As Dreamers anticipate a deportation order from the Trump administration, more anti-immigrant graffiti appears in Ann Arbor

Donald Trump is expected to announced tomorrow that he’s decided to kill the Obama administration immigration policy known as DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), which essentially allows those who immigrated to the United States illegally as children, to stay in the country without fear of deportation, so long as they continue to be good, contributing members of society, etc. [It’s actually more complicated than that, but that’s the gist of it. If you’d like to know more, you’ll find the specifics here.] While it’s expected that Trump will give Congress six months to come up with some kind of an alternative, assuming the repeal goes into effect, it could mean that the 787,580 people who registered to participate in the program, commonly referred to as “Dreamers,” could face deportation.

It should be noted that these young people came forward willingly, and in good faith, to announce themselves as undocumented immigrants, and register for this program that promised a path toward the American dream. On December 8, Trump, in a brief moment of lucidity, said the following of these young people. “We’re going to work something out that’s going to make people happy and proud,” he said, “They got brought here at a very young age, they’ve worked here, they’ve gone to school here. Some were good students. Some have wonderful jobs. And they’re in never-never land because they don’t know what’s going to happen.” Then, on January 18, just before taking office, Trump said that he was going to propose a plan with “a lot of heart” – one which would leave the Dreamers “very happy.” Well, I think it’s safe to say, that’s not what’s happening.

When asked why this should be a priority of our nation now, people on the far right talk of the societal costs associated with having these young immigrants in our country. Apparently, though, that’s not quite true. Not only are the coasts associated with having the Dreamers in the country relatively low, but the costs associated with deporting these individuals would be enormous. As the folks at the Washington Post point out, it will likely cost on the order of $8.5 billion to deport these Dreamers. That, as the Post points out, would be enough “to fund the National Endowment for the Arts (which Trump’s budget proposed eliminating) for 56 years,” or pay for “40 percent of Trump’s proposed border wall.” Furthermore, according to the conservative CATO Institute, “DACA rescission will cost employers $6.3 billion in employee turnover costs, including recruiting, hiring, and training 720,000 new employees.”

Really, it makes absolutely no sense, at least fiscally speaking. We’ve invested a great deal in these young people, most of whom, if I’m not mistaken, came here prior to starting kindergarten, and they’re just now beginning to contribute as tax-paying members of our society. Why push them out now? I mean, Apple alone, according to CEO Tim Cook, employs 250 Dreamers. Do we really want these people to return to Mexico and Asia, taking their talents, and their tax dollars, with them?

But I think we all know what this is really about. It’s about race, and the fear of a rapidly changing American demographic. Members of the far right, like Iowa Congressman Steve King, might say that this is all about restoring the “rule of law,” but it’s all about racial politics, and giving an easy victory to the far right of the Republicans party, like those who marched with torches through Charlottesville a few weeks ago. Dreamers are low-hanging fruit. Finding foreign-born criminals in America, and deporting them, is difficult work. Rounding up Dreamers, though, is easy. They’ve willingly told us who they are, and where they work. They played by the rules. And this, apparently, is how they repay them… Granted, Congress may take the hot potato that Trump just handed them, and do the right thing. Personally, I don’t think he cares. All he wants, I think, is for the far right to know that he’s doing his part to make America white again.

[above: A map showing where the DACA Dreamers are located, taken from the Washington Post article linked to above.]

For what it’s worth, not all Republicans are against DACA. According to a recent report in the Atlantic, allowing the Dreamers to stay is something most conservatives are OK with. “Nearly 80 percent of Republicans, and three-quarters of Trump voters, support it,” they say. But, they’re quick to add, “(I)mmigration hardliners like the pundit Ann Coulter, Breitbart, and Attorney General Jeff Sessions have been vocal proponents of ending the policy.”

As with the pardoning of racist Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio last week, what we’re seeing here is Trump feeding raw meat to the most far-right members of his base, the people who conservatives in Congress truly fear, the most rabid nationalists and racists in America… This, it’s clear to me, is all about Trump preparing for battle over impeachment, and making sure the so-called deplorables are solidly behind him. There’s no other reason for this to be happening now, as we’re facing a nuclear showdown with North Korea. This isn’t about crafting good policy. This is about using the lives of nearly one million young people for political gain.

Unfortunately, as all of this is playing out in DC, we’re seeing signs of anti-immigrant sentiment here at home. In addition to the white supremacist literature found in Ypsilanti a few days ago, and recent incidents at the Ann Arbor Skate Park, and Concordia University, the “rock” on U-M’s campus, which had been painted by members of ALMA (Assisting Latinos to Maximize Achievement) to welcome new students to campus, was covered in pro-Trump and anti-immigrant graffiti.

[For more information about this most recent incident on the University of Michigan campus, see the La Casa (Latinx Alliance for Community Action Support and Advocacy) statement, and the response by U-M Chief Diversity Officer Robert Sellers.]

