“Remember how I said what I said, and how everyone got so mad? Well, I actually meant the opposite.”

It’s being reported that we have White House Chief of Staff John Kelly to thank for today’s uncomfortable press event, during which Donald Trump tried to walk back the fact that he’d taken the side of Vladimir Putin over the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation. According to Vanity Fair, it was Kelly, who, after hearing the President say “I don’t see any reason why it would be,” in response to a question about whether or not he believed the intelligence community conclusion the Russians had meddled in our 2016 election, got on the phone and began lobbying congressional Republicans, trying to get them to go on the record publicly against Trump.

I guess, while he might be a bit of an asshole, and even a racist, there’s a line that Kelly, a retired United States Marine Corps general who started climbing through the ranks during the Cold War, just won’t cross when it comes to watching an American president side with a former KGB agent over his own people. “Kelly was irate,” according to multiple sources, as he “called around to Republicans on Capitol Hill and gave them the go-ahead to speak out against Trump.”

And, who the fuck knows… maybe this is why Kelly has hung on so long in the White House. Maybe he knew, one day, he might be called on to step in and do something big. And maybe this was it. I suspect maybe that’s giving him a little too much credit, but I can’t help but think that he did what he did, knowing full well that there would be a hefty price to pay. And, if that’s the case, I appreciate his having decided to go out like this. Although it’s hard to tell if anything is really going to change, even though a few Republicans have been encouraged to speak up, and Donald Trump has been made to publicly take back at least part of what he said.

Here, if you haven’t heard it yet, is how Trump attempted to walk back what he’d said in Helsinki.

That’s right. The President of the United States was forced to read from a prepared statement, telling the world that he’d inadvertently said “I don’t see any reason why (the Russians) would be (involved)”, when he meant to say, “I don’t see any reason why (the Russians) wouldn’t be (involved)”. It’s a lie, of course, as it clearly wasn’t what he was trying to convey, given the context, but I suppose they had to try something, no matter how preposterous.

“In a key sentence in my remarks, I said the word ‘would’ instead of ‘wouldn’t,'” Donald Trump told members of the press today. “The sentence should have been, ‘I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be Russia.’ Sort of a double-negative.”

I don’t imagine it worked on a lot of people, but I suspect there were probably some who were able to convince themselves, having heard this, that everything was once again alright… and that we hadn’t elected a Putin puppet, but an imbecile easily confused by adverbs and negatives… Ah, to be so blissfully stupid.

Also telling, the White House once again allowed photographers to get close enough to take shots of the prepared statement that Donald Trump was reading from, revealing not only that he’d added “no collusion,” but also crossed out a line saying that we should bring “anyone involved in (the) meddling to justice.” [One is left wondering why in the world the President of the United States might decide to leave something like that out. It’s strange, right?]

Similarly, Peter Alexander of NBC News claims to have “asked (Trump) three times if he would publicly condemn Putin for election interference” at this event earlier today. All three times, Alexander said, Trump responded by either saying “Thank you,” or ignoring him altogether.

Oh, and it looks like Donald Trump might have some more explaining to do. According to Russian Major General Igor Konashenkov, our President entered into some kind of military agreement with the Russians during the mysterious two hours and ten minutes that he and Putin were locked in a room together. “The Russian Defense Ministry is ready for the practical implementation of agreements in the area of global security reached in Helsinki between Presidents Putin and Trump,” Konashenkov said earlier today. [While members of the press have been asking the White House for details, thus far, everyone seems to be silent.]

Oh, and it’s probably worth pointing out that it wasn’t just that Trump said one pro-Putin, anti-American thing during that press conference in Helsinki. There was a lot more… Here’s a list from NBC News.

So, yeah, I guess you could say that things are kind of fucked up here in America at the moment. But I suppose we should have expected a little drama when we elected a Russian asset to be our President. Hopefully, if nothing else, this serves as a lesson to others.

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 140 Comments

Some Dare Call It Treason: When a former CIA Director starts referring to your actions as “treasonous,” I think you might have a problem

Well, today was the big day. Following almost immediately on the heels of last week’s big announcement about the grand jury indictments of 12 Russian military intelligence officers for committing acts of cyber warfare against the U.S. during the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump had more than ample opportunity to cancel this morning’s private one-on-one meeting with Vladimir Putin, the man we now know, for a certainty, orchestrated the hacking of Democratic campaign servers in order to aid the Trump 2016 team. Instead of heeding the advice of the U.S. intelligence community, however, Donald Trump continued on with his plans, meeting with the ruthless dictator behind closed doors for over two hours, with no other Americans present. And, sadly, that wasn’t the worst of it.

