Courageous, patriotic celebrities speak out on the evil of our America-hating President

In defense of Clint Eastwood, he’s not the most out-of-touch celebrity on the right by a long shot.

This entry was posted in Politics, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  1. anonymous
    Posted September 5, 2012 at 11:02 pm | Permalink

    There’s nothing worse than a life long drug addict who finds god.

  2. Terry
    Posted September 5, 2012 at 11:20 pm | Permalink

    If you’re like me, you’ll have to clear your mind after watching those. I recommend this.

  3. Edward
    Posted September 6, 2012 at 5:36 am | Permalink

    Don’t forget to include Kelsey Grammer on that list.

  4. SparkleMotion
    Posted September 6, 2012 at 6:23 am | Permalink

    Dave Mustaine counts as a celebrity?

  5. anonymous
    Posted September 6, 2012 at 9:40 am | Permalink

    I can kind of follow the logic. Obama killed the people in that Colorado theater, and at that Sikh temple because he wanted a reason to take our guns away. That makes sense to me. The thing that I don’t get, though, is how the reconcile this with the fact that he hasn’t made a single move to take out guns away. I mean, we’ve been talking about him taking our guns away for the past four years, and he hasn’t done a single thing about it. And his term is about to come to an end.

  6. mark k
    Posted September 6, 2012 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

    anonymous have you heard of “fast and furious”? Not sure that was an attempt at taking away guns, but with this tranparent admin I guess we’ll never know why his people sold guns to known killers, or whether or not he placed that order.

  7. Posted September 6, 2012 at 1:52 pm | Permalink

    How much do you think Michelle Obama weighs? I think that is the more important question.

    I am 6’0″ and weight 157 pounds (today). At 5’10” and 157, Michelle Obama would be slightly bigger than I am. I have been 175 pounds in the past and noticed. Actually, everyone noticed. I was no longer able to fit into my clothes.

    Given Mrs. Obama’s slightly shorter stature, she would be rather chunky at 175 pounds, which she really is not. Like I said before, Michelle Obama would need to be 175 pounds to even enter the “overweight” category. She would still be way under the mean BMI for her age.

    I am interested in your informed estimate of her weight. Please provide it so that we can assess the veracity of your claims.

  8. Dan
    Posted September 6, 2012 at 4:05 pm | Permalink

    troll much, Peter?

  9. Posted September 6, 2012 at 5:40 pm | Permalink

    The man made a claim and quite strongly. The same unsubstantiated comments have Ben made by other right wing posters. Yet, like them, he is unable to back it up. In fact, given the documented evidence, he is flat wrong.

    Trolling, hardly. All he has to do is estimate her weight, a quite simple matter for someone as credible as Mr. Mark K. We can then use his estimate to test his claims.

    Knowing that he has professional experience weighing females of all ages makes his input all the more important.

  10. Tom
    Posted September 6, 2012 at 5:46 pm | Permalink

    Mark K-
    Fast and Furious looks like a plan gone bad. There is no evidence to suggest a WH plan
    and the Justice Dept has release 7600 pages to Congress.

  11. Mark K
    Posted September 6, 2012 at 6:26 pm | Permalink

    “In fact, given the documented evidence, he is flat wrong.”

    Documented? Where Peter?

  12. Mark K
    Posted September 6, 2012 at 6:30 pm | Permalink

    Hey Peter lets see what Sir Mix A lot has to say about that.

  13. Posted September 6, 2012 at 8:14 pm | Permalink

    I can’t fathom why Sir Mix A Lot’s follow up, “Put ‘Em On The Glass” flopped. I’m serious..I thought it was funny. Maybe not “my anaconda don’t want none unless you got buns hun” funny, but still not that awful.

  14. Dan
    Posted September 6, 2012 at 9:05 pm | Permalink

    Hey Pete,

    You dragged a different thread into this one. Why? So you could perpetuate your agenda from that thread onto this one (which had nothing to do with weight).



    good work

  15. Dan
    Posted September 6, 2012 at 9:08 pm | Permalink

    Hey Pete,

    I assume Mark now assigns your name to a tag next to “troll” like he did for EOS and mark k.

    Congrats. You’ve earned it.

  16. Posted September 6, 2012 at 9:53 pm | Permalink

    Pete defends Michelle Obama when one of you calls her a fat ass, and you see that as trolling. I think that speaks volumes.

  17. Dan
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 7:48 am | Permalink


    Your boyfriend Pete is trolling multiple threads, bringing up BS and trying to start shit.

    That’s trolling, defined.

    You see that as not trolling. I think THAT speaks volumes.

