Wealthy patriots make the case to kill Bush’s tax cuts

Billionaire investor Warren Buffet has long been outspoken in his belief that the rich in American need to pay their fair share in the way of taxes. While a majority of Americans would agree with Buffet, it’s not something that many of our leaders in Washington seem willing to bring up, let alone champion. As we’re seeing play out right now with regard to the Bush tax cuts for the super-wealthy, which are set to expire at the end of the year, very few of our leaders seem willing to say the obvious, which is that we cannot afford them. (Furthermore, they did not spur the economy forward, as Bush had told us that they would.) Instead, we’re hearing signals from the White House that they might be willing to consider a compromise of some sort, like extending the tax breaks for the wealthy another two years. If Obama doesn’t, we’re told, he runs the risk of offending the Republicans, who, in retribution, likely wouldn’t allow for middle class tax relief legislation to move forward. (For all their talk of how important it is for us to cut our deficit, the Republican members of Congress seem a lot more concerned about preserving tax breaks for the wealthy. But, I guess that makes sense, as they’re the ones who fund political campaigns and host fundraisers.)

But, in spite of this lock-step march toward Plutocracy, Buffet, and other high net worth individuals, like Bill Gates Sr., keep pushing back – trying to find a ways, whether it be through the reinstatement of the estate tax, or the repeal of the Bush tax cuts, to keep a level American playing field. And, the good news is, they’re attracting other millionaires to their cause.

A few days ago, an organization calling itself Patriotic Millionaires for Fiscal Strength announced its existence. The organization’s 40-some members, on their website, made the following suggestion to Obama.

patrioticmill2

You’ll notice that they moved the income threshold from $250,000 per year to $1,000,000, but the important thing, at least to me, is that wealthy Americans are getting involved in the conversation, admitting that they need to do more, and framing the debate in terms of patriotism. I’d have to look at the numbers and see what moving the bar from $250,000 to $1,000,000 would mean in terms of lost revenue, but, given the choice between extending the tax cut for everyone, and extending it for just those making under one million dollars a year, I’d rather go with the latter. Hopefully, however, we can do a better job of compromising, and get it closer to $500,000. (note: over 375,000 Americans make over $1,000,000 annually.)

As for Buffet, he’s hitting the press this week. Here he is with Christiane Amanpour.

And, here’s a bit of the transcript from Talking Points Memo:

…”If anything, taxes for the lower and middle class and maybe even the upper middle class should even probably be cut further,” Buffett told ABC News in an interview set to air later this week. “But I think that people at the high end — people like myself — should be paying a lot more in taxes. We have it better than we’ve ever had it.”

“The rich are always going to say that, you know, just give us more money and we’ll go out and spend more and then it will all trickle down to the rest of you. But that has not worked the last 10 years, and I hope the American public is catching on,” Buffett said in the clip from ABC News’ “This Week with Christiane Amanpour.”

So, is Buffet right – are you beginning to catch on?

Posted in Economics, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

So, what’s on your mind, Michigan?

tongueeaterc

Anything goes… Tell us about yourself. What makes you happy? Do you have a parasite for a tongue? What are you doing this weekend? Are we invited? Where are you spending Thanksgiving? Have you ever found a dead body? Did you ever see your parents naked? What makes you angry? Did seeing your parents naked make you angry? What are your fears? Have you ever touched a famous person? Who’s your favorite artist? What’s your favorite Vonnegut book? What would you like to change about yourself? What’s your favorite restaurant that’s now closed? Surely you have something to share with us…. Let’s have a nice talk, OK?

Posted in Other | Tagged , , , | 37 Comments

Total contempt for my country

I know we got here somehow, but I cannot for the life of me understand how… I feel like neutering myself with a sharp rock and crawling off into a mud pit somewhere. Which, I guess, was kind of the objective of this PSA.

Posted in Art and Culture, Rants, sex | Tagged , , , , | 8 Comments

No tax cuts for the rich

I’ve been writing a lot about lately about the growing gap between rich and poor in American, and the systematic destruction of the middle class, and how I believe both trends to be destructive to our Democracy. I didn’t want to write about it tonight, though. I was actually planning to take the night off, but then I happened across this op-ed by Nicholas Kristof in today’s New York Times, and felt compelled to share it. I don’t know what good it’ll do, as I suspect that most of you agree with me already that it’s a significant problem, but I suppose it’s possible that one of you out there tonight is right on the brink of getting off your ass and actually doing something about it. And, if that’s the case, and if I can be the one to give you that final push that’ll get you off the couch, I don’t see as how I can just take the night off. So, with all that said, here’s a clip from Kristof’s piece:

…My point was that the wealthiest plutocrats now actually control a greater share of the pie in the United States than in historically unstable countries like Nicaragua, Venezuela and Guyana…

The best data series I could find is for Argentina. In the 1940s, the top 1 percent there controlled more than 20 percent of incomes. That was roughly double the share at that time in the United States.

