In an alternate Republican universe, Comey’s testimony yesterday vindicated the President

I don’t have time to say much this morning, but I felt as though I had to share this tweet of Trump’s.

By way of background, here, from the New Republic, is how everyone else saw Comey’s testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee yesterday.

…Comey took a sledgehammer to the Trump administration’s narrative and made it abundantly clear that Trump tried to influence the FBI’s investigation into Michael Flynn and that he was fired because he refused to drop that investigation. (To be fair, Trump has also been very clear that he fired Comey for refusing to drop the Russia investigation.) Just as importantly, he made the case that Trump is a liar who, either through incompetence, malevolence, or self-involvement (or all three), is undermining checks and balances and that he is doing so for no other reason than to protect himself. Comey called Trump’s bluff and invited him to release any tapes he might have of their interactions.

Most importantly, though, Comey methodically made the case that Trump obstructed justice, both in their interactions and by firing him. There has been a great deal of speculation about the significance of Trump’s meeting with Comey—and the fact that Trump asked others to leave before asking him to drop the Flynn investigation. Comey declined to speculate, but he made it very, very clear that his interpretation of events was that Trump was attempting to obstruct justice. There can be no other conclusion from his statements before the Senate Intelligence Committee.

In three hours Comey dramatically raised the stakes for what is undoubtedly the highest profile investigation since Watergate. Trump (and Flynn and Jeff Sessions and anyone else who was close to the Trump campaign) should be absolutely terrified.

And, here, in case you missed it, are a few video highlights of the well-respected former FBI Director discussing in detail Trump’s misconduct and abuse of power.

For what it’s worth, I was most struck by the fact that Trump, according to Comey, before suggesting that he drop the investigation into Michale Flynn’s collusion with the Russians, first asked everyone else in the room to leave. This, to me, would indicate that he knew damn well that he was about to cross some sort of line. Furthermore, I was struck by the fact that, according to Comey, the President, in spite of the fact that our 17 U.S. intelligence agencies were in agreement that the Russians had actively sought to influence our 2016 election, didn’t seem to show any interest in the subject, instead focusing on how the investigation might impact members of his administration. Taken along with Comey’s testimony concerning Trump’s demand of loyalty, and the fact that Trump, by his own admission, fired Comey for his pursuit of “the Russia thing,” I think any reasonable and open-minded individual should be able to infer obstruction of justice.

But, yeah, Trump says he was completely vindicated because Comey said under oath that, yes, he assured Trump that, at the time, he was not personally under investigation. As Comey pointed out, however, that doesn’t mean he’s not under investigation now for obstruction of justice… And, regardless of how Trump spins it, that’s not the way anyone who’s paying attention saw it.

Here, by the way, is the front page of Trump’s hometown, New York newspaper this morning.

Now’s the time to call your elected officials, especially if they’re republicans, and demand that they put country before party, and force Trump from office. Our Republic cannot exist with this man in power. And this has nothing to do with political gamesmanship. (Pence, I suspect, would accomplish more in office that Trump would.) This is about preserving our country for future generations.

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 45 Comments

Exploiting a loophole, Ypsilanti’s Cross Street Village transitions away from affordable senior housing just 15 years after receiving Low-Income Housing Tax Credits

As I understand it, tomorrow (Friday) at 9:30 AM, there’s going to be an open meeting at the Presbyterian church on North Washington Street, south of Cross, to discuss changes afoot at Cross Street Village, the senior housing development located in Ypsilanti’s old high school building at the intersection of Cross and North Washington. It would appear that the owners of the building, American Community Developers of Detroit, have either decided to significantly raise the rents themselves, or sold the 104-apartment development to another company that has announced that course of action, in spite of the fact that, when they purchased the property from the Ypsilanti school district some 20 years ago, they pledged to keep it low-income senior housing for a term of 99 years. Well, it would now seem as though the building’s owners are now trying to renege on that promise, taking advantage of a back-out clause in the agreement they’d signed with the Michigan State Housing Development Authority (MSHDA), the entity through which they requested and received a Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC). As I don’t know the whole story, I’m reluctant to suggest that this is simply a money grab, and that the owners don’t care for the at-risk seniors that are already being put on the street, but it certainly looks that way.