  18. kjc
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 8:14 am | Permalink

    Not that I’m easily offended but you’re referring to Pete as mark’s boyfriend why?

  19. Dan
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 8:20 am | Permalink

    Because Mark continually defends Pete’s nonsense and trolling. He obviously has a mancrush on him.

    (Not that there’s anything wrong with that)

  20. anonymous
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 8:27 am | Permalink

    The answer, KJC, is because a man feels better about himself when he infers that other men are gay. This is especially true when the man in question is insecure about his masculinity. You see it happen quite often when men of lesser intellect are made aware of that fact. Their first reaction is to infer that their opponent is a homosexual. Homosexuals, you see, are weak and terrible.

  21. Dan
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 8:33 am | Permalink

    or, anonymous, some people are so afraid of homosexuals, that they refuse to use the term “gay” in any fashion, even when joking around. Referring to someone’s buddy as their man crush or boyfriend is so un-pc and despicable to these people.

    It’s such a taboo word for these extreme gayphobes.

  22. anonymous
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 8:56 am | Permalink

    Yes, because you use the word “gay” and I chose, in this instance, to use the word “homosexual”, you are more enlightened than me, regardless of the homophobic context of your statement.

    As the invisible man in the chair said to the aging Republican tough guy actor, “go fuck yourself.”

  23. Posted September 7, 2012 at 9:01 am | Permalink

    Dan has been posting here for like two months and he’s already the official moderator of

  24. Dan
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 9:05 am | Permalink

    It’s only homophobic if you read it as a homophobe or an uber-PC nancy boy. Sorry to offend you. I’m sure you’ll tell your grandkids about that time the bad man on the internet referred to two male friends as boyfriends.

  25. Mother Theresa
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 9:19 am | Permalink

    I don’t know how he finds time to moderate the site, given all the gay cocks he’s responsible for ejaculating each day. Never having been in the situation, I can’t say for certain, but I imagine it would be difficult focusing on the screen with sweaty ball sacks slapping against your forehead, and semen gushing into your ears.

    (As I used the word “gay” the above comment was not homophobic. Anonymous is the true homophobe as he used the word “homosexual”.)

  26. Dan
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 9:26 am | Permalink


  27. kjc
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 9:58 am | Permalink

    I think you read too many magazines, Dan.

  28. kjc
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 10:00 am | Permalink

    So I assume you use the N word too, as a joke, to show that you’re not afraid of black people? Huh nancy boy?

  29. Dan
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 10:25 am | Permalink

    If i was younger, I’m sure I would. It’s slang to kids these days. My cousins and nieces and such post that on facebook pretty much daily.

    I just really have no occasions to use it.

    But the one gay friend I do have, I call him a fag all the time. He uses that word all the time as well.

  30. Posted September 7, 2012 at 11:16 am | Permalink

    I grew up in Mississippi.

    White people still use the N word down there all the time, but it’s not cool at all. White kids use it, but that never made it right. I don’t get your view at all, but I’m not surprised you feel that way.

    I don’t know about your friend though I wonder why he’s your friend, when all he is to you is your “gay friend.” Some of your best friends are gay, right?

    I bet if I jokingly called any of my friends by the label of whatever bigot driven category they fit in, I’d have a lot less friends than I already do.

    Try calling your “black friends” by the N word. It might be fun for you.

    Maybe I’ll join in. I’ll start calling my wife a “Nip,” and my son a “half breed.” I’ll call my mom a “Squaw.” One of the ladies I work with will now be a “Chink” or maybe I’ll just start calling her “Slant eye,” rather than using her name.

    Hell, all women can just be “bitches” or “sluts.” After all, teenage girls call each other that all the time on Facebook.

    Yes, it might be really funny.

  31. Mr. X
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 11:34 am | Permalink

    What we need to come up with is an equally bad word for white men. Cracker and honkey just don’t cut it. Until you have that, people will never understand. These words aren’t just words. They rose up through history, which was ofter violent. That’s why there’s never been anything worse that honkey. And there won’t be until white me are having a word yelled at them as they’re being pulled from their porches and lynched, raped, etc.

  32. Dan
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 11:54 am | Permalink


    I am not friends with uptight douches. I told you I only had one gay friend, not “some of my best friends are gay.” But he is one of my best friends. Stood up in my wedding. If he were to get upset that I used a word while joking around or being sarcastic, then I wouldnt be his friend.

    and I never suggested that that was the only thing I referred to him as. I never suggested “all women can just be bitches or sluts.” But If I were to call my wife a bitch, she wouldnt go crying in the other room and act like she was assaulted. She’d probably call me a dickhead and the world would still spin.

  33. Larry
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 11:57 am | Permalink

    Did I create this meme correctly?

