obama’s choice for vice president: caroline kennedy vs. wesley clark

That other self-important MM from Michigan — Michael Moore – came out today with his choice for Obama’s VP. He thinks it should be JFK’s daughter, Caroline Kennedy. I like the way he’s thinking when he says that we need someone who didn’t support the war, but I disagree about Kennedy. She may be a wonderful person, and “Obama/Kennedy” might look great on bumper stickers, but, in my opinion, she just doesn’t have the foreign policy chops to pull it off. I like the idea of bringing in a well-liked woman with a fresh perspective, relatively little baggage, and a tie to an era when our leaders truly inspired the people of the world, but I don’t think Obama can afford to have someone in the number two spot who doesn’t know national security.

I also believe there’s a racial component to be considered. Like it or not, I think that many Americans, when they enter the voting booth, will be reluctant to vote for a black man, despite what they may say beforehand. And, I don’t want to give them a real, legitimate reason to hide behind. And I think that’s what would happen if Obama didn’t add someone to the ticket with experience in international relations. I think that people already struggling with the issue of race, would use it to justify their vote for McCain. And I don’t want to make it that easy for them.

So, yeah, I’d go with someone with a strong national security background — preferably someone who hasn’t recently served as an elected official, at least when we voted to send our troops to war. I’m thinking of someone like Wesley Clark, or, after last night’s post, maybe Andrew J Bacevich, a retired Colonel who recently lost his son in Iraq, and considers himself a “Catholic conservative” (assuming that he’d do it).

Here’s what Michael Moore had to say to Caroline Kennedy:

Dear Caroline,

We’ve never met, so I hope you don’t find this letter too presumptuous or inappropriate. As its contents involve the public’s business, I am sending this to you via the public on the Internet. I knew your brother John. He was a great guy, and I know he would’ve had a ball during this thrilling and historic election year. We all miss him dearly.

Barack Obama selected you to head up his search for a vice presidential candidate. It appears we may be just days (hours?) away from learning who that choice will be.

The media is reporting that Senator Obama has narrowed his alternatives to three men: Joe Biden, Evan Bayh and Tim Kaine. They’re all decent fellows, but they are far from the core of what the Obama campaign has been about: Change. Real change. Out with the old. And don’t invade countries that pose no threat to us.

Senators Biden and Bayh voted for that invasion and that war, the war Barack ran against, the war Barack reminded us was the big difference between him and Senator Clinton because she voted for the war and he spoke out against it while running for Senate (a brave and bold thing to do back in 2002).

For Obama to place either of these senators on the ticket would be a huge blow to the millions that chose him in the primaries over Hillary. He will undercut one of the strongest advantages he has over the Hundred-Year War senator, Mr. McCain. By anointing a VP who did what McCain did in throwing us into this war, Mr. Obama will lose the moral high ground in the debates.

As for Governor Kaine of Virginia, his big problem is, well, Obama’s big problem — who is he? The toughest thing Barack has had to overcome — and it will continue to be his biggest obstacle — is that too many of the voters simply don’t know him well enough to vote for him. The fact that Obama is new to the scene is both one of his most attractive qualities AND his biggest drawback. Too many Americans, who on the surface seem to like Barack Obama, just don’t feel comfortable voting for someone who hasn’t been on the national scene very long. It’s a comfort level thing, and it may be just what keeps Obama from winning in November (“I’d rather vote for the devil I know than the devil I don’t know”).

What Obama needs is a vice presidential candidate who is NOT a professional politician, but someone who is well-known and beloved by people across the political spectrum; someone who, like Obama, spoke out against the war; someone who has a good and generous heart, who will be cheered by the rest of the world; someone whom we’ve known and loved and admired all our lives and who has dedicated her life to public service and to the greater good for all.

That person, Caroline, is you.

I cannot think of a more winning ticket than one that reads: “OBAMA-KENNEDY.”

Caroline, I know that nominating yourself is the furthest idea from your mind and not consistent with who you are, but there would be some poetic justice to such an action. Just think, eight years after the last head of a vice presidential search team looked far and wide for a VP — and then picked himself (a move topped only by his hubris to then lead the country to near ruin while in office) — along comes Caroline Kennedy to return the favor with far different results, a vice president who helps restore America to its goodness and greatness.

Caroline, you are one of the most beloved and respected women in this country, and you have been so admired throughout your life. You chose a life outside of politics, to work for charities and schools, to write and lecture, to raise a wonderful family. But you did not choose to lead a private life. You have traveled the world and met with its leaders, giving you much experience on the world stage, a stage you have been on since you were a little girl..

