What a difference a year makes

One year ago this evening, at the Democratic National Convention, First Lady Michelle Obama, referring to the tone of the Trump campaign, coined the phrase, “When they go low, we go high.”

Today, in Ohio, after tweeting that Congressman Adam Schiff was “sleazy,” and attacking his own Attorney General for being “weak,” President Donald Trump went before a few thousand supporters and announced to great applause that he had it within him to be “more presidential than any president.” Then, proving he’d been lying when he said that, he told the assembled crowd about how criminal immigrants “slice” and “dice” beautiful, young American girls with knives, keeping them alive as long as possible in order to prolong their pain.

Posted in Observations, Other, Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Declaring “Obamacare is death,” Trump ramps up rhetoric to push health care repeal through Congress. We have to stop him.

Not one to just accept the fact that the American people absolutely detest Trumpcare, tomorrow, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell will once again attempt to push it through the Senate. Yes, it’s been called “the worst designed social policy in history,” and people have begged, since it will impact approximately one-sixth of the entire U.S. economy, that we at least discuss the possible consequences before voting, but McConnell clearly thinks, through some combination of intimidation and bribery, that he has the votes, and nothing’s going to stop him… not even the fact that John McCain is still recovering from surgery. [As MSNBC’s Christopher Hayes‏ just said on social media, “How bad does a piece of legislation have to be that it can’t survive a week delay while your colleague with brain cancer recovers?] If I had to guess, I’d say McConnell thinks this is his last chance to kill Obamacare before the White House succumbs to the Russia scandal, and he’s not throwin’ away his shot, even if it means completely breaking the Senate. [McConnell, for what it’s worth, has broken the system before. See his recent theft of a Supreme Court seat.]

So, in less than 12 hours, our Senators will be asked to move forward a bill that none of us has even seen, and that includes the Democratic members of the Senate who will be asked to vote on it. [As Senator Kamala Harris just said on Twitter, “It seems the Republicans are still making us vote tomorrow, they just don’t know on what.”] Yes, it would seem, having now failed on multiple occasions to get Trumpcare across the finish line, McConnell is trying something new… He’s having people vote to advance a bill, the content of which is absolutely unknown to them. [Once advanced, 20 hours of ‘debate’ will commence, during which time Senators can offer amendments, which McConnell can then accept or reject when constructing the final version of the bill, which could come up to vote as early as Thursday, assuming the vote to proceed passes tomorrow. If things play out this way, as it’s expected they will, the Senate will be voting on a bill by the end of the week that has not have even been scored by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), which means that, when it’s voted on, we won’t event know how many Americans it will leave without health care, etc. To say we’re in uncharted waters here is an extreme understatement.]

All we know about Trumpcare 3.0 at this point is that it’s probably not going to be too terribly different from the last two versions that the Senate attempted to pass, both of which, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, would have seen some 22 million Americans losing their health insurance over the course of the next decade. [If this new version were any better, you can bet that they’d be sharing it with us prior to the vote, instead of just hoping to force it through quietly.] And this is why, it’s worth noting, the Republicans have been mercilessly attacking the CBO (which is actually run by a Republican appointee) in recent days, and threatening to slash its budget.

And Trump, for what it’s worth, is doing his part as well, giving laughably ridiculous speeches about what he’s taken to calling “the forgotten victims of Obamacare.”

So, just to reiterate, the President of the United States, who is pushing the Senate to pass legislation that would see on the order of 22 millions of Americans lose the health coverage they currently have, in order to transfer hundreds of millions of dollars back to our billionaire class, is saying that this has to be done immediately in order to save those suffering courageously under Obamacare. And, after years of looking, the Republicans have apparently found about a dozen of these so-called “victims” (all of whom appear to be alive) to stand behind the President while he promises to sign into law legislation that no one has seen, and everyone who studies such things thinks will likely both dramatically decrease coverage and raise premiums… I know, if you’re like me, you’re probably thinking, “Hey, I know a few folks who are actually alive because of Obamacare, but I’ve never met anyone who considers themselves to be a victim of it,” but that’s the truly inspired thing about this new White House framing. We haven’t heard about these folks, you see, because they’re the “forgotten” victims, the ones that the mainstream media has conspired to keep us in the dark about, the ones that are too afraid to share their tragic stories of not being forced into bankruptcy by medical debt and the like.

