Civil rights icon Representative John Lewis leads House sit-in to demand vote on gun legislation

gunsitin

In the wake of the recent mass shooting in Orlando that left 49 people dead, Democrats in both houses of Congress have proposed legislation aimed to curb gun violence by expanding background checks to include guns purchased either online or at gun shows, and block anyone on the federal terrorist watchlist from purchasing deadly weapons.

Last week, Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut, saying “We have a moral obligation to act and not accept that this is inevitable,” began a 15-hour filibuster in the Senate that successfully forced Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to bring a series of gun-related proposals to the floor. [All of the proposals failed, but at least we now know which U.S. Senators voted to put assault rifles into the hands of suspected terrorists, like the young man behind the Orlando attack.]

And, earlier today, civil rights icon John Lewis took up the cause on the floor of the House, in hopes of forcing House Speaker Paul Ryan to bring a similar vote. Ryan responded by ordering that the C-Span cameras be turned off, and calling for an end to the session once Lewis, having said, “We have turned deaf ears to the blood of the innocent and the concern of our nation,” began calling his fellow Democrats up from their seats to stage a sit-in, demanding “Give us a vote!” While the C-Span coverage went dead, though, the protest inside the House chamber continued to grow, as more Democratic Representatives came forward, and others, like Senators Chris Murphy, Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders, came to show their support. And those assembled began broadcasting on their phones by way of Periscope and Facebook. [Eventually, I’m told, C-Span began broadcasting this cell phone video.]

Here, to get a sense of how things began, is footage of Lewis calling his fellow Representatives to join him.

“We are blind to a crisis. Mr. Speaker, where is the heart of this body? Where is our soul?,” Lewis said as he announced his plans to sit down on the floor until such time that Paul Ryan would agree to call a roll-call vote, allowing the American people to see which of their elected officials had been bought by a weapons lobby unwilling to even consider the most basic common sense measures to address gun violence.

For those of you would would like to know more, here are a few relevant clips from around the internet…

Politico:

…Democrats have tried numerous times over the past week to force a vote on a “no fly, no buy” bill, which would bar terror suspects on the “no-fly” list from purchasing guns. The sit-in represented a sharp escalation in the fight, however, putting political pressure on Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) to allow a roll-call vote on the policy issue that’s gotten the most traction following the Florida shooting.

But by early afternoon, there were no signs that Republicans would acquiesce to the Democrats’ demands for a vote. Republicans believe that if they give in now, it would encourage more such actions by Democrats, and one GOP leadership aide called the move a “Democrat publicity stunt.”

But Democrats claim they will stay on the floor as long as it takes. They want Ryan to cancel the mid-July recess to take up their proposal.

“We have been too quiet for too long,” Lewis said. “There comes a time when you have to say something. You have to make a little noise. You have to move your feet. This is the time”…

Washington Post:

…House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) pledged that Democrats would stay on the floor until they get a vote.

“We’ll be here as long as it takes, every day,” she said during a news conference on the steps of the Capitol. “This is the moment of truth.”

But in appearance on CNN, House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wisc.) showed little inclination to meet Democrats’ demands, criticizing them for staging “a publicity stunt” and for calling for votes on “a bill that already died” in the Senate earlier this week.

“People have a guaranteed right to Second Amendment rights,” Ryan said. “We’re not going to take away a person’s constitutionally guaranteed rights without due process.”…

Some Republicans said it was possible the lights and air conditioning would be turned off later in the night when the House adjourns for the day.

“You don’t usually leave the lights on all night long, and you don’t necessarily leave the air conditioning on,” said Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.), adding that he thinks the House should adjourn – but will leave it to Ryan to “decide what needs to happen and when.”

Time:

…As with much of the civil disobedience that fueled progress in the civil rights movement, Lewis’s involvement in efforts to end segregation involved knowingly violating the laws that enforced it. He was beaten by mobs and arrested by police.

And on Wednesday—more than 55 years after he first led lunch counter sit-ins—Lewis and his Democratic colleagues technically broke rules that forbid anyone from taking photos or video inside the House chamber, staying in place for a sit-in after the House had been called into recess.

“Sometimes you have to violate a rule, a law, to uphold a greater law, a moral law,” Lewis said Wednesday on CNN. “We have a right to sit down or sit in to engage in nonviolent protest. It is always right to do right”…

Talking Points Memo:

…One Republican congressman did not share in the spirit of a sit-in protest by House Democrats Wednesday on gun control legislation, tweeting that the demonstration was “a disgrace to Woolworth’s.”

Rep. Mark Walker (R-NC) took to Twitter while the Democrats sat and made speeches on the House floor, referencing the 1960 sit-in at the Woolworth’s lunch counter in Greensboro, North Carolina, where four black students refused to leave after being denied service.

