giving to growing hope before the year ends

One of my favorite local non-profits is Growing Hope. I wrote to Amanda Edmonds, their Executive Director, yesterday and asked her for a quick end-of-year appeal that I could reprint here. Linette and I had been thinking about making a last-minute contribution, and it occurred to me that there might be other people out there in the MM.com audience willing to do the same. Following is Amanda’s response:

Growing Hope depends on donations from community members near and far to keep our operations running. We, as many organizations, do a whole lot with a very very little amount of money, but those individual donors are what lets us pay the basic bills necessary to stay afloat. It’s those sort of things that are very hard to find grant and other monies to fund, in part because they are less glamorous sounding (”help us pay for out audit and liability insurance!!” doesn’t sound so sexy). Whether you’re here in Ypsi or Washtenaw County, or someone who believes in healthy food access, urban agriculture, and school gardens from afar, we hope you’ll support us. If you pay by credit card or write that check today, it can still count as a 2007 donation.

Also, there’s this super cool facebook grant competition being funding by the Case Foundation. They’re testing to see how online giving through social networking sites can make a real impact, and between now and February 13 is a competition to see what “cause” on facebook can have the most donors (donating $10 minimum). The top cause will get a $50K grant, the second $25, and third $10K. For Growing Hope, that’s significant money! Also, in every 24 hour period between now and then, the cause with the most donors in that period gets $1000. So if you are already on facebook, or feel inclined to join, join our cause at here, and if you’re cool like that, donate $10 (or more!)… and recruit others to join and do the same. $10 ain’t much, but with 10 other people is $100! You can see a NY Time article about it here.

Our website also has some embedded flickr slideshows– one of a few of our favorite pics of 2007… and another of people around town wearing our hip GH t-shirts that are for sale. And, you can still get our 2008 calendars online and at the Ypsi Co-op and Bombadills….

The last time I wrote about Growing Hope, I got an email from a former Ann Arborite currently traveling in the Netherlands. She was checking up on my site from a coffeeshop, read about Growing Hope, and made a contribution. It was one of those rare times that I felt like this blog was actually worth the time I put into it. At any rate, I’m posting this here today in hopes that someone else out there might have a few dollars to contribute to a very good cause.

Happy New Year.

Posted in Ypsilanti | 1 Comment

someone wasn’t buying it

I just snapped this a few minutes ago while out walking the dog. Apparently, someone on Michigan Avenue wasn’t buying in to the whole feel-good “no man is a failure who has friends” message of “It’s A Wonderful Life.”

Posted in Ypsilanti | 9 Comments

ringing in the new year the right way

I realize this probably only applies to about one in a thousand of my readers, but I wanted to let you know that one of my favorite online radio stations, Radio Dismuke, has a special lineup planned for New Year’s Eve. If you don’t already have plans, and if you enjoy listening to pre-WWII jazz, check it out. I caught some of last year’s show and it was incredible. The live broadcast will run from 10:00 PM to 3:00 AM EST. (The entire program will be rebroadcast on New Year’s day between 1:00 PM and 6:00 PM EST.)

Also, while we’re on the subject of damned good music, the best local radio show we’ve got here in southeast Michigan, Arwulf’s “Sunday Best,” will be live tomorrow morning between 10:00 AM and 1:00 PM EST on WEMU, 89.1 FM. Those of you not in the area can listen online… Seriously, it’s brilliant radio.

The band pictured here is one of cornet-player Joe “King” Oliver’s. If you’d like to hear some real “Hot Jazz,” just click here and prepare to have your mind blown by the “King.” You won’t be sorry.

There’s no better way to start the new year, in my opinion, than with these folks. No offense to Dick Clark, but Miley Cyrus and the rest of the lineup at this year’s “New Year’s Rockin’ Eve” aren’t talented enough to wipe the sweat from King Oliver’s balls. (Sorry if that sounds crude. The truth sometimes is.)

Posted in Art and Culture | 3 Comments

contemplating the new year

Posted in Mark's Life | 7 Comments

another update from the edwards campaign in iowa

Robert just wrote in with an update from the Edwards campaign headquarters in Iowa. Here it is:

I have traveled around to many more parts of Iowa now, and I have a lot of very positive news to report regarding Edwards’ prospects here.

First off, the Edwards Campaign is really kicking into high gear now, and I am happy to report that I see no serious “cracks” in the organization or in our base of support here. Where I was a little worried a while back about the level of experience among the Edwards staff, I can report now that the situation with that is improving by the minute, as much more seasoned folks are arriving from DC and Chapel Hill.

