With the release of the Mueller report imminent, the President’s desperate lies intensify

I have a migraine. My head hurts like hell, but, after about four hours, I can finally see again, so things seem to be trending in the right direction… At any rate, I wanted to share a few things with you before I crawl back beneath the covers.

Word came out from the Department of Justice this morning that Attorney General William Barr will be be releasing Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s redacted report on the Russia investigation this Thursday morning, and, as you might imagine, Donald Trump responded by going completely, fucking insane, lying about the findings of the report, and demanding that his investigators be investigated.

This, of course, is a lie. For all his talk of “total exoneration,” the Mueller report did not absolve him of collusion, corruption, or obstruction. In fact, even according to William Barr, Trump’s hand-picked Attorney General, the report did not establish that “no obstruction” took place. In his roundly-criticized four-page summary of the Mueller report, Barr even quoted Mueller as having said, “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.” So, when Trump says that Mueller and Barr found “no collusion,” it’s a deliberate misstatement of fact. While it appears to be the case that Mueller did not find enough to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the President knowingly conspired with the Russians to interfere in the 2016 election, he very clearly states that obstruction of justice may have happened. And the consensus of legal scholars seems to be that he was looking to Congress to make that determination. Barr, however, interceded before Congress could see the report, offering his own interpretation… which was that the President, in his opinion, could not be found guilty of obstruction, regardless of evidence to the contrary.

Barr not only intercede on the President’s behalf to muddy the waters by declaring that no obstruction had taken place, but he also held the Mueller report for several weeks, refusing to even release the Special Counsel’s non-confidential overview documents to Congress, despite repeated demands. Meanwhile, of course, it would appear that Barr briefed the White House on the report, giving them a head start of several weeks not only so that they could push out the “total exoneration” narrative, but also so that they could start drafting a formal response, which one imagines will come out at the same time as Mueller’s report. And, not just that, but, when testifying before Congress last week, Barr threw some red meat to Trump’s conspiracy theory-loving base, suggesting that members of the U.S. intelligence community had illegally “spied” on the Trump campaign — an accusation that Trump is pushing aggressively today, in the run up to the release of the Mueller report.

For what it’s worth, this again is a lie, and even Barr has since backed away from it. The Republicans investigated so-called “Spygate” several times when Devin Nunes ran the House Intelligence Committee, attempting to establish that the FBI had acted inappropriately in their investigation of the Trump campaign, and they never found anything of substance to substantiate the President’s claim that the whole thing started with Hillary Clinton hiring former MI6 agent Christopher Steele to make up lies about his ties to Russia, or the ridiculous claim that Trump advisor Carter Page had been targeted for investigation without good reason. [The truth is, the investigation of Russian interference started well before the Steele dossier, when it became known that Trump associate George Papadopoulos had told an Australian diplomat in a bar the the Russians were preparing to help their campaign by releasing emails damaging to Hillary Clinton. Plus, the Steele dossier wasn’t something that the Clinton campaign had thought up. It was actually drafted by Steele, a former British agent with a significant network of Russian contacts, on the behalf of the Washington Free Beacon, a conservative online news site. And, as for Carter Page, members of our intelligence community sought a FISA warrant against him, not because he was working for Trump, but because we knew of Russian attempts to recruit him as an agent.]

But, for those who are unwilling to do the research and look at the actual facts, we have this alternative narrative being put forward by Trump and his associates, claiming that it’s all a “hoax” perpetrated by “dirty cops” within the intelligence community directed by Hillary Clinton… which, by the way, makes absolutely no fucking sense, given that it was the FBI that gave Trump the advantage going into the election by announcing that the investigation into Clinton’s email server had been reopened. And, more importantly, if Clinton had been behind the Steele dossier, hoping to use it to defeat Trump, why is it that it didn’t become public until the January after the election? The whole thing just makes absolutely no fucking sense. But yet here we are, arguing reality with old white men who just refuse to accept the truth.

