esolar raises $130 million to build steam power plant

If I could put off washing the tower of dishes one more night, I’d be writing about eSolar’s funding tonight… If you had a blog, and no dishes to wash, what would you be writing about?

Posted in Other | 17 Comments

what’s it going to take to get a redevelopment liquor license in depot town?

Remember that conversation we had a few weeks ago about the Elbow Room, and how Andy Garris, its owner, had indicated that he would be launching a new bar in the Thompson Block? Well, I got copied on an email last night from the developer of the property, Stewart Beal. It seems as though the Depot Town DDA is making it difficult for Garris to acquire a special Michigan Redevelopment Liquor License. It’s hearsay at this point, but word on the street is that Depot Town merchants, and local neighborhood leaders, have issues with Garris because of his association with both the Elbow Room and Ann Arbor’s Studio 4. Garris has said publicly that his proposed, yet to be named, Depot Town business would be different from these other bars, but it would seem that people don’t believe him. I’ve spent the last few hours talking with folks about the situation, and the impression I’m left with is that people genuinely fear that Depot Town, if this new bar were allowed to open, would be the scene of knife fights in the streets, gang activity, public vomiting, anonymous sex on front porches in front of children, you name it.

I don’t know Garris. I may have seen him in the Elbow Room – I don’t know. So, I can’t speak to his character. I can say, however, that I haven’t had any problems since he’s been running things there. I’ve never been beaten up. I’ve never been vomited on. No one has made love to me on the porch of a nearby house.

I can see why some in Depot Town might be apprehensive. Things weren’t always good in that part of Ypsi. The area has by sheer determination turned itself around over the past several decades, and I’m sure there must be fear of backsliding. That’s understandable. At the same time, however, I know from talking with merchants there that the ranks of well-paid automotive workers, who have always been economic backbone of Depot Town, are beginning to thin. And, as these workers take their buy-outs and move south, their dollars are going with them. In the long term, someone needs to bring new, younger blood into to Depot Town.

Another, bigger issue is that if Garris does not get this new license, the Thompson Block redevelopment will stall again, perhaps forever. And I find it hard to believe that a rehabbed building containing a successful business that brings people to the area, is worse for the community than a crumbling and dangerous vacant building. As I understand it, Beal and others have been looking for an anchor tenant for the past year with no luck. I know that some in the area would prefer to see something like Chelsea’s Common Grille move in, but it doesn’t look as though that’s going to happen. And, we don’t have unlimited time to wait. With every passing day, the nearly 150 year old, poorly cared for building buckles a bit more. (It’s just a matter of time before someone is hit by a falling brick.)

So, as I understand it, here’s the deal with the liquor license… Garris wants to open a bar of some kind in the Thompson Block. There are, however, no liquor licenses to be had. Fortunately, the State liquor control board, or whoever the governing body is for such things, has created a special license for just such redevelopment projects. These licenses cost about $20K, as opposed to upward of $80K, which ostensibly would allow the owner to put the difference into the building and/or business. The down side is that the license is tied to that particular location and that one individual. It cannot be sold or transferred. If Garris were to go out of business, he’d be out $20K. He couldn’t sell it, and the bar could not be sold as a bar (unless another liquor license had by then become available). Got it?

Now, as I understand it, it’s up to the City Council to decide what kind of terms go along with the Redevelopment Liquor License. They can, for instance, say that for a business to quality in Ypsi, it needs to have a 1,000 square foot kitchen, a certain number of tables, and serve dinner a certain number of hours. In this way, they can exert some kind of control over the kind of business that’s going to be there. Indications are being given that the Depot Town DDA plans to ask that the bar be set very high, pushing Garris away from the idea of a bar, and toward a restaurant, which I don’t think he has much interest in. It would essentially kill the deal.

The alternative, of course, would be for Garris to find a full-priced, available liquor license and do as he likes. I’m sure that’s a possibility that he’s considering, but, as I said, I’ve asked around a bit and I don’t know that there are any to be had. (I’m not positive about the liquor license that was at Andrews, but the one at the Elbow Room and the one at TC’s are tied to their buildings and cannot be moved.)

