On Monday, when Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg warned that the high court’s Hobby Lobby decision would send our country careening into a “minefield” of complicated legal issues, she was absolutely right. Less than 24 hours after the ruling, which established both that corporations could profess religion, and that U.S. laws couldn’t compel them to do things “incompatible with their sincerely held religious beliefs,” the challenges have already begun.
Today, according to the Atlantic, a letter signed by 14 representatives of faith-based entities was delivered to the White House demanding that a recently announced executive order which would make it illegal for federal contractors to discriminate on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation, be edited to allow such discrimination, if done by people who profess to hate said people based upon sincerely-held religious conviction. “We are asking that an extension of protection for one group not come at the expense of faith communities whose religious identity and beliefs motivate them to serve those in need,” the letter stated.
And that, my friends, is how it begins.
Now it’s just a matter of time before everyone with a statement to make, from the owners of Chick-fil-A, to the regents of Bob Jones University, are in court, demanding that we the people acknowledge their god-given right to not serve delicious chicken sandwiches to the gay, and deny tenure to those of the weaker sex…. who really should, you know, be home baking pies, nursing babies and studying the bible.
update: While it sounds as though Hobby Lobby will continue to offer birth control for their employees, excepting those four types of contraception which “prevent an already fertilized egg from developing any further by inhibiting its attachment to the uterus,” other employers may not be so generous. The Daily Beast has compiled a list of 82 companies that may eliminate contraception coverage to some degree in the wake of yesterday’s Supreme Court decision. The Michigan companies on the list include Trijicon, Willis & Willis PC, Barron Industries, Midwest Fastener Corp, Autocam Corporation, Dominos Farms, Mersino Management, Eden Foods, MK Chambers Company, Mersino Dewatering, Weingartz Supply Company, and the Ave Maria Foundation.
11 Comments
It is going to be SO interesting when a non-Christian group utilizes this law. Right now, certain groups are doing everything but lowering their sunglasses and saying “ooh la la” like David Lee Roth at the thought of being able to deny things based on religion beliefs. What on earth will they do if their Orthodox boss doesn’t want to pay for their piggy-based thyroid pills? (Although I guess the rich people will just whip out their checkbooks and pay for it themselves, right?)
What if the company I work for is owned by a man who believes, based on scripture, that women have to wear burkas?
The owner of Eden Foods is speaking out.
Read more:
http://www.lenconnect.com/article/20140701/News/140709958#ixzz36Q2tVt3U
How do other coop members feel about Eden products being on the shelves?
I am a coop member and I am ok with them keeping Eden products on the shelf but I myself will refuse to buy them and I imagine that many other members will too. So maybe, purely as a good business decision, they may want to not buy any more.
Kim,
In the burka case, I don’t think the analogy works. SCOTUS is saying that the government can’t force a corporation to pay money to purchase something against their religious beliefs (and yes, IMO the idea of a corporation having religious beliefs is ridiculous but that is what they said). An employer forcing their employees to wear burkas (or say a prayer or whatever) would be a different test, so this ruling would likely apply to that scenario.
The most applicable analogies have to do with health care since that is something companies “pay for” as part of employee compensation (e.g., can Scientologists opt out of providing blood transfusions?). I think the next wedge is likely to be companies trying to opt-out of offering health coverage for same-sex partners on religious grounds.
Edit: “*not* likely apply”
“Potter went to court more than a year ago after learning the Affordable Care Act required Clinton-based Eden Foods to begin including contraceptives in its health insurance plan. He stated it violated his beliefs as a practicing Catholic.”
Potter is known to be a complete asshole.
We need to fight hate with hate. Companies objecting to this decision need to make it clear that they will not hire pro-lifers and will not provide insurance which pays for Christian funeral services.
Agreed Lynne. I am done with Eden Foods.
Does the Ypsi Food Co-op offer employer-provided health insurance that covers these contraceptives?
“Eden Foods is OFF THE SHELVES at Seattle Co-op thanks to you!”
Read more:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/07/17/1314628/-Eden-Foods-is-OFF-THE-SHELVES-at-Seattle-Co-op-thanks-to-you