Over the past week, I’ve heard several stories of people being forced out, and of rents rising by as much as $127 a month. I’ve also heard that they’ve already started moving in younger tenants, so it would appears as though the transition from senior housing is already well underway. With that said, though, our State Representative, Ronnie Peterson, has called for this public meeting tomorrow to discuss what, if anything, can still be done at this point. [I’m told that our Mayor, Amanda Edmonds, County Commissioner Ricky Jefferson, as well as several members of City Council will be in attendance as well.]

While I’ve yet to see the Regulatory Agreement that was signed with MSHDA, the sense I get, having now talked with a few people, is that it’s unlikely we’ll be able to hold them to their promise. As Ypsilanti Councilwoman Beth Bashert told me, “This is a national problem, not just with this situation. Some of these loopholes are being closed, but not enough.” As for those changes, according to former Ypsilanti City Planner Teresa Gillotti, MSHDA amended their LIHTC contracts around 2005, to better ensure that agreements concerning “affordability periods” are honored, but I think it’s safe to say that probably won’t really help us in this situation… As I see it, the only real leverage we probably have is the fact that American Community Developers is still applying for, and receiving, tax credits from MSHDA for there developments in the state, but I can’t see our current leadership threatening to blackball a developer for taking advantage of a loophole. If anything, I suspect, they’d applaud it. [Remember, this is the same administration that, shortly after coming to office, raised taxes on pensions, while, at the same time, slashing business taxes.]

At any rate, I just thought that you should know that this was happening. Elderly people in our community are being pushed out, and their apartments are being rented to those who can afford to pay considerably more… As I mentioned earlier, I haven’t had a great deal of time to look into this yet, but I’d be interested to know what people were told when the moved in, and whether or not prospective tenants and their families were made aware of this eventuality. Furthermore, I’d be interested to know why it looks as though this took us completely by surprise as a community. As others have noted, developers around the country have been taking advantage of these 15 year LIHTC back-out clauses for some time now, and I’d like to think that, knowing this, the folks at MSHDA, or our elected officials, could have done something to head this off, or at least prepare for the eventuality that this might be happening. Regardless, now that it’s happened, I’d like to think that, because of what we’re seeing take place at Cross Street Village, we might start thinking proactively about other developments in the region that could follow suit.

Posted in Corporate Crime, Uncategorized, Ypsilanti | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 14 Comments

Comey to take the stand and explain how Trump, demanding loyalty, instructed him to drop the FBI investigation into collusion between members of his campaign and the Russians

I’m sure I don’t need to remind you, but today’s the day that case against Donald Trump is expected to turn. In three hours, former FBI Director James Comey is going to testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee and say, under oath, that the President of the United States attempted to coerce him into stopping the agency’s investigation into collusion between members of his campaign and Russian agents working on Putin’s behalf to influence the outcome of our presidential election. This, in other words, could very well be the beginning of the end, the point at which we stop debating whether or not a crime may have taken place, and start prosecuting the sitting President of the United States for obstruction of justice. And this is the day we’ll know for certain where each Republican member of congress stands… whether they’ll do the right thing, and join us in the fight to save our Democracy, or whether they’ll continue to protect a President they know to have engaged in illegal activity. Today’s the day we draw the line in the sand.

The above front page story from the LA Times should give you a pretty good, high level indication of what Comey is expected to say when he takes the stand this morning. If you have the time, however, I’d suggest you read the former FBI Director’s entire prepared statement, which was made public yesterday afternoon by Senate Intelligence Committee, as it relays in incredible detail how aggressively Donald Trump worked to end the FBI’s investigation. I’d also suggest, if you have the time, that you look up the phone numbers of your representatives in Congress, so that you can begin calling them once Comey is done testifying, demanding that they immediately begin impeachment proceedings.

As Representative Adam Schiff pointed out today, we now not only know the efforts to which President Trump went to influence the Director Comey, but we have a timeline that tells a very clear story as to what happened transpired and why.

And, here, in case you missed it yesterday, was the highlight of undercard fight before today’s main event.

For those of you unable to watch the video, here’s a brief description from Politico of the exchange that took place between Senator Angus King, FBI Acting Director Andrew McCabe, NSA Director Michael Rogers, and Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats, all of whom refused to answer the Senator’s questions about the extent to which the President may have attempted to similarly attempted to coerce them.

…“I would like a legal justification for your refusal to answer,” King said. “Why are you not answering these questions?”

“Is there an invocation of executive privilege?” King added, referring to the possibility that Trump would attempt to stop them from testifying by claiming their conversations are legally protected from disclosure.

