanovitch a standing ovation over the yelling of Republicans, who were seeking to advance the ridiculous narrative that they’d somehow been treated unfairly in this process. [No matter what bad-faith arguments the Republicans make, always remember that the Democrats are following the procedure passed by the Republican majority in 2015 to the letter.] While the bravery of Yovanovitch can’t be overstated, my sense is that the people applauding weren’t just clapping for the ambassador, but for all of the those women and men like her, who continue to do the difficult, important and often thankless work of diplomacy on behalf of our nation. Yovanovitch gave those people voice on Friday, and one can only hope that she’ll inspire more career professionals in the State Department to step up and do the right thing, not just because Donald Trump is a danger to our nation, but because, if we’re ever going to set things right, we’re going to have to attract more people of character to public service. In an age where the Secretary of State sits back and allows diplomats to be assaulted by the President of the United, the Vice President refuses to defend his own foreign policy aids from attack, and people are constantly being not just thrown under the bus, but called traitors, it’s difficult to imagine people lining up to enter the world of foreign service. And we’re desperately going to need those people if this nation of our is going to survive. There’s a lot of cleaning up to be done, but noting is more important, in my mind, than rebuilding the State Department, and restocking the bench with people like Yovanovitch, who put country over party, and service over profit. This administration, insecure and terrified, has been shitting on these people for the past three years now, presenting their virtues as faults to the American people, and disparaging them as “deep state” operatives, when all they really want to do is defend the constitution, and it’s great to finally see these people getting their chance on the stage, reminding us all what it’s really all about.

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Well, it’s no longer “hearsay”

This past Wednesday, as you may recall, William Taylor, the acting U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, told members of the House Intelligence Committee that his aide, later to be identified as David Holmes, had overheard a cellphone conversation between Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, and President Donald Trump on July 26, during which the two men discussed the prospect of getting the Ukrainians to open in investigation into the Bidens. Well, Holmes gave his deposition before the committee yesterday afternoon, and things really aren’t looking good for either Sondland, who has already had to “revise” his sworn testimony once, or Donald Trump, who has been pulled right into the heart of the investigation.

As you may recall, Sondland had initially said under oath that he wasn’t aware of anything that might be of interest to investigators. “Nothing was ever raised to me about any concerns regarding our Ukraine policy,” he said, before going on to add that he “never” thought there was any precondition placed on the American aid to Ukraine. This narrative, of course, soon fell apart for the good ambassador, as others in the administration, like Taylor and Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman, defying the administration’s command that they not provide sworn testimony, came forward to confirm the quid pro quo at the center of this scandal. And, when their testimony was made public, Sondland’s memory apparently started to improve. Sondland, at this point in the story, then issued a new statement saying that he not only knew about, but actually conveyed the terms of the extortion to the Ukrainians. “I said that resumption of the U.S. aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anticorruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks,” he said. But, he pointed out, he never coordinated these activities with the White House… Here’s an excerpt from that revised testimony.

Well, it looks like Sondland might now have to revise his sworn testimony yet once again… assuming he’s allowed to do so by Congressional investigators. You see, yesterday afternoon, David Holmes was deposed by members of the House Intelligence Committee, and it would appear as though, during his testimony, he recounted in exquisite detail how Sondland, on July 26, held his cell phone away from his head far enough so that others in the group could hear Donald Trump, a well-known loud-talker, on the other end, confirming his participation in this diplomatic shake-down.

Here, according to Holmes, is how that part of the conversation between Sondland and Trump went down.

Sondland: “Zelensky loves your ass.”

Trump: “So, he’s going to do the investigations?”

Sondland: “Zelensky’s going to do anything you ask him.”

One imagines, when Sondland testifies in public next week, members of the House Intelligence Committee might want to ask him if his memory has been further “refreshed,” and, if so, whether he’d like to once again amend his testimony.

Oh, and it’s worth noting that we have the Republicans to thank for this. As I understand it, Holmes came forward with the offer to testify about what he’d heard because Congressional Republicans kept repeating “It’s all just hearsay”, in hopes of discounting the sworn statements of everyone who had come forward thus far.

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 27 Comments

Impeachment open thread

Well, here we are. Tomorrow morning, at 10:00 AM, the impeachment inquiry into Donald Trump’s abuse of power will enter its public phase, as Bill Taylor, the acting U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, and George Kent, the deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, testify before the House Intelligence Committee. This, my friends, is when the shit starts getting real.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 112 Comments

Elaine Luria’s got the best political ad this election cycle

I’d like to think that there’s still a place for non-veteran Democrats to serve in the age of Trump, but this ad for Elaine Luria, who is running for reelection in Virginia’s second congressional district, really demonstrates just how powerful of an argument candidates can make when they’re coming from a place of deep national security experience. Luria, a commander in the Navy, not only won in 2017, in a district that Trump carried by over 3 points, and hadn’t sent a Democrat to Congress in almost 20 years, but she had the courage to stand up and support the impeachment proceedings against the President when other moderate Democrats in red districts did not. And it seems like a model that could be replicated around the country, especially as suburban women continue break with Trump… Again, I hope we don’t get to the point where the only path to Congress involves serving in uniform, or being an ex-CIA officer, like Michigan’s Elissa Slotkin, but it really feels as though now is the time for women with national security experience to come forward, and draw a sharp contrast with Donald Trump, who, while he purports to be a strong military leader, continues to put our allies in harms way while giving the dictators of the world everything that they desire.

I have some concerns about making the Democratic Party the party of national security officers and career military, but, if that’s what it takes to right the ship, I think I’m OK with it.

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 13 Comments

Connect

BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative VG Kids space