“Calling this a sit-in is a disgrace to Woolworth’s,” Walter wrote. “They sat-in for rights. Dems are ‘sitting-in’ to strip them away”…

In case it’s not obvious, the photo at the top of this post shows Elizabeth Warren, John Lewis, and our own Debbie Dingell sitting down in protest… Oh, and don’t feel too bad for Dingell, who looks painfully uncomfortable in the photo. Someone apparently found her a chair.

IMG_5541

Posted in Civil Liberties, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments

Totally Quotable Arlo: “I wish I was a baby again” edition

Today’s addition to the Totally Quotable Arlo file is a bit out of character for our young protagonist. He said it this morning, just a few minutes after waking up. Clementine, who was heading off to her survivalist summer camp, had said something to him, and he kind of curled up under the blanket as he was responding to her. I don’t think she’d said anything mean to him. My best guess is that he asked to cuddle and she told him that she had to leave. I was sitting nearby at the time, putting on my shoes, and, while I didn’t hear their exchange, I heard his response, which was uncharacteristically sentimental. Arlo, for the most part, is a pretty happy kid, and, with the exception of his saying “Nobody loves me” every so often in response to being told to go to bed, I don’t recall him ever bemoaning his lot it life, wishing to be someone other than who he is, etc. And I guess that’s why this quote of his kind of stuck in my head. It’s uncharacteristically sad, but also kind of beautiful… like he’s starting to discover what it means to grow up, and what you give up in the process.

babyagain

[If you’ve got a few extra minutes, check out our Totally Quotable Arlo archive.]

Posted in Mark's Life, Special Projects | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Surprising absolutely no one, Michigan’s testing of welfare recipients for drug use has yielded zero results

I posted the following on December 28, 2014, in a post titled “Unconstitutional, scientifically unsound, fiscally irresponsible, suspicion-based drug testing of welfare recipients comes to Michigan”.

In what seems like a pretty clear attempt to appease the far right and drive more of Michigan’s poor from the public assistance rolls, Governor Rick Snyder signed legislation on the day after Christmas giving the State the power to collect and test the urine of welfare recipients suspected of using drugs. [“Merry Christmas, welfare queens!”]

The bundle of legislation, which includes House Bill 4118 and Senate Bill 275, allows for a one-year pilot program to be implemented in three as-yet-to-be-determined counties.

Leaving aside for the moment that similar programs have failed miserably elsewhere, I’m curious as to how State officials will be selecting individuals for testing. Will there be specific things they’re looking for? Will they be looking for track marks? Will being pale and disheveled be enough to bring out a piss cop to escort you into the restroom? Will race factor into it? Will a skinny, young black man in drooping pants, for instance, be more susceptible to testing than, say, a middle-aged white man, like myself, wearing a suit? I’d love to read their guidelines as to what a “possible drug user” looks like…

One wonders if they’ll have a book of photos that State employees can refer to when trying to asses if someone looks like a drug addict. And, if so, one wonders if it will include a photo of Congressman Trey Radel of Florida, who was arrested last year for cocaine possession, shortly after he voted in favor of a Republican bill that would allow states to require a clean drug test before making food stamps available to those in need. But he, of course, wasn’t a poor person of low moral character who just chose to indulge in drugs. No, according to him, he was a man struggling with “the disease of alcoholism,” who simply made “a poor choice.” Sure, both he and the food stamp-collecting drug user spent our tax dollars on illegal substances, but the difference, as they say, is black and white.

Earlier, when I mentioned that programs like this “rarely” worked, I misspoke. I don’t think there’s even a single instance of a system like this working anywhere in the United States. In Florida, their program was found unconstitutional. And, in Tennessee, when they decided to test welfare applicants, they found only 1 out 800 to be a user of illegal drugs. If there’s a place where this has actually helped people, and saved a state money, I’ve yet to see it. In Virginia they were smart. They did the math and figured out that the cost of such a program, about $1.5 million, would be over five times the amount that would be saved in unpaid benefits, so they killed it. [Here in Michigan, the Senate Fiscal Agency estimates that a statewide program would cost $700,000 to $3.4 million to run, while saving anywhere from $370,000 to $3.7 million in caseload reductions.]

My guess is that Snyder knows this, and that’s why we’re looking at a three-county rollout and not a new statewide program. This will allow him to say to those on the right that he tried to ferret out those lazy, good-for-nothing, crack-smoking welfare queens without having to actually flush away too much money. And it will probably keep several people who could use assistance from seeking it, which is clearly the objective. This isn’t about finding an addict and getting him help. This is about bullying the average poor person, and letting him know that, if he wants to eat in Michigan, he’s going to have to piss in front of us. It will invariably fail, though, as it has everywhere else. I just hate the fact that we have to go through this charade. We know that this program is, as the folks at the ACLU have so eloquently summed it up, “unconstitutional, scientifically unsound, fiscally irresponsible, and one more way the ‘War on Drugs’ is an unfair war on America’s most vulnerable populations,” but, because rich, white Republicans want it, we’re going to do it anyway. And, when it fails, we’ll just move on to find a new way to demonize the poor during our next lame duck session.