All bullshit aside, here’s what we know beyond a shadow of a doubt. The Russians interfered in our election on the part of Donald Trump, and he welcomed their assistance. The Russians attempted through various means to make inroads with the Trump campaign, and, at every turn, they found Trump’s associates receptive. And, when questioned by investigators, these same Trump associates then lied about it, repeatedly. Sure, it may be that Mueller didn’t feel it was enough to stand up in court, and allow him to secure a conviction, but we know that it happened.

We know that Jared Kushner sought to set up a secret backchannel with Russia. We know that, when Russian operatives approached Donald Trump Jr. with an offer to help the campaign, he not only responded by saying, “I Love It,” but set up meeting at Trump Tower that was attended by several members of Trump’s campaign. And, we know, when this meeting became public, that Donald Trump himself penned a letter for his son, stating that the meeting had been about adoption policy, when it hadn’t. And we know that, in Helsinki, Donald Trump sided with Vladimir Putin over against his own intelligence agencies, saying that he believed Putin when he said that Russia didn’t interfere with our 2016 election. [Our intelligence agencies had already shown Trump definitive proof that Putin had personally called for the hacking.] And let’s not forget the only change Donald Trump’s team made to the GOP platform before the Republican National Convention in 2016 was to remove U.S. assistance for Ukraine, much to the delight of Putin… I could go on. I didn’t even mention the fact that we know from Michael Cohen that Trump talked with Roger Stone before the election about the timing of the Wikileaks releases of stolen Democratic emails on behalf of the Russians… But suffice it to say that there’s a great deal of evidence of very bad things having happened. And, if Barr doesn’t redact all of it, we’re going to know a great deal come Thursday.

So, prepare yourselves. The next few days are going to be filled with more shouts of “treason,” and demands that the investigators be thrown in jail. This, I’m afraid, is going to get incredibly ugly.

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 46 Comments

Offering no evidence, William Barr tells Congress, “I think spying did occur” on Trump campaign by intel agencies in 2016

Attorney General William Barr, testifying before the Senate Appropriations Committee today, let it be known that, in his opinion, “spying did occur” on the Trump campaign by U.S. intelligence agencies in 2016. Barr not only offered no evidence to back up this surprising claim, but, upon further questioning, said that he would not be “putting together a panel” to investigate the matter further, which would seem to indicate that knows full well that the investigation into the campaign was completely warranted, given the overwhelming evidence of Russian election interference and the numerous unreported meetings between members of Trump’s inner circle and individuals with ties to the Russian government. But yet he said it anyway. The question is why. Why would Barr, without evidence of wrongdoing, knowing that none exists, suggest that the intelligence community had been out to get Donald Trump in 2016?

Here, if you’ve yet to see it, is footage of Barr throwing chum to the rabid conspiracy theorists that now form the base of the Republican Party — people who actually believe that the intelligence community, directed by a liberal, globalist cabal of child sex traffickers, had illegally spied on the heroic, truth-telling Donald Trump without justification.

Later in his testimony, Barr would back away from the word “spying,” and would attempt to distance himself from the accusation that the intelligence community had conspired against Donald Trump. “I’m not suggesting that (the investigation) wasn’t adequately predicated,” he told the Senators, who had been understandably caught off-guard by his earlier comments about “spying”.

Seizing on Barr’s earlier comment, and ignoring the fact that he’d eventually walked back what he’d said, Donald Trump and his supporters once again went on the offensive, demanding members of the intelligence community be made to pay a price for what they’d done. Here’s a tweet from earlier today, in which Donald Trump suggests that the whole investigation was nothing more than a “treasonous hoax”.