When the private meeting had concluded, as thinking people everywhere were busy speculating how it was that Putin came to have such a hold over our President, Donald Trump stood up in front a room of reporters next to a smirking Putin and said that, despite the indictments, and the mountains of evidence that had been shown to him, he still saw no reason for concern. In fact, he said, he still wasn’t convinced that it had even happened.

Asked point blank if he believed his own intelligence agencies, and their conclusion that Russia had meddle in our election, Donald Trump said, “My people came to me, [Director of National Intelligence] Dan Coats came to me, some others, they said they think it’s Russia. I have President Putin. He just said it’s not Russia. I will say this, I don’t see any reason why it would be.”

Our Republican President then went on to say, “President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today.”

Watch for yourselves.

So, now the nation holds its breath and waits to see what our Republican Congress will do, as they hold every lever of power, and have been satisfied to look the other way just as long as Donald Trump agreed to appoint their judges, and cut their taxes. Now, though, according to the Atlantic, it’s “the moment of truth,” where Republicans have to decide whether or not they really care about the country at all, or only the wealth and power that come with control. And people like Democratic Congressmen Adam Schiff are appealing to their last vestiges of decency, urging them to do the right thing before they “become enablers” of something truly horrific, as though that hasn’t been their position from the time the Access Hollywood “pussy grabbing” audio first surfaced, to just recently, when we learned about the toddler prisons on the border. The truth is, they’re now so far down the slippery slope, I doubt they could stop even if they’d wanted to. The momentum, I fear, just won’t let them.

And so we wait, as, one by one, the Republican members of Congress weigh in with their statements.

So far, it’s not looking good. While John McCain came out and pronounced it to be “disgraceful,” most wouldn’t allow themselves to go so far. Bob Corker, for instance, just said he was “saddened” and “disappointed.” That, however, was still better than Rand Paul, who praised the “renewing open lines of conversation” between the U.S. and Russia. [McCain went on to say, “No prior president has ever abased himself more abjectly before a tyrant.”]

But some seem to be searching for a way off the sinking ship. Newt Gingrich, for instance, took to Twitter and demanded an explanation. “President Trump must clarify his statements in Helsinki on our intelligence system and Putin,” he said. “It is the most serious mistake of his presidency and must be corrected—-immediately.”

But Fox, you can be sure, isn’t going to just sit around and wait for the pressure to build against the President. They’ve already begun spinning, with Sean Hannity going on the offensive this evening, pushing a conspiracy theory in line with their always popular “Obama was worse” narrative. According to Hannity, whatever Putin may have done, Obama did worse when he “interfered in Israel’s election.” This, of course, is a claim that has already been debunked, but what does that matter, right? We, after all, have a war against immigrants to fight here, and Donald Trump is our great white champion, no mater what kind of leverage Vladimir Putin may have over him.

And, as you might expect, Donald Trump has gone back to blaming Hillary Clinton’s server for getting itself hacked, like a rapist arguing that his victim was “asking for it” because of the way that she was dressed.

So if you care at all about this country, I’d encourage you to call your elected officials and demand that they speak out. We cannot just allow this to pass the same way that we’ve allowed everything else to pass. And I’m afraid we need to start pressuring the people who support Donald Trump, and not just the man himself. As vile as he may be, and as corrosive as he may be to our democratic institutions, the truth is that he couldn’t have made it in office for one week without a complicit Congress that was willing to look the other way in exchange for wealth and power. And we need to go after those people. And, maybe, just maybe, now that the t-word is being uttered in polite D.C. society, they’ll be forced to re-triangulate and do the right thing.

Speaking of the t-word, the one good thing about Trump’s absolutely jaw-dropping performance in Helsinki today is that people have now started to say it more freely. Here, to give you and example, is something written earlier this afternoon by former CIA Director John Brennan.

[note: If something is “nothing short of treasonous,” it’s treasonous.]

So, yeah, when you call your elected officials, be sure to tell them that what we just saw in Helsinki is treason, and that it’ll be the lucky ones who are just driven from office and banished to the wilderness.

The penalty for treason, after all, is death.

There’s more that I could say… I wanted to tell you, for instance, about how Trump actually suggested at some point in the joint news conference that Robert Mueller make information and sources available to the Russians so that they might help investigate, but, in hopes of preserving a bit of my sanity for the street fights to come, I’ve decided to take it easy this evening.

