The “What in the Hell is Going on with Ypsi’s New Unified School District?” post

    Tonight’s the night that I’d set aside to figure out what in the hell is going on with Ypsi public schools. Judging by the increasingly insane comments being left elsewhere on the web, and the epic emails that are being forwarded to me, it sounds as though the great experiment – of combining the Willow Run and Ypsi school districts – is threatening to come off the rails in a big way. Here, before we start discussing what’s happening right now, and whether things can still be salvaged, is a bit of relevant history. (If you know any of the following points to be incorrect, please let me know, and I will edit accordingly.)

    1. Under serious pressure from the state, our two school districts agreed last summer to restructure as one entity, in hopes of further slashing expenses and staving off a forced take-over at the hands of a Governor-appointed Emergency Manager. (They had good reason to be concerned. As you’ll recall, at about this same time, the Emergency Manager given the power to oversee Highland Park’s schools disbanded all of them, replacing them with for-profit charter schools operated by The Leona Group.)

    2. The administrators of the two schools, their respective boards, and the powers-that-be within the Washtenaw Intermediate School District (WISD) lobbied hard on behalf of the merger, and, in November, the citizens of both school districts voted to make it happen, convinced that it was the only way to keep some semblance of local control. (As you may recall, WISD Superintendent Scott Menzel made the case for the merger in an interview on this site. “(T)he key question to ask is whether it is possible for Ypsilanti and Willow Run to remain independent school districts,” said Menzel. “Given the current trajectory – declining enrollment, increasing deficits, poor academic achievement – the answer to that question is no. The cuts required to balance the budget will result in driving more students from the district and compromising any effort to improve achievement. This is a death spiral. The only viable option going forward is to pursue consolidation of the districts and work diligently to create a new district that is both financially viable and designed to raise the level of achievement by implementing a 21st century, world-class education.”)

    3. Having gotten the go-ahead from the voters, WISD administrators began to put their plan into action. A new board for the unified district was created (pictured right), composed of members of both previous boards, as well as several un-elected individuals appointed by the WISD. Community meetings were held. Subcommittees were formed. And it was agreed, among other things, that all of Ypsilanti’s teachers would be fired at the end of this school year, with the understanding that many would then be hired back to teach within the newly-formed district. Curiously, the same did not hold true for the superintendents of the two original school districts – Dedrick Martin (Ypsilanti) and Laura Lisiscki (Willow Run) – both of whom were given contracts through 2016.

    4. Paying $12,000, the WISD engaged consultants at the Michigan Leadership Institute to aid in the search for a new superintendent. The idea, as I understood it, was that they would do a wide search for external candidates with experience in merging districts, and turning around failing school systems. The community was surprised to learn a few weeks ago, however, that, before this outside search could be conducted, both Martin and Lisiscki would be given an opportunity to be considered for the post. Only if neither was chosen by the new board of education, we were told, would the broader search be conducted.

    5. There was, however, a third internal candidate for the position. Sharon Irvine, a lawyer and educator who currently serves as the Ypsilanti Public Schools’ executive director of human resources, indicated that she would like to be considered, alongside Martin and Lisiscki. Irvine, from what I understand, gained the respect of many for having successfully worked with the teachers’ union last year to cut costs without having to resort to the 30% across-the-board pay cuts which had been proposed. Video of Irvine, explaining what she would bring to the job, and how she managed to win concessions from teachers while retaining their support, can be found here. (Irvine’s interview is followed by those of Lisiscki and Martin.) It’s probably also worth noting that Irvine, in addition to seeking the job of Ypsi’s superintendent, was also pursuing the job as the head of Tecumseh’s school system. From what I’m told, however, she’s now out of the running, as Tecumseh’s board of education has made it clear that they want someone for the job who lives in their community, and Irvine lives in Ypsilanti, and, I believe, intends to stay here.

    6. Last Thursday, on Valentine’s Day, the new board of education publicly interviewed all three candidates. (The video link can be found above.) The public, during this session, also had an opportunity to voice their opinions and to ask questions. While there was support for Laura Lisiscki from members of the Willow Run community, Dedrick Martin didn’t fare as well. In fact, many of his former constituents voiced their dissatisfaction with his performance, and urged that the board consider hiring Irvine, based, apparently, upon the vision that she put forward during her interview. It’s unclear how much weight, if any, however, will be given to public opinion. At least that’s the sense that I get from comments made by board member Don Garrett, who was heard urging other board members to avoid talking to constituents, as they might unduly “influence” them. (I haven’t found it yet, but I’m told the audio can be found somewhere among the video’s on this Willow Run site. I intend to go through them tonight, in search of the clip I’ve been told about, where Garrett says to a fellow board member, “WISD appointed YOU to the Board not the community.”)

