For-profit prisons… What could possibly go wrong?

As it’s been a while since we’ve had a post here about the prison industrial complex, I thought that I’d pass along this clip from Charles Blow’s recent piece in the New York Times.

“Louisiana is the world’s prison capital. The state imprisons more of its people, per head, than any of its U.S. counterparts. First among Americans means first in the world. Louisiana’s incarceration rate is nearly triple Iran’s, seven times China’s and 10 times Germany’s.”

That paragraph opens a devastating eight-part series published this month by The Times-Picayune of New Orleans about how the state’s largely private prison system profits from high incarceration rates and tough sentencing, and how many with the power to curtail the system actually have a financial incentive to perpetuate it.

The picture that emerges is one of convicts as chattel and a legal system essentially based on human commodification.

First, some facts from the series:

– One in 86 Louisiana adults is in the prison system, which is nearly double the national average.

– More than 50 percent of Louisiana’s inmates are in local prisons, which is more than any other state. The next highest state is Kentucky at 33 percent. The national average is 5 percent.

– Louisiana leads the nation in the percentage of its prisoners serving life without parole.

– Louisiana spends less on local inmates than any other state.

– Nearly two-thirds of Louisiana’s prisoners are nonviolent offenders. The national average is less than half.

In the early 1990s, the state was under a federal court order to reduce overcrowding, but instead of releasing prisoners or loosening sentencing guidelines, the state incentivized the building of private prisons. But, in what the newspaper called “a uniquely Louisiana twist,” most of the prison entrepreneurs were actually rural sheriffs. They saw a way to make a profit and did.

It also was a chance to employ local people, especially failed farmers forced into bankruptcy court by a severe drop in the crop prices.

But in order for the local prisons to remain profitable, the beds, which one prison operator in the series distastefully refers to as “honey holes,” must remain full. That means that on almost a daily basis, local prison officials are on the phones bartering for prisoners with overcrowded jails in the big cities.

It also means that criminal sentences must remain stiff, which the sheriff’s association has supported. This has meant that Louisiana has some of the stiffest sentencing guidelines in the country. Writing bad checks in Louisiana can earn you up to 10 years in prison. In California, by comparison, jail time would be no more than a year.

There is another problem with this unsavory system: prisoners who wind up in these local for-profit jails, where many of the inmates are short-timers, get fewer rehabilitative services than those in state institutions, where many of the prisoners are lifers. That is because the per-diem per prisoner in local prisons is half that of state prisons…

My information may be a bit out-of-date on this, but, the last that I heard, here in Michigan, a few of our more powerful unions had stepped in to stop a push by Republicans in the legislature to expand the role of private prisons in our state. While legislation has passed the Senate that would allow the Michigan Department of Corrections to place inmates in for-profit prisons, the House has not been able to follow suit. It would seen that a number of House Republicans, from districts with existing, state-run prisons, are pushing back, at least for the time being. The following comes from a May 4 report by the Mackinac Center.

…House Bill 5174 would allow the Michigan Department of Corrections to house prisoners in privately operated prisons. What’s more, the measure includes a requirement that the private prisons would have to save 10 percent in costs to qualify.

Even with this savings language, the bill remains bogged down in the Michigan House where the GOP enjoys a 63-47 majority and only 56 “yes” votes are needed for passage.

It’s not a secret in Lansing that a group of Republicans, most of whom have prisons in their districts, is causing the logjam.

Michigan corrections officers unions and the United Auto Workers are active in those prison districts and also at the capitol. A union tent was on the capitol lawn the day the prison privatization vote was supposed to take place.

A more expensive state-operated prison likely would be closed and replaced by the privately owned North Lake Correctional Facility in Baldwin if the bill is enacted. Some observers argue that this appears to be one of the strongest trumps the unions are using to keep the bill penned up.

At the moment, it appears that most, if not all, of the Republican hold-outs will have no primary election opponents this summer. That could also be a factor in the success the unions have been enjoying on this issue because the unions could help an upstart challenger enter one of the primary races if the sitting House member decided to support the prison privatization bill…

An earlier report, from yet another Mackinac Center publication, has more background.

