polaroid

A reader of Crimewave named Terry Gilmer made these Mark and Linette action figures about a dozen years ago. He sent us a Polaroid of them holding up little copies of the magazine. Given the nature of Polaroids, you can’t make out a lot of the detail. (The Linette has on a tiny beer can hat and an astroturf dress.) When I first saw it, I thought that they were holding up newspapers, the way kidnapping victims are often made to do, to show that they’re alive on a certain date. I just happened across the picture a few minutes ago, while cleaning my office. I was sitting there at my desk, looking at it and wondering what Terry was up to these days, when Linette came in. She told me that they’d just stopped making Polaroid instant film… I guess from now on hostages and action figures will just be hearing soulless, little digital clicks, instead of that distinctive Polariod sound.

Posted in Pop Culture | 6 Comments

americans will die if we can’t spy on them

Sure, he used the word “fascist,” which I know turns a few of you off, but Keith Olbermann, I thought, did a great job last night explaining the politics behind the current FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) debate. The image here is a still from his report. It features a quote from Senator Ted Kennedy, which kind of gets to the heart of the matter.

Bush said that without the immediate renewal of FISA, American lives would be lost. Democrats agreed to renew the legislation. Their only significant stipulation was that the clause concerning telecom immunity first had to be removed. The administration said no. You could read that one of two ways. Either Bush, as Kennedy suggests, cares more about keeping American phone companies out of court than he does about keeping American citizens safe, or the whole thing about American lives hanging in the balance was bullshit from the start… Of course, there’s another possibility – that both things are true.

The bottom line is that the widespread warrantless tapping of our phones does not make us safer. And, more importantly, it degrades what it is that has always set our nation apart… Yes, by all means, we should tap the phones of suspected terrorists, but we shouldn’t violate the Bill of Rights to do it. The telecommunications companies that gave in to pressure from the Bush administration, and provided access to our private communications, should not be allowed to just walk away as though they did nothing wrong.

Posted in Civil Liberties | 13 Comments

telecom immunity

The U.S. Senate voted yesterday to broadly expand the surveillance powers of the government. Most notably, the legislation will give retroactive immunity to the telecommunications companies that had cooperated with the administration, giving them access to the private communications of American citizens, without so much as a warrant. I’m proud to say that both of our Michigan Senators voted against the bill. It’s also worth noting that while Barack Obama voted to strip the provision concerning telecom immunity from the bill, both Hillary Clinton and John McCain conveniently missed the vote altogether. If you’d like to see how your elected representative voted, you can check here… And here’s a clip from an email I just received from Michigan Senator Carl Levin:

…Retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies is not fair. It is not wise. And it is not necessary.

That’s why yesterday I voted against the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Amendments Act.

The Senate had a number of opportunities to amend the FISA law and ensure that American citizens who were harmed by unlawful collection of their personal information could have their day in court. Unfortunately, all of these amendments were rejected.

Make no mistake, I supported the bipartisan agreement that provided the Intelligence Community the authority it needs to collect intelligence information on suspected terrorists. The collection of that intelligence is important to our national security and merits congressional support.

However, I could not support the section of the FISA legislation that granted retroactive immunity for telecommunications providers who disclosed communications and other confidential information about their customers at the behest of government officials.

The telecommunications providers did this despite a law specifically making it illegal to do so. Additionally, retroactive immunity would require dismissal of lawsuits by anyone who was the victim of illegal interception and disclosure of their communications.

It is my hope that the Senate will have another opportunity to consider this legislation and eliminate unfair, unwise, unnecessary retroactive immunity provisions following conference with the House of Representatives…

So, here’s a question for you… How is it that with American voters overwhelmingly against this legislation, and a Democratic majority in the Senate, we allowed the Bush administration to claim this huge victory? You don’t suppose it might have something to do with money, do you?

How pathetic is it that we can muster these huge, brilliant public demonstrations against Scientology, but we can’t get up the gumption to surround the White House and show that we’ve had enough of getting fucked?