    7. Then, over last weekend, things really heated up, as people, from what I understand, started to get the sense that Martin’s appointment might be a foregone conclusion. When the board reconvened on Monday to discuss the candidates, they were met with a packed house, a vocal majority of whom, I’m told, were Irvine supporters. According to some who attended the meeting, the board did not seriously deliberate the merits and deficits of each candidate. Furthermore, I’m told that board member David Bates took the opportunity to chide the audience for making negative comments about Martin, and for asking him unduly probing questions during the Q&A the week before. Ypsilanti Education Association (YEA) President Krista Boyer, I’m told, attempted to read a statement concerning the superintendent search, and was cut off mid-sentence. In the end, Garrett and Bates suggested that the board might consider an administrative structure that could include both Martin and Lisiscki as co-superintendents, rewarding them, I suppose, for having run two of the State’s worst-performing school districts. (I apologize for the snark. I imagine that, to a great extent, their failures were predetermined by the constricting budgets that they were forced to work with, and other factors. But I still find it odd that we’d be seriously talking about one of them, let alone both, which, to my mind, kind of defeats the purpose of the merger.) According to our friend Maria Cotera, who has written extensively about the state of education in Ypsilanti on this site in the past, there were audible gasps from the crowd when this dual-leadership model was suggested, and some people were even shouting, “No!” (As all of this played out, Martin and Lisiscki were apparently seated at the front of the room, with the board of education, while Irvine was seated in the audience.) Maria approached one of the board members after the meeting to explain why people in the Ypsi community felt so strongly about the need for real change in district leadership, and a heated exchange ensued. She copied me on the letter which she sent to the board member with whom she had exchanged words, and you’ll find it below, with her permission, along with a bit of a preface, putting the whole thing into perspective.

    FROM MARIA COTERA:

    A very depressing update on school consolidation and the crisis in leadership…

    As you know, I have been participating in the redesign of Ypsilanti Community Schools in the wake of the Ypsi-Willow consolidation. I’ve been going to weekly meetings for a little over a month (my group is focused on “climate and culture”) and I have been very inspired and impressed by the good community people who are committed to seeing this process through. The group has included teachers, school social workers, and community organizations (Neutral Zone, Ozone House, etc). We have been talking a lot about “restorative justice” paradigms for improving school culture, and there are people at the table who are very committed to centering social justice in our “climate” conversations. For some time now, I’ve been meaning to update your readers about this wonderful work because it has made me very hopeful for Ypsilanti Community Schools. Unfortunately, recent events have interrupted this idyll, and it looks like it’s business as usual for Ypsi. About a month ago, we were informed that our search for a new superintendent would begin internally, and that the current superintendents would be interviewed before any external candidates. Luckily one internal candidate, Sharon Irvine, who was head of HR in Ypsi Schools decided to throw her hat into the ring, and last Thursday she, along with Dedrick Martin and Laura Lisiscki, gave public interviews to a standing room only crowd. I was absolutely wowed by Sharon Irvine’s presentation. She came off as professional, thoughtful, and committed to improving the district. She gave one of the best interviews I have ever seen, and I wrote enthusiastically to board members afterward, expressing my strong belief that she would be the best person to lead the district as we transition into greatness. Apparently many, many others did as well. Then, on Monday night, the board met to discuss all three candidates, and you can read all about the depressing turn of events here. In a nutshell, the suggestion was made by Don Garret, and seconded by others on the board, that we pursue hiring multiple candidates (presumably the two former superintendents), throwing Sharon Irvine under the bus. This decision was made despite overwhelming support for her from Ypsi constituents. I got into a rather heated exchange with a board member afterward, and rather than recite what happened here, I’m sharing the letter that I wrote at 5:30 in the morning.

    Dear Board Member___________,

    First of all, let me apologize for losing my temper last night. I regret very much not being able to convey to you my strong feelings about the situation (as well as my commitment to Ypsi Schools) while holding to basic standards of civility.