The nation has, remarkably (considering our fascination with celebrity), left you alone and let you live your life in peace. (It’s like, long ago, we all collectively agreed that, with her father tragically gone, a man who died because he wanted to serve his country, we would look out for her, we would wish for her to be happy and well, and we would have her back. But we would let her be.)

Now, I am breaking this unwritten code and asking you to come forward and help us in our hour of need. So many families are hurting, losing their homes, going bankrupt with health care bills, seeing their public schools in shambles and living with this war without end. This is a historic year for women, from Hillary’s candidacy to the numerous women running for the House and Senate. This is the year that a woman should be on the Democratic ticket. This is the year that both names on that ticket should be people OUTSIDE the party machine. This is the year millions of independents and, yes, millions of Republicans are looking for something new and fresh and bold (and you are the Kennedy Republicans would vote for!).

This is the moment, Caroline. Seize it! And Barack, if you’re reading this, you probably know that she is far too humble and decent to nominate herself. So step up and surprise us again. Step up and be different than every politician we have witnessed in our lifetime. Keep the passion burning amongst the young people and others who have been energized by your unexpected, unpredicted, against-all-odds candidacy that has ignited and inspired a nation. Do it for all those reasons. Make Caroline Kennedy your VP. “Obama-Kennedy.” Wow, does that sound so cool.

Caroline, thanks for letting me intrude on your life. How wonderful it will be to have a vice president who will respect the Constitution, who will support (instead of control) her president, who will never let her staff out a CIA agent, and who will never tell her country that she is “currently residing in an undisclosed location.”

Say it one more time: “OBAMA-KENNEDY.” A move like that might send a message to the country that the Democrats would actually like to win an election for once.

So, which MM to you agree with?

Wait… Before you answer, I should mention one last thing — and I realize that by saying this, I’m probably going to push some of your over to Moore’s camp… I’m tired of picking VPs for cynical, calculated reasons. I’m sick of picking VPs based on what demographic they might deliver, or what hole in the candidate’s resume they might fill. I hate that Gore picked Lieberman. For once, I’d like the Presidential candidate to pick the person who he genuinely feels would make the best President in his absence. I’d love to have a ticket that I could really believe in — one that wasn’t vetted first by focus groups and consultants. I’d love to hear Obama say at the convention next week that, in spite of having campaign consultants tell him that he should, for instance, bring in a southern white male with military experience (as I’ve just done), he’s going to pick the person that he feels we as a country need right now — the person he feels would be the best ally to have by his side as we set out to undo the damage of the past several decades and make this country a place we can be proud of again. And, maybe Michael Moore is right — maybe that’s Caroline Kennedy.

update: It just dawned on me that maybe Moore isn’t serious about this at all. Maybe he’s just flattering Kennedy, in hopes that she, as the head of Obama’s VP search committee, will take some of the advice, and steer Obama toward someone other than either Joe Biden or Evan Bayh. If that’s the case, I think it was pretty well played by Moore.

Posted in Politics | 12 Comments

“the limits of power: the end of american exceptionalism”

The other day Bill Moyers had retired United States Army Colonel Andrew J Bacevich on his show discussing his new book, “The Limits of Power: The End of American Exceptionalism.” If you have the time, I’d highly recommend watching the video or reading the transcript. It’s all good, but here’s a little clip:

BILL MOYERS: Here is one of those neon sentences. Quote, “The pursuit of freedom, as defined in an age of consumerism, has induced a condition of dependence on imported goods, on imported oil, and on credit. The chief desire of the American people,” you write, “is that nothing should disrupt their access to these goods, that oil, and that credit. The chief aim of the U.S. government is to satisfy that desire, which it does in part of through the distribution of largesse here at home, and in part through the pursuit of imperial ambitions abroad.” In other words, you’re saying that our foreign policy is the result of a dependence on consumer goods and credit.

ANDREW BACEVICH: Our foreign policy is not something simply concocted by people in Washington D.C. and imposed on us. Our foreign policy is something that is concocted in Washington D.C., but it reflects the perceptions of our political elite about what we want, we the people want. And what we want, by and large – I mean, one could point to many individual exceptions – but, what we want, by and large is, we want this continuing flow of very cheap consumer goods.

