do americans have the stomach for belt-tightening?

I was just reading this Metafilter thread on the pathological “optimism” of our Commander-In-Chief, and how it manifests itself in his carpet purchases, and there were a few comments that resonated with me on the subject of how much Americans would be willing to sacrifice if called upon to do so. (Metafilter threads often take interesting detours like that.) Anyway, as it’s a subject that we’ve talked about here before, I thought that you might find them of interest.

The first comment I’m going to share was written in response to another Metafilterite who had said, “Gore would have a better chance with a campaign based on ‘Together we can fix global warming’ rather than ‘The Earth is about to die and we need to do something about it’.”

I hope that would work, but I suspect otherwise. My earliest political memories are of Jimmy Carter calling for shared sacrifice, austerity, conservation and we’re in this togetherness. Reagan countered with empty-headed proclamations of “morning in America”, and offered tax cuts for the wealthy and deficit spending. Carter is still to many, “the worst president of our lifetime” (when he wasn’t really that bad), and Reagan is damn near canonized by a significant portion of the population.

I realize that it is all in how you frame an issue, but I think any candidate that asks for any kind of sacrifice or belt-tightening is going to get his or her ass handed to them, at least until the next Great Depression.

And, here’s the second comment, which was written in response to the “they’re going to get their asses handed to them” quip I just posted.

And any candidate that suggests anything that could be construed as America losing or retreating from battle will get the same treatment.

It’s not easy to tell America the truth. America wants to overeat and lose weight, overspend and be rich, overstretch and be strong.

So, how much reality can the American people take? And, how much of a sacrifice are the American people willing to make, and for how long?

Posted in Observations | 3 Comments

david ware’s lyrics and the role they played in his shooting

The Ypsilanti Police Department has just released the official report (pdf) marking the end of the investigation into an unarmed man’s killing by police here on January 23, 2007. If you’re curious to know more about the incident, there’s quite a bit in the MM.com archives. For right now, however, I just wanted to share these short clips from the report pertaining to why the officer who shot and killed David Antjuan Ware may have had reason to suspect that he was carrying a gun.

I’m not suggesting that the police officer who killed Ware wasn’t right to have used lethal force. Ware was a known criminal fleeing from the site of a felony, who may have, through his actions, given officers reason to believe that he was armed. What I find really odd, however, is the fact that the police felt it necessary to bring Ware’s rap lyrics into it, holding them up as evidence against him. According to the logic of the report, the officer who fired the fatal shot had every reason to suspect that Ware was armed because of the content of his songs.

Does that strike anyone else as odd? (It reminds me of when religious-types pick apart popular songs looking for references to the occult.)

I can’t imagine what the police would find in lyrics that I’ve uttered over the years, but I’m sure that someone creative could use them to demonstrate almost anything.

Well, to end on a good note, I did notice that they got the deceased’s name right in this press release.

Posted in Ypsilanti | 13 Comments

the michigan victory garden campaign

I’ve mentioned Victory Gardens here a few times before. They came into vogue during the Second World War, when, unlike now, American citizens had been asked to sacrifice at home so that a war could be fought and won. People were asked to grow their own produce. Every carrot not eaten here, after all, was a carrot that could be canned and sent to our soldiers, and every gallon of gas that wasn’t spent hauling produce to your grocer was a gallon that could be poured into a bomber making runs into enemy territory. I’ll have to call my grandmother later to verify this, but I don’t suspect there was much complaining about it. People just did what they had to do. They knew that freedom hung in the balance. So, women got together at night and sewed blankets for our solders, kids collected scrap metal that could be used to make planes, and families, by and large, played by the rationing rules. And, a hell of a lot of them started gardening.

An estimated 20 million Americans took part in the Victory Garden initiative, and, according to Wikipedia, they produced nearly 40% of the vegetable produce consumed in the nation. Vacant lots were commandeered, as were roofs and patios. Even sections of Golden gate Park in San Francisco were cultivated… For those interested, a great 1940’s newsreel on the initiative can be found at Archive.org.

I love the story. I love the fact that there was a time when Americans pulled together and sacrificed for the greater good. There’s something very romantic and appealing about that, especially in a time when we all feel so disconnected from our neighbors and our communities (and, for that matter, the earth).