    
Honestly, I think I might have been able to hold it together a little better if I didn’t feel like I was watching the Chapelle debacle happen all over again. And it bears mentioning that what was most painful about that situation was not that our beloved school closed, but the way in which the board and administration dealt with us. When parents fought against the closing of Chapelle we were consistently treated with disrespect by the board and the administration. We were treated as if we had no business trying to tell the board or administration what to do, as if we were just interfering with business as usual. That struggle was not just about one school and whether it would stay open, but about whether, and to what extent, the board and administration was accountable to the very people who were its PRIMARY stakeholders: parents and families. Consistently, as with the discussion last night, the people who spoke out were marginalized as “just a few loud voices” as if what we were fighting for was irrelevant to the rest of the community. Never did anyone back then (other than Kira Berman or Andy Fanta) suggest that maybe we were actually articulating the sentiments of the parents who couldn’t make every meeting. Indeed, our community meetings (organized by us, not the board or the administrations) numbered in the hundreds and included all sectors of the Ypsi community. In short, we know very well that the community can be mobilized when they care about something. Just as it would be incorrect for us to assume that we speak for the entire Ypsi school community, it is simply flawed thinking for you and the rest of the board to assume that the people who were not there last night support Dedrick Martin (as Linda Horne suggested). Indeed, it has been my experience that when people in the community do feel strongly about a situation, they will come out in force, as they did to save Chapelle, and they will not rely on surrogates to speak their minds.

    Why am I talking about old history (Chapelle) here? Because to my mind, that situation helps us to diagnose the real problem with Ypsi schools, a problem that goes way beyond its budget woes, and one that will (apparently) not be resolved in this current effort to “re-imagine” the schools. It was on display last night, and many in the audience recognized it immediately. Three years ago, when faced with the community outcry over Chapelle, our relatively new superintendent could have approached the situation very differently. He could have seen the huge outpouring of support as an indicator of public investment, not just in a building, but in what that building represented—in its vision of community. He could have thought: “maybe we can parlay this passion into renewed passion for our schools?” He could have said: “what is Chapelle doing right? How is it getting stakeholders from across Ypsi to care so much? And how can I develop that passion in all our schools?” THAT is leadership. THAT is visionary thinking. Had he done that, perhaps we would be in a different situation right now. Perhaps we would be able to sing the praises of Chapelle and all of the other schools we care about, perhaps our enrollments wouldn’t be in a death spiral (an outcome many of us predicted). Had he done that, he would have earned the undying support of many of us, and we would now be begging you to keep him. This is not just about “giving in” to community pressure, but about having the courage to listen to his constituents and TRULY think outside of the box. But he didn’t do that. What he and the board did instead was to circle the wagons, take a defensive posture, and discount everything we had to say as if it were irrelevant. 

    Which is why I reacted so strongly when you gestured toward the pictures on the wall (of the superintendents) and said (rather dismissively) “you people aren’t satisfied with anyone, how many of these men have you run out of the job?” Frankly, the suggestion that we are merely irrational complainers who would hate anyone who took on the job of superintendent is deeply offensive to the intelligence of the community that you currently represent, and displays an attitude of disregard that seems consistent with the attitude of past board members. We, the community, the parents, the teachers are on the ground every day in our schools, we know, better than anyone else what the health of our educational ecosystem is because we live and breathe it. Our impressions and ideas are not just irrational “reactions;” they are informed by experience, and in the case of the teachers, real knowledge about the best educational environment for our children. As a board member, and our representative, your commitment, your compassion, and your respect, should be as available to us as it is to the current superintendent. 

Someone said last night, out of earshot, “Ypsi will never change.” After Chapelle closed, many, many people said the same thing, but we remained committed to the schools and passionate about their success. Over the last three years that passion has waned, as we have watched our schools slowly decline. We no longer encourage new parents to enroll their kids, and when people express doubts about the schools, we no longer passionately defend them, we merely shrug our shoulders and say “it is what it is.” This is tragic. The closing of Chapelle did not break us, it was what followed: the revelation that David Houle (who Martin hired from Willow Run and who called for the closing of Chapelle) had made our finances vastly worse (and hidden that fact), the half-baked curricular changes that were introduced to the public seemingly at random, the dysfunctional consolidated busing system, the reactionary resistance to field trips and other enrichment activities, the unwillingness of the administration to engage ANY new ideas (contrary to Martin’s assertion, New Tech was in the works before his arrival), the disaster at the high school. By any measure the last three years have been a depressing parade of failures. This is not a personal attack—it is an accurate diagnosis of REALITY that is backed up by our lived experience as well as the district’s declining enrollments.