…Bills in the House (Bills 5174 and 5177) and Senate (Bills 877-878) would allow the Department of Corrections to send hundreds of adult inmates to a currently shuttered private prison in Baldwin. The Baldwin facility is owned by Florida-based GEO Group, formerly known as Wackenhut Corrections Corp.

The stated goal of the bills is to operate the private Baldwin prison for at least 10 percent less than it costs to others in the state prison system.

“For me, it’s the same motivation we had when we started charter schools,” said state Rep. Joe Haveman, R-Holland. “It’s going to create competition in how Michigan runs prisons. Competition is just good for everybody. I hope this will save money. I know we will learn something that will make us better. Let’s just try it in one facility and see if it works better. I want to hold the Corrections Department’s feet to the fire.”

Supporters like Haveman say the privatization experiment is one of their most hopeful remaining strategies for saving money in the state’s $2 billion prison system, which accounts for 21.5 percent of the state general fund budget. Despite a 17 percent reduction in the prison population, operations efficiencies, and employee concessions on health-care costs, the prison budget continues to grow due to large labor costs and pension obligations…

It’s probably worth noting that Wackenhut was acquired in 2002 for $570 million by Group 4 Falck (a Danish corporation). The resulting company then merged with the G4S in 2004 to become G4S Secure Solutions, the U.S. subsidiary of G4S. G4S is the world’s largest security company, with over 630,000 employees, in more than 125 countries. According to Wikipedia, it is the world’s second-largest private sector employer on the planet, after Wal-Mart.

Here, with more background, is a clip from a recent article by the folks at the Grassroots Leadership News.

…The Michigan House of Representatives is considering bills HB 5174 and HB 5177 to reopen a youth correctional facility in order to house adult inmates. The North Lake Facility for Youth, or Baldwin facility, was opened in 1998 by Wackenhut Corrections Corporation – now know as The GEO Group shuttered the facility in 2005. GEO, in a speculative move with high hopes of filling the prison with Californians, expanded the prison from less than 500 to about 2400 beds. The expected California contract did not fully materialize and the GEO Group’s Lake County facility, dubbed the ‘punk prison’, stood empty for some years.

The Wackenhut/GEO Group’s track record at the youth facility was atrocious:

– Youth were held in solitary confinement, a few for more than one hundred days at a time. One mentally ill inmate spent more than 400 days in ‘segregation.’

– Seventy-six suicide attempts were documented from July 2004 through March 2005

– There were confirmed beatings and rapes.

– Parents complained that children with lesser offenses were not safe from those who had committed violent crimes.

– There was a demonstrated lack of mental health and educational services.

– The facility was chronically understaffed.

– It was a violent facility.

In the United States District Court, Western District of Michigan (Case No. 5:05-CV-0128 ) the Michigan Protection & Advocacy Service, Inc. brought a lawsuit against the Michigan Department of Corrections “to challenge and remedy the Defendant’s illegal and unconstitutional use of isolation, denial of adequate mental health services, and denial of appropriate educational services to young prisoners with mental illness and/or developmental disabilities. The Defendant’s actions and inaction have caused youth with mental illness and developmental disabilities great and irreparable harm.”

When Michigan closed Baldwin in 2005, it was then hit with a $5.4 million lawsuit by GEO/Wackenhut. The corporation, responsible for the operation of the facility and all of the problems that led to its closing, wanted to keep Baldwin open or force the state to continue its payments for an empty facility. The case was eventually heard by the Supreme Court of Michigan which ruled: “Defendants [the state of Michigan] were entitled to cancel the lease … [and] exercise by the state of its contractual right of cancellation does not constitute a government taking of private property.”

And, now The GEO Group and privatization are back. In a state with a declining need for more prison beds, HB 5174 and HB 5177 make no sense. These bills would allow yet another contract between the The GEO Group (yes, the same GEO Group with its abysmal track record and its unsuccessful suit against Michigan) and the Department of Corrections to fill their beds, for a price, at the Baldwin facility. To fill those 2,400 beds, Michigan would need to move inmates in from its own public prisons.