Goodspeed, patriots.

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 51 Comments

Catching up with SolarYpsi

Tomorrow evening (Tuesday, July 17) at 6:00, Dave Strenski, the founder of SolarYpsi, is going to be in our conference room at Landline Creative Labs to discuss how solar power works, and the local resources that exist to help you get started, should you decide to join the ever-growing number of Ypsilantians who are attempting, at least in some small way, to explore the potential of renewable energy. So, if you’re at all interested in learning about how solar might be right for you, or if you just want to hear the story of how SolarYpsi grew from its first installation of four solar panels at the Ypsilanti Food Co-op back in 2005, to the incredible force it is today, feel free to come out and join us. I’ll be sure that someone is outside 209 Pearl Street at around 6:00 to let people in. [For those of you who can’t make it out, you’ll find Dave’s TEDx talk, which I imagine might be somewhat similar, online.]

[The above image was borrowed with permission from my old friend Doug Coombe, as the photos that I have of Dave Strenski all date back to 2013, when I last interviewed him for this site.]

Following, for those of you who might be interested, is a short discussion between Dave and I about the current state of YpsiSolar, what what he intends to be discussing tomorrow evening at Landline. Enjoy.

MARK: Since the beginning of Solar Ypsi, how many installations have you and your team done?

DAVE: According to the running tally on the SolarYpsi website, there are a total of 75 installations, mostly in Washtenaw County. 39 of those sites are in the City of Ypsilanti. SolarYpsi has installed some of those with volunteer help. We’ve also helped coordinate grant money or donations for contractors to do some of the installations. And some of them have been done by homeowners and their installers with our encouragement and education.

MARK: So, when you add all of these together, how much power are we talking about?

DAVE: From all of our installations, which are mostly across Eastern Washtenaw County, we’ve got a solar capacity of 1.36 megawatts (MW). And most of that is here, in Ypsilanti. Within the City of Ypsilanti alone, it’s a total of 1,106,285 watts, or over 1.1 MW. So, given that we have about 20,000 people in the City, that means we’re producing around 55 watts per capita. This, by the way, puts Ypsilanti in the top 20 nationally for watts produced per capita.

MARK: How much have the prices of solar panels, batteries, etc, fallen since you launched SolarYpsi?

DAVE: When I started in 2005, and put those first 4 panels on the Ypsilanti Food Cooperative, they were about $1,000 per panel, and generated 190 watts of power ($5.26/watt). A panel today that is about the same size cost about $215 and generates 295 watts ($0.73/watt). That’s a 7x drop in price! I have yet to install batteries and don’t recommend that for people that are connected to the grid.

MARK: How are your installations now different than those that you did early on? What have you learned?

DAVE: The basic design of an installation has not changed. For a typical asphalt shingled roof we use a metal flashing that slides under the shingles and is lag bolted to the roof rafter. Aluminum rails are then placed on these attachment points and run the length of the roof. Wires and optimizers are then attached to the rails before the panels are placed on top and hire everything. The process is the same, but we’re always learning how to do it faster and cheaper.

For the racking, we’ve used UniRac and SunRail, but we’re mostly using Iron Ridge now. You can visit the installation page of SolarYpsi.org and select solar installation based on the type of panel, inverter, installer, etc.

MARK: In addition to doing installs yourself, as you mentioned earlier, you also talk with local Ypsi residents about doing their own installations. Do you have any way of knowing how many households in Ypsi now have solar panels?

DAVE: The SolarYpsi page has 39 solar installations in the City of Ypsilanti. These ranged from one or two panels on homes to over 2,000 panels at Highland Cemetery. But I also know of a few installations in Ypsi that are not yet on the SolarYpsi website. So, it’s more than 39. If anyone would like their system on SolarYpsi, just let me know, and we’ll set up a page.

MARK: How many Ypsilanti homes, based on your calculations, would be feasible for solar power?

DAVE: Great question! Being a bit of a geek, I figured out how to dump all the Ypsi addresses from the property look-up page and found 6,300 addresses. Solar can be put on an East or West facing roof, but you get your best return on investment with a South facing roof. If we assume all of Ypsi streets run east-west or north-south, then about half of these properties should have a South facing roof. Many of those will have trees shading the roof, so my best guess is a couple of thousands roofs would be good for solar. I’m actually writing a program to push all the addresses through Google’s Sunroof Project and rank all the building from best to worst. I have found a couple of homes that are completely surrounded by trees, not very good for solar power.