    When this consolidation effort got underway, I joined it because I still had an sliver of hope that we could turn out schools around. We were promised a “complete reboot” and though many of us had doubts about consolidating, we mobilized our friends and family to support the effort. Over the last few months I have been involved with the process, and I have been impressed by the WISD’s ability to bring many stakeholders to the table. I work over 60 hours a week, and I still dedicated every Thursday I could to helping the process along. Last Thursday at yet another meeting, I sat through an interview that simply blew me away, and I began to believe that we could really make this happen. As I listened to Sharon Irvine talk, I began to see a new vision of Ypsilanti Community Schools. I saw a leader that could stop the flow of students out of the district, and who might even bring a few back! I saw someone who could get people behind her, even when she was asking them to make deep sacrifices. I thought: “we won’t find anyone better, even if we do an outside search.” And I began to hope again, and dream, just a little bit, that things would be better. I came home, singing her praises to my husband, and I began to see a glimmer of hope in his eyes as well.

    Last night it was a different story. I saw the same old dysfunctional decision making at play. I saw the condescension and outright hostility towards anyone in the community who spoke their mind when their opinions didn’t concord with those of certain board members. I saw appeals to consider the “bravery” and “resilience” of superintendent candidates for undergoing a consolidation process that was inevitable, coupled with the outright disdain for the bravery of teachers, who risked their professional futures by speaking out. I saw an upside down world in which a candidate who has no support from his current staff and has earned the outright hostility of many members of the community he supposedly represents, being praised for “taking-risks” and for making decisions that were unpopular. I saw people on the board suggesting that his lack of support was actually a “plus” and enjoining us to support whomever was chosen, for the good of the district, apparently not realizing that support from the people needs to be EARNED not demanded.
    
So I let my passion for the future of our schools get the best of me, and I lost my cool.

    
Yelling is never the answer, I know that, but a lot is riding on this decision, and, as I said last night, my commitment to the district is both deeply personal and political. I believe, very strongly, that the public schools, especially in a place like Ypsi where divisions between communities can run deep, are one of the last civic and social places where people come together. There’s lots of talk of the “diversity” of our schools, and usually its empty rhetoric, but just last Friday I was at a dance at Estabrook and I marveled at all of the people there. It was a true cross section of our community, with people of all races and classes mingling freely as their children ran like crazy all over the place. For me, this has always been the wonderful thing about Ypsi schools, and it has kept us here even when the future seemed very bleak. As I have said many times before, the public schools are our last, best, laboratory for democracy. They are places where people from all sides of town come together, with a singular mission, to teach our children that we must all stand together or fall apart. 

Ultimately, this is less about who will guide our future, than about how decisions are made, and whether the input of a community’s primary stakeholders carries any weight at all in the decision-making process. Unfortunately, in Ypsilanti, the community has been seen as an impediment, not a primary partner in this process. I thought this would change with consolidation, but after last night, I realize that I was wrong.

    Respectfully,
    Maria Cotera

    Personally, it seems odd to me that the board would even consider bringing back either Martin or Lisiscki without first doing a comprehensive outside search. That, to me, is lunacy. I can accept that one of them might be the right person for the job, but I don’t see how the board could be expected to make a decision of that magnitude without first knowing who else is available and willing to take on the challenge. Not doing a broad search for a position of such critical importance is, in my opinion, irresponsible at best. As Maria points out, we have a huge opportunity here, and we cannot afford to make the wrong decision when it comes to leadership. I don’t think I’m exaggerating when I say that this is the last shot that we have to turn around Ypsil public schools, and we cannot squander the opportunity. Now is the time for bold change, and we need a visionary leader to make that happen. And, to be quite honest, I haven’t seen the potential of that from either of our previous superientendents.

    The meeting to select a superintendent has been delayed until this Monday, February 25, at 7:30 PM. The meeting will take place at the Willow Run Community Schools Auditorium at 235 Spencer Lane, and it promises to be a doozy. A PDF of the agenda can be found here.

