alberto gonzales attempts escape

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales stepped down today amid what Michigan Congressman John Conyers, the Chair of the House Judiciary Committee, calls, “a cloud of suspicion that the system of justice has been manipulated for political purposes.” Word on the street is that Bush crony Michael Chertoff, the man who so poorly handled the Hurricane Katrina situation as U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security two years ago, is likely to be named his successor. If you think about it, Bush doesn’t have a very deep bench to pick from. The crony team, it seems, is thinning out. And he desperately needs one of his people at the Department of Justice in order to keep legitimate investigations from taking place. If Chertoff doesn’t work out, my guess is that we’ll see Harriet Miers in a moustache, speaking like Borat.

[Tonight’s post was brought to you by Miss Teen South Carolina, The Cories, and Danny Devito.]

Posted in Politics | 7 Comments

edwards breaks left… is it out of desperation? does it matter?

I like Edwards and I like what he’s saying about the “Corporate Democrats” that run the party, but I can’t help but think it’s motivated by where he’s polling nationally relative to Hillary and Obama. That’s not to say that he doesn’t believe it. He very well may. I just wonder why he’s been ramping up the rhetoric these past several months. I’d like to think he’d be saying these things even if he were leading in the fundraising race, but I don’t know. I suppose on some level it doesn’t matter. What ultimately matters is that, for whatever reason, he’s shining a light on a system that’s horribly damaged. Hopefully he’ll have an opportunity to keep going, despite the corporate media’s insistence on making the Democratic primary a two-person race… Here’s a clip from AlterNet:

Last week, John Edwards fired a broadside against corporate America and, more significantly, “corporate Democrats,” the likes of which hasn’t been heard from a viable candidate with national appeal in decades.

Edwards is en fuego right now, and if he keeps up the heat, his candidacy will either be widely embraced by the emerging progressive movement or utterly annihilated by an entrenched establishment that fears few things more than a telegenic populist with enough money to mount a credible campaign.

“It’s time to end the game,” Edwards told a crowd in Hanover, New Hampshire. “It’s time to tell the big corporations and the lobbyists who have been running things for too long that their time is over.”
He exhorted Washington law-makers to “look the lobbyists in the eye and just say no.”

[Quoting Edwards:]

Real change starts with being honest — the system in Washington is rigged and our government is broken. It’s rigged by greedy corporate powers to protect corporate profits. It’s rigged by the very wealthy to ensure they become even wealthier. At the end of the day, it’s rigged by all those who benefit from the established order of things. For them, more of the same means more money and more power. They’ll do anything they can to keep things just the way they are — not for the country, but for themselves.

[The system is] controlled by big corporations, the lobbyists they hire to protect their bottom line and the politicians who curry their favor and carry their water. And it’s perpetuated by a media that too often fawns over the establishment, but fails to seriously cover the challenges we face or the solutions being proposed. This is the game of American politics and in this game, the interests of regular Americans don’t stand a chance.

[End quote.]

It’s a structural argument, and Edwards didn’t pull punches in calling out his fellow Democrats, saying: “We cannot replace a group of corporate Republicans with a group of corporate Democrats, just swapping the Washington insiders of one party for the Washington insiders of the other.” The rhetoric was a clear signal that Edwards is going to beat the drums of reform as a contrast to Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in the primaries…

My hope is that momentum really starts building for him like it did for Dean at the grassroots level… And, I think I know what might do it for a lot of people. I think that Edwards should reach out to Gore and offer him a cabinet-level position focusing on the environment and alternative energy. Gore, I’m thinking, may go for it, as he probably wouldn’t have any shot at all to guide policy in a Hillary Clinton White House. The only thing stopping him, would be the thought that Obama might take the nomination, but I think that’s unlikely if it comes down to him and Clinton. So, there’s my advice. Get Gore on the ticket in some non-VP capacity. It would give Edwards the push he needs to break into the top tier. And that and a win in Iowa would put him in the Oval Office.

Posted in Predictions | 9 Comments

dingell’s mcmansion proposal draws more fire

It’s taken a few weeks, but Dingell’s proposal about cutting off the mortgage-interest tax deduction for homes of more than 3,000 square feet, is starting to make headlines outside of Michigan. In the past few days, there were articles in both “Forbes” and the “Washington Post.” Here’s a clip from the former.

…According to the federal government’s American Housing Survey in 2003, the latest available, more than 8.6 million homes are 3,000 square feet or more in size nationwide. That number likely increased in the final two years of the real estate boom that ended in 2005.

The real estate industry has long opposed limiting a tax break that many homeowners, especially those looking to shelter higher income levels cherish.

The housing market’s downturn makes this an especially bad time to alter the interest deduction, industry officials say.