I’ve already done this process manually and just picked out 50 of the biggest commercial roofs Ypsilanti. When I added up the solar potential of these roofs, it came out to 7 Megawatts, so just greeting those would make us number one in the nation for solar per capita! I’ve worked with the City to send them all a letter encouraging them to consider solar for their roofs.

MARK: What’s the state of legislation now in Michigan? Am I correct that, while people can’t sell power back to the grid, they can receive credits of some sort for the excess power which they produce?

DAVE: Michigan currently has net-metering which means you can push out power to the grid and get full credit for those kWh, and then bring them back in for the same prince. Essentially this means free power storage. There was an effort last summer to change this, but it was defeated. The threat to net-metering continues, so I would suggest that anyone considering solar should act now and hopefully get grandfathered into the existing program if the rules do change.

There is still a 30% Federal Renewable Energy Tax credit available that starts to expire in 2019. I believe that this summer is the time to act, because I’m guessing all the solar contractors will be booked up with work next summer as everyone races to get their systems installed before the tax credit expires.

MARK: OK, so that’s why you were saying earlier that you haven’t given much thought to battery technology… it’s because, in Michigan, at least right now, legislation exists that essentially let’s you bank your power on the grid.

DAVE: I like to seperate renewable power from uninterruptible power. Those are two separate problems. If you want uninterruptible power I would suggest getting a gas power generator and a transfer switch. When the power goes out, flip the switch and power up the generator. While batteries are a great solution if you’re a cabin in the woods, there no reason to have them when you’re connected to the grid. Batteries will add thousands of dollars to the cost, lowers your efficiency because all the power has to be transform to go into the battery and transform again to come out of the battery, and have a lot more maintenance. They also only last about 7 to 10 years, so you’ll have to replace them about 3 times during the life of the solar installation.

MARK: So there are no state laws and incentives being considered, at least that you’re aware of, that might encourage more people to explore solar here in Michigan?

DAVE: That’s right. I’m not aware of any state incentives in the works, just the Federal tax credit that is set to expire in 2019. I would love to find a bucket of money for the city to offer solar rebates. Lowering the price by a few thousand dollars would really lower the barrier for people to go solar.

MARK: What’ll you be talking about at Landline on the 17th?

DAVE: I will be explaining how solar power works, the economics of solar power, and how it attaches to your home or business. Bring your electric bill and address and we can make an estimate of what it would cost to install solar power and an estimate of the return on investment.

MARK: So what are you and your SolarYpsi volunteers working on these days?

DAVE: While we’re still doing volunteer installations – and we’re doing four of those right now – we’re mostly trying to influence businesses and homeowners to contact their own solar contractors and put panels on their roofs. As mentioned above, we surveyed Ypsilanti’s roofs and picked out 50 of the largest roofs, all of which were above businesses. Then, working with the City, a letter was drafted and sent to these businesses encouraging them to go solar and to attend an information meeting much like what we’re doing on Tuesday. Out of the 50 letters, two seem interested and we’re working on making it happen. I’m also doing something similar, and trying to identify the 100 best residential roofs for solar power.

We’re currently working on a Department of Energy SunShot “Solar in your Community” challenge. We’re completed two projects so far and looking for more large roofs for solar installations. This challenge has a grand prize of $500,000! It would be great to win that prize and put that money toward more solar projects in the city.

I’m always looking for people and/or organization that want to donate money to put solar on a non-profit in Ypsilanti. The project I would really like to get funded is putting solar on 13 Habitat for Humanity homes. I’ve surveyed the 44 homes they have built over the past 30+ years and found the best. I have quotes for new roofs and to install solar and a pledge of large donation toward this project, but still short on funds to make it happen. This would be a great project because by installing solar on a low income home, you’re effectively putting $50 in the homeowner’s pocket every month for the next 30 years. If we could train and hire local people to do the installations we would be creating jobs. How great would that be!

Drop me an email if you have any ideas how to get this funded.

MARK: And you’ve won some awards since we last spoke too, right?

DAVE: Yes. SolarYpsi has worked with the City to win two solar awards. We won a Gold SolSmart award from the Solar Foundation (the first and only in Michigan), and we won a Smart City award. We’re also written up in the current issue of the Michigan Municipal League magazine for a Community Excellence award.

[Solar presentations are offered by SolarYpsi every month at a different location around town. You can also find recordings of past solar presentations on the Ypsi Live facebook page and a version in Spanish on the Contacto Michigan facebook page.]