Trump, during his address from the White House this afternoon, wasn’t pulling any punches. After informing us that there were hidden victims of Obamacare, he went on to declare, “Obamacare is death,” after which he warned those Republican Senators that might be considering a ‘no’ vote tomorrow. “Any Senator who votes against starting debate is telling America that you are fine with the Obamacare nightmare,” he said.

This is the upside-down word we now find ourselves inhabiting, where Obama is victimizing people by making health care accessible to them, and our new President is fighting tirelessly against the so-called deep state to make things right again, begging for the Republicans in Congress to come to his defense and join him in this righteous battle (to make America’s less well-off both sicker and poorer)… Here’s Trump, in his own words, in case you missed it, calling for Congress to help him as he fights to make America great again by doing things like, taking away health care from those who need it and squashing the Russia investigation.

When I read this, I couldn’t help but think about those of us who aren’t billionaires, or presidents of countries and Fortune 500 companies. What about us? Don’t we deserve protection as well? Shouldn’t we, like Trump, demand that Congress comes to our defense and protects us?

If you think they should, please call and tell them Tuesday morning, before it’s too late. [You can find the numbers for your Senators here.]

Oh, and, before you call your Senators, check out these action steps from Indivisible’s Stop Trumpcare site, which include links to sample scripts and the like.

1. No on the motion to proceed. Make sure both of your senators are voting NO on the first procedural vote—the “motion to proceed.” This is where we’ve won before. If we stop the process at this stage, we keep McConnell from bringing the bill up for a vote. If he succeeds in passing the motion to proceed, McConnell will then have complete control to make last-minute changes to the bill and offer even bigger bribes to Senators. Stopping the motion to proceed stops McConnell. We’ve got a call script to get you started.

2. Filibuster by amendment. If McConnell succeeds in getting past the motion to proceed, that puts Democrats and Republicans in a floor flight—where Republicans hold almost all the power. If this happens, Democrats need to make sure to use every tool available to them to slow down debate and to pick apart as much of the bill as possible. Tell your Democratic Senators to Filibuster by Amendment and to raise “points of order” against provisions that don’t meet reconciliation requirements. (See our legislative explainer on the Byrd Rule.)

3. Focus on House ONLY after Senate. And, if McConnell manages to pass the bill (probably Thursday or Friday), then your attention needs to immediately turn to your House member. The House will need to pass the exact version as whatever the Senate passes, so we’ll need to quickly pivot back to have any chance of stopping it.

One last thing you might want to keep in mind when you’re calling you Senators… Loyalty’s been in the news a lot lately. The President likes to talk about it. He demands it of people. Just today, he told 40,000 Boy Scouts that we could use “more loyalty” in in the Untied States. Well, when you call your Senators, ask them if they intend to be loyal to you, their constituent. You’ve given them your votes and support over the past several years with the understanding that they will do their best to enact legislation that will serve the needs of you and your family, and Trumpcare, most of us would agree, doesn’t do that. Given that, one has to wonder where the loyalty of those voting in favor of Trumpcare really lies… with the people of their states, or with the Koch brothers and Steve Wynns of the world. It’s something to keep in mind today, but also come election day in 2018.

update: Every major patients’ rights group in America came together to place a full-page ad in today’s New York Times demanding that our Senators vote not to move this monstrous bill forward.

Posted in Health, Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 16 Comments

The beleaguered Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, his tit firmly in the wringer, fights for survival

We’ve known for some time that Attorney General Jeff Sessions is a liar, but we’re finally beginning to get a sense of just how deep it goes.

This past January 10, during his confirmation hearing, Jeff Sessions, when asked by Senator Al Franken whether or not he’d had any contact with any representatives from the Kremlin during his time as a member of the Trump campaign, responded, “(I) did not have communications with the Russians.” He not only said this while under oath during the televised hearing, but, just seven days later, when asked in writing by Senator Patrick Leahy whether or not he had “been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day,” Sessions doubled down, answering with a definitive, “No.” These statements, as we’d soon discover were both false.