We want to be able to pump gas into our cars regardless of how big they may happen to be, in order to be able to drive wherever we want to be able to drive. And we want to be able to do these things without having to think about whether or not the book’s balanced at the end of the month, or the end of the fiscal year. And therefore, we want this unending line of credit.

BILL MOYERS: You intrigued me when you wrote that “The fundamental problem facing the country will remain stubbornly in place no matter who is elected in November.” What’s the fundamental problem you say is not going away no matter whether it’s McCain or Obama?

ANDREW BACEVICH: What neither of these candidates will be able to, I think, accomplish is to persuade us to look ourselves in the mirror, to see the direction in which we are headed. And from my point of view, it’s a direction towards ever greater debt and dependency…

There’s nothing really groundbreaking in what he’s saying — it’s all stuff we’ve discussed here before – but it’s good to hear someone from the military joining the growing chorus of people saying that we desperately need to rethink what it means to be American, to be happy, and to be free. As he says at some point during the interview, when you look at what really matters, it doesn’t have anything to do with consumption.

Of particular interest to me was the part where he talked about Carter and his comprehension in the 1970’s of the problem facing our country today. It’s unfortunate that we Americans were either unable or unwilling to listen to him at the time. Hopefully there’s still time to make amends.

Speaking of consumption, I just saw a new Discover ad on television. It started with a soothing voice saying, “We’re a nation of consumers, and there’s nothing wrong with that,” over uplifting music and images of happy people.

[via Metafilter]

Posted in Sustainability | 4 Comments

protecting my family from penny farthing attack

This picture was just sent in by one of the many delusional readers of this site. I’d normally just disregard something like this, but I’ve decided to post it here on the front page as, in some kind of weird way, the subject matter establishes a direct link between me and my beloved Number 6. I don’t know why I identify with him so strongly. Maybe it has something to do with the way he came to find himself in his village, and how closely it mirrors the circumstances surrounding my being brought to Ypsilanti.

Posted in Mark's Life | 8 Comments

the 2008 ypsilanti fried chicken showdown: installment 4

And today we find the boys at Haab’s

Haab’s
18 W Michigan Ave

OEC: Haab’s is the most regal and fabled of Ypsi’s fried chicken, both because Haab’s is a local dining institution, and it was once been part of the “Chicken in the Rough” franchise. Rumor is they left the franchise when the franchise was lowering standards. Now known as “Chicken in the Basket,” it’s probably truer to “Chicken in the Rough” than anything that still bears that name. For my chicken-loving-dollars, the chicken is best thing on Haab’s menu, although I do miss the cigar smoking chicken that once decked the walls.

BA: As my dear friend OEC will no doubt observe, Haab’s chicken tastes more chickeny than anybody else’s. I’m not sure how that is, but it’s true.

OEC: Kind of the purest fried chicken we tried, not bland, just full chicken flavored. They must sprinkle on some extra chicken.

BA: I was much pleased with Haab’s sides.

OEC: Especially if you include the Corner Brewery beer on tap as a side…

BA: I normally hate shoestring french fries. They’re usually so small and hard, that I can’t dunk a bunch at once without losing some or breaking them in half. And you can’t dunk them one at a time without feeling like you’re burning more calories trying to eat them all than they replenish between dunks. It’s so frustrating, I want to flip the table over and foam at the mouth, crying in rage. But Haab’s has good bigger greasy bendy shoestrings immune to breakage, and the inclusion of vinegar is a huge plus. Also, you can order onion rings instead. They “accidently” gave me both (because I looked important, no doubt).

OEC: My favorite of the fries, too. Comes with a salad in the famed chilled pewter bowl. As a full-service place, there’s good options for sides and nice in-house dining. I like sitting in the old bar and watching the long belts pull the old ceiling fans round and round.

BA: If I could’ve had mashed potatoes, they’d get a 5 for sides. Great biscuits, even better because they come with honey. Thank you for letting me pay this time, so OEC will quit thinking he’s all better than me for the time being.

OEC: BA did pick-up the biggest tab, as it included adult beverages.

Notes: Smoking allowed in the bar. Lots of ashless eating elsewhere.

And it’s a total coincidence, but I’m going to have some good news to report about Haab’s chicken come Monday, September 1. Be sure to check back… And that’s all I’m at liberty to say right now.

Posted in Food | 10 Comments

will freezer burn affect the value of my half-rotten sasquatch corpse?

Posted in Mark's Life | 22 Comments

Connect

BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative Mike Giannouris