In a more perfect world, we would have a President leading our nation who, seeing this increasingly heated racial environment, would intercede and encourage us to be better people. Instead, though, we have someone looking to exacerbate the situation by adding fuel to the fire… Again, there is no reason why this had to happen now. This only serves to heighten tensions and push us closer to a breaking point. And, for what? So our President can look good to his far right base? So he has a bargaining chip to work with when trying to find the money to build his wall? It’s absolutely shameful. Using these young people in such a way is beyond disgusting. It’s just plain vile.

update: Jeff Sessions has made it official. The hot potato has officially been pitched to Congress.

Posted in Ann Arbor, Civil Liberties, Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 100 Comments

A big “thank you” to all those who died in the Chicago rail yards so that we might have the day off to grill hot dogs… Happy Labor Day

I know it’s probably cheating, but here’s something that I posted more than half a decade ago on the occasion of Labor Day. If anything, I think it’s even more appropriate today, seeing as how Michigan has since become a so-called “right to work” state, and we now how have an unquestionably anti-worker administration running our country.

pullmantownstrike

As some of you probably know, Labor Day was first celebrated here in the United States in 1882. It wasn’t, however, made a national holiday until 1894, in the wake of a bloody strike by employees of the Pullman Palace Car Company, an Illinois-based manufacturer of luxury rail cars. It all began when the company, after having cut the wages of workers across the board by as much as 25%, refused to reduce the rent charged to these same workers, who lived and worked in the company town of Pullman, Illinois. And, from there, the strike spread throughout the railroad industry… The following extended clip comes from the Kansas Heritage Group:

…The strike went peacefully, but after several weeks the Pullman management had not changed its position and the strikers were desperate for aid. During the strike, the American Railway Union had convened in Chicago because it was the rail center of the United States. The recently formed American Railway Union had 465 local unions and claimed the memberships of 150,000 workers. Since, the Pullman workers were an affiliated union on strike in Chicago the ARU offered to send arbitrators for the Pullman cause. The Pullman workers refused this aid, even so the ARU under the leadership of Eugene Debs decided to stop handling Pullman cars on June 26 if the Pullman Union would not agree to arbitration. The stage was set for the largest strike in the nation’s history.

On June 26, the ARU switchmen started to refuse to switch trains with Pullman cars. In response, the General Managers Association began to fire the switchmen for not handling the cars. The strike and boycott rapidly expanded, paralyzing the Chicago rail yards and most of the twenty-four rail lines in the city.

On July 2 a federal injunction was issued against the leaders of the ARU. This Omnibus Indictment prevented ARU leaders from “…compelling or inducing by threats, intimidation, persuasion, force or violence, railway employees to refuse or fail to perform duties…” This injunction was based on the Sherman anti-trust act and the Interstate commerce act and was issued by federal judges Peter S. Grosscup and William A. Woods under the direction of, Attorney General, Richard Olney. The injunction prevented the ARU leadership from communicating with their subordinates and chaos began to reign.

Governor Altgeld of Illinois had been hesitant to employ the state militia to put down the strike instead relying on the local authorities to handle the situation. However, he said he would use the National Guard to protect property. Above all Governor Altgeld did not want federal troops to intervene. However, the issuing of this federal injunction and the fact that mail-trains might be delayed caused President Grover Cleveland to send in federal troops from Fort Sheridan. On July 3, Federal troops entered Chicago against Governor Altgeld’s repeated protests. Governor Altgeld protested by writing President Cleveland on July 5, saying, “…surely the facts have not been correctly presented to you in this case, or you would not have taken the step, for it seems to me, unjustifiable. Waiving all questions of courtesy I will say that the State of Illinois is not only able to take care of itself, but it stands ready to furnish the Federal Government any assistance it may need else where…” Despite these repeated protests by Governor Altgeld, President Cleveland continued to send in federal troops.

The reaction of the strikers to the appearance of the troops was that of outrage. What had been a basically peaceful strike turned into complete mayhem. The mayhem began on July 4, with mobs of people setting off fireworks and tipping over rail cars. The workers started to tip railcars and build blockades in reaction to the presence of the federal troops. In addition to this, there was additional level of chaos caused by the ARU leaders’ inability to communicate with the strikers because of the federal indictments. The rioting grew and spread then on July 7, a large fire consumed seven buildings at the World’s Colombian Exposition in Jackson Park. This burning and rioting came to a zenith on July 6, when fires caused by some 6,000 rioters destroyed 700 railcars and caused $340,000 of damages in the South Chicago Panhandle yards.