Since the state does not need new prison beds, one has to wonder why some members of the Michigan legislature are so wedded to the idea of filling The GEO Group’s beds and coffers with Michigan inmates and taxpayer dollars. It is time, I think, to follow the money. And, to ask hard questions…

So, to summarize, an enormous international security firm, based outside of the United Sates, would like to start moving Michigan’s adult inmates into a for-profit prison, which, under their management, was shut down several years ago (when it was a for-profit youth detention facility), amid numerous lawsuits, and verified instances of misconduct and serious mismanagement. And, it would seem, in spite of this fact, a majority of Michigan lawmakers are supportive of this new plan, either because they’ve received generous contributions from the company in question, or because they feel as though the possibility of trimming an additional 10% from our prison budget is worth the gamble. Or, maybe they just have a fetish for privatization at any cost.

[Tonight’s post was brought to you by Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania judges Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan, who were recently found guilty of taking bribes in return for handing down harsh sentences to minors being held in for-profit facilities.]

update: As coincidence would have it, MLive has a piece this morning concerning Governor Snyder’s views on private prisons. Here’s a clip.

…“I don’t believe in privatization. I believe in being competitive,” (Snyder) volunteered for apparently the first time the other day. Given the tenacity that other R’s demonstrate for this, it was a shocking statement.

This is important in that some Republicans are on a mission to privatize prisons and if the governor is opposed, that spells trouble for them.

Republican Sen. John Proos, of St. Joseph, had not heard about the governor’s revelation but that did not move him off message. He is all about “bench-marking” the cost of prison services and if somebody can do it more cheaply, Mr. Proos figures, on behalf of taxpayers, the state should go there.

Gov. Snyder observes, “Simply privatizing a prison is not on my agenda.”

Which, based on his previous use of the same phrase, means: If they send it to him, he will sign it…

That last line is great, isn’t it?

Posted in Civil Liberties, Michigan, Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 18 Comments

Carpools leaving in the morning for “Occupy the PGA” event in Benton Harbor

A little over a year ago, we discussed the fact that, under the rule of unelected Emergency Manager, Joseph Harris, public properties in Benton Harbor were being sold for pennies on the dollar to wealthy investors, over the objections of the struggling city’s largely African American population. [As our friend Richard Murphy reminds us, in his note, which you can find at the end of this post, the groundwork for this theft of public land was completed years ago, under the Granholm administration.] One of these properties, as you may recall, was a piece of city-owned beachfront property know as Jean Klock Park. The people of Benton Harbor were told, by Harris, that the park had to be sold in order to cover the outstanding debts created by decreasing tax revenue. The purchaser, the people were told, was to be Whirlpool, a large corporation headquartered in the prosperous neighboring town of St. Joseph. The corporation, as people would soon find out, wanted to create an upscale, private, beachfront golf club. And, that’s exactly what happened… Now, a year later, this newly opened golf course will be hosting its first Professional Golf Association tournament. Fortunately, protesters are planning to attend from around the country, flying kites over the fairway, pulling banners behind them, bringing attention to the fact that this once-public land had been essentially stolen by the wealthy. The following note (slightly edited) comes from Jen Trombley, who is organizing a carpool from Ypsilanti.

…There will be two carpools happening.

In Ypsi, people will be meeting at the Ypsi Free Commune [407 W. Forest Ave, at the corner of Hamilton and Forest] at 8:00 AM. Cars will be taking off no later than 8:30 AM.

In Ann Arbor, people will be meeting at 515 East Jefferson at 7:30 AM sharp. By 7:45 AM, cars will be heading to 200 Wall Street in downtown Benton Harbor.

If possible, bring a kite with your sign on it. Otherwise, bring a sign, or just yourself. People are asked to wear black in solidarity, but its gonna be a hot one so don’t feel you must. Thanks comrades! Hope to see you there!!!!

Events apparently started yesterday, with a “death march” from Benton Harbor’s City Hall to the golf course.

And, demands were made… The following comes from the Occupy the PGA website.

“Concerned citizens of Benton Harbor demand: Transfer 25% of the 2012 Senior PGA profits to the citizens of Benton Harbor as partial rightful compensation for stolen land and water and for the purpose of meeting budget deficits and building affordable housing for the people of Benton Harbor.”

[note: I’m assuming they mean 25% of the profits from this one event, and not from the PGA Senior Tour’s entire season, but it’s not clear.]

