culture war in uglihoma, or how i lost my bid for senate

It requires registration, but there’s a good diary entry at the New Republic site by Brad Carson, Congressman for the Second District of Oklahoma, on why he thinks he lost his bid for Senate. (Carson is one of two enrolled Native American tribal members in the United States House of Representatives.) Here’s a good chunk of it:

I don’t remember when I first realized that my campaign for United States Senate was in trouble. But one moment stands out. I was in Sallisaw, Oklahoma, home of the annual Grapes of Wrath Festival, in which locals celebrate John Steinbeck’s fictional Joad family and their mythical journey from eastern Oklahoma to California. It was a Sunday morning, one week before the third anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attacks, and I had been invited by the pastor of a local Baptist church to discuss the topic: “How Would Jesus Vote?” Both my opponent in the Senate race, Tom Coburn, and I had been invited to what was more or less an interview before the pastor’s congregation. I would go first, then Coburn would speak the following Sunday, and a right-wing talk-radio host–no friend of mine, to be sure–would conclude the three-week inquiry into how Jesus would want us to cast our ballots.

Now, I must confess: My own view is that Jesus would probably not vote at all, given the organized corruption that passes for modern American politics. But the idea that Christ Himself might sit out the 2004 election was apparently not under consideration, so I accepted the invitation–much to the pastor’s avowed surprise. As an active Baptist who grew up in the Baptist church, I had no illusions that most of my co-religionists were ardent Democrats, but I rarely turned down any chance to make the case for my own candidacy and that of my fellow party members. After all, wasn’t Daniel blessed for braving the lion’s den?

As I arrived at the church, my wife and I were given the church bulletin, which outlined the weekly selection of hymns and Bible readings. On the back of the bulletin, atop the blank space reserved for copious note-taking during the sermon, was the heading: “wwjv? pro-life or pro-death?” (I favored the partial-birth abortion ban but opposed overturning Roe v. Wade.) In the sanctuary, a 20-by-20-foot depiction of a fetus looked down upon the assembled throng from a projection screen. Superimposed upon the unsettling image–which morphed to show the fetus in various stages of gestation–was fact after fact about abortions in America.

After the morning rituals, the pastor called me to the stage, and we engaged in a lengthy discussion about abortion, homosexuality, “liberal judges,” and other controversial matters. After leaving the stage, I rejoined the congregation, and the pastor launched into an attack on the “pro-choice terrorists,” who were, to his mind, far more dangerous than Al Qaeda. Yes, he acknowledged, thousands had died on September 11, but abortion was killing millions and millions. This was a holocaust, he continued, and we must all vote righteously. Vote righteously! In 13 months of campaigning across the vast state of Oklahoma, I must have seen or heard this phrase a thousand times, often on the marquees of churches, where, outside of election season, one finds only clever and uplifting biblical bromides. But it was not until that September Sunday in Sallisaw, one of the most Democratic towns in Oklahoma, that I first understood that the seemingly innocuous phrase “vote righteously” was the slogan not of a few politicized churches, but the cri de coeur of millions–millions who fervently believe that their most deeply held values are under assault and who further see this assault as at least tolerated by the Democratic Party, if not actually led by it.

As a defeated Senate candidate in the most red of red states, many people have asked me for insights into the Democratic Party’s failure to connect with culturally conservative voters. Much has already been written on this topic, and scholars will add more. But I do know this: The culture war is real, and it is a conflict not merely about some particular policy or legislative item, but about modernity itself….

For the vast majority of Oklahomans–and, I would suspect, voters in other red states–these transcendent cultural concerns are more important than universal health care or raising the minimum wage or preserving farm subsidies. Pace Thomas Frank, the voters aren’t deluded or uneducated. They simply reject the notion that material concerns are more real than spiritual or cultural ones. The political left has always had a hard time understanding this, preferring to believe that the masses are enthralled by a “false consciousness” or Fox News or whatever today’s excuse might be. But the truth is quite simple: Most voters in a state like Oklahoma–and I venture to say most other Southern and Midwestern states–reject the general direction of American culture and celebrate the political party that promises to reform or revise it.

This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.


  1. mark
    Posted November 16, 2004 at 9:09 pm | Permalink

    I thought that this piece would spark a lot of conversation, but so far nothing.

  2. Posted November 17, 2004 at 4:17 am | Permalink

    Mark, I, personally, am just so tired of politics. I wish we could somehow incorporate the British/Canadian process into ours – just the part where they announce an election and six weeks later it’s done with and over with! The year long process makes me (and I’m sure other people) burn out long before it’s over. I don’t have the energy anymore to try to understand why people voted the way they did.

    On a similar note, have you seen the book, What’s the Matter with Kansas? which examines why so many Americans vote against their economic interests?

  3. mark
    Posted November 17, 2004 at 4:59 am | Permalink

    I think I mentioned a few days ago that my friend Jim was thinking of starting a book club. While I haven’t discussed anything with him other than the first book we’d be reading, I’d plan to suggest “What’s the Matter with Kansas.” I haven’t read it yet, but I’ve been wanting to… As for political burn-out, I know what you mean. My strong dislike for Bush got me though the election, and the long-shot chance that widespread vote fraud would be discovered kept me going a week or so past November 2nd, but now I’m sputtering.

  4. Posted November 18, 2004 at 4:44 am | Permalink

    A friend of mine who lives in Pittsfield Twp. read it while in the hospital. She’s a professor of economics and her specialty is poverty. Perhaps she’d be a good member of the book club – I can ask her, if you’d like.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


BUY LOCAL... or shop at Amazon through this link Banner Initiative Manchurian Candidate Banner