To those who said that we should give Barr the benefit of the doubt over his poor handling of the Mueller report — which he still hasn’t given to Congress, by the way — I think we’ve now seen enough to know that his intentions are far from good. At every turn, he’s done Donald Trump’s bidding, and it just seems to be getting worse. He clearly doesn’t care about the long term damage being done to the intelligence agencies that he presides over as Attorney General, or the harm that he’s doing by sewing these seeds of distrust in American institutions. All he seems to care about is muddying the waters in hopes of helping Donald Trump to avoid facing the consequences of his actions. He was clearly selected for the job because he promised to shield Donald Trump for any investigations, and it would appear that every decision he’s made since has been with that objective in mind… I didn’t think it possible, but he’s making Jeff Sessions look like a heroic paragon of virtue in comparison.

Senator Mark Warner, I think, said it best. “Mr. Barr knows how counter-intel investigations work,” he said. “He knows there was ample evidence of Russian attempts to infiltrate the Trump campaign and that the FBI took lawful action to stop it. Giving a wink and a nod to this long-debunked “spying” conspiracy theory is irresponsible.

And, like that, we’re seeing the reputation of yet one more person in Trump’s orbit turn to shit.

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 87 Comments

Lacking any other ideas, Trump and doubles down on border cruelty, firing everyone who stands in Stephen Miller’s way

I wanted to write about immigration yesterday, after news broke that Donald Trump had fired Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen, but I just didn’t think that I could do the subject justice, given the sheer magnitude of everything that’s been happening. But, with that said, I’ve decided to give it another shot right now. Only, this time, I’m going to lower the bar for myself considerably… What follows isn’t meant to be exhaustive. And it certainly isn’t meant to be a replacement for real reporting that you might find elsewhere. It’s just one man’s unfocused rambling about a subject that deserves much better. So, with that said…

Trump is fucked. He’s made immigration his signature issue, and he doesn’t have a fucking clue as to how to navigate it. He knows, when he says something nasty about immigrants on the southern border, he gets a good response from the conservative base, so he continues to do it, but he clearly has no fucking idea how to move from casually racist tweet to formal U.S. policy. And it’s painful to watch. Every instinct that he has tells him to talk about how terrible things are at the border, but, then, at the same time, he knows that he’s now been president for over two years, and that doing so reflects badly on him. So he tries to walk this line between fact that fiction, where, on one hand, he says the border is “tight” thanks to his heroic efforts, and, on the other, he paints a portrait of violent gang members pouring over the border in magical vehicles filled with drugs and sex slaves who have been bound with insidious blue tape. And, as you can imagine, this doesn’t exactly make life easy for the men and women charged with enacting his vision… One day, for instance, he’s signing an executive order ending his own administration’s family separation policy, and not long afterward, he’s berating his appointees for not continuing the cruel and illegal policy that he’s vowed publicly to stop.

And that seems to be why Kirstjen Nielsen is now out of a job. She apparently couldn’t convince Donald Trump that she just wasn’t able to reinstate an illegal program that he himself had rescinded by way of executive action… Here’s the background from CNN.

…Three Thursdays ago, in a meeting at the Oval Office with top officials — including Nielsen, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, top aides Jared Kushner, Mercedes Schlapp and Dan Scavino, White House counsel Pat Cipollone and more — the President, according to one attendee, was “ranting and raving, saying border security was his issue.”

Senior administration officials say that Trump then ordered Nielsen and Pompeo to shut down the port of El Paso the next day, Friday, March 22, at noon. The plan was that in subsequent days the Trump administration would shut down other ports.

Nielsen told Trump that would be a bad and even dangerous idea, and that the governor of Texas, Republican Greg Abbott, has been very supportive of the President.

She proposed an alternative plan that would slow down entries at legal ports. She argued that if you close all the ports of entry all you would be doing is ending legal trade and travel, but migrants will just go between ports.

According to two people in the room, the President said: “I don’t care.”