This past March, we learned that Sessions, in direct contradiction of his sworn testimony, had in fact met at least twice with Russian Ambassador to the United States Sergey Kislyak. [As you’ll recall, Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn was forced to leave the administration when it became know that tapes existed of him talking about the possibility of ending U.S. sanctions against Russia with Kislyak the month before Trump was to take office.] Sessions, of course, like everyone else in the administration, begrudgingly acknowledged the meetings once they became public, but was quick to suggest that they had nothing whatsoever to do with the Trump administration. “I did meet with this one Russian official a couple of times,” Sessions admitted, but, he added, “(I) never had meetings with Russian operatives or government intermediaries about the Trump campaign.”

Well, it would seem as though this too is now being called into question.

News just broke this weekend that our intelligence community has intercepted communications between Ksilyak and the Kremlin, in which the Russian Ambassador apparently told his higher-ups that substantive conversations were had between himself and Sessions about what a Trump victory might mean for the Kremlin.

So, just to recap, Sessions denied having any contact whatsoever with the Russians during the campaign, and, when he was found to be lying, explained away the meetings by saying they had nothing at all to do with his role as Donald Trump’s foreign policy advisor. And, now, assuming we can believe these newly disclosed intercepts, it would seem as though that too was a lie. And, that’s not all. If I’m reading the reports correctly, it would appear as though these intercepts also confirm the men met a third time, at the Mayflower Hotel, just after Trump gave the first foreign policy speech of his campaign, which, as coincidence would have it, was very pro-Russia.

Interestingly, just after this news broke about the existence of intercepts detailing these discussions between Kislyak and Sessions, the Kremlin announced the Ambassador’s tenure in the United States had come to an end. Also of note, this most recent intelligence leak, which clearly doesn’t help the already embattled Attorney General, comes just a few days after Trump said to the New York Times that he never would have brought Sessions on as his Attorney General if he’d known that he was going to recuse himself from the Russia investigation. As for who might have leaked this most recent information, it would appear that, like the leaks that came before, it came from inside the White House. If I had to guess, I’d say the leak originated with the President himself, who, according to scuttlebutt, wants Sessions gone, as he’s refusing to fire special prosecutor Robert Mueller… Regardless of who might be behind the leak, or what motivated it, it’s looking like Sessions might have the opportunity to play Scarlet O’Hara in that prison production of Gone With the Wind after all… Unless, of course, he’s able to convince Mueller that he’s the one person who deserves to walk free in exchange for his testimony. There’s just one one golden ticket, though, and they’re all fighting for it.

[note: I know the “tit in a wringer” analogy is crude, but I’ve been revisiting Watergate these past few weeks, like I’m sure a lot of you have, and that phrase from “All The President’s Men,” just keeps echoing in around in my head. Nixon Attorney General John Mitchell, as some of you might recall, was said to have uttered it when describing what would happen to Washington Post Publisher Katherine Graham if she went forward and published a story about there being a secret fund within the Committee to Reelect the President to, among other things, fund shady information gathering activities and dirty tricks, essentially tying the Watergate burglary to the White House. As it turned out, it was Mitchell’s tit that was in the wringer, as he was one of the individuals that controlled the fund… If Sessions was smart, he would have thought about this before following in Mitchell’s footsteps, serving as Attorney General for a corrupt administration.]

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 14 Comments

With Mueller’s net tightening, Trump is said to be exploring whether or not he can pardon himself, and those close to him

With Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner all set to testify before Senate committees this coming week, I can’t say as though I was surprised to read just now in the Washington Post that President Trump, according to White House sources, has begun talking with his attorneys about the possibility of pardoning those in his inner circle, as well as himself… Following is a clip from the article in question, in case you might have missed it.

Some of President Trump’s lawyers are exploring ways to limit or undercut special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s Russia investigation, building a case against what they allege are his conflicts of interest and discussing the president’s authority to grant pardons, according to people familiar with the effort.

Trump has asked his advisers about his power to pardon aides, family members and even himself in connection with the probe, according to one of those people. A second person said Trump’s lawyers have been discussing the president’s pardoning powers among themselves.

Trump’s legal team declined to comment on the issue. But one adviser said the president has simply expressed a curiosity in understanding the reach of his pardoning authority, as well as the limits of Mueller’s investigation…

Frankly, I wouldn’t be at all surprised, given what’s come out over this past week concerning the June 9, 2016 meeting at Trump Tower between senior members of the Trump campaign, a Kremlin attorney charged with ending sanctions levied against Russia, a former Russian counter intelligence officer with a reputation for hacking, and a Russian national implicated in laundering money on behalf of organized crime figures friendly with Putin, if we heard late tomorrow that Trump had not only pardoned his son, his son-in-law, and his former campaign manager, but had also moved to fire Robert Mueller, the former FBI director tasked with heading the investigation into Russian interference in our last election. One would hope, if Trump reacted in such a way, Republicans in Congress would finally begin to move against him, but, as you know, we’re in completely uncharted waters here, and anything could happen.