Rogers answered that he is “not aware of” an attempt to invoke executive privilege, but said he is in touch with the White House counsel’s office on the matter of what he can and cannot say in a public hearing. “To be honest, I didn’t get a definitive answer,” he said.

Pressed on the question of executive privilege, Rogers shut down King’s line of questioning. “I’m not interested in repeating myself, sir,” he said. “And I don’t mean that in a contentious way.”

“Well, I do mean it in a contentious way,” King snapped. “I don’t understand why you are not answering our questions. You can’t— When you were confirmed, before the Armed Services Committee, you took an oath. ‘Do you solemnly swear to give the committee the truth, the fully truth, and nothing but the truth so help you God?’ You answered yes to that.”

Rogers answered that he “feel[s] it’s inappropriate” to reveal details of his private conversations with the president and with Comey in an open hearing.

“What you feel isn’t relevant, admiral,” King fumed. “What you feel isn’t the answer.”

King then tried the same line of questioning with Coats, asking: “What is the legal basis for your refusal to testify to this committee?”

“I’m not sure I have a legal basis,” Coats admitted. “But I’m more than willing to sit before this committee during its investigative process in a closed session and answer your question.”…

As former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said yesterday, Watergate pales in comparison.

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 13 Comments

If you didn’t watch the interview Carter Page did with Chris Matthews, you really should… and then you should explain it to me

I cannot, for the life of me, understand why Carter Page keeps agreeing to be interviewed on television. It’s absolutely bewildering… Seriously, of all the unbelievable characters we’ve been introduced to this past year, he’s the one that I find the most fascinating. I could literally write for the next five hours about him, but I’m curious to know your thoughts… So, what do you make of Carter Page?

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , , , | 48 Comments

It looks as though Trump once again played right into Putin’s hands, turning against Qatar before the facts were in, and creating an opening for the Russians

On Monday, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt and Bahrain closed all borders (land, sea and air) with the country of Qatar, an action that was then followed by Yemen, the Maldives and Libya. And, this morning, our President took to Twitter to take credit for the fact that these countries had moved to isolate Quatar, suggesting that he’d set the whole thing in motion late last month, when, during his visit to the Middle East, he’d demanded that countries cut ties to terrorist organizations. The only issue is, our State Department still considers Qatar to be an ally, and, what’s more, the country is home to the U.S. Central Command’s regional headquarters, as well as an air base from which coalition attacks against the Islamic State are launched. Oh, and perhaps most importantly, there’s apparently evidence that Qatar didn’t really deserve any of this… More on that in a minute… First, here are Trump’s tweets, which White House spokesperson Sean Spicer assured us this afternoon were “official statements by the President of the United States.” [If you’ll recall, Kellyanne Conway had suggested over the weekend that Trump, at least when he was on Twitter, didn’t speak on behalf of the administration.]

OK, well here’s the thing… It looks now as though this move against Qatar, at least according to CNN, may have been the result of fake news planted by Russian hackers. That’s right. According to U.S. government sources, Trump may have denounced a key American ally, when, in fact, the evidence against said ally – a document showing Qatari Emir Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani to be a supporter of radical elements within the Muslim Brotherhood in Iran – was planted by the Russians… The following is from CNN.

…The alleged involvement of Russian hackers intensifies concerns by US intelligence and law enforcement agencies that Russia continues to try some of the same cyber-hacking measures on US allies that intelligence agencies believe it used to meddle in the 2016 elections.

US officials say the Russian goal appears to be to cause rifts among the US and its allies. In recent months, suspected Russian cyber activities, including the use of fake news stories, have turned up amid elections in France, Germany and other countries.

It’s not yet clear whether the US has tracked the hackers in the Qatar incident to Russian criminal organizations or to the Russian security services blamed for the US election hacks. One official noted that based on past intelligence, “not much happens in that country without the blessing of the government”…

Qatari Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammed Bin Abdulrahman al-Thani told CNN the FBI has confirmed the hack and the planting of fake news.

“Whatever has been thrown as an accusation is all based on misinformation and we think that the entire crisis being based on misinformation,” the foreign minister told CNN’s Becky Anderson. “Because it was started based on fabricated news, being wedged and being inserted in our national news agency which was hacked and proved by the FBI.”