The situation “outside” is good too. I feel very confident that Edwards is going to win in the rural areas of the west and north by significant margins. You can definitely get that sense pretty soon after spending a little time out there. A number of prominent politicians in those areas have expressed this off the record a well.

I think our biggest challenges are going to be in the areas around Ames and Iowa City, where candidate preferences seem to be almost random, and Edwards just doesn’t seem to be “out-there” enough for many potential caucusers (Ron Paul is going to do well in these areas on the Republican side). Obama is strong in these areas, and Hillary seems to have a very solid base of support in those communities too. Fortunately for us, the manipulations of the caucus/primary order have placed the Iowa Caucus on a day when these big university towns are semi-ghost towns, and their impact on the statewide results will be significantly reduced as a result.

Another great thing I can report is that Edwards seems to be enjoying very low negatives compared to the other candidates. Hillary’s negatives seem to be the highest and many people cite her as the reason they are voting for someone else. Of course most of this is really unfounded and unfair to her, but that doesn’t change the fact that it is a very real problem for her. Obama’s negatives aren’t quite so high, but they are definitely a factor for him as well. Edwards’ negatives are so low that he is managing to maintain a considerable lead in terms of caucusers second choice. This could be a determining factor in a significant number of precincts, as to who grabs those loose delegates.

The most positive thing I’ve been seeing and hearing over the period of the last few days is the apparent growing awareness among the likely caucus goers that a southerner would have a significant advantage in the general election. Many late deciders seem to be making their decisions on this fact. Even a few Hillary and Obama supporters have been switching over and citing it as their reason for doing so. It’s a very positive development for Edwards, and one I would have not predicted a few weeks ago.

The good news for Edwards supporters in Michigan (and IN, IL, and WI) is that they don’t have to drive hours deep into Iowa to get to a place where they are most needed. I say this because I believe the cities right along the eastern edge of the state, on the Mississippi River, are the “battleground” areas. One example, Davenport, is only a two and a half hour drive beyond Chicago. Burlington, Muscatine and Dubuque are three more which are just across the river from Illinois.

If we can hold our own in the battlegrounds along the Mississippi, I think we’ll have this thing won.

So, do I have any other readers heading to Iowa to join Robert? If so, send me photos and updates. The caucus is just 6 days away now… If you can’t get out to help in person, how about contributing a few bucks? I’m sure it would go to good use.

[And all the photos were wiped out in the infamous Iranian Hacker Attack, but, those of you who are interested can still read about my meeting with John Edwards here.]

Posted in Politics | 6 Comments

kossacks in ypsi

As I’m waiting for my car to be repaired right now, I guess I won’t be going, but I’ve just been alerted that Michigan readers of the Daily Kos are at this very minute at Frenchie’s hating America together.

Posted in Ypsilanti | 6 Comments

pelosi’s gift to the men and women of america

I’m not sure if he made it himself, or if he picked it up somewhere on the net, but I just received the following holiday card from MM.com regular Edweird, and felt compelled to pass it along… Those of you who would like to share your thoughts with Speaker of the House Nancy “No Impeachment” Pelosi can find her contact information here… And, once you’re done spitting bile, if you’ve got the energy, send Congressman Wexler a note of appreciation for what he’s been doing. Or, better yet, sign his petition to initiate impeachment hearings against Cheney. Just because Pelosi presently seems unwilling to follow through on the will of the American people, it doesn’t mean it can’t happen.

Posted in Politics | 5 Comments

bike-powered movies and the greening of ypsilanti

Our friend Homeless Dave left a comment yesterday in response to my last post about the prospect of a people-powered movie series in Ypsilanti’s Riverside Park. He not only had some great ideas for us to consider, but he even pushed the Manhattan Project metaphor a little further along. Here’s what Dave had to say:

Re: Ypsi’s Manhattan Project (YMP)

Question: What’s the YMP equivalent of Fat Man and Little Boy?

Background: Directly powering an electrical device by pedaling a generator still requires something in the circuit to smooth out the voltage delivered to the device and to accommodate the variation in the voltage required by the device. There are at least two ways to do this: (i) capacitor (ii) battery. The 58-Farad ultra-capacitor I have costs around $150, and was shipped wrapped inside 6 inches of bubble wrap with CAUTION labels and language suggesting to me it might as well be nuclear waste. As I understand it, the virtue of an ultra-capacitor lies in its ability to very quickly charge up and discharge its voltage on demand, say for example, in applications like accelerating an automobile. So apparently there’s lots of ultra-capacitors involved in getting decent performance out of electric cars like the Tesla Roadster. By comparison, the battery I have from BatteriesPlus on Packard Street cost maybe $25 and is no more dangerous than any lead-acid car battery … which is still plenty dangerous, I suppose.