Regardless of whether or not something absolutely earth shattering happens in the next day or two, one does get the sense that the stage has been set for a showdown of some kind, now that Trump has thrown down the gauntlet [as he did yesterday when he told the New York Times that he wouldn’t accept Mueller looking into his personal finances], and Mueller has picked it up [making it clear today that, yes, he’d be doing just that].

Here’s the whole thing told in two tweets.

So, yeah, apparently Mueller, the ex-Marine former FBI director, wasn’t all put off by Trump’s hollow blackmail threat… a fact which, I’m sure, came only as a surprise to our President.

Anyway, as you might imagine, everyone is now running around like crazy, asking questions like, “Can a president really pardon himself?” and “What would Republican members of Congress do if he were to fire Mueller?” Well, here, with a partial answer to the first question, is what MSU Law professor Brian C. Kalt had to tell the Washington Post.

…Currently, the discussions of pardoning authority by Trump’s legal team are purely theoretical, according to two people familiar with the ongoing conversations. But if Trump pardoned himself in the face of the ongoing Mueller investigation, it would set off a legal and political firestorm, first around the question of whether a president can use the constitutional pardon power in that way.

“This is a fiercely debated but unresolved legal question,” said Brian C. Kalt, a constitutional law expert at Michigan State University who has written extensively on the question.

The power to pardon is granted to the president in Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, which gives the commander in chief the power to “grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.” That means pardon authority extends to federal criminal prosecution but not to state level or impeachment inquiries.

No president has sought to pardon himself, so no courts have reviewed it. Although Kalt says the weight of the law argues against a president pardoning himself, he says the question is open and predicts such an action would move through the courts all the way to the Supreme Court…

update: The cool thing about Twitter is the you can just write to folks, and sometimes they actually write back… Here’s the beginning of my conversation with Brian Kalt on the scope of presidential pardon power.

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 34 Comments

Drip, drip, drip…

As I’m still recovering from yesterday’s never-ending, late night rant, I’d intended to take tonight off. Three things happened today, however, that I wanted to let you know about…

1. According to reports, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson is considering the closing of the State Department’s cybersecurity office. While it’s possible that all of the duties of the group would be taken on by other State Department offices, it’s understandable that many find the prospect extremely troubling, given that the NSA, CIA and FBI all believe, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the Russians are actively engaged in cyber warfare against our nation. And, making matters worse, as I’m sure you can appreciate, this announcement comes less than a week after Trump announced his desire to work more closely with the Russians on issues of cybersecurity, much to the shock of our national security community.

2. While Donald Trump is denying it, news broke this evening that, during last week’s G-20 conference in Germany, he and Vladimir Putin had a second, considerably more private, meeting. According to reports, the meeting, in violation of all known accepted protocol, was attended by just Trump, Putin, and a Russian interpreter. Why they should want to meet like this, without any other members of our national security team present, especially given the rumors swirling about collusion and election rigging, your guess is as good as mine.

3. It’s been made public that the eighth person to attend the June 9, 2016 Trump Tower meeting we discussed yesterday between top Trump campaign officials and Russian operatives, was Ike Kaveladze, a Russian citizen who, not too long ago, was accused of having laundered some $14 billion for Russian organized crime in the United States. [So, just to recap, in that one meeting, we had an attorney focusing on the lifting of sanctions, a former Russian counter intelligence officer with an expertise in hacking, and a money launderer with expertise in hiding the assets of the Russian mob. But, if we’re to believe the White House, they’d just stopped by to advocate on behalf of the Russian orphans.]

Make of all that what you will. I think I speak for most of you, however, when I say it looks as though the net is beginning to draw tighter around the husky orange carcass of our small-handed, wannabe leader. There’s just no way the intelligence community is going to allow this to go on much longer… No, the wheels of the deep state are already grinding away.

[The image above was from an earlier post, but I thought it fit nicely.]

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 22 Comments

Connect

BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative Jodi Lynn