Since then, we’ve reversed places. The share controlled by the top 1 percent in Argentina has fallen to a bit more than 15 percent. Meanwhile, inequality in the United States has soared to levels comparable to those in Argentina six decades ago — with 1 percent controlling 24 percent of American income in 2007.

At a time of such stunning inequality, should Congress put priority on spending $700 billion on extending the Bush tax cuts to those with incomes above $250,000 a year? Or should it extend unemployment benefits for Americans who otherwise will lose them beginning next month?

One way to examine that decision is to put aside all ethical considerations and simply look at where tax dollars will do more to stimulate the economy. There the conclusion is clear: You get much more bang for the buck putting money in the hands of unemployed people because they will promptly spend it….

But there is also a larger question: What kind of a country do we aspire to be? Would we really want to be the kind of plutocracy where the richest 1 percent possesses more net worth than the bottom 90 percent?

Oops! That’s already us. The top 1 percent of Americans owns 34 percent of America’s private net worth, according to figures compiled by the Economic Policy Institute in Washington. The bottom 90 percent owns just 29 percent…

I think we have to draw a line in the sand. This is a fight that we can win. All the polling data says that a majority of Americans are against extending the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. And, the evidence, as we discussed yesterday, seems to indicate that extending them, despite what we’re being told, wouldn’t stimulate the economy. So, we’ve got the American people behind us, and evidence that these tax cuts wouldn’t fuel the economy the same way the middle class tax cuts would. But, for some reason, we’re still scared to stand up and fight for what we know is right… It brings to mind something that George Soros is said to have told people in a private D.C. meeting a few days ago. Explaining to a gathering of progressives why they might be better served investing in individuals other than our President, Soros said that he was:

“…used to fighting losing battles, but doesn’t like to lose without fighting…

And that’s how I feel right now. I’m tired of compromising on the things that matter. I’m tired of sitting back and taking it when the Republicans pursue policy that’s clearly destructive. I’m tired of letting them play their games, like walking away from the most recent nuclear arms agreement with Russia, for no reason other than to discredit Obama, when doing so makes us less safe. (It also makes Putin stronger, by the way.)

How did we get here? When Reagan was President, the tax rate on the most wealthy was considerably higher, for Christ’s sake. Have we moved that far to the right? Here we are, scared to death to even suggest that we might want to tax the rich at a rate less than Ronald Reagan…. And, speaking of Reagan and nuclear treaties, let’s remember that he said he dreamed of a day without nuclear weapons. Can you imagine a Republican saying that today? Or, how about this quote from President Eisenhower?

…Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some fifty miles of concrete pavement. We pay for a single fighter plane with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people…

I can only think of two Democrats who might dare to make a speech like that today. We’ve let the pendulum swing way too far to the right, and it’s time to say that enough’s enough. It’s time to stand up and fight for what we know if right. And it starts with the killing of these Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. We can’t afford them. They won’t help us. And they’re destructive to Democracy.

Posted in Economics, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

All the Devils are Here

I’m going to lay in bed and watch The Wire tonight. It’s not nearly as fun, but, if you’re looking for something to watch, here’s video of Jon Stewart interviewing the authors of the new book All the Devils Are Here: The Hidden History of the Financial Crisis. I’m not incredibly knowledgeable when it comes to obscure financial instruments like credit default swaps, but Stewart does a pretty good job of conveying the important stuff. Maybe it’s due to the fact that his brother, Larry Leibowitz, is the COO of the New York Stock Exchange, but I think Stewart understands the financial markets better than almost any other television host out there today. But, like I said, I don’t really know what I’m talking about when it comes to this stuff… OK, now I’m going to go and watch Omar Little be a badass… Goodnight.

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Exclusive – Bethany McLean & Joe Nocera Extended Interview
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor Rally to Restore Sanity

Those of you who find this a bit too intellectual for your tastes, might prefer something else instead.

Posted in Corporate Crime, Economics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Connect

BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative Cherewick 2