Posted in Politics | 17 Comments

who the hell was george johnson, and where did he eat his lunch?

I just received my copy of the University of Michigan alumni newsletter. There was one article that I found to be particularly interesting. It was on a 1943 dating guide provided to UM students. It had all the stuff that you’d expect, like the following advice on how to handle “wolves” and their demands for “favors,” but what really interested me was a passage toward the end… First, here’s that advice on “giving favors”:

…If a boy asks you when you are going to grow up and act like a college girl because you won’t kiss him good night, ignore him… Boys respect girls who deserve respect!… Social success at Michigan definitely does not depend upon humoring the passions of other people. It may result from a tactful practice of doing just the opposite…. Girls don’t have to ‘give’ to be popular, and, as a matter of fact, it usually turns out that the most discreet and unkissable girls draw the better class of men — not the wolves, but the good guys that are going places, and who like girls with ideals as high as their own!…

OK, now here’s that passage in the article that I found really interesting:

…”Remember to escort your girl through the side door, for there is an old Michigan tradition that the front door of the Union is for men only. It may be that the gallantry of the Michigan man will not permit him to allow his fair lady to enter an uncanopied doorway, but, just in case you should forget, there is a gentleman at the front door to deter you.” (This was a reference to George Johnson, a cigar-chomping 76-year-old who had been guarding the Union’s front door against females since the Harding administration. He had infuriated women in 1935 for suggesting in public that the appearance of that year’s entering class of co-eds failed to meet the Michigan standard.)…

I’m not shocked to learn that women were asked to enter the union through a side door in 1943. Even though I believe the University of Michigan began accepting women in 1870, it doesn’t surprise me to hear that they were still treated unequally up until the second world war. The thing that I found interesting is the fact that UM employed an old man to keep women from a certain entrance. I was intrigued, so I started poking around some more. I found the following in another UM publication:

…The current Union building for many years remained a facility predominantly for ‘Michigan Men.’ George Johnson, hired as Michigan Union doorman in 1920, occupied the east entrance and told all females attempting to enter the facility, “‘please use the side door, ma’am.'”

In 1932, a female student disguised herself as a reporter and entered through the east doors. She was quickly apprehended and taken to the police station for “violation of the city ordinance forbidding masquerading in the attire of the opposite sex.”

The rule was lightened the next year when the Union board of directors voted to allow female visitors and guests to use the building–but only on football Saturdays.

After Johnson died in 1946, the Union’s east entrance stood unmanned and the front door rule, like many of the old traditions, gradually faded away…

If I weren’t so busy with other stuff, I’d keep digging. I’d like to find out more about George Johnson, and this woman who was arrested for dressing like a man. It’s weird what little things fascinate me. I’ve just got this cigar-chewing doorman stuck in my head and I’m wondering, for some inexplicable reason, what he looked like and where he ate his lunch.

Posted in Michigan | 10 Comments

obama in the south

John Kerry let me down in 2004, so I’m not too keen on quoting him here, but he made an observation today in an email to his former supporters that I thought should be noted. Here it is:

…This blew me away: in Barack’s victory in Virginia last night, he won 142,000 more votes than all of the Republicans combined, and his victory margin over Senator Clinton was larger than John McCain’s entire vote total. All of this, in what the Old Guard liked to pretend was “red state” Virginia…

I know it may not mean much, seeing as how a great many Republicans probably didn’t bother to vote, knowing that McCain already had the nomination sewn up, but still… I can’t believe that Obama’s margin of victory over Clinton was greater than McCain’s total vote count. That’s amazing. It doesn’t, of course, mean that Obama would beat McCain in a head-to-head contest in Virginia, but it’s still interesting to note. I’d like to think better of the South, where I was born, but I can’t help but worry that when push comes to shove a large percentage of white men won’t vote for a black man to be President. Hopefully it’s not the case, but I fear that even some who voted for Obama in the primary may not vote for him come election day. Let’s all hope I’m wrong.

Posted in Politics | 24 Comments

Connect

BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative Nanook