    Also of interest: Apparently, the YPSD has taken down its own Facebook page because it was getting overloaded with negative comments, but some rebellious community members have established their own Facebook page to replace it, and ensure that information gets out in a timely fashion.

    This entry was posted in Education, Michigan, Uncategorized, Ypsilanti and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

      33 Comments

      1. anonymous
        Posted February 21, 2013 at 10:26 pm | Permalink

        The fix was in from the start. Martin and Lisiscki are already under contract and they’ll stay. That’s probably why they supported the merger.

      2. Mr. Y
        Posted February 21, 2013 at 10:49 pm | Permalink

        Martin and Lisiscki have been co-chairing the subcommittee charged with insuring that the new district has ‘strong leadership at all levels’, so they’re essentially the ones drafting the list of attributes that we should be looking for in a Superintendent. Does that strike anyone else as odd?

      3. Posted February 21, 2013 at 11:22 pm | Permalink

        I’m told that Garrett’s statements can be heard here:

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiVivZl277M

      4. missypsi
        Posted February 21, 2013 at 11:35 pm | Permalink

        The video is VERY hard to hear at first, because they turned their mics off. However, as Don Garrett gets rolling in his “mansplaining” to the two women on the board, his voice gets louder and louder. You can really start hearing him at around 5:18. The true story here is the way new board member Celeste Hawkins won’t let him intimidate her. Priceless.

      5. Greg
        Posted February 21, 2013 at 11:49 pm | Permalink

        Mr. Y., I found that odd as well. They should either have to recuse themselves from the search or from any committee involvement until after the search.

        I always knew that this was going to be a long and grueling process with a good deal of fence mending needing to be done to keep all sides happy as the took bits and pieces from each district to make a new one. But I cannot imagine anyone thought that it could end up anything like this.

        Can the voters get a mulligan?

      6. tommy
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 5:13 am | Permalink

        A thought for you Mark – School of Choice / Saline.

        This new district will fare no better than the separate ones. Go West – we would love to have Clementine and Arlo.

        Thought twice about posting this for the fact that I may be labeled a snob, but so be it. The fish rots from the head; the rest of the (student) body will continue to suffer.

      7. maryd
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 5:46 am | Permalink

        I urge everyone to pay attention…this opportunity could be squandered in the blink of an eye. To turn off their microphones is such an offense but to have David speak the way he did to the attending public is history repeating itself. To hell with the parents whose children may attend eh?

      8. Elf
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 8:03 am | Permalink

        Rrom a local parent to our state rep:

        Dear Representative Rutledge,

        I am compelled to write to you today regarding the Ypsilanti Community Schools consolidation and my concerns about the new School Board. I am asking for your help. I also think you need to be aware of this situation because you have championed the consolidation efforts and worked to make it a reality. Your reputation is at stake, but more importantly the lives of our children are at stake.

        The consolidation of Ypsilanti and Willow Run Schools is already a failure. The voters placed their faith in this process with the expectation that things would change. We trusted that our new board members (who we did not elect-they were appointed) would act in the best interests of our children and the taxpayers who they represent. Our trust was misplaced. This community wants reform, we want change, and we want better for our children. Our new board is making poor decisions, they are actively ignoring the voices of the community stakeholders (while professing to want to hear us), and they are not following the mandates and criteria that were developed to guide our transformation. Our community has little recourse. The board members were not elected, so they are not subject to recall. We are stuck. We have to watch a few individuals make critical decisions that affect our children and we have to accept whatever decisions they make.

        I am asking you to look into the effectiveness of the Ypsilanti Community Schools leadership and intervene where you are able. Please watch the superintendent interviews which took place on February 14. They can be found here: http://www.youtube.com/user/WillowRunBoE?feature=g-hist The board has decided to not make a decision on hiring a new superintendent and have asked the MLI to look into options for keeping the two current superintendents. The various educational unions and many families in the district support the first person who interviewed. She met the criteria developed by MLI (which can be found here:http://www.mileader.com/docs/2013YpsilantiCommunitySchools.pdf) , yet apparently our board has decided to not be bound by those criteria or to consider the opinions of the key stakeholders. Instead our board’s opinions are being influenced by their feelings about the two current superintendents.

        Also, please watch the comments made by board members to each other after the interviews have concluded. I have two major concerns related to this. First, the board deliberately decided to post the agenda for their next meeting while having no intention of following it. They basically misled the public and wasted our time. Second, one board member actively suggests to the others that public opinion should be dismissed. Our input should be ignored. This is contrary to the criteria and mandates the community and educational leadership developed in preparation for our consolidation.

