I went to the gym after work this evening and watched coverage of today’s admission of failure by the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction. I found myself getting incredibly pissed off, to the point of inadvertently blurting out “asshole” a couple of times, and flipping up my middle finger at the television set in disgust. I just couldn’t control my anger at the Republicans, who have demonstrated yet once again that they would rather throw our country into the economic abyss than even consider letting the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans expire. And, as our friends at Think Progress remind us, it isn’t as though the Democrats on the committee didn’t try to find common ground. Here’s an excerpt from their timeline.
February 14, 2011: President Barack Obama submits budget for 2012 with about $2 trillion in deficit reduction, half of which come from spending cuts.
April 15, 2011: House passes Rep. Paul Ryan’s (R-WI) budget, which includes $5.8 trillion in spending cuts along with tax cuts for the richest Americans.
May 5, 2011: Vice President Joe Biden begins debt talks.
May 11, 2011: Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) says he will not raise debt limit without spending cuts that match how much the limit is raised.
June 23, 2011: Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) walks away from debt ceiling talks with Biden after refusing to consider any tax increases. The administration had offered $2.4 trillion in spending cuts for $400 billion in taxes, an 83:17 split.
July 7, 2011: Obama and Boehner begin debt-ceiling negotiations.
July 9, 2011: Boehner walks away from Obama’s “grand bargain”: $4 trillion in debt reduction comprised of $1 trillion in revenue and $3 trillion in spending cuts, including entitlement reforms.
July 19, 2011: The Gang of Six proposes a $4 trillion deficit reduction plan, including $2 trillion in revenue.
July 22, 2011: Again, Boehner walks away from negotiations after Obama offers $1.2 trillion in revenues and $1.6 trillion in spending cuts, including entitlements.
July 31, 2011: Debt ceiling agreement is reached, cutting $1 trillion in spending immediately and establishing the super committee to reduce deficits by at least an additional $1.2 trillion.
October 26, 2011: Democrats first super committee offer is $3 trillion in deficit reduction comprised of about $1.3 trillion in revenues and $1.7 trillion in spending cuts, including cuts to Medicare and Medicaid. Republicans immediately reject it. Republicans’ first super committee offer is $2.2 trillion in deficit reduction, which includes no new tax revenues.
November 8, 2011: Republicans’ second super committee offer is $1.5 trillion in deficit reduction. It does include $300 billion in new tax revenue, but in exchange for extending the Bush tax cuts and lowering the top tax rate. The plan would ultimately cut taxes for the wealthy and raise them for everyone else.
November 10, 2011: Democrats’ second offer is $2.3 trillion in deficit reduction, consisting of $1.3 trillion in spending cuts and $1 trillion in revenue. The revenue would be split between $350 billion in concrete measures and $650 billion in future tax reform. Republicans reject it.
November 11, 2011: Democrats agree to Republicans’ top lines including just $400 billion in revenues and $875 billion in spending cuts, but refuse to accept the GOP’s tax cut for the rich. Republicans reject it and make their final offer: $640 billion in spending cuts and $3 billion in revenues.
What this timeline shows is just how much Democrats have been willing to bend, only to have Republicans reject very generous offers. Back in June, Democrats reportedly offered a mere $400 billion in tax increases as part of a $2.4 trillion deficit reduction package — a 83:17 ratio of spending cuts to tax increases. Republicans said no.
And, now, having failed to reach a bipartisan agreement, we trigger the automatic 2013 spending cuts that were stipulated in the original agreement (half from domestic programs, and half from military spending). Republicans are already saying that they’ll find a way to work around this provision, in order to protect military spending, but Obama has come out saying that he’ll veto any such attempt… It seems to me to be a colossal failure on the part of all those involved, but maybe Russ Feingold is right. Maybe this failure today is a good thing, in that in means that Democrats didn’t cave in to Republican pressure, as they so often do. Here’s what Fieigold had to say about today’s events.
The chairs of the congressional super committee just made a huge announcement: The super committee will fail to send a deficit reduction plan to Congress before its deadline this week.
Progressives demanded that the rich pay their fair share, or no deal, and Democrats stood strong.
Democrats tried to craft a compromise with Republicans that included the 1% paying their fair share, but Republicans refused to budge. So Democrats walked away from the bad deals Republicans offered, just as hundreds of thousands of progressives asked them to do.
This news means that Congress will have no fast-track path for dismantling crucial programs like Social Security and Medicare.
Democrats’ strong stand is thanks to you and hundreds of thousands of your fellow progressives around the country who petitioned the super committee or contacted members directly.
We prevented a bad deal from the super committee, but the fight isn’t over. Republicans have shown that protecting corporations and the 1% is their top priority, despite an overwhelming majority of Americans wanting the wealthiest among us to pay their fair share.
Now we must take the fight directly to Republicans, and force them to explain why protecting corporate tax loopholes is more important than preserving Medicare; why cutting Social Security benefits is better than asking the wealthiest individuals and corporations to pay their fair share in taxes; and why coddling corporate America is more important than standing up for average working families.
We must not, and will, not let up in this important fight…
I just hope that the people of America will be able to see the truth behind this recent development, and know that Romney and others are full of shit when they say that it’s all Obama’s fault. This, as much as I’d like to blame the administration, isn’t about a failure of Democratic leadership. This is about class warfare. This is about a very powerful segment of our population that would rather see our nation destroyed than pay the same tax rate that the did under Reagan. This is about purposefully bankrupting the nation so that social programs, like welfare and Social Security, can be destroyed. This is the endgame that Grover Norquist dreamed of when he said, “I don’t want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.” This, in my opinion, borders on treason.
8 Comments
Bernie Sanders agrees with Feingold that no plan is better than a bad plan. I’m inclined to believe him.
On one side of the coin, we have the top 1% keeping their tax cuts. On the other, we have the American workers, who will undoubtedly be asked to pay more.
The rest of this LA Times article can be found here.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-congress-next-20111122,0,6053596.story
I heard Jeff Sessions on the television this morning saying that they would have come up with an agreement, but that Obama never told them that was what what he wanted. It was unbelievable. I’m trying to find video of it. In the meantime, here’s a story from yesterday in which he says pretty much the same thing, blaming the President for not showing leadership.
http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/fineman-no-leadership-obama/2011/11/21/id/418771
From the Progress Report.
Occupiers are taking the Capital in a few minutes.
http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/737143/everything_you_want_to_know_about_what_ows_is_up_to_now_%28and_why_it_just_had_its_biggest_media_week_ever%29
I accuse the Republicans of treason, and I only get 5 comments? I got three times as many comments for a single sentence about a dog eating its own testicles. I’ll never figure you guys out.
No Treason.
Don’t worry, Mark. I never get any comments, either.