Changes to the interest-deduction tax break “would have repercussions for the housing market as a whole,” said Mary Trupo, a spokeswoman for the Washington-based National Association of Realtors trade group…

Consumer behavior, such as buying energy-efficient light bulbs and appliances, is more important than a house’s size, Bill Killmer, executive vice president for advocacy at the National Association of Home Builders, said Friday in an e-mailed statement. “Home size is not a good indicator of the amount of energy a household would use,” Killmer said….

Dingell, a longtime supporter of Detroit’s auto industry, insisted that the proposals are not an attempt to publicize the economic costs of fighting the impact of climate change.

“To those who have suggested this may be an attempt to sabotage climate change legislation: you are wrong,” said Dingell, a House member since 1955. “I’ve spent more than half a century in Congress, and I have never introduced legislation with the intention of seeing it fail.”

So, did you get the Republican talking points? The first one is that this is bad for the housing industry, which is already suffering. The second is that large homes are often more efficient than smaller homes. We’ll be hearing these over and over again these next few months, so prepare yourself. I personally don’t think that either holds a lot of water. I don’t think that this legislation, if it passed, would hurt the real estate market any more than it’s already hurting, and I doubt very seriously that a 3,000+ square foot home – regardless of what kind of light bulbs its owner buys – uses less energy than the average American home, which is probably about 1,000 square feet. I’m sure that you could find a 3,100 square foot home that consumes less energy than a 2,900 square foot home, but that wouldn’t prove much anything. Maybe Dingell just tossed this out to take the heat off the auto companies for a while, but I think it’s a damned good idea. Sure, 3,000 square feet is kind of arbitrary, but Americans need to start feeling the real costs of global warming, and they need to change their behavior accordingly. We can debate the number, but we have to draw a line somewhere. McMansions, like Hummers, are a bad thing for society and they need to be phased out.

Posted in Global Warming | 13 Comments

the shrinking cities of america have something in common

Earlier today, someone passed along the following quote to me. I’m told it’s from Hunter Morrison, the Director of the Center for Urban and Regional Studies Youngstown State University. If it’s true it’s an amazing and terrible statistic.

“80% of the shrinking cities in the United States are in the Great Lakes states.”

I suspect that might change in a hurry once the water starts drying up in the southwest, and air conditioning bills start becoming unmanageable, but, for now, it’s a pretty bleak statistic.

[More about Mr. Morrison can be found here. And, thanks to the internet, you can even hear what he sounds like, if you’re so inclined. Here’s a link to a discussion he recently had with Ohio bloggers on the subject of the “Youngstown 2010” plan, which he helped to draft.]

Posted in Observations | 4 Comments

welcome to the new, sterile downtown ypsilanti

During a five-hour meeting of the Ypsilanti 2020 Task Force this afternoon, a fellow Task Force member asked me if I’d ever taken the time to read the Ypsilanti Township master plan. I told her that I hadn’t, and she suggested that I might want to go home and find it online. She said that I’d find the part about the “new downtown Ypsilanti” to be particularly interesting.

For those of you not from around here, the City of Ypsilanti is surrounded by a Township. From what I can tell, there’s always been some hostility between the two. I’m told that there was a time the Township would have gladly agreed to join with the City, creating one entity, but the City was unreceptive. Now, it seems, the shoe is on the other foot. While the City has suffered economically these past several years, the Township appears to have done quite well. With a surplus of undeveloped land, they’ve been able to grow (read “sprawl”) while we in the City been forced to work with what little we have. So, while we’ve been attempting to remediate brownfields on a shoestring, they’ve been putting up subdivisions on virgin land where farms once stood. As a result, their tax base continues to increase as ours drops. It probably also doesn’t hurt that they have few of the costly problems that we, as an urban area, need to address each day.

So, what I heard this afternoon is that the Township has plans to create a “historic downtown” of their own, just a few miles away from our existing downtown. I’ve been reading through the Township master plan for a while now, and I can’t seem to find any specifics, but I did find this one passage:

… Consider the additional commercial zoning in the Huron Street / Whittaker Road corridor between I-94 and Textile Road in order to promote creation of a town center district with a wide variety of goods and services available in a central location…

If this is true, and if it’s gone at all beyond the “let’s consider” phase, I think it’s incredibly perverse. We, as I’m sure some of the braver Township residents must know, already have a real, historic downtown. They don’t need to build cheap replicas of historic buildings, as has been done recently in Canton, Michigan, with the construction of Cherry Hill Village and it’s Ye’ Ole’ Coldstone Creamery. We already have them. Ypsilanti has an authentic downtown. Yes, it might have panhandlers and a strip club, and there might be challenges, but it does exist. And, yes, I suppose it would be easier to just start over again and create a sanitized and Disnified version of our cultural past, but can’t we do better? Don’t we owe it to ourselves and our kids to try to fix what’s broken before just starting over again? Does authentic history have a value, or is it just the appearance that we ultimately care about?

Posted in Ypsilanti | 22 Comments

Connect

BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative Bat Attack