        I urge you to speak with your constituents about their experiences with this process. Please intervene in whatever ways you are able. A big fear of the consolidation was not the fear of change. It was the fear of NO change. I realize it is very early in this process; bit critical decisions have to be made now. The actions (or more precisely inaction) by our school board have already doomed us to failure. We have lost hope. We need your help to set this right. Please help us.

        I thank you for your consideration and I look forward to your reply.

        Sincerely,

      9. koosh
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 9:14 am | Permalink

        asking rutledge to do something is hilarious. rutledge is as incompetent as ypsi schools.

        the voters have no one to blame but themselves.

      10. josh
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 9:29 am | Permalink

        Even if Martin and Lisiscki were wonderful, having two co-superintendents would be idiocy. Someone needs to be running the show. I don’t want them compromising with each other and watering down policy changes. I want the superintendent to spend their time working with parents and teachers, not each other.

        FWIW, I have had one brief interaction with Martin at the Heritage Festival and was not impressed. I had my toddler with me so I said half-joking, “looks like you have about 4 years to get things going in the right direction.” I was hoping for maybe a conversation about the challenges YPS faced. He replied with a defeated smile and a shake of the head, “oh, we don’t have that long.” C’mon man! It might be the truth, but that’s not what you tell a prospective parent. I got the feeling he had completely internalized the Ypsi self-esteem issues. Sell your schools! Highlight what is going right, and how you’re dealing with what isn’t. Telling people essentially that “we’re fucked” pretty much guarrantees the outcome.

        I don’t expect miracles. Socio-economic class and parental involvement are pretty much the primary indicators of how well students learn. No superintendent is going to change that, but maybe they can at least convince parents that give a damn, that they give a damn too. I don’t particularly mind that my child goes to school with children with serious challenges. There is a definite advantage to not growing up in the upper-middle class bubble of A2. However, I do mind if the school system has already written them all off.

      11. Edward
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 9:37 am | Permalink

        Is someone going to broach the subject of race? I feel it bubbling below the surface.

      12. Brainless
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 9:57 am | Permalink

        Edward, don’t be an asshole.

        The mere mention of two leaders is more than just a red flag. It’s a fucking disgrace. Voters never should have let this process into the hands of the existing superintendents, the WISD and the board. They should have broomed the lot and taken over the process themselves. NEVER give away your power. You got snookered, folks, and now you have TWO shitty leaders to show for it.

        I honestly feel horrible for those of you who don’t have the choice but to send your kids to Ypsi schools.

      13. kjc
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 10:00 am | Permalink

        “C’mon man! It might be the truth, but that’s not what you tell a prospective parent.”

        why do you have to lie to parents? they’re such babies.

      14. EOS
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 10:02 am | Permalink

        Everyone has a choice. It all boils down to what your priorities are.

      15. west cross
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 10:42 am | Permalink

        When it became clear that Martin had no supporters in the crowd, Linda Horne came forward, presenting herself as an emissary from the African American community, stating that he had widespread support across the city. The popular narrative, it seems to me, is that Irvine’s supporters white women from Normal Park who have the time and resources to attend these meetings.

      16. A Teacher
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 10:57 am | Permalink

        I love Ypsi Public Schools. I came from a private school for the gifted and fell in love with the kids, the challenges and the staff. I have worked under good leadership and the worst of it. Here is what I know. To layoff EVERY teacher in the districts while not doing the same to the administration speaks volumes for the lack of respect that the board has for the people that are actually doing the work of the distric (namely teaching children) and their blind determination to hold high a leadership that has FAILED is unconscionable. Failed to keep us on track in the first place, failed to give adequate direction through it, hired even more incompetent leadership and has managed to allienate the very community we are trying to bring back. I urge the new school board to consult with the WISD about what their roles as appointed board members should look like. Are good school boards supposed to make decisions in isolation and without listening to the constituents? Is that why you were chosen? Our joined districts need to be a NEW district. Keeping both of the former leaders is expensive, unnecessary, and really means that we are still divided and on the same track as before. Going down together isn’t what I had in mind when I suppoted unification (even though I knew that my own job might be lost as a result).

      17. Chris Cross
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 11:27 am | Permalink

        How do people feel about David Bates’s stewardship of the district?