Posted in energy, Landline Creative Labs, Michigan, Uncategorized, Ypsilanti | Tagged , , , | 6 Comments

OK, with Trump heading into a private meeting with Putin just days after Mueller went public with evidence proving Russia’s state-sanctioned hacking of our 2016 presidential election, is it finally time to admit that the conspiracy theory is actually fact, and take to the fucking streets?

As I’m not sure where to start, or where this post may go, I’m just going to jump right in and start rambling. Hopefully you can follow along. If not, I apologize.

Earlier this past week, before Donald Trump left the U.S. for what would turn out to be a completely disastrous NATO summit in Brussels, in which he succeeded in offending every leader of the free world, he met with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who informed him that the Justice Department would soon be indicting 12 Russian intelligence officers for hacking Democratic emails in hopes of influencing the outcome of the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

In spite of this, however, Trump continued to call the Mueller investigation a “rigged witch hunt” while on his European trip, and cheer on his Republican enablers in Congress as they interrogated FBI agent Peter Strzok for hours on end about a single text message that he’d send to a coworker within the agency with whom he was having an affair. The fact that Strzok had said in this text message, “we will stop him,” these Republican members of the House argued, proved that there was deep state conspiracy against their beloved leader, Donald Trump. Strzok, as you’ve likely seen by now, more than held his own against the ridiculous attack, reminding the Republicans on the House Oversight Committee that, while it’s true that he may have taken offense at Donald Trump’s having attacked the family of a deceased war hero, which is what apparently motivated the text in question, there was no evidence that he had done anything to interfere in the election on the part of Trump’s adversaries. [If anything, as we know now, the FBI tipped the election to Trump, when, just days before the election, FBI Director James Comey, under pressure from Trumpists in the FBI New York field office, announced the reopening of the farce of an investigation into Clinton’s email server.] Here, in case you missed it, is Strzok firing back in response to the Republican narrative.

In more sane times, a hearing like this never would have taken place, but, as the Republics control Congress, and as they’ve demonstrated that they have every intention of defending Donald Trump from prosecution, we have no choice but to be subjected to such nonsense. So, instead of holding substantive investigations into the clear and ongoing threat we as a nation face from Russia, the House of Representatives keeps tugging on the same little thread, hoping to convince the viewers of Fox News that Strzok sat at the center of a governmentwide conspiracy to keep Donald Trump from ‘Making America Great Again.’ So they attacked Strzok’s character, insinuating that his “we will stop him” text proves the existence of a vast anti-Trump conspiracy at the highest levels.

My favorite of the despicable attacks directed at Strzok came from Texas Congressman Louie Gohmert, who said “I can’t help wonder, when I see you looking there with a little smirk, how many times did you look so innocent into your wife’s eye and lie to her about Lisa Page?” [Does Strzok’s wife have just a single eye?] Lisa Page, for those of you who don’t recognize the name, was the FBI attorney with whom Strzok had been having an affair. [Someone might want to tell Gohmert that Donald Trump was having unprotected sex with a porn across while his wife was home with their newborn son, as I suspect he may want to use the same line during Trump’s impeachment hearing.]

And, as Trump’s hypocritical enablers  attacked Strzok for infidelity, yelling nonsensically about how the Mueller investigation has been politically motivated, the Democrats politely reminded everyone in the audience that, far from being a “witch hunt,” the Mueller investigation has already secured numerous indictments and guilty pleas… more, in fact, than Watergate, Whitewater or Iran-Contra during the first years of those investigations. Speaking of which, how much does it piss you off to hear Trey Gowdy demand that we wrap up the Mueller investigation when he spent several times as long on the Benghazi investigation, yielding not even a single indictment?

Here, while we’re on the subject of the Strozok hearing, are a few of my favorite things that transpired. First, we’ve got Republican Paul “I’m a dentist and therefore a body language expert” Gosar attempting to demonstrate his deep understanding of the constitution.

And, here, in my second favorite clip, is Democratic Congressman Jamie Raskin reminding everyone that, during the campaign, Strozok wasn’t the only one talking negatively about Donald Trump…. No, a lot of Republicans, many of whom who have since chosen to embrace Trump, once said much worse things about him.

Somehow, though, the President’s attorney, Rudy Giuliani, watched all of this unfold and declared it a great victory for his client. The entire Mueller investigation, he argued, should be thrown out because of Strzok’s incredible bias.