According to research by the Detroit Free Press, “Michigan has roughly 80,000 welfare recipients, 21,000 of them adults age 18 and older who could be subject to drug testing depending on which counties are selected for the pilot.” Assuming this program costs somewhere in the order of $3.4 million to run, should it go statewide, that’s about $162 for each one of these 21,000 people. Just think how much good could be done with that money, if they State really cared about the health and welfare of its citizens, and not just saving money by forcing them from welfare programs.

If I had more time, I’d look into how much the state budgets for the treatment of drug-addicted welfare recipients. My guess is that it’s not too much, though, and that it’s dropping every year. And I suspect that $3.4 million, if directed to such a cause, could be extremely beneficial. But, instead, we’ll single out poor people who look like drug addicts and we’ll have them pee in cups while being watched by State employees. It makes perfect sense, doesn’t it?

And what happens to these people when we kick them off the welfare rolls? Do they just stop eating, wither away, and disappear? Or do they have the audacity to continue living, finding other, perhaps illegal ways, to stay alive? And, if so, one wonders what the costs to society might be as petty theft, prostitution and robbery rise… But surely the Republicans in Lansing have considered this, right?

urineI would never suggest anyone send piss though the mail, as doing so would probably get one labeled a terrorist in today’s America, but I really love the idea that Republican legislators could arrive back to work after the holiday break finding gallons and gallons of angry, stale piss waiting for them… Actually, now that I think about it, maybe mason jars full of water and yellow food coloring would do the trick, sending the message without opening anyone up to prosecution… What do you think?

Well, the results are now in. The following comes from a Guardian article titled “Michigan’s drug-testing welfare program has yielded zero positive results so far“.

Not a single welfare recipient or applicant has tested positive for banned drugs in a Michigan pilot program, part of the growing practice of screening beneficiaries of government assistance for drug abuse.

The program, which ends on 30 September, may face renewed scrutiny in the wake of Wisconsin congresswoman Gwen Moore’s proposed legislation to force taxpayers with more than $150,000 of itemized deductions to submit to the IRS a clear drug test. Under the legislation, applicants who refuse the test would be required to take the significantly lower standard deduction when filing their taxes.

Moore’s office said drug-testing welfare recipients and applicants is “blatantly unacceptable” and pushes a stereotype that impoverished individuals are more susceptible to substance abuse than other, wealthier individuals who are beneficiaries of government programs.

“Congresswoman Moore finds it shameful that states like Michigan, Wisconsin and Florida continue to push these discriminatory policies under the guise of fiscal responsibility,” Moore’s communications director, Eric Harris, told the Guardian.

“Drug-testing struggling families and individuals as a condition of eligibility for vital, life-saving social services is blatantly unacceptable and the insinuation that those battling poverty are somehow more susceptible to substance abuse is as absurd as it is offensive.”

The Michigan program began last October and covers Allegan, Clinton and Marquette counties. As of May, a total of 303 applicants and recipients for the state’s Family Independence Program, which provides temporary cash assistance, have participated in the pilot program. Zero have tested positive, the state said. When the program concludes, the state department of health and human services has 60 days to produce a report on its results.

Michigan’s governor, Rick Snyder, who signed legislation in December 2014 to launch the pilot program, declined to comment on the results so far…

One wonders just how much we wasted on this little exercise that we could have spent on educating our youth or housing the homeless… Good work, Snyder.

Posted in Civil Liberties, Michigan | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 13 Comments

The rehab of 209 Pearl is finally getting underway

209progress

As it’s been a while, I thought that I should give you an update on the renovation of 209 Pearl Street.

Since my last post, things have changed a bit. Most notably, we’ve chosen not to have a loft apartment on the second floor, and instead build-out more offices for Landline Creative Labs. It wasn’t an easy decision, as we really wanted to have an apartment on the second floor, which we could one day convert to a rental, allowing us to experiment with residencies and the like, but the demand from creative professionals for high quality, affordable, downtown space was just too significant to ignore. Without even really marketing the space, we had more interest than we could accommodate under our initial plan, so we decided to incorporate more offices. What you see here is our most recent plan for the space. You’ll notice that, in addition to now having 10 office spaces and three bathrooms on the second floor, we also have a large conference room, a reception area, and a wheelchair lift, which we were able to afford once we decided not to pursue the apartment.