  34. Posted September 7, 2012 at 11:59 am | Permalink

    Sorry, man, you don’t get it.

  35. Larry
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 12:36 pm | Permalink

    So I didn’t do the meme correctly?

  36. Meta
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 12:52 pm | Permalink

    Chuck Norris’s thousand years of darkness has begun. The following coverage of last night’s Democratic National Convention comes from a journal called the Onion.

    “My fellow Americans and godless infidels, I command you to join me as we cast an endless pall of far-left evil across the hills and valleys of our nation!” Obama bellowed from the stage, as thousands in attendance moaned in compliance and gyrated their hips and groins in a lascivious dance. “Together, as a barbarian people forged by the wicked flames of irreligiosity and united by visions of a liberal dystopia, we will rise up as one to scorch the earth with boundless amorality.”

    “The streets shall run red with the blood of forced sodomy, performed daily upon every American man, woman, and child!” the commander-in-chief shouted, froth forming around his mouth as the crowd threw hundreds of aborted fetuses onto the stage. “Die, Christians, die!”

    Slamming his fists on the lectern until his hands began to bleed, Obama proceeded to lay out a “three-point plan of sin and lechery” for his second term. If reelected, the president said, he would begin by banning organized religion entirely—starting with Christianity—and burning all churches to the ground, preferably “with their wretched, Jesus-loving congregants still huddled inside like rats.”

    Read more:,29478/?ref=auto

  37. kjc
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 1:11 pm | Permalink

    well, no one here is your friend so maybe you shouldn’t refer jokingly refer to two men as boyfriends when you want to disparage them. consider it a time when you “just really have no occasion” to do so. we’ll all take your word for it that you’re brave and not-p.c. and not afraid to offend any minority perspectives and that you have a gay friend who think you’re great and doesn’t mind being called a fag by you. but he’s your friend and people here aren’t. and you don’t care about any of the people here, or respect them, and yet you come here anyway just to offer your courageous perspective. that’s a troll to me. you don’t give a fuck. you just show up.

  38. Thom Elliott
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 1:28 pm | Permalink

    “Call my wife a bitch…she would call me a dickhead…”. Sounds like a model relationship Dan, casually using unkind words to abuse each other sounds like the norm I would want for my relationship (we have never once used unkind or abusive words for each other, not once, it is in no way appropriate to use abusive language on your significant other). Also calling my gay freinds by cruel terms in a casual way is really the way to show you respect them, I would just love if my freinds thoughtlessly debased my existence to me. Congrats on your amazing (abusive and dysfunctional) relationship with your “freinds” and “wife”.

  39. Dan
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 1:48 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Thom. But when I start taking advice from you, it’s time to kill myself.

    and kjc, i didnt call anyone here a fag. I called Peter mark’s boyfriend. Get a fucking grip, dude. Everyone knows mark is married with kids. You over sensitive cry babies are hilarious. “Oh no, that troll Dan made a sarcastic comment regarding 2 married men’s relationship! What has this world come to??!!”

  40. Sandy Ego
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 2:03 pm | Permalink

    Dan, I think what you’re not understanding is that we’d all rather you go haunt some other blog.

  41. Thom Elliott
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 2:03 pm | Permalink

    Its not advice, its an observation. If you feel like those things are normal or acceptable, like most things I see you say, you’re sorely mistaken, and bewilderingly mindless. You’re an abusive “partner” and “friend”, undoubtably a result of your lack of mindfull attention to your life, which is typical of the banal nihilism you typify. Buy some Plato on your way back to your dreary and loveless home after work and think about your life Dan. The unexamined life isn’t worth leading.

  42. kjc
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 2:23 pm | Permalink

    “You over sensitive cry babies are hilarious.”

    aren’t you the guy who was whining about being perceived as a troll, along with EOS and mark k? talk about crying over nothing.

    as for your sarcasm not being properly appreciated, i’m sure you’ll tell your grandkids about the pc police who were mean to you on the internet.

  43. Dan
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 7:58 pm | Permalink


    That’s fine. I dont have a problem leaving here. Sorry to offend you.


    Since your such the “thinker”, I had assumed that you saw that I said “IF” i called my wife a bitch, etc. And again, thanks for your advice. My advice to you: stop living off of your mother, live the life you preach onto others. You continually claim it is impossible in this society. Try checking this dude’s life out. Stop making excuses for yourself and live the life you claim to desire.

    and kjc, I really dont give a shit if you or anyone here thinks I’m a troll. That wasnt my “complaint.” My complaint was that every single person that isnt a 100% staunch liberal is deemed a troll here. My point was that opposing opinions arent welcome here. It’s a virtual circle jerk without mark k and EOS checking you guys. Enjoy.

