jimmy was right

I was just checking out Mother Jones and I happened across a review of a book that I thought you might be interested in. The book is titled, “Twilight in the Desert: The Coming Saudi Oil Shock and the World Economy,” and it’s by investment banker Matthew R. Simmons. While the book itself sounds interesting, the thing I though that you might appreciate was the introduction to the review, which was written by Tom Engelhardt. Here’s how he begins:

Right now, the price of a barrel of crude oil is flirting with $60 (ed — it reached $61 this afternoon); a Chinese state-controlled oil company has made an $18.5 billion bid for the American oil firm, Unocal — you remember, the company that fought to put a projected $1.9 billion natural gas pipeline through Taliban Afghanistan and hired as its consultant Zalmay Khalilzad, presently our Afghan ambassador and soon to be our ambassador to Iraq; world energy consumption, according to last week’s British Financial Times, surged 4.3% last year (the biggest rise since 1984), oil use by 3.4% (the biggest rise since 1978); in the meantime, Exxon — which just had the impunity to hire Philip Cooney after he was accused of doctoring government reports on climate change and resigned as chief of staff of the White House Council on Environmental Quality (“The cynical way to look at this,” commented Kert Davies, U.S. research director for Greenpeace, “is that ExxonMobil has removed its sleeper cell from the White House and extracted him back to the mother ship.”) — has quietly issued a report, The Outlook for Energy: A 2030 View, predicting that the moment of “peak oil” is only a five-year hop-skip-and-a-pump away; “Oil Shockwave,” a “war game” recently conducted by top ex-government officials in Washington, including two former directors of the CIA, found the United States “all but powerless to protect the American economy in the face of a catastrophic disruption of oil markets,” which was all too easy for them to imagine (“The participants concluded almost unanimously that they must press the president to invest quickly in promising technologies to reduce dependence on overseas oil…”); and oil tycoon Boone Pickens, chairman of the billion-dollar hedge fund BP Capital Management, is having the time of his life. (“I’ve never had so much fun?”) Over the last five years, he claims, his bet that oil prices would rise has “made him more money… than he earned in the preceding half century hunting for riches in petroleum deposits and companies,” and he is predicting that prices will only go higher with much more “pain at the pump.” Ah, the good life. And if you don’t quite recognize the new look of this fast-shifting energy landscape, then how are you going to feel if the Age of Petroleum turns out to be drawing — more rapidly than most people imagine — to a close?

Well, hold your hats, folks. Below Michael Klare, an expert on “resource wars” and the author of the indispensable Blood and Oil: The Dangers and Consequences of America’s Growing Petroleum Dependency, discusses a new bombshell book by oil industry insider Matthew Simmons, and his unsettling news that everything you’ve heard about those inexhaustible supplies of Saudi oil, which are supposed to keep the world floating for decades, simply isn’t so. This is real news and absorbing its implications is no small matter.

Imagine, just for the sake of argument, where we might be today, energy-wise, if Americans — and American legislators ?- had actually taken Jimmy Carter’s famed 1979 “moral equivalent of war” speech on energy conservation seriously, but rejected his Carter Doctrine and the Rapid Deployment Joint Task Force that went with it — both of which set us on our present path to war(s) in the Middle East. Here’s part of what Carter said to the American people on television that long-ago night:

“Beginning this moment, this nation will never use more foreign oil than we did in 1977 — never. From now on, every new addition to our demand for energy will be met from our own production and our own conservation. The generation-long growth in our dependence on foreign oil will be stopped dead in its tracks right now and then reversed as we move through the 1980s, for I am tonight setting the further goal of cutting our dependence on foreign oil by one-half by the end of the next decade — a saving of over 4-1/2 million barrels of imported oil per day? To give us energy security, I am asking for the most massive peacetime commitment of funds and resources in our nation’s history to develop America’s own alternative sources of fuel — from coal, from oil shale, from plant products for gasohol, from unconventional gas, from the sun? I’m proposing a bold conservation program to involve every state, county, and city and every average American in our energy battle. This effort will permit you to build conservation into your homes and your lives at a cost you can afford?”

“But we wanted SUVs, and exurbs.” Not a bad epitaph for America, huh? Or, maybe just, “Shit, I guess Carter was right.”

Oh, while we’re on the subject, an engineer mentioned to me a few days ago that, on average, an SUV expends enough energy to fully power 20 homes.

This entry was posted in Alternative Energy. Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

2 Comments

  1. Anonymatt
    Posted July 7, 2005 at 8:45 am | Permalink

    What does “fully power 20 homes” mean? Is it just the electricity? that sounds plausible, but if it’s supposed to include heating too, I’m suspicious. Could you really heat 20 homes with one SUV’s tank of gas? Power, maybe, but I doubt heat.

    The statistic doesn’t really mean anything unless we know how many homes other vehicles could power. Then we could compare SUVs vs. the average car, a hybrid car, etc.

    Not that I like SUVs.

  2. john galt
    Posted July 7, 2005 at 6:42 pm | Permalink

    A tank of gas (maybe 30gals for an SUV) probably can power 20 homes, but for how long? We have a generator at work that can power the building for about 36hrs (actually just the data center, no lights/ac or anthing extra), but it has a 500 gallon tank.. so 30 gallons is probably good for about 5 minutes or so. I call shenanigans on this quote. If we cut down all the national forests, we could grow corn and make ethanol, but that has its own problems, We could of course go back to livestock, but then you have the poop factor.. You could ride a bike, but that isn’t practical except for a few places (and what if its raining).. We could drill more oil domestically, but most of the Dems are opposed to that.. Maybe we should just all become Amish and revert to the 1800’s (and don’t kid yourself farm life is harder than you think)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Connect

BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative Poop Modrak