Ultimately, acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney seemed to have been able to talk the President out of closing the port of El Paso. Trump, however, was insistent that his administration begin taking another action — denying asylum seekers entry. Nielsen tried to explain to the President that the asylum laws allow migrants from Central America to come to the US and gain entry. She talked to the White House counsel to see if there were any exceptions, but he told her that her reading of the law was correct…

Senior administration officials also told CNN that in the last four months or so, the President has been pushing Nielsen to enforce a stricter and more widespread “zero tolerance” immigration policy — not just the original policy started by former Attorney General Jeff Sessions and undone by the President once it was criticized — that called for the prosecution of individuals crossing the border illegally between ports of entry, resulting in the separation of parents from children.

According to multiple sources, the President wanted families separated even if they came in at a legal port of entry and were legal asylum seekers. The President wanted families separated even if they were apprehended within the US. He thinks the separations work to deter migrants from coming.

Sources told CNN that Nielsen tried to explain they could not bring the policy back because of court challenges, and White House staffers tried to explain it would be an unmitigated PR disaster…

And, when Nielsen couldn’t do the impossible, she was forced out… Fortunately, though, she left the Department of Homeland Security in good hands, describing her Deputy Secretary Claire Grady, who would be taking her place, as “a steady force and a knowledgeable voice.” And I suspect she was, for the following day or so… Grady, you see, just announced that she too would be leaving as a part of the President’s purge.

So, the Secretary of Homeland Security was fired, the Acting Deputy Secretary was forced out, and, at the same time, the White House announced that Trump’s nominee to head Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is no longer heading toward confirmation. And, all of this happened within a day or so of Randolph “Tex” Alles being fired as the director of the Secret Service. So, as of right now, the Trump administration has no permanent Secretary of Defense, Secretary of the EPA, Secretary of Homeland Security, Budget Director, White House Chief of Staff, U.N. Ambassador, FEMA Administrator, ICE Director, or Director of the Secret Service. And Donald trump will soon be losing both the Director of the Small Business Administration and the Director of Customs and Border Patrol. This, I don’t think I need to tell most of you, is not only unprecedented, but absolutely fucking insane.

And this leadership vacuum means that, at least as far as immigration is concerned, Stephen “Donald Trump Will Not Be Questioned” Miller is going to be taking a more central role… and that’s not a god thing for humanity.

And, this, my friends, is where I start to lose focus, as there are so many elements of this story that I want to share, but I just lack the time and energy to do so in a coherent way… So let’s just have a few bullet points.

• Donald Trump does not understand immigration law… A few days ago, in Calexico, California, our President criticized the 1997 immigration ruling that makes family separation illegal. The case, known as Flores v. Reno, involved a 15 year old girl by the name of Jenny Lisette Flores, who had come to America n the ’80s, seeking asylum from El Salvador. Donald Trump, apparently not knowing this, lashed out a “Judge Flores” while in Calexico. “Judge Flores, whoever you may be, that decision is a disaster for our country,” Trump said, apparently unaware that Flores was the girl at the center of the case, and not the judge presiding over it. You would think, given that his family separation policy was killed because of this case, he might know the most basic of facts, but apparently not.

• Donald Trump again said today that family separation was a policy of the Obama administration. This is false.

• Donald Trump, while in California, told his fans that we don’t need any more immigrants, as our country is, “full”. It is not.

• Donald Trump, while at he border a few days ago, instructed U.S. border agents to break the law, and keep asylum seekers from entering the country.

I could go on, but I think you get the point. Trump is becoming more of a threat to the rule of law, and the circle of people around him is getting progressively smaller, more desperate and more insane. And, you can be sure, this will not end well.

Posted in Civil Liberties, Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 28 Comments

William Barr on the DOJ’s attempt to destroy the ACA and leave 20 million Americans without health care

[William Barr, looking like an actor auditioning for an Alka-Seltzer ad spot, testifies before the House Appropriations Committee.]