And, as I said, all of this was unfolding as Donald Trump was in Brussels, offending our allies and putting the NATO alliance, which has served as a safeguard against Russian aggression for the past seven decades, at risk… Here, with that it in mind, is some old 2016 presidential debate footage between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, in which Secretary of State Clinton notes specifically that Putin’s end goal is not just to destabilize America, but to fracture the NATO alliance. [Pretty interesting, right?]

But, wait, it gets weirded. As Donald Trump was lying about our allies and tearing at the fabric of NATO, and House Republicans were attempting to argue that the whole Mueller investigation should be ended because Peter Strozok once had the audacity to tell his lover that the American people would do the right thing and keep Donald Trump from office, Robert Mueller was preparing to go public with 12 indictments against Russian military intelligence (GRU) officials for hacking the Democratic National Committee’s servers in 2015 and 2016 and the email accounts of individuals working for the Clinton campaign.

Of course, all of this information – the fact that we had evidence of the involvement of Russian military intelligence officers – wouldn’t have been news to Donald Trump. As the President of the United States, he would have known all of this some time ago. He would have known this when he said one year ago this month that he wanted to form an “impenetrable Cyber Security unit” with Putin, giving the Russians access to our cybersecurity infrastructure. And he would have know it two years ago, when he said that it was a “joke” that “Russia leaked the disastrous DNC e-mails”. And he certainly would have known about a few weeks ago, when word first broke that he was planning to meet with Putin in private this coming Monday… a meeting which, by the way, he’s yet to cancel, even with these most recent public revelations.

Speaking of the revelations included in these most recent indictments. Here’s one of my favorites. On July 27, 2016, according to these recently filed court documents, the Russians targeted Clinton campaign emails “for the first time.” Do you know what happened earlier that same day? Well, friends, that’s the day that Donald Trump stood on a stage in Florida and said, “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing.

Trump, now that all of this is out in the open, isn’t thanking the intelligence community for their work. He’s also not cancelling his face-to-face meeting with Putin on Monday, which is said to be happening without any other Americans present. And he’s not calling for increased election security. No, he’s not doing any of that. What he’s doing is blaming Barack Obama for not having stopped any of this from happening… Following is Trump’s tweet and Democratic Congressman Adam Schiff’s response.

For what it’s worth, Schiff left out one salient fact. Obama went to Republican Mitch McConnell and asked him to issue a joint statement on the subject of Russian election interference, only to have the Senator refuse.

Oh, and in the background, as all of this has been going on this past week, the Republicans voted unanimously to name Trump nominee Brian Benczkowski the head of the Justice Department’s criminal division, despite the fact that he has absolutely no prosecutorial experience, has never so much as argued a single case in court, and worked for Alfa Bank, a Russian bank owned by an oligarch closely tied to Vladimir Putin… If the name Alfa bank sounds familiar, it’s likely because it’s come up in relation to the Russia investigations. As CNN recently reported, “Questions surrounding Alfa Bank first arose in 2016 when a group of computer scientists raised concerns about Internet records that showed that Alfa Bank servers repeatedly looked up the unique internet address of a Trump Organization computer server in the United States.

One last thing. While not naming names, these most recent grand jury indictments indicate that Americans citizens were in contact with those running the Russian hacking operation. Specifically, the document refers to a U.S. congressional candidate and a person in regular contact with senior Trump campaign officials. [The person in regular contact with the Trump campaign is thought by many to be Nixon “ratfucker” Roger Stone.]

So, yeah, I guess you could say America is in peril. Russia sought to instal Donald Trump as our president, and they succeeded. Whether or not he would have won without their help, we’ll never know. What we do know, however, is that, instead of supporting the investigation and actively taking steps to ensure that it never happens again, Donald Trump has sought to suggest that the entire investigation is nothing more than an attempt on the part of angry Democrats to delegitimize his presidency. And, what’s worse, Congressional Republicans are actively supporting him as he does this, attacking his enemies, spreading his lies, and laying the groundwork for something akin to Nixon’s Saturday Night Massacre… Benczkowski, as head of the Justice Department’s criminal division, will be in a position to help kill the investigation, should Trump make a move against Rod Rosenstein… And, according to Politico, House Freedom Caucus leaders Mark Meadows and Jim Jordan could move to impeach Rosenstein on behalf of the President as early as Monday — the same day that Trump will be meeting privately with Putin.

So, at what point do we take to the streets? Do we wait until Rosenstein is fired, or does the general strike start the moment Donald Trump goes into his private meeting with Vladimir Putin?