209PearlJune2016layout

As we don’t yet have signed leases with our prospective tenants, I probably shouldn’t mention them all by name. I will say, however, that the three companies I told you about in that first post announcing our plans – the graphic design firm [Invisible Engines], the video production company [7 Cylinders], and the photography studio [CS Photo] – are all still onboard. And, in addition to them, we’ll also likely have an illustrator, a motivational training firm, another film production group, another graphic design company, a clothing design cooperative, and someone who does podcasts on the subject of sustainability. And, it’s probably worth noting, these aren’t all just local people. A few will be commuting to Ypsi from Ann Arbor, and one just recently moved to the area from Vermont. And, if things work out, we might even have someone joining us from Canton… And I think that’s the really cool thing about this. We won’t just be pulling people into downtown from their home offices in Ypsi, but we’ll actually be bringing commuters into Ypsi to work, shop at our local restaurants and stores, and hopefully even create more jobs here as they grow.

As for where we are relative to construction, things are just beginning to heat up. After two months of demolition, during which we ripped out everything that we don’t need, we’re finally starting to focus on construction and repair. We’ve got finalized plans from our architect, our electrician, and our plumber. We’ve signed a contract with an elevator company. And our carpenter is ready to start work as soon as we get our permits. And, with the blessing of the Historic District Commission, we’ve just started on the renovation of our 90 year old windows… Oh, and we also just secured a grant to help us complete the build-out the offices, but I can’t get into any specifics about that for another week or so.

IMG_5403

The above photo was taken as both Jesse and I worked on the scaffold, pulling down long strips of cement-covered wire mesh from the ceiling. For what it’s worth, when long strips of cement-covered wire mesh start to come down, they come down fast. Once you get the first few nails pulled, gravity just takes over, and, before you know it, razor sharp strips of the stuff are swinging through the air at an incredible velocity, as the weight of the stuff starts pulling away from the nails that once secured it to the beams overhead. Just moments after the above photo was taken, I nearly severed my right thumb, as a six-foot long segment of the stuff sliced through my hand, causing my blood to spray all over the scaffold, mixing with Jesse’s from a days previous, when the same cement-covered wire mesh nearly tore his hand from wrist. The good news is, it’s all gone now, and it looks great.

Not only did we pull out all of the old stuff covering the rafters, but we brought in a crew to dry ice blast the wood that we’re planning to keep exposed. So 90 years of dust, crumbling insulation, dead wires, and bird droppings are now gone… Sadly, I don’t have a “before” photo, but here’s what our 1926 rafters and joists look like now, after a few days of dry ice blasting. This shot was taken in what will be the Landline lobby.

IMG_5435

Oh, and we scraped up what we could of the old carpet, padding and glue, exposing the original pine floors, which we’re hoping to refinish in some of the spaces.

There’s still a ton that needs to be done, and, given our budget, it’ll be tight, but we’re confident that we can pull it off. Stay tuned for more timely updates over the coming weeks, as plumbers, electricians and carpenters begin their work, and the place starts taking shape.

LandlineEarlyLogoProgress

Posted in 209 Pearl, Architecture, Art and Culture, Landline Creative Labs, Local Business, Locally Owned Business, Uncategorized, Ypsilanti | Tagged , , , , | 10 Comments

Father’s Day 2016

This was my Father’s Day highlight… working with an inconsolable Arlo to build a device capable of retrieving his “laser” from the toilet.

IMG_5509

Linette was in Florida this past weekend, and I just hung out with the kids. We ran around the sprinkler, hung out at the local pool, cooked out with neighbors, and stayed up late watching science fiction movies and eating nachos. I know, as a father, I’m supposed to say that the best Father’s Day present would be just a little peace and quiet, but I genuinely enjoyed the chaos these past few days with the kids, even with the inevitable sweaty melt-downs that come along with the first 90-degree temperatures of the year.

The photo above took place earlier this morning, as I was waiting patiently for the kids to remember that it was Father’s Day. [As it turns out, they wouldn’t remember until almost noon, when someone on the street wished me a “Happy Father’s Day,” at which point they assured me that they’d intended to make me a card or something.] I’m not sure what Arlo had been doing with his little blue LED light, which he calls his “laser,” in the toilet, but apparently he dropped it in. After a few minutes of screaming, we went outside to walk around the block, calm down, and devise a plan. We ultimately decided to tie some twigs together with twine, creating a kind of tiny basket, which we then lowered into the toilet to retrieve the laser. It wasn’t as much fun as taking Clementine and her 6th grade friends out for ice cream after their last day of school, like I got to do on Friday evening, but it was kind of lovely in its own way, working together to find a way to get something out of the toilet without using our hands, and then dousing it with rubbing alcohol to kill the “poop germs.”

Posted in Mark's Life | Tagged , , , , , , | 13 Comments

Connect

BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative Cherewick Header