Sheikh Saif Bin Ahmed Al-Thani, director of the Qatari Government Communications Office, confirmed that Qatar’s Ministry of Interior is working with the FBI and the United Kingdom’s National Crime Agency on the ongoing hacking investigation of the Qatar News Agency.

“The Ministry of Interior will reveal the findings of the investigation when completed,” he told CNN…

Hours after Trump’s tweets, the US State Department said Qatar had made progress on stemming the funding of terrorists but that there was more work to be done…

And that’s not all. After Qatar was effectively isolated from its neighbors and the United States, Putin called Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani to discuss how their two countries might work more closely together… Yes, it would appear that Donald Trump just drove a wedge between the United States and one of our most trusted regional allies, allowing Putin to walk right in and establish a relationship that could weaken our position in the Middle East… One hopes that Trump is on the phone right now, apologizing to Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani, but one suspects that, instead of admitting he’d been played for a fool, our President is now preparing to double down with yet another tweet about how we’re better off without a base in Qatar.

Please, Republicans, I get that you love power, and feel as though Trump can do your dirty work, destroying social security, health care, public education, the EPA, and everything else you’ve been unable to get rid of these past several decades, but, really, what good is it going to be in our country is gone? This is well past the serious stage? This is life and death. This man, if you continue to aid and abed him, will be the end of us all, and you have to see that. Please take the opportunity this Thursday, when Comey in on the stand, to do the right thing, and bring an end to this terrifying chapter in American history. Stop assisting with the coverup by focusing on leaks, and whether or not members of the Obama administration may have “unmasked” individuals caught up in domestic surveillance operations, and instead focus on the fact that our sitting President is a danger to our Democracy, and act accordingly. As the above incident demonstrates, we’re almost out of time.

update: Our friend Juan Cole, as always, has much better insight when it comes to what’s really happening behind the scenes. Here’s a clip from his most recent post, Trump’s Ally: Saudi Arabia’s drive for Aristocratic Hegemony in the Middle East.

…The Muslim Brotherhood is not a terrorist organization, and Qatar, contrary to what Trump alleged, is not supporting terrorism. In fact, the common conceit in the West that Wahhabism is linked to terrorism would be hard to prove. Lots of Sunnis and Shiites have committed terrorist acts, as have Catholics, Protestants, Buddhists and Hindus. Most Wahhabis go through life committing no violence. I even know relatively liberal Wahhabis who are more liberal than some Sunnis I know. The oil wealth has created a new generation of cosmopolitan Wahhabi young business people and professionals. There are still many strict puritans, of course, but puritanism, however annoying, is not terrorism. And let’s not forget that America was founded on puritanism.

Qatar stands accused of using the Al Jazeera satellite t.v. station to promote the Muslim Brotherhood. (Religious Palestinians have long been important in its management and staffing.) When the Muslim Brotherhood came to power in Egypt in 2011-2012, claiming Islamic authority based on its populism and elections, that posed a severe threat to the Saudi monarchy, which suddenly had a religious and not just secular rival in Egypt. The Saudi elite was afraid Brotherhood influence would come over and challenge the monarchy.

Hamas in Gaza is a distant branch of the Muslim Brotherhood (it is organized by country, so there is no common reporting line). That is one reason the Saudis dislike it and back the secular PLO.

Qatar, from Riyadh’s point of view, is just not a team player. It has supported the Muslim Brotherhood and kindred movements in Egypt and Syria. It is allied with the pro-Muslim Brotherhood Turkey. Qatar’s traditional policy is to keep lines open to Iran and to remain on speaking terms with the ayatollahs, while Saudi Arabia’s deputy crown prince Muhammad bin Salman wants to isolate Iran, cut off its government, and kill it. Qatar is on the exact opposite side from Iran in Syria, where it supported the Muslim Brotherhood rebels, some of whom morphed into radicals. But it doesn’t support the Salafis such as Jaysh al-Islam, who are backed by the Saudis.

Both Qatar and Saudi Arabia have lost in Syria to the Iran-Russia coalition. But since Qatar has no ambitions to be a regional hegemon (it is too tiny for that), they can live with that defeat and still hope to be influential among the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood-linked groups in any post-war settlement. The Saudis are furious about their defeat and inability to dislodge Iran from Syria. The Saudis are on a war footing in their quest for hegemony, and so abhor grey areas. Everything is black and white to them, and Qatar is not following that logic.

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Connect

BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative Mothmen