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 62 Comments

Ypsilanti’s free public phone is once again up and running

Not too long after we got the free public phone up and running across from Ypsi’s transit center this past spring, something terrible happened, and it died. Well, thanks to our friends at Futel, a replacement phone was shipped out from Portland, and we’ve once again got free phone service on Pearl Street. For those of you who have no idea what I’m talking about, here’s a bit of background that some friends and I had written up for a yet-to-be launched webpage about the phone….

In March 2018, 209 Pearl Street became home to a free community telephone thanks to a partnership with Futel, a Portland-based activism/public arts entity dedicated to the democratization of telecommunications through the introduction of free payphones into America’s urban centers. “Given the building’s history as a communications node for Michigan Bell back in the 1920s, as well as the proximity to the transit center, it made perfect sense,” said building co-owner Mark Maynard, who had been introduced to Futel founder Karl Anderson through Dug Song, co-founder of Duo Security.

Ypsilanti’s Futel phone, which is the 6th in the Futel network, can be found across the street from the Ypsilanti transit center, on the eastern side of the former Michigan Bell Telephone building at 209 Pearl.

The following conversation between Anderson and Maynard on the history and objectives of Futel, was published on Maynard’s blog in June 2017.

ON THE GENESIS OF FUTEL:

MARK: OK, let’s talk about Futel. What’s the idea behind it?

KARL: I have a prepared statement which I think should fully explain everything”

“At Futel, we believe in the preservation of public telephone hardware as a means of providing access to the agora for everybody, and toward that goal we are privileged to provide free domestic telephone calls, voicemail, and telephone-mediated services. We do not judge the motivations of our users, or who they choose to call; if they don’t have someone to call, we can provide a presence on the other end. Denial of telephony services has long been a tactic used against undesirable populations, and our devices will counteract that. But more importantly, we will help to establish a new era of communication, one in which reaching out is not only desirable, but mandatory.”

“To what extent are our interactions mediated by intelligent machines? Who is doing the talking when we let them decide who we interact with and what constitutes appropriate topics of communication? We believe that the time has come to greet each other not with our heads down, staring at our hands and begging for the permission of the minds that oversee our networks, but proudly, standing tall, with our eyes open and aware of our surroundings.”

“We are primarily driven by the basic needs that we see on the streets every day, by giving something away that is cheap for us but valuable to the recipient. But we hope that we can also build a tower of Babel on top of that, a monument of telephones and switching networks and cascading psychological structures which will give the community something else as well, something we may not appreciate until it has forever changed us.”

MARK: And how did all of this come to you? Was there something specific that made you think, “It’s imperative, for all the reasons outlined above, that we bring public phones back”?

KARL: The original reason was mainly just that I like payphones. Public phones were part of the cyberpunk urban furniture that we didn’t expect to go away, and part of hacker history. I like street hardware, public keyboards, the whole thing. And then there was a guy who mowed my lawn, but he couldn’t always keep his phone paid up. He would push his mower around the neighborhood, but some days I wouldn’t be home, or I wouldn’t need my lawn mowed. I thought he might find it helpful if he had a phone and a voicemail account. And my street has a lot of foot traffic, there’s a light rail station down the block and a lot of tent encampments around. I thought it would be interesting to see how it would get used. I just repeated all those reasons to myself until I was convinced. It might not make the most sense, but other people have continued to contribute over the years, I use that as validation.

MARK: Speaking of the history of hacking, were you ever in envolved in phone hacking, or phreaking?

KARL: Not me! I didn’t even get a modem until 1990, and, while I did visit some scummy BBSs, I was really just an outside observer when it came to that particular scene. I may or may not have enjoyed using a red box, though.

MARK: Where was your first install, and has the vision for Futel changed at all as a result of what you’ve experienced thus far?

KARL: The first Futel phone is in Portland, in front of my house. I expected it to get used, given the neighborhood I’m in, but I’ve been surprised by how much activity it gets. But, to your question, no, the vision remains pretty much the same. We’re both a social service organization and a public art project… I should add, however, that we realize all communities are different, and, for that reason, we want to allow flexibility when it comes to how the phones are configured. It depends on what the host might want, so long as the phones provide free calls…

OPERATORS MIGHT BE STANDING BY:

MARK: So, speaking of operators, is scaling going to be difficult as you add more phones, and thus users to the system?

KARL: We have several operators, but we can always use more. I’d love to have more in other timezones. But, to answer your question, we don’t always get every call. If you don’t get an operator, though, you can always try again. Eventually someone will call you, if you stick around…. When an operator doesn’t pick up, you’re prompted to leave a message, and you can leave your voicemail box number, if you want a reply.