Generally speaking, it is the job of the U.S. Department of Justice to defend the laws of the United States. This, however, is not the case with Donald Trump’s Department of Justice, which is actively engaged in a partisan campaign to destroy the Affordable Care Act and its life-saving protections for people with preexisting conditions. Today, Attorney General William Barr, who was on Capital Hill to discuss the proposed Department of Justice budget, was asked by Democratic Representative Matt Cartwright why the DOJ, under his direction, was committing resources to the fight to see the ACA ruled unconstitutional… a move which, I should add, would rip health coverage from approximately 20 million Americans. Barr, like an asshole, responded by essentially saying, ‘If you think think what we’re doing is so bad, you shouldn’t worry about it, as we won’t prevail in court.’ Here’s the video.

I know, on a day when Barr also told members of the House Appropriations Committee that he had no intention of sharing an unreacted copy of the Mueller report with Congress, and refused to say whether or not he’d already given a copy to the Trump administration, this exchange on health care isn’t likely to get much attention, but it’s incredibly important. The American people need to know that Barr’s DOJ is actively working to eliminate protections for people with preexisting conditions, and roll back the Medicare expansion that brought health care to so many. It’s absolutely unconscionable… And, no, I don’t believe Donald Trump when he says that he’ll present the American people with “truly great” health care once the ACA has been destroyed, and he’s reelected. He’s been promising a magical health care plan — one that covers everyone, and costs less than the ACA — since 2010, but we’ve yet to see it. It doesn’t exist, and it never will. And every Republican in Congress knows it… but yet they continue to play along.

Posted in Health, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Elizabeth Warren’s Accountable Capitalism Act

I thought I could wait a little longer before getting out my credit card, and going into debt for a 2020 presidential candidate, but I’ve been reading stories about how Elizabeth Warren is lagging behind her fellow candidates on the fundraising front, and felt compelled to put a few dollars into her account. I don’t know that she’s necessarily my favorite candidate — it’s far too early in the process, I think, to pick favorites — but, from what I can tell, her policy positions are the most comprehensive and well thought out of any of the candidates, and, for that reason alone, I’d like to see her remain in the top tier of the ever widening Democratic field. And the reality is that it’s the candidates who raise the most money that get the most attention. [I also gave to her Senate campaign back in 2012, because I liked the fact that she was talking about income inequality when few others were.]

Speaking of Warren’s interesting, ambitious, and well thought out policy positions, here’s just one example. She’s proposed, as part of her Accountable Capitalism Act, that corporations with annual revenue of over $1 billion, reconfigure their boards so that 40% of all seats are held by workers… Here, with a little more detail, is an excerpt from the Harvard Business Review.

U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren has proposed a novel way to reform corporate governance. It would require companies with more than $1 billion in revenue to get a corporate charter from the federal government (rather than from an individual state), which in turn would require a commitment to a broad range of stakeholders, including not just shareholders but also employees and the communities in which the businesses operate. In addition, federally chartered companies would be required to let workers elect 40% of board members. There are other aspects of the proposal, including an aim to limit stock buybacks and stock-based compensation — you can read more about it here or here.

Warren’s vision is to ensure that the success of U.S. companies is shared more broadly, rather than largely benefiting shareholders. But would it have that effect?

The idea seems to be that having a more collaborative decision-making structure would cause better and more-equitable decision making. Here the example of Germany is illustrative. For the past 40 years, corporate governance in Germany has been based on the idea of codeterminance, in which workers have a say in company decision making. Workers elect a substantial share of the board and form work councils, which are groups of employees, distinct from trade unions, empowered to consult with management about decisions. Germany’s codetermination model does seem to lead to a more equitable distribution of company profits, and so Germany is commonly cited as an example of why such an approach should be adopted in the U.S…

Another component of this same ambitious proposal would require both 75% of shareholders, and 75% of board members, to agree before a corporation engages in any political activity.

I’d like to go on, but I’ve got television to watch and laundry to fold… Here, though, for those of you who want to know more about Warren’s Accountable Capitalism Act, is a clip from her office’s press release.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 29 Comments

Connect

BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative Mike Giannouris