      18. moleman
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 11:39 am | Permalink

        mark fyi – please check your social network “other” messages.

      19. Tommy
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 11:50 am | Permalink

        There you are Edward. 1hour, 5 minutes. No longer bubbling below the surface.

      20. 734
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 11:52 am | Permalink

        Really, how can they even begin to justify not having a wider search? What’s the justification?

      21. Sharon
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 11:55 am | Permalink

        Hello Mark,
        I want to step in to honor the work and commitment of WISD in this process by dispelling one rumor. WISD staff has stayed appropriately neutral in the superintendent search process and did not approach me about adding my name as a potential superintendent candidate.

        Sincerely,
        Sharon Irvine

      22. site admin
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 12:02 pm | Permalink

        Thank you for the clarification, Sharron. The following sentence has been removed.

        I’ve heard that she was encouraged by the WISD administrators to apply, but I don’t know for certain that’s the case.

      23. maryd
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 12:04 pm | Permalink

        Race is irrelevant to this issue. To bring it in is to introduce unnecessary drama. Irvine is a great administrator. Anyone who had the pleasure of working with her knows this. We have had excellent African American leaders as well. Jon Brown comes to mind. We have also had from damaging to dangerous leaders and administrator, I will leave them nameless but many remember and would concur. I would also not agree the consolidation is a failure. It has great potential and early days yet. I say some on the “board” needs thicker skin and to remember who they are serving.

      24. josh
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 12:14 pm | Permalink

        @kjc,

        Maybe I wasn’t clear. I don’t want him to lie. I just want him to be a bit more engaged than “yep, we’re fucked. Lost cause.” It’s possible to be honest about the challenges we face and be positive about how we are going to face them.

      25. Watching Ypsi
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 12:16 pm | Permalink

        Crazy world.

      26. a question
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 12:24 pm | Permalink

        I have a question concerning the appointment of members to this new school board. How was that handled? Generally we elect members of the school board. This time, however, it sounds like WISD appointed some from the community, while choosing others from the Ypsi and Willow Run boards. Will there be a special election so that voters can have a say?

      27. Edward
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 12:41 pm | Permalink

        My sense is that the old board members are pushing for their former Superintendents, while WISD would like to see change. Do others concur with that assessment?

        Also I think the fact that Sharon Irvine only corrected you on that one small point is telling.

      28. @Edward
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 1:03 pm | Permalink

        Sharon Irvine did not endorse the events, timeline or completeness of this story. She only clarified the characterization of WISD’s role/actions in the process, which again shows the level of professionalism you get with her.

      29. Posted February 22, 2013 at 1:07 pm | Permalink

        I have to wonder if any of our for-profit charter school friends are watching this matter and planning to open up in Ypsi….

        (PS: Ms. Irvine is a lawyer and a teacher??? Hey sister! :))

      30. M.T.
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 5:24 pm | Permalink

        Who ultimately makes the decision as to whether the search is conducted? Does WISD have any say, or is it all up to the board?

      31. (not the other) Bob
        Posted February 22, 2013 at 11:38 pm | Permalink

        A quick note to Maria-your letter is a powerful one and captures many of the hopes, and concerns, that I have for the district. Just wanted you to know that your efforts are appreciated and that your views are not simply representative of a small band of malcontents!!!

      32. Tammy
        Posted February 23, 2013 at 8:32 am | Permalink

        Here here.

      33. Maria Cotera
        Posted February 23, 2013 at 8:32 am | Permalink

        Friends, apparently a rally has been organized by some parents…

        Support our children! Please come to Monday’s Consolidated school board meeting. The board is planning on choosing the new superintendent of the consolidated district. This decision not only affects our children, it affects the economics of our entire community. Let’s meet in the parking at 6:45pm to show our solidarity. Pass It on!

        When: Monday, February 25
        Rally: 6:45, Willow Run High School Parking Lot
        Meeting: 7:30 Willow Run High School auditorium

      One Trackback

      1. [...] a few days ago, there are, in my opinion, several reasons to look beyond our former leaders, and open the search up to a wider pool of candidates, in hopes of finding someone who might have experience successfully merging districts, or, better [...]

      Leave a Reply

      Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


      1 × six =

      You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

        Connect

        Hut-K ad Vault of Midnight ad Sabor Latino ad BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative ryan