It wasn’t exactly an original idea, as Amy Franceschini, who I’ve told you about here before, had been doing something similar in San Francisco, but I started wondering whether or not it might be feasible to kick off a national campaign around the new Victory Garden, focusing on, instead of war, the fuel consumed in shipping produce from Honduras and hauling it from Mexico, and what it costs us, environmentally speaking. “Victory Gardens against Global Warming,” has a nice ring to it, I think. (I suspect there are a lot of people out there, like me, who are looking for real, tangible ways to join in the fight against global warming, and it would be great to give them something to do.)

So, I had a beer a few days ago with my friend Amanda, the Director of the local pro-gardening organization Growing Hope, and we talked about rolling out a southeast Michigan pilot program. (I’ve since also exchanged notes with Amy Franceschini and it sounds as though she’s planning to take her program outside of San Francisco shortly, so the two initiatives could dovetail nicely.) Of course, as it’s already April 24, it doesn’t leave us much time for this year, but here’s the idea, in a nutshell.

We launch a Michigan-specific Victory Garden site, which includes video tutorials (like that one I showed you a little while ago on indoor composting) on building raised vegetable beds, planting, etc. All the plans will be available for free, however, if people wanted to, they could also purchase components (cedar for the raised beds, worm castings, soil, seeds, etc) from Growing Hope. The key thing is that we’d have everything laid out very clearly for the new gardeners among us. We’d do the research as to which vegetable varieties work best in our climate, and we’d suggest a mix of plants. (Maybe the seeds would be available for free, if we could get donations to cover them.) The main thing is that we’d have a simple Do-It_Yourself starter kit… Like I said, we’re getting into this really late, but we think it’s still possible. So, this next week we’ll be exploring it some more, and then we’ll decide to either do it now or hold off for a season… If you have thoughts, or if you’d like to join the team, let me know. If we do get this off the ground, we’ll need a ton of help with everything from the building of demo gardens and packaging seeds to launching a website and shooting video.

Posted in Special Projects | 40 Comments

what’s my friend jeff selling on his site today?

I read somewhere today that Google AdWords has paid out over one billion dollars to online publishers, so I guess I shouldn’t be making fun, but Jesus Christ… Judging from the ads they’re running on my friend Jeff’s site they must think he’s got the morbidly obese market all sewn up, like he’s the Richard Simmons of blogging or something.

And it gets worse.

(I’m tempted to start running AdWords here on MM.com just to see what their sophisticated algorithms kick out concerning my audience. It would be painful to accept, but I suspect the phrase “lonely obese ball shavers” would figure prominantly.)

Posted in Observations | 2 Comments

bill moyers is back and he’s calling for the accountability of the american press

Bill Moyers’ new show, premiers this Wednesday evening on PBS. The first episode is entitled “Buying the War,” and it’s about the complicity of the American press during the run-up to the war in Iraq, when we, the American people, were being told of eminent mushroom clouds and the evidence linking Iraq and Al Queda. Given the source, I think it’s safe to say that it’ll be worth viewing. If you have any doubt, though, check out this clip… I was afraid, when Bill left “Now” a few years ago, that we’d lost him for good. It’s nice to have him back. His voice is absolutely critical right now, especially on the topic journalism and it’s role in a free society.

While we’re on the subject of journalism, it’s also worth pointing out that Harpers has a good piece today on Alberto Gonzales and his work to further undermine the freedom of the press in the United States. Here’s a clip:

In June, a case is slated to go to trial in Northern Virginia that will mark a first step in a plan to silence press coverage of essential national security issues. The plan was hatched by Alberto Gonzales and his deputy, Paul J. McNulty–the two figures at the center of a growing scandal over the politicization of the prosecutorial process. This may in fact be the most audacious act of political prosecution yet. But so far, it has gained little attention and is poorly understood.

In the summer of 2005, Alberto Gonzales paid a visit to British Attorney General Peter Goldsmith. A British civil servant who attended told me “it was quite amazing really. Gonzales was obsessed with the Official Secrets Act. In particular, he wanted to know exactly how it was used to block newspapers and broadcasters from running news stories derived from official secrets and how it could be used to criminalise persons who had no formal duty to maintain secrets. He saw it as a panacea for his problems: silence the press. Then you can torture and abuse prisoners and what you will–without fear of political repercussions. It was the easy route to dealing with the Guant

Posted in Media | 1 Comment