At this time in the Chicago vicinity, there were 6,000 federal and state troops, 3,100 police, and 5,000 deputy marshals. However, all this manpower could not prevent the violence from peaking when on July 7, national guardsmen after being assaulted, fired into the crowd killing at least four (possibly up to thirty) and wounding at least twenty. The killing continued when two more people were killed by troops in Spring Valley, Illinois. All this violence started to cause the strike to ebb and on that same day Eugene Debs and four other ARU leaders were arrested for violating the indictment. These officers were later realized on $10,000 bond. The strike was failing rapidly, so the ARU tried to enlist the aid of the AFL in the form of sympathetic strikes. When this was refused the ARU attempted to abandon the strike, on the grounds that workers would be rehired without prejudice except were convicted of crimes however, this offer was refused by the General Managers’ Association. The strike continued to dwindle, and trains began to move with increased frequency. The strike became untenable for the workers and on August 2 the Pullman works reopened.

This strike was truly monumental if some of the figures for lost revenues are looked at. The railroads alone lost an estimated $685,308 in expenses incurred during the strike. However, the railroads lost even more in revenue an estimated $4,672,916. In addition, 100,000 striking employees lost wages of an estimated $1,389,143. These costs are just the localized effects of the paralyzation of the nation’s rail center and do not include the far ranging financial effects. The manpower used to break the strike was also immense. The total forces of the strikebreakers both government and private were: 1,936 federal troops, 4,000 national guardsmen, about 5,000 extra deputy marshals, 250 extra deputy sheriffs, and the 3,000 policemen in Chicago for a total of 14,186 strikebreakers. In addition to these figures there were also twelve people shot and killed, and 71 people who were arrested and sentenced on the federal indictment. This strike had other far ranging consequences. The federal government took an unprecedented step in using indictments to make any form of a strike essentially illegal and supported this action by deploying federal troops against the will of the states.

The results of the Pullman Strike were both enormous and inconsequential. They were enormous because the strike showed the power of unified national unions. At the same time the strike showed the willingness of the federal government to intervene and support the capitalists against unified labor. The results were inconsequential because for all of the unified effort of the unions the workers did not get their rents lowered.

So, several men in Chicago lost their lives, labor had been struck a tremendous blow, and President Grover Cleveland, fearing an even greater worker revolt, pushed the national holiday through Congress in order to appease the masses. And, now, we celebrate the day by grilling out and taking one last dip in the pool.

Here’s to all the men and women who died so that we might enjoy the 40 hour work week, safe working conditions, and all the rest of it… Let’s enjoy the fruits of their labor while we can, because God knows we’ll see kids working in coal mines again in our lifetimes. To do otherwise, after all, would be Socialism.

update: A link to the following graph was just left in the comments section. I thought that it deserved to be up here, where it had a greater likelihood of catching your attention.

[note: I posted the above update in 2011. If you have access to a more recent graph showing how both middle class income and union membership have fared over these last half dozen years, let me know.]

update: I was going to write something, here at the end of this post, about the people Trump has tapped to push forward his labor agenda, but, as luck would have it, I just happened across a new post at The Cap Times of Madison that said it better than I ever could. Here’s a clip.

…(Trump) has made that plain by assembling an administration that is packed with political grifters who have made it their business to defend sweatshops, depress wages and tip every balance toward multinational corporations.

Trump’s National Labor Relations Board picks — Marvin Kaplan and William Emanuel — have been greeted with scorn by advocates for a living wage and workplace fairness. As Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren told Emanuel during his confirmation hearing: “You have spent your career at one of the most ruthless, union-busting law firms in the country. How can Americans trust you will protect workers’ rights when you’ve spent 40 years fighting against them?”

Trump’s Secretary of Labor, Alexander Acosta, has a miserable history of aligning with right-wing and corporate interests. After law school, Acosta clerked for Third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Samuel Alito. Alito is now the U.S. Supreme Court’s aggressive foe of worker rights. Acosta, who served briefly as a George W. Bush appointee to the National Labor Relations Board, went on to face harsh criticism for the partisanship he displayed on voting rights cases while leading the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division.

As labor secretary, Acosta has remained on the wrong side. Just weeks ago, he appeared before the annual gathering of the militantly anti-labor American Legislative Exchange Council — along with anti-union zealot Betsy DeVos, Trump’s secretary of education.

Trump’s pick to serve as deputy secretary of labor, Patrick Pizzella, has an even more troubling record than Acosta. A former campaign staffer for Ronald Reagan who has served in Republican and Democratic administrations, Pizzella was once employed by the viscerally anti-union National Right to Work Committee and later joined the firm that scandal-plagued lobbyist Jack Abramoff was associated with before his 2006 conviction on federal charges that included attempted bribery.

When Alaska Republican Sen. Frank Murkowski proposed legislation to raise wages for workers in the Northern Marianas Islands, a U.S. territory that corporations used to get a “Made in the USA” label on sweatshop products, Pizzella lobbied for the sweatshop owners…

Speaking of sweatshops, today’s post was brought you by Ivanka Trump.

Posted in Corporate Crime, Economics, History, Michigan, Other | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Connect

BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative The Prisoner