The Governor, who was at the golf course a few days ago, celebrating with the likes of Jack Nicklaus, described the redevelopment project as, “Pure Michigan”. (Sadly, I think that he’s right.) The following comes from the Herald Palladium:

…Before meeting with golf legend Jack Nicklaus, designer of the course hosting the Senior PGA Championship, Snyder took the time to tout the event as a major boost for the region and the state.

“It’s Pure Michigan,” Snyder said, echoing the state’s tourism motto. “From what it was before, to what it is now, it’s fabulous.”

The governor was referring to the many years of planning and development that went into turning former industrial sites, and some park land, into the sprawling venue that drew the PGA for what he called “a magnet event.”

He offered kudos to the people of Benton Harbor for working with Whirlpool Corp. and Cornerstone Alliance to make Harbor Shores a reality.

In answer to another query, Snyder said he was not concerned about possible protests during the event from residents angry about the acquisition of part of Jean Klock Park for the golf course.

State officials in Lansing have to deal with tough issues, including a tight budget, but he said this is not the time to worry about those matters.

“It’s time to celebrate and have fun.”…

As of right now, there’s no word as to whether or not Snyder will be taking any of the poor children who used to play at Jean Klock Park to “celebrate and have fun” at the new, exclusive golf club.

update: As our friend Murph reminds us, this project was in the works years before Joseph Harris was appointed to rule Benton Harbor. Here’s his comment.

If you want to look for the story of Jean Klock Park, you need to start years ago, long before Governor Snyder’s tenure or Joe Harris’ installment in Benton Harbor.

Try this Freep article from 2007, talking about the City Council selling land from the park for development in 2003, and then approving the long-term lease of land to Harbor Shores for development of the golf course in 2006. Governor Granholm’s administration gave $120 million in incentives to the developers. There have been years of lawsuits in the State and Federal courts trying to block the development of the golf course.

So, sure, Harris happened to be in place by the time the golf course opened, and he has further restricted public access to the park since then, but laying the development of the golf course at his feet is ridiculous — and absolves all the people who were /actually/ responsible for its development.

Jean Klock Park /is/ a great case of the public trust betrayed to the benefit of the wealthy — and of a community backed into a corner and forced to be complicit in that betrayal — and I’m sure that the people of Benton Harbor are glad the rest of us are (finally) paying attention, but if we lay blame at the feet of the Emergency Manager and Governor Snyder, we’ve failed to actually learn the lesson here.

Posted in Michigan, Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 15 Comments

If you disagree, please feel free to leave a comment…

Actually, feel free to write about whatever you like. I won’t stop you. I just don’t have anything left to offer tonight. Having spent my day in back-to-back meetings, I’m even more of a depleted husk than usual.

Posted in Mark's Life | Tagged , , , | 44 Comments

Glen Ford discusses the origins of the corporate assault on public education, and the role of black political leaders

A few weeks ago, in post about the complete dismantling of public education as we know it in Philadelphia, I quoted a publication called the Black Agenda Report. The article that I’d excerpted, as you may recall, dealt primarily with the curious silence of black civil rights leaders. Here, for those of you who might have missed it, is that excerpt again.

…The black political class is utterly silent and deeply complicit. Even local pols and notables who lament the injustice of local austerity avoid mentioning the ongoing wars and bailouts which make these things “necessary.” A string of black mayors have overseen the decimation of Philly schools. Al Sharpton, Ben Jealous and other traditional “civil rights leaders” can always be counted on to rise up indignant when some racist clown makes an inappropriate remark about the pretty black First Lady and her children.

But they won’t grab the mic for ordinary black children. They won’t start and won’t engage the public in a conversation about saving public education. It’s not because they don’t care. It’s because they care very much about their funding, which comes from Bill Gates and the Gates Foundation, from Wal-mart and the Walton Family Foundation, from the corporations that run charter charter schools and produce standardized tests.

