I’d wanted to write about something else entirely tonight, but then I stumbled across the above tweet, and it sent me tumbling through the looking glass, into a pitch-black world of toxic masculinity and weaponized insecurity, where women, having been debased to the point of no longer being considered human, are seen merely as instruments through which men achieve fulfillment, or, should they decide not to accept that God-given role, obstacles that need to be eliminated by force.
Before I pull you through the looking glass with me, though, let’s start by talking about our most recent mass school shooting.
This past Friday, as I was preparing to head to Kentucky for the funeral of my grandmother, 17-year-old Dimitrios Pagourtzis walked into an art class at his high school in Santa Fe, Texas and opened fire on his fellow students. In spite of the fact that two armed police officers were on campus at the time of the shooting, the attack went on for four minutes, leaving 10 dead and another 13 wounded. [The attack was followed by a 25 minute stand-off with the police, at the end of which a wounded Pagourtzis surrendered.]
The response from the right was, to put it simply, unsurprising. Florida Senator Marco Rubio once again offered his hollow thoughts and prayers. [Rubio has taken has taken at least $3.3 million from the NRA.] Texas Senator Ted Cruz said, “We need to be doing everything humanly possible to stop this from ever happening again,” while doing absolutely nothing to stop it from happening again. [Cruz took $360,727 from the NRA in 2016 alone.] And Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos, who had been tasked with creating a school safety commission in the wake of the school shooting in Parkland, Florida this past February, said, “We simply cannot allow this trend to continue.” Of course, since announcing the March launch of her school safety committee, which also includes Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, and Homeland Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, DeVos has done next to nothing. [The commission held one closed-door meeting on March 28, but seems to have essentially stopped work as the nation’s attention drifted away from the Parkland shooting and back to the corruption of the Trump White House.]
While our politicians have done nothing, the student activists of Parkland, thankfully, have continued in their work, recently announcing a five-point plan to decrease gun violence… Here are the high-level policy changes they would like to see made by Congress.
1. Dedicated funding for the CDC to research gun violence
2. Strengthening the ATF’s ability to track and record gun sales
3. Universal background checks for gun purchases
4. A ban on magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition
5. A ban on assault weapons, including a registration or buyback program for these weapons already in circulation
As the Washington Post reported today, though, almost no Republicans have agreed to pursue even these very basic – and popular – changes to current law. While I suppose it’s possible that some could have changed their minds in the wake of this most recent mass shooting in Santa Fe, when the Washington Post reached out to all 237 Republican House members last week, asking what they thought of the Parkland proposal, only 29 responded. And, of those 29, only two said they support all five objectives. [Republican Congressman Paul Gosar of Arizona, responded to the Post reporter by saying, “One more law won’t stop mentally ill or hostile people from killing others,” apparently unaware that, in other countries, laws have, in fact, been effective in curbing gun violence.]
OK, maybe I’m being a bit unfair when I say that no Republicans are coming forward with ideas as to how we might address the fact that we’re presently losing more American citizens in school shootings than in foreign war zones. Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, for instance, had a great suggestion just after the shooting in Santa Fe that left eight students and two teachers dead. He suggested that maybe, instead of decreasing the guns in circulation, we should limit the number of entrances to our schools. “There are too many entrances and too many exits” to properly guard, he said… apparently not considering how much easier it would be for a gunman to kill students running to a single entrance, or how much more deadly school fires would be.
The National Entrance Association doesn't want us to talk about it, but we clearly have a "too many entrances" problem in America. https://t.co/Ay6jj3xRha
— Mark Maynard (@MarkAMaynard) May 19, 2018
Sadly, though, Patrick’s was one of the more sane responses that I’ve heard over the past few days. Some, as you can see in the tweet at the top of this post, are actually suggesting that these episodes of mass murder could be decreased if only women could be somehow compelled to have sex with young men like Dimitrios Pagourtzis.
You see, several of the men committing these horrible acts have attempted to make the case that they were really given no choice by the women they came in contact with, who, by denying them affection and respect, had robbed them of what was rightfully theirs. By making them incels, or “involuntary celibates,” these men argue, they’ve been left with no choice but to strike back against their female oppressors in defense of their manhood. Before killing 10 people in Toronto this past April Alek Minassian took to Facebook to post, “The Incel Rebellion has already begun!”. And, back in 2014, Elliot Rodger, who killed 6 people and wounded 13 more in California, described himself the same way… as an “incel.” And, while I’m not aware of him using the word “intel,” we’re now finding ourselves talking about pretty much the same thing in the case of Pagourtzis, whose first victim this past Friday was a 16 year old girl who has the audacity to “spurn” his manly advances, apparently robbing him of what was rightfully his.
So, this is how I’m spending my first evening home after attending my grandmother’s funeral… reading about the weaponized insecurity of white males who aren’t being given what they feel is rightfully theirs… The following comes by way of Salon.
Jordan Peterson, the clinical psychologist and University of Toronto professor who was recently canonized as a member of the Intellectual Dark Web, is a serious person. Peterson said as much in a lengthy New York Times profile dubbing him “Custodian of the Patriarchy.” Times reporter Nellie Bowles penned the piece, which has since been labeled a “hit job” and an “assassination attempt” on Peterson’s character.
The article was a followup of sorts to Times opinion editor Bari Weiss’ story on the Intellectual Dark Web, an informal collective of anti-left lecturers and podcasters who have gained notoriety for amassing a significant following on YouTube and Reddit. Peterson, like many of his IDW cohorts, is of the opinion that the progressive liberal agenda of equal opportunity and tolerance contradicts human nature and the Western ideal of individual responsibility. It comes to no surprise that most of Peterson’s audience is made up of young, white males who feel subjugated in a society that is trying to prop up women and racial minorities.
A self-help guru, Peterson has spent a lot of time pondering the source of youthful-male rage, which manifested last month in a terrorist attack in Toronto perpetuated by a man who described himself as an incel–short for involuntary celibacy–a term representing a group of men and an online culture that blames women for their poor sex life.
…Over the course of Peterson’s two-day-long interview with the Times, the academic offered his insights on the relationship between man and woman and how feminism has polluted the natural order.
“The masculine spirit is under assault,” Peterson told the Times. “It’s obvious.”
One of Peterson’s most controversial opinions in the profile is his recommended remedy for the virus plaguing the masculine spirit.
“The cure for that is enforced monogamy,” Peterson said.
It was the type of assertion that usually precedes a laugh and a clarification that it was a joke. But Peterson did not say this in jest…
Oh, and, while we’re at it, just tell me that this Trump comment from earlier today about the curtailing women’s reproductive rights isn’t related…
For the first time since Roe v. Wade, America has a Pro-Life President, a Pro-Life Vice President, a Pro-Life House of Representatives and 25 Pro-Life Republican State Capitals! pic.twitter.com/EfF54tmetT
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 23, 2018
I’d like to think that humanity can be somehow be salvaged, but, Jesus Christ, it’s getting difficult to stay optimistic these days. It feels as though the very foundation of civil society is crumbling beneath our feet…
And, for what it’s worth, fuck “the masculine spirit”.