  44. Dan
    Posted September 7, 2012 at 8:34 pm | Permalink

    oh, and one last comment. kjc, I assume you were equally appalled when one Thom Elliot accused mark k and myself of “giving each other brojobs?”

    Or do you only get offended when someone outside of your circle jerk jokes about homosexual activity?

  45. Mark k
    Posted September 8, 2012 at 7:24 am | Permalink

    Dan you know the deal with liberals, if you are different they have no tolerance. You put out an example to prove my point. Not only did Thom suggest we give each other “Bro jobs”, he talked of ” Thrill killing”. And not one word from the peanut gallery. If you leave, I’ll probably be gone too, not sure if I want to be the lone man out in this circle jerk. Even though I don’t always agree with you Dan, you at least have some common sense, and decency. Maybe we should take Sandy’s advice, I wonder if Mark feels the same. Mark are people with different opinions welcome here, or would you rather we leave?

  46. Thom Elliott
    Posted September 8, 2012 at 9:01 am | Permalink

    Dan, I was frustrated and horrified by your stalking me, I depicted you boys as a team of serial killing homosexual cannibals because I despise you, not because I have a problem with gays, nor was I joking, I’m pretty sure you’re up to some unsavory shit. I think you and your ilk are scum, mark k is a submental lunatic, and you Dan are a mindless suburbanite wretch without morality, and more importantly, you have no debate skills. You are free to talk shit and make up things about me, I thought i’d do the same for ou. That you’re an abusive and thoughtless man, without hope for redemption, is obvious.

  47. Mark K
    Posted September 8, 2012 at 9:36 am | Permalink

    Thom, so you consider calling someone a homosexual an insult? So now we know how you feel the gay community.

  48. Thom Elliott
    Posted September 8, 2012 at 9:42 am | Permalink

    Mark k, you’re an intellectual invalid. I’ve never seen you say anything of value ever, you can continue to spew your moronic sewage all day, you’ve got nothing interesting to add other then demented scrawl. The gay community and I are fine, thanks.

  49. Mark K
    Posted September 8, 2012 at 10:52 am | Permalink

    Thom the thinker said: “Mark k, you’re an intellectual invalid. I’ve never seen you say anything of value ever, you can continue to spew your moronic sewage all day, you’ve got nothing interesting to add other then demented scrawl.”

    Right after he posted this brilliant comment:
    “Dan, I was frustrated and horrified by your stalking me, I depicted you boys as a team of serial killing homosexual cannibals because I despise you, not because I have a problem with gays, nor was I joking, I’m pretty sure you’re up to some unsavory shit.”

    Oh snap! My uncle used to say: “If you can’t impress them with your intelligents, baffle them with your bull shit” I think you have this one perfected. Have a nice day.

  50. Dan
    Posted September 8, 2012 at 11:29 am | Permalink

    You keep draggin me back, Thom.

    #1, i may be a suburbanite wretch without morality, but I assure you, yopu an intellectual child compared to me.

    #2, Why don’t you heed my advice and live the life you claim to desire?

    #3, mark is 100% correct. You tried to INSULT us by insinuating we were gay. you even used the word shameful. And now you are going to act like you didnt say it was shameful to be gay? cause thats EXACTLY what you said. ” while you give each other shame filled brojobs while you weep”

    you words, not mine

  51. Posted September 8, 2012 at 11:39 am | Permalink

    I think it’s awesome that, as we celebrate the 10th anniversary of this blog tonight, we have a new breed of antibiotic-resistent super troll establishing itself here, in the dark recesses of our communal bowel. I find it rejuvenating, and I see it as a sign of our success that the week trolls of the past are being replaced by a more virulent strain.

  52. Posted September 8, 2012 at 12:15 pm | Permalink

    Goddammit no one commented on the majesty of Sir Mix a Lot’s Put ‘Em on the Glass! What is wrong with you people?!?!?!

  53. Mark K
    Posted September 8, 2012 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    Sorry Patti. I never heard Put ‘Em on the Glass before, so I checked it out on youtube, even had to register. It’s the same as Baby’s Got Back, just dirtier and not in a good way. I think Baby’s Got Back is a much funner song, after watching Put ‘Em on the Glass I felt sorry for Sir Mix A lot . Him doing that song reminded me of child that swears to get attention. Sorry he’s still a one hit wonder, and that hit being Baby’s Got Back. I wonder if they’ll play that at Mark’s party? I know I’d get up and dance.

  54. kjc
    Posted September 8, 2012 at 8:04 pm | Permalink

    I thought the bro jobs thing was equally stupid. It happens often.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative Hischak2