To name just one payment to one figure, Rev. Al Sharpton took a half million dollar “loan” from charter school advocates in New York City, after which he went on tour with Secretary of Education Arne Duncan and Newt Gingrich extolling the virtues of standardized testing, charter schools and educational privatization. Bill Gates delivered the keynote speech at the latest gathering of the National Urban League. And the nation’s two big teachers’ unions, NEA and AFT have already endorsed Barack Obama’s re-election, and will funnel him gobs of union dues as campaign contributions, despite his corporate-inspired “Race To The Top” program which awards federal education funds in proportion to how many teachers are fired and replaced by inexperienced temps, how many schools are shut down, and how many charter schools exempt from meaningful public oversight are established and granted public funds…

The reason that I mention this is that someone just sent me a link to a YouTube video in which Glen Ford, the executive editor of the Black Agenda Report, goes even further on the subject, suggesting that conservative think tanks, like Milwaukee’s Bradley Foundation, have been working since the mid-1990s to cultivate a cadre of young, black, Democratic leaders, who, while outwardly appearing progressive, promote the wedge issue of school privatization. Their goal, he contends, is clear. They want to destabilize the Democratic base, which has historically fought for worker rights, increased workplace safety, environmental protection and any number of other causes that negatively impact the corporate bottom line. And, they’ve identified school privatization as the holy grail of wedge issues. As Ford points out, the privatization of public schools not only further enriches corporate America, but it also breaks unions, which have historically formed the base of the progressive movement. And, perhaps most importantly, the end result is that poor, overwhelmingly-Democratic populations are less educated… Here, with much more, is Ford.

So, what do you think? Is this the stuff of conspiracy theories, or does Ford have a point? Is school privatization, as he suggests, an astroturf issue, created in a conservative think tank, in order to drive a wedge between African Americas, who legitimately feel as though public schools aren’t meeting the needs of their families, and their historic allies in the teachers union? And, is Ford right when he portrays Newark Mayor, Cory Booker, as a black Manchurian candidate?

Posted in Civil Liberties, Education, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 21 Comments

Republicans use most recent JPMorgan scandal to demonstrate folly of regulation, instead of criminal corporate behavior

There’s a great piece in the Washington Post today about Republicans in the Senate, and how they seem determined to focus their wrath not on the individuals at JPMorgan who were recently caught engaging in risky, irresponsible stock trades, but on those federal regulators who didn’t somehow foresee these actions and stop them from happening. It would be bad enough if these Senators were advocates of strong, active regulation, but they’re not. Quite the contrary, the elected officials in question, who are funded in large part by companies like JPMorgan, have fought tooth and nail to keep the financial industry free of federal oversight. But, as we’re seeing now, that doesn’t stop them from assigning blame to said regulators when such problems, brought about by deregulation, invariably arise. Lacking any sense of shame and/or irony, these Senators then have the unmitigated gall to suggest that instances like this prove not that oversight should be strengthened, but that oversight is ineffective, and consequently should be further defunded. The twisted, ballsy brilliance is truly awe-inspiring… Here’s a clip from the opinion piece by Dana Milbank.

JPMorgan Chase has spent upward of $20 million on lobbying and campaign contributions in the past three years. On Tuesday, the bank received a healthy dividend on that investment.

Its chairman, Jamie Dimon, has admitted that the firm was “sloppy” and “stupid” in making trading bets that lost $2 billion. But Republicans on the Senate Banking Committee wouldn’t hear of it; they preferred to blame government.

As the panel held the first hearing on the JPMorgan losses, Sen. Richard Shelby (Ala.), the committee’s ranking Republican, glowered at federal regulators and charged that they “didn’t know what was really going on.”

“When did you first learn about these trades?” Shelby inquired.

Gary Gensler, head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, admitted that he had learned about them from press reports.

“Press reports!” Shelby echoed, with mock surprise. He smiled. “Were you in the dark?”

Gensler tried to explain that his agency does not yet have authority to regulate the bank, but Shelby interrupted. “So you really didn’t know what was going on . . . until you read the press reports like the rest of us?” he asked again.

“That’s what I’ve said,” Gensler repeated.

But Shelby wanted him to keep saying it. “You didn’t know there was a problem there until you read the press reports?”

Shelby’s performance was worth every bit of the $72,950 JPMorgan Chase and its employees have given him in the past five years, making the bank his second-largest source of campaign cash. It was a remarkable bit of jujitsu: The trading scandal at JPMorgan highlighted the urgent need for tougher regulation of Wall Street, but Shelby’s harangue was part of a larger effort to use the scandal as justification to repeal regulations…

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Connect

BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative Orson Welles