You’ve got to gamble on occasion. In this case, there is a chance that things won’t go well. But, as I see it, the alternative – that the historic building will be left to collapse – is worse. So, if I lived in the neighborhood, I’d jump at a chance to have the longtime eyesore cleaned up and occupied by a business owner who, I think by all accounts, has done a pretty good job of managing the Elbow Room. That’s just me though.

[note: Speaking of TC’s, I hear the business is available for $20K and the liquor license for $80K. They’re asking about half a million for the building, but it sounds as though a rental agreement with an option to buy could probably be arranged. So, if there are any people out there in the audience who’ve always dreamed of moving to Ypsi and opening a bar, now might be your chance…. Actually, it just occurred to me that I have a reader in Atlanta who used to work at TC’s. He’s a successful designer now, but you never know – maybe we could lure him back.]

Posted in Ypsilanti | 54 Comments

the pennsylvania primary

CNN is saying the Pennsylvania primary is too close to call. According to Fox News, with 3% of precincts reporting, Clinton has a ten point lead. I had been hoping that somehow Obama could end this thing decisively tonight, in spite of the recent polling numbers, but it’s looking as though that’s not going to happen… And now, I guess, MSNBC is projecting Clinton to be the winner… I guess we’ve got at least a few more weeks of Democrats beating the shit out of one another to look forward to.

Posted in Politics | 2 Comments

update on the great ypsi bike-powered movie thing

OK, it was super short notice, but some of us met last Friday evening to discuss the bike-powered movie project. About 8 people attended. Following are my rough notes on what was discussed. If it’s not clear from reading through them, the consensus of those present was that it’s not only a project worth doing, but one that might actually work.

Posted in Special Projects | 33 Comments

evolution and gravity

The following comment comes from a great thread on Metafilter about Ben Stein’s new anti-evolution film, Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. The commenter’s name is Malor.

You know, I see evolution compared with gravity a lot, as both are considered ‘certain facts’. This is a better analogy than many people realize, because both are theories (ideas) about observations in the physical world, and, interestingly, neither is certain.

Now, it’s obviously true that if you drop an apple, it’s going to fall down, barring some intervention. The apple will always fall if unsupported, 100 times out of 100. This part is absolute fact. But we still don’t really understand why. We have many guesses about how the gravitic force is transferred, from bent spacetime to fundamental particles to something from string theory that I don’t really remember…. but we definitely are not sure why things fall down. That does not change the fact that they do.

Evolution is quite similar. The observation is that creatures change over time. This is absolutely true; it’s one of the best-supported facts in all of science. There is no doubt whatsoever that this happens; we can see it in the fossil record, we can see it in genetics, we can see it with short-lived organisms in the laboratory.

But the explanation for WHY they change over time is less certain. “Survival of the fittest” is a very, very likely explanation, but it’s not absolute fact in the same way. Just like with gravity, however, our uncertainty over WHY creatures change does not alter the fact that they do.

What the creationists are proposing is simple nonsense. It’s literally wild flights of fancy, purely imaginary bullshit that they’re trying to substitute for real physical observations of the world around us. Evolution is weak only in one area; the explanation of WHY creatures change. That’s the part we added to the fundamental evidence, and that’s the part we could have wrong. (I don’t think we do, but if any part of that theory can be attacked, it’s there.)

Anyone who tells you that God created the Earth, in whole, 6000 years ago, is telling you something that flat, absolutely, is not true. If you were to print all the evidence against 6k earth and pile it in a nice stack, it would almost certainly reach the Moon.

Hell, we can tell this from very simple genetics; if you accept that CSI can determine who committed a crime from a hair left at the scene, or that we can reliably determine paternity from genetic testing, then you really can’t accept 6,000 year old Earth. We can easily trace family genes back much farther than that. You can have one or the other… you can believe in paternity testing, or you can believe in 6k Earth. One or the other, but not both.

So, should you get into this argument with someone in real life, try that angle on them. If they accept paternity testing and crime-scene DNA analysis, how do they deal with the fact that we can clearly trace many thousands of human generations through our genes? If we can assure you who your parents were, and your grandparents, and your great-grandparents… where is the magic line where genetics suddenly stops working?

I like the idea of using the television shows like CSI to disprove the assertions of Biblical literalists. I thought that you might like it too…. Now, if only we could use Law and Order to somehow prove to these same people that “abstinence only” education doesn’t work.

Posted in Other | 59 Comments

Connect

BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative Apes Selection