Based on cost and availability, batteries are probably the way you want to go for YMP. You’ll be charging the battery as it’s simultaneously discharging into the device. So it doesn’t have to be a huge battery, if your goal is to directly power some device by pedaling a generator. It just has to be big enough to perform its voltage-smoothing function. But as long as batteries are a part of the equation, it’s worth thinking about a battery as something more than just a way to smooth out the voltage delivered by pedaling. I mean, what people typically use batteries for is storage.

Answer: Two large (200-300 pound) batteries (consisting possibly of smaller batteries linked together). They should be the largest batteries that are still portable on some sort of human-powered cart.

Question: What’s the point of these huge fuckin batteries?

Answer: Once charged up, they will supply the already-stored power necessary for the ’show’ without any pedaling effort during the event itself. The communal pedaling effort to charge up Fat Man and Little Boy could be distributed over several days, weeks, even months prior to the event to be powered by these batteries. And because the pedaling activity can be distributed over a longer time, there is a reduced need to construct a multitude of pedal-powered generators. A couple of them would probably be sufficient. So you could focus on making those couple of pedaling units really efficient and nice (adjustable seat-posts for different size riders, adjustable handlebar stems, clipless pedals and adapters for non-cleated shoes, whatever), instead of trying to make lots and lots of them. Even though the number of units would be way smaller, the number of pedalers participating in the enterprise is potentially way larger.

Local non-profits that are willing and able to provide a publicly accessible space could act as stewards of the pedaling units and batteries during the charging. The idea is that folks who wanted to help charge the batteries by pedaling would go and do that pretty much at their convenience–by themselves or with a group of friends taking turns–at whatever non-profit the units were housed.

Ideally what you’d want is a realtime update on the web indicating progress towards a full charge–something along the lines of one of those United Way giving thermometer-type deals where the level of giving is reflected in an upward-creeping red column–perhaps some image more evocative of Ypsi than a thermometer, like the water tower … um, yeah, okay, maybe a giant phallus growing redder with each pedal stroke is not exactly what you want. But the idea is that people could check in on the web and see where things stood at any time.

Getting the batteries charged up for some upcoming ’show’ is certainly an impetus to participate in the pedaling project. But charging up the batteries could be an ongoing project that, in principle, never needs to end, even if there’s no ’show’ scheduled. When fully charged, the batteries would then be an impetus to schedule a ’show’, because Fat Man and Little Boy would need to have all that pent-up charge released.

Question: Isn’t it more like a community activity to have the activity of group pedaling during the show, instead of individual efforts prior to the event? It sounds boring to just go pedal by myself.

Answer: Maybe, I dunno. I think the potential for wider participation in the pedaling (if it’s done prior to the show) means that you have the easy conversational gambit among strangers of, “Did you do any pedaling for this?”, or “So, how many watt-hours did you do?” or “So where did you do your pedaling?” So the event itself could be an opportunity to build community by sharing individual histories, whereas group pedaling at the event would emphasize building community through a history shared directly as a group. You wouldn’t have to pedal by yourself–you could go with a friend and take turns. It’s worth mentioning that pedaling a stationary pedaling device is a pretty brutal way to spend even modest chunks of time, no matter what the context. You might well want to be alone in your physical and mental agony.

Question: This one movie we want to watch in the park runs for 2 hours, so what makes you think it’s possible to put together batteries that weigh 300 pounds or less that will deliver the roughly 4kWh we need for that?

Answer: That’s a good, empirical question. Someone with more expertise than I’ve got should analyze it. It’s worth considering though, how long you can power a ’show’ with the equipment you think you need, given just the power of a couple of 200-300 pound batteries–whatever that capacity turns out to be. And then you consider what kind of ’show’ can be put on within that constraint. One example of a concept that could be a shrunk or expanded to fit would be a SlideLuck PotShow type event, where the material to be displayed consists of several short sets of images selected from artist submissions. If you’ve got enough power for 30 minutes, well, then you only select 15 of the two-minute sets, instead of 50. In fact, asking the SlideLuck Potshow itself to consider Ypsilanti as a venue wouldn’t be a bad idea. (Detroit and Ann Arbor are already slated for 2008, I think, and a key organizer has local ties–Casey Kelbaugh is the son of the UM School of Architecture’s Dean, Doug Kelbaugh, who is among other things … a cycling enthusiast.) Or perhaps there will be a repeat of ArbCamp, which Fat Man and Little Boy could allow to happen in a real camp-like setting, say in Nichols Arboretum–now that would be a real ArbCamp worthy of the name (what’s the power requirement beyond a bunch of laptops–I dunno)

Question: Why is it necessary to push this metaphor of Manhattan Project all the way to needing an equivalent of Fat Man and Little Boy? This seems more like just a rhetorical ploy to make us think about using stored charge instead of pedal-powering directly. Why do you want to associate this enterprise with death and destruction? Fat Man and Little Boy were BOMBS, remember?