MARK: If someone out there happens to read this, and wants to find out about being an Futel operator, is there an online application or something? And can people sign up for limited shifts? Could someone, for instance, sign up for 9:00 to midnight EST the first Friday of every month?

KARL: We don’t currently have limited shifts, but operators don’t need to respond to every call. The system rings every operator, and, whoever wants to pick up the call just indicates their intention before being connected. As for prospective operators, they’re always welcome to apply. All they have to do is call an existing operator from any Futel phone! The handbook is currently only printed in issue one of (the Futel zine) Party Line, but we could set up an orientation conference call…

FUTEL SERVICES:

MARK: OK, one of the choices (on the Futel menu) is voicemail. Can people actually set up voicemail through Futel?

KARL: Yes, and voicemail can be left or checked from the incoming line. We would like to be able to give out numbers that would go directly to voicemail accounts someday – the caller wouldn’t know that you didn’t have a phone…

MARK: OK, so there’s also a reference to conference calls. What’s that all about?

KARL: It’s basically a party line.

MARK: And the “wildcard line”?

KARL: That is an audio zine, basically call and response. Users can contribute from any Futel phone. Currently, you can only hear it from the phone, although I plan to put them on the net when I get time.

MARK: So people are prompted to say something… tell a story, describe what’s happening where they are, etc… and your intention is to aggregate all of that into an audio zine that could, one day, be shared online, as well as through Futel phones.

KARL: Two episodes are already shared through the phone. I like to give phone users something special, so they get everything first. But you can hear at least one episode on the incoming line – 503 HOT 1337.

MARK: So, here in Ypsi, assuming we move forward, how much flexibility would we have in configuring our menu?

KARL: We will be making a custom menu for Ypsi. We really should get the mayor’s number in there, and relevant social services, whatever else you want. The only real constraint is that it’s a slow process right now to push changes.

MARK: Can you give us an idea of the kinds of numbers you’re sharing on other Futel phones?

KARL: Besides the mayor, we have a directory of social service numbers and a directory of amusing numbers. The social service numbers are things like 211, a transportation service called Call To Safety, bus schedules, things like that. The amusing numbers include the Apology Line, which is one of our inspirations, it’s basically voicemail discussions as social art.

MARK: What about emergency calls? Is there any risk, given how the system is configured, that emergency calls may not go through? I mean this is all contingent on the wireless being operational and the internet being up, right? I’m just wondering if there’s any responsibility, when you place a public phone outside, to ensure that it connects… Is that something that you’ve thought about?

KARL: There is always risk, and there is great responsibility. If the power or net goes down, the phone goes down. All I can say is that reliability is the first priority, we monitor and notice when a phone isn’t connecting, and we test emergency calls with each release, and we’ve been more reliable than other payphones in the area. One user had to run over a mile and pass two non-working phones to use ours. One user had difficulties and got an operator to make a call. I do fear that someone will spend time someday trying to use a non-working Futel phone in an emergency. But I am certain that it is a net positive, the phones have been used to get emergency medical services at least twice…

So, with that, we’d like your thoughts on what we should ask Anderson to consider adding to the Ypsi menu the next time he does a system-wide update? Should we link directly to the providers of community services, like the Shelter Association of Washtenaw County, Community Action Network, SOS Community Services, or Ozone House? And should we have a link to a local weather forecast? Or how about a suicide prevention hotline? And how about arts, culture, history? For instance, in New York City they have phone booths where people can hear the stories of immigrants. Could we have a local historian record an abbreviated history of Ypsilanti? Or what if we set up a number where Futel users could hear something by a random local band? Now that we have this platform, how would we like to use it? I mean being able to make free phone calls is awesome on its own, but what else could we use the Futel platform for?

[above: An amateur male model, hired from Craigslist, pretends to use Ypsilanti’s first Futel phone.]

One last thing… It should be noted that Ypsi’s Futel phone, which is hosted by the folks at Landline Creative Labs, was funded in part by a grant from the Ann Arbor Awesome Foundation. Also, the phone wouldn’t be online right now if not for David Gustofson, who handled the original installation for us, and Ryan Brase, who helped troubleshoot the last time things went to hell. And, of course, we wouldn’t be having this discussion right now, were it not for the vision and drive of Karl Anderson, the founder of Futel.

[above: Futel’s Karl Anderson tests equipment at 209 Pearl Street.]

Posted in Landline Creative Labs | Tagged , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Connect

BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative Frankenstein Flower Header