Answer: Granted, it’s a rhetorical ploy. But there’s a promotional and marketing advantage to having a reduced set of items to focus on–like just two big-ass batteries. If you’re pitching a prospective donor, you can say, “Your money is being spent on Fat Man, a big-ass battery. Period.” That’s easy to parse in two seconds, or about the average modern attention span. In the physical form of these two big-ass batteries, you also have two very focused and readily apparent places to sell sponsorship space. Shoot, Tesla Motorworks might be happy to donate the batteries themselves (they have a dealership in Detroit somewhere, I think) … but I’m not sure that the association they want with their product is bicycle power–they’re trying to target the sportscar market. And yes, there’s the death and destruction aspect. That could be tackled head-on with a slogan/motto something like: Ypsi’s Fat Man and Little Boy–they’re batteries, not bombs.

As revolutionary as a nuclear bomb? Many not. But I think if we could pull this off, we could really kick-start something… Speaking of which, I just heard a piece on NPR about Greensburgh, Kansas and their plans to come back “green” in the wake of a devastating tornado. More and more towns are going to jump on this bandwagon. If Ypsi were smart, it would be one of the first to really embrace alternative energy and sustainability, and not one of the last. The nation’s first people-powered film series may not be a huge step toward that end, but at least it would put us on the map, and for not very much money. If we were smart, we’d not only go for it, but we’d make sure that our city had all the policy and tax incentive pieces in place to take advantage of any press which might result… I’m still recovering from Christmas, but if people are interested in discussing this, let’s get together for a beer early in the new year.

[And I probably won't have time to blog about it tonight, but I wanted to at least mention briefly that my thoughts right now are with the people of Pakistan. One hopes that, somehow, today's assassination of Benazir Bhutto can lead to positive change.]

Posted in Special Projects | 2 Comments

happy holidays

I think I may have posted this here a few years ago at Christmastime. Doug Skinner sent it to me. It’s from an old Austrian greeting card. According to folklore, the creature, known as the Krampus, was St. Nicholas’s “dark assistant.” He was also known as Knecht Ruprecht, Perchten, Pelznickel, Black Peter, and Klaubaur. While St. Nick went about the business of handing out treats to the good kids, the Krampus would be dispatched to punish the bad… As it’s not terribly good for business, we don’t have an equivalent these days, and the world is worse for it.

If you have a rant about Christmas, our religion of consumption, or the rotten nature of kids today, here’s the place to leave a comment.

Posted in Other | 12 Comments

solar cheaper than coal

Too good to be true? Maybe. But the company Nanosolar claims to have found the holy grail. They claim to be able to generate solar power for $1 a watt, thanks to a revolutionary aluminum-based solar cell design. Here’s a clip from today’s “New York Times”:

Nanosolar, a heavily financed Silicon Valley start-up whose backers include Google’s co-founders, plans to announce Tuesday that it has begun selling its innovative solar panels, which are made using a technique that is being held out as the future of solar power manufacturing.

The company, which has raised $150 million and built a 200,000-square-foot factory here, is developing a new manufacturing process that “prints” photovoltaic material on aluminum backing, a process the company says will reduce the manufacturing cost of the basic photovoltaic module by more than 80 percent.

Nanosolar, which recently hired a top manufacturing executive from I.B.M., said that it had orders for its first 18 months of manufacturing capacity. The photovoltaic panels will be made in Silicon Valley and in a second plant in Germany.

While many photovoltaic start-up companies are concentrating on increasing the efficiency with which their systems convert sunlight, Nanosolar has focused on lowering the manufacturing cost. Its process is akin to a large printing press, rather than the usual semiconductor manufacturing techniques that deposit thin films on silicon wafers.

Nanosolar’s founder and chief executive, Martin Roscheisen, claims to be the first solar panel manufacturer to be able to profitably sell solar panels for less than $1 a watt. That is the price at which solar energy becomes less expensive than coal…

If true, the whole world’s about to change.

Posted in Alternative Energy | 8 Comments